![]() |
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 11956021)
People who paid tribute to Clear in the form of money and personal infomation did damage to this nation: they tacitly approved of the requirement of ID for travel by commercial aircraft. That's what's really reprehensible about Clear and those who allowed themselves to be extorted.
|
Actioned, Actionable? And how...
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 11953832)
Have you considered complaining to your Congressperson in the US House of Representatives and to your two US Senators about the situation... ? They can help put pressure on the TSA to stop with the foolishness that consumes passengers' time and produces aggravation when it comes to the security screening...
You can bet that there is much to come of this. Don't be surprised to hear words like "fraud" and "criminal" (all the major hustle to join by cognizant people at Clear in the run up to this) and "class action" -- beyond these boards. But those are looking back. GUWonder offers as sage a comment here as he ever has. While others are working those aspects, this is what we can be doing moving forward, the 260,000 who went for it, and those who didn't -- together. Coincidentally today, there's this: http://www.boston.com/news/local/new...on_data_theft/ This is actually a second interesting coincidence. Does anyone remember that the laptop was misplaced just as the first decision on the TJX case was handed down? |
I'm upset about the demise of Clear. It made getting through security predictible. I knew I could clear security in 5mins.
I had the RTGO card (FLO) b/c it was cheaper (100/year). I'm thinking about cancelling and getting a pro-rated refund before they fold. Ideally, they would take over Clear lanes, but that's just wishful thinking. |
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11955000)
There was a huge misconception, partially precipitated by Clear, that the program would either enable a partial or full bypass of the "security" process/screening. Once it became clear that it wasn't that, in my opinion, was the downfall of the program.
The TSA did not like this program....ever. When they did not budge on shoe or coat removal or SSSS-exemption for Clear members, that demonstrated there was no real benefit for the price and the other information they wanted. So no, my reasoning wasn't knee-jerk at all, I just happened to think things through and see the model was unsustainable. |
Originally Posted by merrickdb
(Post 11956263)
<SNIP> And the terrorist name match, while certainly a problem for those whose names are close to those of people on the list, is, for most of us, added security with almost no burden on the traveller. I'm all for that.
|
Originally Posted by merrickdb
(Post 11956263)
You know Spiff, I'd say the majority of us, including me, really don't mind having to show our IDs. There are a lot more important things to worry about than a TSA agent shining a light on my ID before I fly. To the degree that having ID / boarding pass checks eliminates non-flyers from clogging up security lines, it's a benefit. And the terrorist name match, while certainly a problem for those whose names are close to those of people on the list, is, for most of us, added security with almost no burden on the traveller. I'm all for that.
|
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 11956206)
Spiff, your point about ID is meaningful and correct. But that ship has sailed. The stupid meaningless wall is in place and it ain't going anywhere. Now the only question is the easiest way over, under, around or through it. And the traffic-free toll tunnel just closed. :(
We can convince our elected representatives to put an end to this disgusting, un-American stupidity. I will not give into extortion. Give me Liberty, or give me Death. |
Originally Posted by merrickdb
(Post 11956263)
You know Spiff, I'd say the majority of us, including me, really don't mind having to show our IDs. There are a lot more important things to worry about than a TSA agent shining a light on my ID before I fly. To the degree that having ID / boarding pass checks eliminates non-flyers from clogging up security lines, it's a benefit. And the terrorist name match, while certainly a problem for those whose names are close to those of people on the list, is, for most of us, added security with almost no burden on the traveller. I'm all for that.
The TSA should have been shot the moment they started this disgusting, un-American harassment. No government entity has any right to know who flies, when, where, or why. |
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 11956392)
My friend, that ship has not sailed.
We can convince our elected representatives to put an end to this disgusting, un-American stupidity. I will not give into extortion. Give me Liberty, or give me Death. ;) Hey, I've written to my Congressman and Senators. What more can I do? You start a lobbying group to eliminate the ID rule and I'll gladly join up and even contribute to the PAC. Til then, I've done what I can do and yet I dont anticipate any change any time soon. And with TSA's 'competition' from Clear dead, they will only be further emboldened, I fear. :( |
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11954814)
Really? I'm a Marriott Platinum, live in a former Clear city and did not take the offer.
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11954814)
Where does anyone claim to be special?
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11954814)
In the U.S., it was estimated that identity theft cost $45 BILLION in 2007.
So, yeah, I guess nobody wants to use someone else's identity
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11954814)
There's no conspiracy concerns, it's clumsiness. Clear proved that already once.
|
Retinas and fingerprints and data, oh my!
Originally Posted by chrisdeaner
(Post 11954699)
Oh and I never got to use the cool retinal scanners...only the right thumbprint was ever asked for :(
Good luck getting new retinas as your current ones have been compromised. You do realize that ones retina is a truly unique identifier; and now other people can buy, sell and/or lease yours? |
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 11954901)
Considering Clear just went bust, why would anyone else want to follow them down the path to financial ruin? :confused:
|
Clear was one of the few entities trying to stand up to the TSA. Sure it was based on profit and sure they received plenty of personal information but they were there standing for the proposition that taking our shoes off and other TSA garbage wasn't necessary for every person. Clear lobbied Congress and kept pressure on the TSA to back off on some level. Some members of Congress listened to them.
While unfortunate, the practical issue is our elected representatives will not pay much attention to a constitutent complaining about matching ID's to tickets. |
Originally Posted by Echo
(Post 11956538)
Sorry you missed out.
Originally Posted by Echo
(Post 11956538)
It's implied by thinking that someone is going to take your biometric information and use it against you.
Originally Posted by Echo
(Post 11956538)
Do you live on a farm? Because you seem to have an abundance of straw with which to set up these men. The fact is, no one is stealing your identity through a mathematical hash of your fingerprint or iris scan. These are useless to anyone.
Originally Posted by Echo
(Post 11956538)
More straw. Where did they show clumsiness?
|
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 11956608)
You do realize they get your full name and Social Security Number as well, right? No identity theft potential there at all, right? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.