![]() |
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 11955591)
I'm hoping FLO buys their userbase and location rights and gets things rolling. They'll have to do it quickly before airports start removing stuff.
|
Originally Posted by stfarm
(Post 11954704)
Clear in ATL has saved me a minimum of 20 minutes EVERY time I used it (twice a week).
I too am a frequent flier (not 2x a week every week), but I could count on one hand the number of times when I have had to wait more than 15 minutes in line. Sure, it always feels like you're waiting a half hour or more, but in actuality it's much shorter. But irrespective of the actual time savings, CLEAR just wasn't a viable option for me given the limited number of locations in general, but also specific to my travel patterns. Specifically, I don't think there were any lanes at the CO terminal in EWR or the AA terminals at LGA/JFK. |
saw it coming a long time ago.
|
Originally Posted by tjisnumbaone
(Post 11955732)
Wow. Glad I didn't get one. Anyone flown yet today at an airport where CLEAR was? Was the station completely gone or just not manned?
I'm guessing that slot where CLEAR (typically in BOS) will become a FC/Medallion line? |
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 11955591)
I'm hoping FLO buys their userbase and location rights and gets things rolling. They'll have to do it quickly before airports start removing stuff.
Some people will never learn and then they get burned again. |
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 11955798)
So you're saying that the regular (or elite if you are eligible) security line was ALWAYS more than 20 minutes long?
|
Well, I hate to say it, but I think it's for the best. Americans should not have to pay to avoid the insanity that their government imposes on them. It's a moral hazard. We need more people who are aware of the problems.. it's the same reason I think that pilots and FAs should be right there in the security lines with us.
|
For those of you dancing on Clear's grave today, please don't forget that Clear members subsidized additional TSA checkpoints at various airports. I am willing to bet the "Diamond" security checkpoint at IAD will be a casualty of Clear's death, for example.
So enjoy those even longer lines as you smirk in smug satisfaction! :rolleyes: I agree with those who say that it was TSA and privacy freaks that killed Clear. Talk about an axis of evil!! |
Originally Posted by Horizons
(Post 11955374)
Spiff, I generally agree with what you write, but you know as well as the rest of us how things work in this country and the direction they're headed even more so.
Yeah, TSA outsourced the Registered Traveler program so a private company could make some money. But that's the way the USofA operates these days... functions that in any other sane (fair) country would be the province of government, at whatever level, are passed out as favors to industry. Paying for ID convenience does nothing to address the root of the problem: the TSA requiring that passengers show ID. This requirement should be abolished immediately, along with the Shoe Carnival, Liquids Idiocy, and other disgusting, un-American forms of harassment that we face at the hands of this scummy agency. In fact, the TSA itself should be permanently destroyed. People who paid tribute to Clear in the form of money and personal infomation did damage to this nation: they tacitly approved of the requirement of ID for travel by commercial aircraft. That's what's really reprehensible about Clear and those who allowed themselves to be extorted. |
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 11956008)
For those of you dancing on Clear's grave today, please don't forget that Clear members subsidized additional TSA checkpoints at various airports. I am willing to bet the "Diamond" security checkpoint at IAD will be a casualty of Clear's death, for example.
So enjoy those even longer lines as you smirk in smug satisfaction! :rolleyes: I agree with those who say that it was TSA and privacy freaks that killed Clear. Talk about an axis of evil!! Today, one of those actors is dead. Those who allowed themselves to be extorted by that actor should be refocusing their money and efforts on destroying the roots of the problem: having to show ID at all, and the disgusting, un-American agency that made that requirement. |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 11955877)
If not knowing any better, people make mistakes and get the wrong idea because they don't know any better about the best way to get landside when originating at ATL and flying domestically.
|
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 11956008)
I agree with those who say that it was TSA and privacy freaks that killed Clear. Talk about an axis of evil!!
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 11956089)
Privacy advocates didn't kill this company. This company failed to make money to justify its existence as a going concern in the manner it had been run because customers weren't there in sufficient volumes willing to pay sufficient prices to keep this company alive without yet another feed paid for with debt.
The TSA did everything in its power to keep the company from being able to offer value-added services through the entire screening process, limiting Clear's services to pre-screening. Why? Because government bureaucracies do not appreciate being shown how things can be done more efficiently. Privacy nuts railed about how dangerous and stupid it was for people to use Clear's services. Why? Because they forgot their tin foil hats as well as the reality that to some folks, efficiency is more valuable than some potentially naive notion of 'privacy.' Those forces prevailed. So it is back to the elite lines for me, and having to stand there while a civil servant shines his blue light at everyone's license for a full minute looking at all the pretty colors. Spiff, your point about ID is meaningful and correct. But that ship has sailed. The stupid meaningless wall is in place and it ain't going anywhere. Now the only question is the easiest way over, under, around or through it. And the traffic-free toll tunnel just closed. :( |
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 11956206)
Privacy nuts railed about how dangerous and stupid it was for people to use Clear's services. Why? Because they forgot their tin foil hats as well as the reality that to some folks, efficiency is more valuable than some potentially naive notion of 'privacy.'
Those forces prevailed. It's funny to read this thread and outside news sources where people are all of a sudden concerned about privacy now. The overall model they had was unsustainable. Yes, the TSA had a role in that, but to charge that kind of money when I would beat the Clear folks about three or four out of five times via the elite line, and no other Clear benefits did not make long-term sense. |
Rats
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 11955395)
Your claim is wrong on both counts -- conditionally wrong with the first and unconditionally wrong on the second.
If the 260,000 people who decided to buy into the TSA nonsense by jumping onto the "registered" passenger stupidity suddenly came to their senses and jumped on board complaining en masse today to their Senators and Congressperson about the TSA stupidity that is the shoe carnival war on liquids and gels and the ID-is-security fallacy, then more of their elected politicians would do something about the TSA. If most of those 260,000 passengers continue to play surrender monkey to the TSA stupidity, then the TSA stupidity will continue to reign supreme and the members of CLEAR doing such will continue to get what they deserve. It’s cute to think that if we had all complained instead of joining Clear that TSA and/or the government officials would change things. . . except I remember lots of people complaining for a long time, nothing changed and then Clear came along. I will miss them. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:46 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.