Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Precheck - Decline in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2015, 10:38 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis (MSP)
Programs: AA, DL UA (.5MM)
Posts: 226
Originally Posted by MojaveFlyer
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.

And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
Sorry to keep piling on, but...

I didn't apply for Global Entry to "buy" pre-check. I went through the process (application, interview, FBI background check) to create an opportunity to get through US customs smoothly and promptly after International Travel, especially after long, tiring flights.

The first bonus is that I've been able to use the US Global Entry program to get into Australia just like it works on the way home.

My TSA Precheck experience has been at 100% since GE approval, and I do appreciate that very much, but that was not why I applied for GE.
MPsince1984 is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 11:10 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: WFBF
Posts: 963
Originally Posted by MPsince1984
Sorry to keep piling on, but...

I didn't apply for Global Entry to "buy" pre-check. I went through the process (application, interview, FBI background check) to create an opportunity to get through US customs smoothly and promptly after International Travel, especially after long, tiring flights.

The first bonus is that I've been able to use the US Global Entry program to get into Australia just like it works on the way home.

My TSA Precheck experience has been at 100% since GE approval, and I do appreciate that very much, but that was not why I applied for GE.
Yup. I applied for GE because I knew I was about to start doing more international travel than in the past, and I'd had enough experience with waiting around in customs lines to know that a more convenient experience was worth the signup fee. Getting Pre thrown in is just icing on the cake.

Downside: I'm still learning to adjust my arrival times a bit. Showed up to YUL this morning at 6:30 for a 10AM flight to the US, and was through check-in, security and customs preclearance with still over two hours left until my flight. Ended up taking a walk around the terminal and entertaining myself with a bit of planespotting (saw a Royal Jordanian 787 for the first time).
ubernostrum is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 12:38 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
I have no idea what TSA is doing. On a flight a couple months ago they were using an Ipad "randomizer" to speed things along. Seemed silly considering all the info Homeland Security has and they opt to basically flip a coin?

PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
traveller001 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 2:08 am
  #49  
Formerly known as Stephenk19
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 409
Originally Posted by MojaveFlyer
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.

And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
The fee is around 100 USD for GE, if I remember correctly, so I don't feel it is outside the reach of to many people. (GE also gives the additional benefit of easier entry to the US). For the value and time saving well worth it IMHO.

I would (and do) rage more at the gov't for forcing us to put up with the TSA and their methods.
Steve_19 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 3:05 am
  #50  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by CDKing
IIRC all it was sharing was flight history with the airline you are opting in through. I know TSA follows no logic but if it was truly a background check, why was approval only when flying the carrier opted in on and not all carriers? I also recall people getting pre via opt-in and later on getting denied for global entry, which in turn caused pre via opt-in to stop.
The airlines shared more than just flight history for those who opted in by way of FFP. And using flight history is part of the background checking.

PreCheck approval is not -- and has mostly not been -- limited just to the carrier in which non-DHS-paid-program membership people had FFP elite status. For example, people who opted in with AA as elites had increased chances of getting PreCheck LLL with other PreCheck participating airlines too -- just not as high as with the airline with which they had elite status.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 3:11 am
  #51  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by traveller001
I have no idea what TSA is doing. On a flight a couple months ago they were using an Ipad "randomizer" to speed things along. Seemed silly considering all the info Homeland Security has and they opt to basically flip a coin?

PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
The passenger background checks in the main are mostly pointless; and random exclusion/inclusion for PreCheck LLL screening for a trip doesn't increase the security risk to my flights; rather random inclusion into PreCheck LLL ought to decrease the risk in aggregate -- more so if the TSA were to use the freed up resources to focus on better contraband WEI interdiction.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 6:52 am
  #52  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Originally Posted by silkworm87
So here we go... My question is: What are the methods of regaining pre-check eligibility, ranked from easiest to hardest?
Is this a trick question? Do you have some reason to believe Precheck or Global Entry would reject your application?

Neither one are "hard" to get, provided you are willing to accept the background check and meet the qualifications. Since I've voluntarily submitted to other government background checks in the past, I didn't feel like I was really giving up any incremental "freedom" by signing up for GE. The Man already knows everything about me, and probably you too, so might as well get expedited CBP/TSA, right?

I guess someone might say Precheck by itself is "easier" since there are interview stations all over the country, whereas the GE site list is much shorter - mostly major international airports. I just waited until I had a New York trip planned, started my online app about 2 weeks prior to that, then booked a 7AM appointment one morning at JFK, and I was literally out of there at 7:15.

I sympathize with *some* of the points in the OMNI P/R discussion that this thread has devolved into - namely that there was a time when you wouldn't have had to submit to a background check to avoid the more inane aspects of security theatre. But while I may rant a bit on FT about it, when I get to the airport I'm glad I have GE/Precheck.
pinniped is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 6:53 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: AC 100K
Posts: 53
There should be no fee for Global Entry. If the purpose of the program is to enhance security, (which it was last time I checked), then we should aim to have all of the lowest-risk passengers enrolled, not the subset of low risk passengers who are willing to pay a fee. It's not a Disney ride folks.
johnwb is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:25 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,682
Originally Posted by MojaveFlyer
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.

And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
You might be giving the ability to pay 20 dollars a year, more credit than is due.
knit-in is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:29 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
Originally Posted by GUWonder
\ For example, people who opted in with AA as elites had increased chances of getting PreCheck LLL with other PreCheck participating airlines too -- just not as high as with the airline with which they had elite status.
Really? That was certainly not my experience. I was an AA opt-in, and never got PreCheck LLL with other airlines until I enrolled through the PreCheck program and provided a KTN.
BSBD is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:36 am
  #56  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by BSBD
Really? That was certainly not my experience. I was an AA opt-in, and never got PreCheck LLL with other airlines until I enrolled through the PreCheck program and provided a KTN.
Not all people have the same experiences.

To answer your question: really.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:45 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Not all people have the same experiences.
Thank you, Captain Obvious

To answer your question: really.
Has this been discussed here previously? Your comment is the first I've ever seen/heard that FF opt-in could span and has spanned multiple airlines.
BSBD is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:46 am
  #58  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by knit-in
You might be giving the ability to pay 20 dollars a year, more credit than is due.
It's not $20 per year. It's $100 up-front that may come with -- but doesn't guarantee -- PreCheck LLL screening even when/where PreCheck is available and you are flying on a PreCheck eligible carrier. Also, not everyone paying is approved; the costs to acquire membership generally aren't just limited to the $100 application fee even if approved; and the membership can be suspended or revoked within the five-year period.

There is no guarantee that the $100 application fee will result in one use of PreCheck LLL per year for each of the five years that may be covered by the application/membership fee. And they don't generally refund money, so forget about prorated refunds at $20/year.

If DHS is so confident both in scoring people (to make some free people more equal than other free people) and in the efficiency of these "Trusted Traveler" schemes, then they would be doing the country a favor by allowing free opt-ins since we the traveling public already pay DHS a good chunk of money when we fly within/to/from the country.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:50 am
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by rylan
Its just another way for TSA to get money and justify their existence. Don't know about GlobalEntry, but the Pre application process is a joke. Fill out the form/questions online, then set up the 'interview' which consists of verifying the questions you already answered and getting fingerprinted. No other actual behavioral questions or real interview.

Does GE do the same thing or do they actually ask something of substance?
Originally Posted by fti
So with that reasoning you also believe that anyone else who received Pre Check in the past must not be a "security threat" and should also be allowed to continue with PreCheck (parents with kids for example, right?!?). Personally I don't think the TSA determined frequent flyers were not a security threat. They just felt it would be a good way to start the program. Same with the "kettles" that were given it without a background check.



Well, you didn't get a background check either, did you? I agree with the above poster who wonders about those who feel it is their God-given right to have PreCheck.
Originally Posted by DemonDeacon
I hope so. I assume that they do some kind of background check on everyone who receives PreCheck, because if they letting anyone do it, it would destroy the narrative that the body scanners, shoe carnival, liquids out etc. are necessary for security.

Again, this isn't supposed to be about paying to get a less intense security treatment. It's supposed to be about reimbursing the government for the expense of determining that you are a low threat passenger.
No, PreCheck is all about silencing criticism from frequent flyers -- formerly the TSA's most vocal and influential critics. As many of us have said before, PreCheck is nothing more than the old Communist system of Apparachik in which the government grants a "privilege" to a class of citizens in exchange for loyalty. The government can withdraw the privilege at any time for any reason (or no reason), which ensures loyalty. It's worked like a charm.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 7:58 am
  #60  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by BSBD
Has this been discussed here previously?
Getting PreCheck LLL when flying airlines on which they hold no elite status, despite having no KTN entry, has been repeatedly indicated on FT before. Much like it's been mentioned when non-US persons have been getting PreCheck LLL for boarding passes despite the KTN field probably or certainly being empty in the PNR.
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.