TSA Precheck - Decline in
#46
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis (MSP)
Programs: AA, DL UA (.5MM)
Posts: 226
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
I didn't apply for Global Entry to "buy" pre-check. I went through the process (application, interview, FBI background check) to create an opportunity to get through US customs smoothly and promptly after International Travel, especially after long, tiring flights.
The first bonus is that I've been able to use the US Global Entry program to get into Australia just like it works on the way home.
My TSA Precheck experience has been at 100% since GE approval, and I do appreciate that very much, but that was not why I applied for GE.
#47
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: WFBF
Posts: 963
Sorry to keep piling on, but...
I didn't apply for Global Entry to "buy" pre-check. I went through the process (application, interview, FBI background check) to create an opportunity to get through US customs smoothly and promptly after International Travel, especially after long, tiring flights.
The first bonus is that I've been able to use the US Global Entry program to get into Australia just like it works on the way home.
My TSA Precheck experience has been at 100% since GE approval, and I do appreciate that very much, but that was not why I applied for GE.
I didn't apply for Global Entry to "buy" pre-check. I went through the process (application, interview, FBI background check) to create an opportunity to get through US customs smoothly and promptly after International Travel, especially after long, tiring flights.
The first bonus is that I've been able to use the US Global Entry program to get into Australia just like it works on the way home.
My TSA Precheck experience has been at 100% since GE approval, and I do appreciate that very much, but that was not why I applied for GE.
Downside: I'm still learning to adjust my arrival times a bit. Showed up to YUL this morning at 6:30 for a 10AM flight to the US, and was through check-in, security and customs preclearance with still over two hours left until my flight. Ended up taking a walk around the terminal and entertaining myself with a bit of planespotting (saw a Royal Jordanian 787 for the first time).
#48
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
I have no idea what TSA is doing. On a flight a couple months ago they were using an Ipad "randomizer" to speed things along. Seemed silly considering all the info Homeland Security has and they opt to basically flip a coin?
PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
#49
Formerly known as Stephenk19
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 409
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
I would (and do) rage more at the gov't for forcing us to put up with the TSA and their methods.
#50
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
IIRC all it was sharing was flight history with the airline you are opting in through. I know TSA follows no logic but if it was truly a background check, why was approval only when flying the carrier opted in on and not all carriers? I also recall people getting pre via opt-in and later on getting denied for global entry, which in turn caused pre via opt-in to stop.
PreCheck approval is not -- and has mostly not been -- limited just to the carrier in which non-DHS-paid-program membership people had FFP elite status. For example, people who opted in with AA as elites had increased chances of getting PreCheck LLL with other PreCheck participating airlines too -- just not as high as with the airline with which they had elite status.
#51
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I have no idea what TSA is doing. On a flight a couple months ago they were using an Ipad "randomizer" to speed things along. Seemed silly considering all the info Homeland Security has and they opt to basically flip a coin?
PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
PS I rarely get pre-check even holding a SIDA badge at said airport.
#52
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Neither one are "hard" to get, provided you are willing to accept the background check and meet the qualifications. Since I've voluntarily submitted to other government background checks in the past, I didn't feel like I was really giving up any incremental "freedom" by signing up for GE. The Man already knows everything about me, and probably you too, so might as well get expedited CBP/TSA, right?
I guess someone might say Precheck by itself is "easier" since there are interview stations all over the country, whereas the GE site list is much shorter - mostly major international airports. I just waited until I had a New York trip planned, started my online app about 2 weeks prior to that, then booked a 7AM appointment one morning at JFK, and I was literally out of there at 7:15.
I sympathize with *some* of the points in the OMNI P/R discussion that this thread has devolved into - namely that there was a time when you wouldn't have had to submit to a background check to avoid the more inane aspects of security theatre. But while I may rant a bit on FT about it, when I get to the airport I'm glad I have GE/Precheck.
#53
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: AC 100K
Posts: 53
There should be no fee for Global Entry. If the purpose of the program is to enhance security, (which it was last time I checked), then we should aim to have all of the lowest-risk passengers enrolled, not the subset of low risk passengers who are willing to pay a fee. It's not a Disney ride folks.
#54
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,682
I'm a bit astounded, though I'm sure I shouldn't be, at the entitlement I hear coming from those who paid for pre one way or another. It is so much the "American way" to buy privilege, and screw those who can't afford it. Put up this security theater, then allow the wealthy to bypass it, so once again they can feel better than the "kettles" and other sorts of pond scum.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
And as for the program needing to fund itself - I pay the 9/11 "security fee" every time I fly. Enough is enough.
#55
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
Really? That was certainly not my experience. I was an AA opt-in, and never got PreCheck LLL with other airlines until I enrolled through the PreCheck program and provided a KTN.
#56
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#57
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
#58
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
There is no guarantee that the $100 application fee will result in one use of PreCheck LLL per year for each of the five years that may be covered by the application/membership fee. And they don't generally refund money, so forget about prorated refunds at $20/year.
If DHS is so confident both in scoring people (to make some free people more equal than other free people) and in the efficiency of these "Trusted Traveler" schemes, then they would be doing the country a favor by allowing free opt-ins since we the traveling public already pay DHS a good chunk of money when we fly within/to/from the country.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Its just another way for TSA to get money and justify their existence. Don't know about GlobalEntry, but the Pre application process is a joke. Fill out the form/questions online, then set up the 'interview' which consists of verifying the questions you already answered and getting fingerprinted. No other actual behavioral questions or real interview.
Does GE do the same thing or do they actually ask something of substance?
Does GE do the same thing or do they actually ask something of substance?
So with that reasoning you also believe that anyone else who received Pre Check in the past must not be a "security threat" and should also be allowed to continue with PreCheck (parents with kids for example, right?!?). Personally I don't think the TSA determined frequent flyers were not a security threat. They just felt it would be a good way to start the program. Same with the "kettles" that were given it without a background check.
Well, you didn't get a background check either, did you? I agree with the above poster who wonders about those who feel it is their God-given right to have PreCheck.
Well, you didn't get a background check either, did you? I agree with the above poster who wonders about those who feel it is their God-given right to have PreCheck.
I hope so. I assume that they do some kind of background check on everyone who receives PreCheck, because if they letting anyone do it, it would destroy the narrative that the body scanners, shoe carnival, liquids out etc. are necessary for security.
Again, this isn't supposed to be about paying to get a less intense security treatment. It's supposed to be about reimbursing the government for the expense of determining that you are a low threat passenger.
Again, this isn't supposed to be about paying to get a less intense security treatment. It's supposed to be about reimbursing the government for the expense of determining that you are a low threat passenger.
#60
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Getting PreCheck LLL when flying airlines on which they hold no elite status, despite having no KTN entry, has been repeatedly indicated on FT before. Much like it's been mentioned when non-US persons have been getting PreCheck LLL for boarding passes despite the KTN field probably or certainly being empty in the PNR.