![]() |
|
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29272098)
That said, who knows what the timeline for getting your carry on back might be in such a event. I'm guessing if anyone has an idea, you might. My guess is that it's probably one of the lowest priorities. |
And as a friendly reminder...keep your shoes on until you've reached a point in the flight where you would have enough time to put your shoes back on if an emergency landing is necessary.
And add me to the "move to the exit or be moved clear of the isle" camp. Being narcissistic does not make you more knowledgeable than the flight crew during an emergency. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29272098)
The first reasonable point in this thread from the "leave things behind" camp. That said, who knows what the timeline for getting your carry on back might be in such a event. I'm guessing if anyone has an idea, you might. My guess is that it's probably one of the lowest priorities. The unfortunate thing, is while you are deciding if you have time to get your carry-on out of the overhead bin kb9522, other people may die as a result of your non-compliance with the law. From my perspective, your value system is in serious need of change. |
Originally Posted by dulciusexasperis
(Post 29274967)
I find it unfathomable how someone could continue to worry about getting their carry-on when a plane has had to be evacuated. I don't care if I EVER get my carry-on items back. I don't care if my wallet, passport, cash, crown jewels or anything else goes up in flames. The ONLY thing I care about is LIVING to tell the tale.
The unfortunate thing, is while you are deciding if you have time to get your carry-on out of the overhead bin kb9522, other people may die as a result of your non-compliance with the law. From my perspective, your value system is in serious need of change. And which law are you referring to that prohibits me from removing my carry on. |
Originally Posted by airmotive
(Post 29274199)
And as a friendly reminder...keep your shoes on until you've reached a point in the flight where you would have enough time to put your shoes back on if an emergency landing is necessary.
And add me to the "move to the exit or be moved clear of the isle" camp. Being narcissistic does not make you more knowledgeable than the flight crew during an emergency. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29275365)
Right. Every evacuation is life or death. :rolleyes: And which law are you referring to that prohibits me from removing my carry on. The law you are breaking depending on which country you are in is a law such as 'criminal negligence' or 'reckless endangerment'. When you are on a plane, the Captain's word is law according to International Law. That means that if you disobey his command to evacuate in any way, you can then be charged under the local laws that would cover such an act. When the Captain tells you to evacuate (through flight crew as well), that also means without stopping to get things out of an overhead. It is not a request, it is not voluntary, it is a command that has legal weight and as such also has legal penalties for non-compliance. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29275378)
The only narcissism is on the part of FAs and pilots who think passengers are too dumb to be given all the information.
Seconds matter in a fire. In the time it would take the FA or pilot to announce "The left engine is on fire, there is fuel leaking onto the ground and a strong chance the fire will spread to the fuselage, so please evacuate in an orderly manner and rapidly proceed away from the plane" quite a few people could have gotten out of the plane. All you need to know that qualified personnel have called for an emergency evacuation. Follow the instructions of the crew, or sit in your seat and pout while you wait for "all the information", your choice, but don't block others from exiting while you play with your luggage. |
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 29275551)
Thus speaks someone who has ZERO experience of real life emergencies, and that remark exemplifies the ultimate in narcissism.
Seconds matter in a fire. In the time it would take the FA or pilot to announce "The left engine is on fire, there is fuel leaking onto the ground and a strong chance the fire will spread to the fuselage, so please evacuate in an orderly manner and rapidly proceed away from the plane" quite a few people could have gotten out of the plane. All you need to know that qualified personnel have called for an emergency evacuation. Follow the instructions of the crew, or sit in your seat and pout while you wait for "all the information", your choice, but don't block others from exiting while you play with your luggage. |
Originally Posted by dulciusexasperis
(Post 29275522)
Are you really that simple minded or just being deliberately obtuse? The point is YOU don't know if a given evacuation is life or death or not.
The law you are breaking depending on which country you are in is a law such as 'criminal negligence' or 'reckless endangerment'. When you are on a plane, the Captain's word is law according to International Law. That means that if you disobey his command to evacuate in any way, you can then be charged under the local laws that would cover such an act. When the Captain tells you to evacuate (through flight crew as well), that also means without stopping to get things out of an overhead. It is not a request, it is not voluntary, it is a command that has legal weight and as such also has legal penalties for non-compliance. By the way, spare me the insults. Make a point or a move on. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29275927)
You probably shouldn't speak with an assumption of my qualifications. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29275378)
The only narcissism is on the part of FAs and pilots who think passengers are too dumb to be given all the information. |
Originally Posted by kb9522
(Post 29275378)
The only narcissism is on the part of FAs and pilots who think passengers are too dumb to be given all the information. As a whole, yes, the group IS too dumb. WAY, WAY too dumb. But narcissists are always the exception. Right? |
Originally Posted by LTBoston
(Post 29276418)
So what if you HAVE "all the information"? It still doesn't matter, because you don't have the right to prevent others from following an evacuation order just because you don't think it warrants your compliance.
|
Originally Posted by airmotive
(Post 29276548)
As a whole, yes, the group IS too dumb.
WAY, WAY too dumb. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.