Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Ridiculous things your company has done to reduce travel expenses

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ridiculous things your company has done to reduce travel expenses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2012, 10:20 pm
  #166  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
Originally Posted by falconred
Several of us have been required to fly SFO - CEB for our company. There are no direct flights, and travel time is a minimum of 20 hours (~ 18 hour in-flight time).

Coach only.

No exceptions.
Sounds like a smart policy to me. And a not entirely uncommon one, either.
Science Goy is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2012, 10:46 pm
  #167  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR / IAD
Programs: BA/AA/UA
Posts: 2,955
Originally Posted by Science Goy
Sounds like a smart policy to me.
Sounds like someone under six feet tall.
China Clipper is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2012, 11:18 pm
  #168  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
Originally Posted by China Clipper
Sounds like someone under six feet tall.
Sounds like you're wrong. But I do get by just fine in economy, and perform my job competently even when I have to go straight to work after 20 hours of flying. Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.
Science Goy is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 12:05 am
  #169  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Programs: DL GE
Posts: 1,654
Originally Posted by Science Goy
Sounds like you're wrong. But I do get by just fine in economy, and perform my job competently even when I have to go straight to work after 20 hours of flying. Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.
Well, it is for 6+ hours in my case

Sorry about your luck....
pragakhan is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 12:27 am
  #170  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PDX
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 174
Originally Posted by falconred
Several of us have been required to fly SFO - CEB for our company. There are no direct flights, and travel time is a minimum of 20 hours (~ 18 hour in-flight time).

Coach only.

No exceptions.
PDX-PEN is quite common for me and my local co-workers. 30+ hours before you even get the taxi to go to the hotel. On those flights I've met other co-workers doing AUS-PEN which is a little longer. Company policy is full-fare Y; no paid J for anyone (including the tall CEO) except for medical reasons.

Uphill, both ways!

On the upside I did make AA PLT doing this route. Won't keep it long, though.

Originally Posted by Science Goy
Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.
Why's it called business class if it's never justified for business? ;-) But seriously, I'm a little guy and I can't keep my shoulders hunched in long enough to avoid bumping my neighbors while I'm awake; I usually end up trying to stuff my lower arms inside the seatbelt to try to relax my shoulders.

Anyway, for an actual contribution to the thread... I don't have anything nearly as bad as anything here. We have generous allotments per meal (more than I think I could comfortably eat and the kind of place I'd chose for myself) and never asked for receipts as long as I've been below it. However, the category of the meal (breakfast/lunch/dinner) is tract by the expense reporting tool. On an eastbound TPAC the clock is actually earlier when you land than when you take off, so one mealtime get purchased twice for the same calendar day. The expense tool flags this and bugs my manager if I list e.g. two lunches as two lunches. There's no credit for the fact that on the westbound trip there's a day that never really happens.
radarskiy is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 2:24 am
  #171  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR / IAD
Programs: BA/AA/UA
Posts: 2,955
Originally Posted by Science Goy
Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.
Quoted for posterity. I love these sweeping pronouncements!
China Clipper is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 6:02 am
  #172  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 739
Hotel stays ...

- Requiring employees to share rooms.

- If a weekend stay is required; no rental car reimbursement ... unless working at the
customer site. i.e. Marooned at a contract Hampton or HIE near the office parks with
few dining/entertainment options within walking or hotel shuttle distance.

Mileage Reimbursement:

- Disallowing reimbursement for the 12-mile longer/faster/safer expressway route vs.
surface streets, thru the ghetto.

Last edited by dranz; Sep 5, 2012 at 6:14 am
dranz is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 6:20 am
  #173  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 739
Originally Posted by China Clipper
Quoted for posterity. I love these sweeping pronouncements!
... and the inevitable exceptions/contortions for the senior execs that don't
have the keys to the BBJ. <g>

Last edited by dranz; Sep 5, 2012 at 6:30 am
dranz is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 6:22 am
  #174  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The "no F/J" fallacy is that each hour of travel is evaluated on a stand-alone basis. Businesses are competetive and making your top earners happy is part of business. People who have lousy travel experiences will find ways not to travel and thus make their employer less money. When it's a top rainmaker, that's a lot of money lost.

As a small startup or an established business struggling to survive, can you ask your people to suck it up? Sure. But, not for long if you expect to keep the top people.

In additionally, companies which are petty about travel are petty about other things too. In the long haul, the top people leave and the dregs, who have no choice, are stuck.
Often1 is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 7:00 am
  #175  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Staffordshire UK
Programs: Mucci, BA Silver, HON, EK Gold
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by roberino
Ah! Context! So he's an FSE or similar? I used to do that too.

So he must be billing a per diem on weekend days too then, and a lot of them. Still, he'd have to be working a LOT of weekend days. Did he get a full PD on weekend days too? And what about travel days?

I always got told that I had to take all public holidays/bank holidays/maintenance windows and at least 20 of my 25 days annual leave otherwise any days I worked above that I was basically uninsured and my tax code had to be recalculated. Not sure if that was correct or not but no one needs to tell me twice to out my feet up and forget about lasers for a while...
we pay full PD at weekends on the grounds we recognise people have to eat and as I said in a previous post our guys aren't big on supermarket shopping...
We also pay full PD on travel days for the engineers but not the consultants (don't know why - annals of time thing).

I've never heard the limitations on days available for work (admiitedly I've never asked). We allow employees to sell up to, I think, 10 days of their annual leave so that would be a route to reduce any annual leave entitlement.

I must stress this was a unique project for us in terms of scope and timescales, we don't typicaly plan for our FSE's to have this workload
Maigret is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 7:06 am
  #176  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Staffordshire UK
Programs: Mucci, BA Silver, HON, EK Gold
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by Science Goy
Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.

This is patently false. One of my engineers justified a J ticket LHR-IST only last Friday.

Also, everywhere I have worked goes to great lengths to define exactly the criteria for justifying it.

Were it to be the case the entire economics of the airline industry would not be as it is today and 95% of FT wouldn't exist
Maigret is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 7:55 am
  #177  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Originally Posted by Science Goy
Paid F/J for corporate travel is never justified under any circumstances.
No, it sounds like it's not justified under your circumstance.

I've traveled under both policies in the past - I think there are reasonable argument for and against and, to be honest, this has never been a "make or break" thing for me. In fact, I've worked a couple places where I controlled my own travel budget and *could* have bought J but chose to buy Y so I could get more client visits in under the budget. But I could certainly see other situations/contracts where the client is willing to buy J and expects to have a full day of meetings on arrival in Europe and that's fine too...

Also, the situations where people are buying J for business travel usually involve a substantial corp discount - one that is greater on J tickets than Y. (I remember a company where our J discount on United was in the neighborhood of 40%, our full-Y discount was something like 25%, and all of the advance purchase fares were maybe 10-15% off.)
pinniped is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 10:27 am
  #178  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: OH
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat, Marriot Lifetime Gold
Posts: 9,539
I have to say that my company is great. I used to do LAX-GRU a ton. I always left LAX on a Saturday (in J), landing Sunday morning and had a full day to relax/recover. We do actual expenses for all purchases. There is a sheet of international expected costs for all three meals by about 50 major international cities. If you go over, you can explain why and so long as it isn't a regular thing or especially egregious, it isn't a big deal. The expense amounts are enough for a nice meal but not 5 star. Alcohol with meals, within the total meal cost, is covered but drinks alone in a bar are not. Snacks are not covered. I tend to eat breakfast at the hotel and therefore am always over the amount for breakfast, but I eat a lighter dinner and come in under cost, so no big deal.

We can expense reasonable tips and tolls without receipts. The one thing that bugs me is that to get cash when travelling overseas you have to use your personal bank card (no cash on corporate card) so you end up paying the ATM fee on your personal account and that is not expensable. Oh well, it's a few bucks a trip.

We get J on all international trips over 5 hours. So my trip LAX-JFK next week, though longer than 5 hours, is in Y. No biggie, I can use my personal upgrades.

We generally stay in nice hotels, no room sharing, like Hiltons or Starwoods.
Redhead is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 11:32 am
  #179  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
I worked for a company in the late 90's that cut the budget to such low levels that I could not actually do my job or eat.

I was expected to visit 28 US states on 1500 dollars by the end of it. Per month!

I quit that job. So did many many others!
pinworm is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2012, 3:46 pm
  #180  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Programs: Emirates Silver, BA, Flying Blue, Virgin, IHG
Posts: 950
A few contributions - I had a recent expense claim refused because there was no receipt for £13 of tube / bus fares because I had used my Oystercard (but a colleague had £150 of taxis for same journeys approved because they had a receipt)

When my husband worked in Internal Audit for a major PLC staff were given a modest per diem to cover accomodation and meals so staff used to stay in crappy digs sharing rooms (there was a list that they shared) and pocket the difference. Comapny went over to receipted reimbursement only so costs went up significantly as staff all claimed what they were entitled to (single room, meals etc).

I travel to Asia and Africa a lot and have started to say that I will not stay in a hotel without room service - I often get back to the hotel at 9.30pm+ and the hotel restaurant finishes at 10 and so as a woman travelling alone I really don't want to have to go wandering the streets of Saigon that late to find dinner. Latest idea is for us to stay in an appartment owned by our client (in Sri Lanka) and they will get a cook to bring food in. I don't want to stay in a strange appartment in a strange city.

(oh and needless to say senior managers fly first and always via Dubai as they have status)

Oh and we are permitted to not come into the office for one day after we arrive back (long haul, 20+hrs, economy class) so I can leave home on Friday night, fly to Vietnam, work five days, leave Saturday night, arrive home Sunday and I can stay off on Monday (jetlagged) so I miss two weekends and get nothing back.
HelloKittysMum is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.