![]() |
Originally Posted by HansGolden
(Post 24169539)
I'm glad TB is moving on this and the clear majority of FTers wants this! ^
|
Originally Posted by nsx
(Post 24169576)
I wouldn't say that TB is "moving" on this. As the latest instigator, I am studying it and thinking about whether to propose some minimal trial and if so what. This thread has revealed quite a number of important concerns I want to address before proceeding.
|
Originally Posted by HansGolden
(Post 24169608)
I was blown away that 400 FTers would care enough to vote on a TB issue. That's all I'll say. :D:cool:
|
Originally Posted by nsx
(Post 24169576)
I wouldn't say that TB is "moving" on this. As the latest instigator, I am studying it and thinking about whether to propose some minimal trial and if so what. This thread has revealed quite a number of important concerns I want to address before proceeding.
For this reason, I would prefer testing out a “like” button on a trial basis — by all members of FlyerTalk who wish to participate. I believe the experience will reveal the answers to many questions; as well as either confirm or change the opinions of how FlyerTalk members feel about this functionality... ...not to mention that I typically prefer to reach conclusions based on actual data rather than supposition and speculation. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 24169622)
400? Over 650 folks have voted so far.
:D:D:D |
Originally Posted by JonNYC
(Post 24168741)
I'd argue though that those engaging in the pointless "battles" (we have the same at AA presently) deserve what they get; if their "friends" or "allies" want to play games with "helpful" votes, it's stupid, but not much stupider than the thread itself at that point.
... Take for example the macrumors site. It has similiariteis with FT as it is a community of engaged people discussing their hobby. However, it is quite different fron FT as it is extremely uniform. It has become this way because when someone posts something outside the common view, it is downvoted and anone bashing the opponent is upvoted. Now add that like/helpful system to FT and I can easily see the same hapening here on some of the forums where people are very pro their airline and takes all criticism as an attack. Now, how can FT survive as a discussion site if people start to vote for "the right" posts/posters? |
Originally Posted by intuition
(Post 24170106)
Now add that like/helpful system to FT and I can easily see the same hapening here on some of the forums where people are very pro their airline and takes all criticism as an attack.
Now, how can FT survive as a discussion site if people start to vote for "the right" posts/posters? |
A like/don't like button doesn't reflect the true feeling of the flyertalk community only those reading the post/thread. Low traffic posts/threads/forums can easily be manipulated by a few.
If something is liked or not liked what does it signifying? |
Originally Posted by nsx
(Post 24170206)
If there isn't a downvote button, it's hard to see how things could get out of hand. But a trial would be needed to demonstrate what happens either way. The human element is hard to predict.
Or when the "drive-by-rant-by-first-time-poster" gets what he "deserves", perhaps all the regulars of that forum are happy to show their liking? If likes can strengthen a poster, I cannot see why it couldn't strengthen posts with unfriendly content. Human element isn't that hard to predict, but I agree one should give those humans the benfit of a doubt ;)
Originally Posted by amunter
My comment about self-policing is that anybody who has done some reading on FT for some time starts to build a list (or a fuzzy sketch or a hazy image or however your brain works) in their head of who is reliable/helpful/thoughtful/funny/"a good poster" - however you define that - and who is not.
There are some very opinionated FT'ers with high post counts that has some reputation (good or bad). But by reading them several times, I have been able to form a picture in my head of them and their personalities and can in the light of that enjoy their posts. If I never formed my image of them and instead relied on post count and/or how liked they are, I probably would have been driven crazy from their posts. |
Originally Posted by intuition
(Post 24170362)
When a newbie for the millionth time asks a mundane question, it isn't that far fetched that a snarky "use the search" reply will get numerous likes/helfuls, is it?
Or when the "drive-by-rant-by-first-time-poster" gets what he "deserves", perhaps all the regulars of that forum are happy to show their liking? If likes can strengthen a poster, I cannot see why it couldn't strengthen posts with unfriendly content. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 24168991)
People can also use PMs or email to thank others for being especially helpful. This might be more meaningful to the recipient than a public (possibly anonymous) click of some like button.
|
What is FT majority?
Originally Posted by HansGolden
(Post 24169539)
I'm glad TB is moving on this and the clear majority of FTers wants this! ^
My guess is we may see no more than 1000 votes when the poll closes. Should we conclude 1000 people speaks for the majority then? I don't think so.
Originally Posted by HansGolden
(Post 24169608)
I was blown away that 400 FTers would care enough to vote on a TB issue. That's all I'll say. :D:cool:
Nevertheless, a FT poll is not the same as TB elections. We have a clear guidelines for TB in terms of elections, motions and decisions. Not so much with any FT poll. I would even say any FT poll is only fuzzy enough to get some rough ideas among the "vocal or expressive" FTers. In the case of Like/Helpful button, I believe points taken is much more valuable than heads counted. I hope our TBers and CD are among the wise to make the right decisions that actually better and/or benefit FT. |
Originally Posted by SwisherTown
(Post 24170275)
A like/don't like button doesn't reflect the true feeling of the flyertalk community only those reading the post/thread. Low traffic posts/threads/forums can easily be manipulated by a few.
If something is liked or not liked what does it signifying? Which leads to the question on the initial point, what is there to manipulate? There's no proposal on the time to give anything away for extra likes, or to show "liked" posts first, etc. Even if there's a little silly bit of egoboo like showing someone's "like" count on their profile page or even in the left column, so what? -- Let me add the following as an example of a reply where I'd have liked the option of a "Like" button, but where a reply of "Got it, thanks!" would have been noise rather than useful: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/24172984-post8.html |
Originally Posted by Canarsie
(Post 24169631)
I remain not convinced that a “like” button will help improve FlyerTalk for a majority of its members.
For this reason, I would prefer testing out a “like” button on a trial basis — by all members of FlyerTalk who wish to participate. I believe the experience will reveal the answers to many questions; as well as either confirm or change the opinions of how FlyerTalk members feel about this functionality... ...not to mention that I typically prefer to reach conclusions based on actual data rather than supposition and speculation. I think a trial to give folks what it looks like, how FTers use it, etc. would be useful. |
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 21339417)
IMHO, some posts have merit. Others do not. What I care about is whether *I* think a post has merit, not whether other posters think so or not.
So I think a 'like' feature is worthless. But others feel differently and if someone wants to make a compelling case for them to convinces me that functionality would have benefit for some, I would be up for asking IB to look into it. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.