![]() |
Originally Posted by steveman518
(Post 24252126)
n+1 :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by CPRich
(Post 24253137)
The fact that we choose not to use it elsewhere isn't meaningful? We need to like it and use it and not want it here to be meaningful? Sounds like your just setting criteria to exclude those who don't agree with you.
I participate elsewhere with the feature. I don't fnd it useful there, so I don't use it. So I don't believe it would be useful here. Sorry if you don't put much weight to that opinion. I guess some members are more equal than others. Thanks also, for the well-placed George Orwell-inspired finish line |
Originally Posted by onobond
(Post 24254924)
Absolutely agree.
Thanks also, for the well-placed George Orwell-inspired finish line |
I have barely found any context where the "like" button is really good. There might be some, yes, but my vote here on FT is simply no.
|
"Like Post"
I frequent other forums and some of them have a neat feature which FT doesn't use - an option to "like" posts.
Each post shows how many likes it has if someone clicked "like". It's a way of saying "thank you" for a useful post or a way of saying "good joke/nice witty comment". Has FT ever thought of incorporating a similar feature to its forums? |
More about this is here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...ght=%27like%27
|
Originally Posted by oliver2002
(Post 25732251)
More about this is here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...ght=%27like%27
Thanks |
Still strongly in favor myself-- now more than ever.
|
Still mildly in favor, and also still don't get where the non-imaginary cons are. But mostly just amused to see the a long and contentious thread exhumed.
Follow me on Twitter for the absolute latest on the new 2016 AAdv changes. |
Originally Posted by nkedel
(Post 25736702)
Misread that as the "new 2016 AAdv outrages" :D
|
I have no issue revisiting this. Might be fun to see if we can come up with a motion and a vote.
|
Originally Posted by CMK10
(Post 25736909)
Might be fun to see if we can come up with a motion and a vote.
<Like> |
Internet Brands has some other upgrades to FT in the pipeline. This one is not near the top of the list, and I fully agree with that. I think the discussion revealed which version we would like to be able to try out eventually.
|
Given the like button issue comes up so infrequently still doesn't seem like there's a huge clamoring for it. My take is most FTers are fine w/ FT as it is & don't actually give two patooties re: like/dislike. They're probably more concerned w/ content.
Cheers. Sharon |
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 25737288)
Given the like button issue comes up so infrequently still doesn't seem like there's a huge clamoring for it. My take is most FTers are fine w/ FT as it is & don't actually give two patooties re: like/dislike. They're probably more concerned w/ content.
Cheers. Sharon |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:49 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.