Covid19: Swiss refunds after cancellation
#302
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 796
''you mean AMEX processed your charge back without waiting to LX's answer and LX then refused, and therefore AMEX withdrew the charge back?'' exactly this!
taking into account my flight was in C-class, it's a certain amount of money... Let's wait for a few months now...
taking into account my flight was in C-class, it's a certain amount of money... Let's wait for a few months now...
If the merchant outright refuses to refund for a service not provided, why would they agree to it with a chargeback? They would obviously deny the chargeback as well and thus negating the whole point of it...no? or am I not understanding something?!
I thought the chargeback would be the credit card issuer reviewing the case and approving the chargeback request if they feel its justified/covered by law and the merchant has no more option to refuse. This would be at least a real consumer protection, and that's what the credit cards charge with their annual fees and interest on late payments. Again, excuse me if I am dumb and not getting something...
#303
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: Accor PLT,Thai Silver, HH Dia, SPG Titanium (LT Gold), Aegean Gold, BA Silver
Posts: 5,120
I also have one with an OTA for a Swiss flight. Amex says no response we can transfer the money back to you but if the OTA subsequently appeals then it could be reversed. Yep.......................Go figure
#304
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
In this case, I don't quite understand the point of a chargeback...(this is the first time I have ever sent in a chargeback request)
If the merchant outright refuses to refund for a service not provided, why would they agree to it with a chargeback? They would obviously deny the chargeback as well and thus negating the whole point of it...no? or am I not understanding something?!
If the merchant outright refuses to refund for a service not provided, why would they agree to it with a chargeback? They would obviously deny the chargeback as well and thus negating the whole point of it...no? or am I not understanding something?!
A. A merchant (Swiss via its acquirer bank) is presenting a charge to you (via your issuing bank);
B. You (the cardholder) are requesting a chargeback through your issueing bank;
C. The issueing bank is receiving the money from the acquirer bank;
So far so good! Usually there is no step D., because a shaddy merchant won't attempt to continue from this point on. Unfortunately, Swiss is trying everything (illegal) to hold on to their cash, so Swiss is not giving up and is continueing.
D. The merchant does not agree with the chargeback and is "representing" the charge to you again; Basically your card is charged again; Hence, the issueing bank is debiting your credit card account again; This step D process is called representment.
If you as a cardholder want to dispute this representment, your card issuer is facing lots of paperwork. Hence, by default the card issuer is trying to dissuade you from continueing from here to step E.;
E. You are requesting a chargeback of the representment; This is what you need to instruct your bank to do;
F.->G.->H. describes the disputes process by the credit card provider (Visa, MC, Amex);
#305
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 796
This confusion arises because your bank is not properly explaining the chargeback process.
A. A merchant (Swiss via its acquirer bank) is presenting a charge to you (via your issuing bank);
B. You (the cardholder) are requesting a chargeback through your issueing bank;
C. The issueing bank is receiving the money from the acquirer bank;
So far so good! Usually there is no step D., because a shaddy merchant won't attempt to continue from this point on. Unfortunately, Swiss is trying everything (illegal) to hold on to their cash, so Swiss is not giving up and is continueing.
D. The merchant does not agree with the chargeback and is "representing" the charge to you again; Basically your card is charged again; Hence, the issueing bank is debiting your credit card account again; This step D process is called representment.
If you as a cardholder want to dispute this representment, your card issuer is facing lots of paperwork. Hence, by default the card issuer is trying to dissuade you from continueing from here to step E.;
E. You are requesting a chargeback of the representment; This is what you need to instruct your bank to do;
F.->G.->H. describes the disputes process by the credit card provider (Visa, MC, Amex);
A. A merchant (Swiss via its acquirer bank) is presenting a charge to you (via your issuing bank);
B. You (the cardholder) are requesting a chargeback through your issueing bank;
C. The issueing bank is receiving the money from the acquirer bank;
So far so good! Usually there is no step D., because a shaddy merchant won't attempt to continue from this point on. Unfortunately, Swiss is trying everything (illegal) to hold on to their cash, so Swiss is not giving up and is continueing.
D. The merchant does not agree with the chargeback and is "representing" the charge to you again; Basically your card is charged again; Hence, the issueing bank is debiting your credit card account again; This step D process is called representment.
If you as a cardholder want to dispute this representment, your card issuer is facing lots of paperwork. Hence, by default the card issuer is trying to dissuade you from continueing from here to step E.;
E. You are requesting a chargeback of the representment; This is what you need to instruct your bank to do;
F.->G.->H. describes the disputes process by the credit card provider (Visa, MC, Amex);
#307
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,852
This is a bit surprising. In reality this means that ebookers didn't pay to Swiss yet (prior to the cancellation) as otherwise ebookers would refuse to refund/not be in position to refund the traveller. I doubt ebookers will accept Swiss delaying refunds but still refunding the customer (then it would be a matter a time before such OTA had no cash left).
#309
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 35
My travel agent has said the same thing. They can get a refund but still nothing into my account yet. I assume Swiss is still not paying out. Annoying this is I have already flown one of the flights and I had cancelled the flight based on them saying i could. No idea what I'll get back if anything..
#312
Join Date: Sep 2012
Programs: LH*HON, UA*1K,
Posts: 77
SWISS CORE CUSTOMER CARE (HON) Called me today.
After 4 Weeks I asked on Tuesday when they are going to refund my ticket 4000 CHF to NRT.
Today the representative told me she reached to accounting and they refunded it, should be back on my Card tomorrow. Just a data point. Might be a HON Circle "Extrawurst"
After 4 Weeks I asked on Tuesday when they are going to refund my ticket 4000 CHF to NRT.
Today the representative told me she reached to accounting and they refunded it, should be back on my Card tomorrow. Just a data point. Might be a HON Circle "Extrawurst"
#313
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 29,763
The only way an OTA can refund the customers would be the OTA has not paid the airlines yet - i.e. the funds are held in a collateral type account until trips are made.
#314
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,187
All LH Group carriers are asking TAs to queue refunds via the BSP link: https://www.iata.org/en/services/finance/bsp/bsplink/
The refund option normally used by TAs the regular BSP.
The refund option normally used by TAs the regular BSP.
#315
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 29,763
All LH Group carriers are asking TAs to queue refunds via the BSP link: https://www.iata.org/en/services/finance/bsp/bsplink/
The refund option normally used by TAs the regular BSP.
The refund option normally used by TAs the regular BSP.
I found out EU affirms the EU261, so officially not caving in to the demand from Germany and the subsequent 12 countries asking to bend the rules...
Will file EU261 on LX site if I could find that page, even though it might not be of any help...
Anyone knows the link to the EU261 page on LX site? Thanks if someone can post it.