Family Asked To Leave Southwest Flight After Tweet
#136
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MCI
Programs: CBP Global Entry, WN A-List Preferred, WN Companion Pass
Posts: 2,007
Southwest speaks. Kinda.
Reaction to Recent Social Media Concerns
Interesting spin.
Reaction to Recent Social Media Concerns
Interesting spin.
- They reference "family boarding procedures" (and link to the policy), although those don't apply in this case.
- They say the decision was not based solely on the tweet, but don't mention what it was also based on.
- The mention "successful resolution" without saying that it was achieved by requiring deletion of the tweet.
- They say they are thoroughly investigating the situation, which might lead one to believe additional information is forthcoming, but that's pretty unlikely.
Nothing to see here.
Now move along.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsvbYKr19ng&sns=em
#137
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC*SE100K 1MM, Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Posts: 735
Interesting thread, but if I am Mr. A-lister, this is how I think. I travel often for business, and I'm loyal to SW, I have my small kids with me, and I want to sit together. Asking the GA to allow us to board together is not a big deal, as one of us is going to sit in a freaking middle seat anyway. Who should care? We have all tried to stretch the rules (let he who has not sinned cast the first stone). All those on this thread espousing SW's right to enforce the rules to the Nth degree miss the entire point of the SW experience (as they would have us believe it). I am totally in the corner of the father here, having travelled many times with my kids, and having airlines (particularly Air Canada) go above and beyond to allow us to sit together.
#138
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 413
Interesting thread, but if I am Mr. A-lister, this is how I think. I travel often for business, and I'm loyal to SW, I have my small kids with me, and I want to sit together. Asking the GA to allow us to board together is not a big deal, as one of us is going to sit in a freaking middle seat anyway. Who should care? We have all tried to stretch the rules (let he who has not sinned cast the first stone). All those on this thread espousing SW's right to enforce the rules to the Nth degree miss the entire point of the SW experience (as they would have us believe it). I am totally in the corner of the father here, having travelled many times with my kids, and having airlines (particularly Air Canada) go above and beyond to allow us to sit together.
#139
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,072
What a waste of time to delay a plane for a Tweet. Couldn't the agent be doing better things with her time than letting a Tweet ruin her day? I mean come on a passenger had a complaint about his children under the A+ Status and the agent clearly did not know how to think outside of the box.
All the agent had to do was to let the A+ member and his minor children board together. You don't want the kids and parents sitting in totally different locations in the unlikely event of an emergency.
This Gate Agent should rethink working for Southwest or an Airline .Heck remember this Sticks and Stone may break my bones but words won't hurt me. There was not one word that would be deemed threatening or unprofessional.
Clearly Southwest sided with the passenger as they apologized and gave the travers a $50 voucher for each family member.
I think the Gate Agent may be looking somewhere else for a job because working in Customer Service is a tough job. The passenger did not give the full name of the gate agent just the first name and last initial and Gate#. This is so Southwest can follow up.
The Gate Agent forcing the passenger to delete the Tweet is not cool. The Gate Agent will have a chance to explain later but the priority now is to board the plane and send it off on time not to delay the flight over some non issue. Gee can't the agent take some criticism?
If I were the Gate Agent and the passenger wanted to report me on Tweet I would have said Please feel free to do so as we can learn from these experiences and I apologize for not allowing your Children to board with you as an A+ member. We can change our policies and I'm glad you are bringing this to the attention of our Social Media Team.
All the agent had to do was to let the A+ member and his minor children board together. You don't want the kids and parents sitting in totally different locations in the unlikely event of an emergency.
This Gate Agent should rethink working for Southwest or an Airline .Heck remember this Sticks and Stone may break my bones but words won't hurt me. There was not one word that would be deemed threatening or unprofessional.
Clearly Southwest sided with the passenger as they apologized and gave the travers a $50 voucher for each family member.
I think the Gate Agent may be looking somewhere else for a job because working in Customer Service is a tough job. The passenger did not give the full name of the gate agent just the first name and last initial and Gate#. This is so Southwest can follow up.
The Gate Agent forcing the passenger to delete the Tweet is not cool. The Gate Agent will have a chance to explain later but the priority now is to board the plane and send it off on time not to delay the flight over some non issue. Gee can't the agent take some criticism?
If I were the Gate Agent and the passenger wanted to report me on Tweet I would have said Please feel free to do so as we can learn from these experiences and I apologize for not allowing your Children to board with you as an A+ member. We can change our policies and I'm glad you are bringing this to the attention of our Social Media Team.
#140
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 205
I feel that the GA was flexing her muscle and may have just been having a bad day when the customer in question "crossed the line." It reminds me of the SNL skit in the early 90's about Total ....... Airlines. Perhaps a change of employment is in order?
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgu...nes_shortfilms
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgu...nes_shortfilms
#141
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,592
DYKWIM PAX + DYKWIM GA + money maker /not kid friendly boarding Policy = 10 pages+ thread
#142
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VA
Programs: Marriott: LTP
Posts: 387
And on the EBCI--what happens when everyone (who isn't already A-list or BS) pays for EBCI? Back in June, one of our traveling companions paid for EBCI and received a B-18 boarding pass. What happens when that is CXX?
#143
Join Date: Sep 2010
Programs: Avis Preferred Plus
Posts: 622
You know what as someone who likes to make fun of WN's boarding process , I will actually say that it is no big deal to let the guy take his kids with him. Though one could also ask why can't the guy board with families after the A group. He can still find 3 seats together at the back of the plane.
This is WN's problem. If the guy was traveling with two grownup kids, guess what, he could have boarded early, saved two seats for his kids and the FA would take his side(at least from what I observed on my recent flight where she let some guy reserve row 10 for his buddies and actually used the word TATTLETALE to comment on anyone who would object). So this guy gets a worse deal by traveling with younger kids. So if the FA is going to let people like him reserve seats, the GAs might as well let the guy take his kids along.
I don't have any sympathy for either side here. Both overreacted. The GA could have stuck to her line that he board with the family boarding section, but she had no business doing what she did. And why was she checking tweets during boarding? As for the passenger, I understand perfectly what he was trying to do and the Ops agent could have given him a break. But he should also understand he was asking for a favor, and it wasn't his right to have his kids board with him at that position.
How about this as a compromise? If you board with one kid, you keep your position in line. If you have more than one kid, you get top priority over others in Family boarding. Hell, you might as well add more rules since WN seems to relish in adding more rules .
This is WN's problem. If the guy was traveling with two grownup kids, guess what, he could have boarded early, saved two seats for his kids and the FA would take his side(at least from what I observed on my recent flight where she let some guy reserve row 10 for his buddies and actually used the word TATTLETALE to comment on anyone who would object). So this guy gets a worse deal by traveling with younger kids. So if the FA is going to let people like him reserve seats, the GAs might as well let the guy take his kids along.
I don't have any sympathy for either side here. Both overreacted. The GA could have stuck to her line that he board with the family boarding section, but she had no business doing what she did. And why was she checking tweets during boarding? As for the passenger, I understand perfectly what he was trying to do and the Ops agent could have given him a break. But he should also understand he was asking for a favor, and it wasn't his right to have his kids board with him at that position.
How about this as a compromise? If you board with one kid, you keep your position in line. If you have more than one kid, you get top priority over others in Family boarding. Hell, you might as well add more rules since WN seems to relish in adding more rules .
Last edited by saneman; Jul 24, 2014 at 6:08 am
#144
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: MCO
Programs: DL exDM MM
Posts: 762
As a customer service executive, it absolutely boggles my mind reading this, and the other comments that supported the GA. Granted, you are in the minority, most people either disapproved or pointed out there might be a second side to the story. But the line of thinking you posted (and ludicrously called someone else out) is just mind blowing.
What on earth would make you think that a company employee can retaliate against a customer for giving negative feedback of the service they provided?
Sure, the companies provide official ways to provide complaints, but customers are by no means required to use them. They are free to comment on their experience to their friends, their coworkers, the people standing in line next to them... And OF COURSE they are free to write about it on social media.
Can you imagine what would happen if airlines let employees kick passengers off flights every time they complained about poor service, either in person, or online? No public company is going to tolerate that kind of behavior from its employees, whether or not the guy posted on social media, whether or not he named the employee.
I guarantee you SouthWest execs are face-palming over this right now, and preparing memos to their workforce reminding them when it is and isn't appropriate to deny a passenger boarding.
What on earth would make you think that a company employee can retaliate against a customer for giving negative feedback of the service they provided?
Sure, the companies provide official ways to provide complaints, but customers are by no means required to use them. They are free to comment on their experience to their friends, their coworkers, the people standing in line next to them... And OF COURSE they are free to write about it on social media.
Can you imagine what would happen if airlines let employees kick passengers off flights every time they complained about poor service, either in person, or online? No public company is going to tolerate that kind of behavior from its employees, whether or not the guy posted on social media, whether or not he named the employee.
I guarantee you SouthWest execs are face-palming over this right now, and preparing memos to their workforce reminding them when it is and isn't appropriate to deny a passenger boarding.
#145
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: UA GOLD MM,WN CP A+list, HH Gold,MR LT Titanium
Posts: 2,184
No one suggested that a 4 year old board alone. The rule is 4 and under for family boarding. Everyone else is free to board together if they wish- at the position of the latest BP.
#147
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AUS
Programs: AA
Posts: 22
It's been reported by the customer that his requests for "early boarding" for his children on previous trips had been accommodated by SWA. Not that I fly SWA much, but I too have been accommodated by SWA with this exact same request when I've flown with my daughter. Whether or not anyone agrees with the customers "ask" is moot. What's important is the retaliation from the SWA agent after he gave negative feedback via twitter. It's despicable. I don't believe the employee should be fired, but coached on how to respond or not respond in the future when faced with similar situations. If these types things are allowed to happen, it may be one us elite FT'ers that gets removed from a plane for no good reason.
#148
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,012
I would rather have a family board before all the seats together are taken. Someone is asked to move to accommodate the family (and the flight will be delayed until it has been accomplished). So, someone with a lower boarding number may eventually end up with a less than optimum seating choice to accommodate.
#149
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: AL
Programs: AA Plat Pro, DL Sil, UA Sil, Hyatt Global, MR Amb, Hilton Diamond, National Exec, Hertz Pres
Posts: 477
No one is saying you can't board together. You can't however use your A-List to take advantage of the situation and cheat out those passengers who are playing by the rules. The rules are there for a reason to stop abuse from spiraling out of control. Just like blue sleeve abuse that was going rampant to the point they had to get rid of them all and go to a different disposable system. If you are worried about being able to all sit together, get EBCI for everyone. However it really isn't that hard and FAs will work with you if there is ever an issue to get everyone together.
There is a simple solution to this. Children 16 and under can board with families during family boarding. Southwest won't do this because they want families to purchase early boarding. That's really why this policy is in place.
#150
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: AL
Programs: AA Plat Pro, DL Sil, UA Sil, Hyatt Global, MR Amb, Hilton Diamond, National Exec, Hertz Pres
Posts: 477
Family boarding only applies when the children are 4 or under. This policy doesn't help a parent with an 8 year old.