Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WN Emergency landing in Yuma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2011, 1:17 am
  #166  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,329
Originally Posted by pinworm
Does an incident cost less than mass grounding, retrofitting etc? Does an incident cost less than FAA fines? What is the bottom line ($$) for WN?
Actually, it was $7.5 millons dollars fines by FAA.
N830MH is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2011, 5:34 pm
  #167  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
It looks like metal fatigue may not have been the problem, after all.

http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/southwe...ry?id=13439507
mke9499 is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2011, 7:24 pm
  #168  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: LAS-DEN
Programs: WN CP & B-list. Disillusioned fmr UA-1P/2P,F9-Ascent; Fmr AA-Plat,CO-Gold,NW-Silver,TWA-Elite
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by mke9499
It looks like metal fatigue may not have been the problem, after all.

http://abcnews.go.com/Travel/southwe...ry?id=13439507
Note that right at the beginning of the video, the aircraft is clearly not a SOUTHWEST aircraft, as it is painted white!

However, if this is true and it was a problem at the time of manufacturering at Boeing, Southwest took a lot of negative press for something that wasn't their fault. Seems to me that they followed every directive and every bit of information given to them from Boeing. Short of contineously testing the airplanes and never flying them, I'm not sure what else they could have done to prevent this.

Some very good pilots to get the plane down with no serious injuries. Always keep your seatbelt fastened while seated!
FCfree is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2011, 5:46 pm
  #169  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Night Vale
Posts: 1,872
Guess SWA needs Angie's List
kerflumexed is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2011, 9:21 pm
  #170  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,329
Originally Posted by kerflumexed
Yep, sure it is. They violated of federal regulations. WN did not have a repairs the 44 737 aircraft. This is ridiculous!! Which is why WN did not have safety inspected all 737 aircrft. They have be more responsibilities for a safety inspecting the entire aircraft. Maintenance guys should have to do repairs the entire aircraft right way. Guessing WN doesn't have a choice to pay $1.1 millions dollars fined to FAA.
N830MH is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2011, 2:44 am
  #171  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by N830MH
Yep, sure it is. They violated of federal regulations. WN did not have a repairs the 44 737 aircraft. This is ridiculous!! Which is why WN did not have safety inspected all 737 aircrft. They have be more responsibilities for a safety inspecting the entire aircraft. Maintenance guys should have to do repairs the entire aircraft right way. Guessing WN doesn't have a choice to pay $1.1 millions dollars fined to FAA.
As the linked article indicates, the proposed $1.1 million fine is for ATS (the maintenance sub-contractor) and not SWA...
OPNLguy is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2011, 2:01 am
  #172  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,329
Originally Posted by OPNLguy
As the linked article indicates, the proposed $1.1 million fine is for ATS (the maintenance sub-contractor) and not SWA...
Oh, right. I didn't realize know that but, it was another companies who got fined and not WN. Nobody who is not their own fault. They should have be more responsibilities to fixed the aircraft. That is why it is not good at all. This is so ridiculous!! I am very embarrassed what happened the incident of ATS.
N830MH is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2013, 10:22 am
  #173  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL, USA
Programs: WN CP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,192
NTSB has released a report blaming shoddy manufacturing for this one:

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/201...or-hole-in-737

"Hans Weber, an aviation technical expert, president of Tecop International in San Diego, said... 'The workmanship was just terrible. This has nothing to do with a typical fatigue fracture due to aging.'

'I'm relieved that it's not because of some aging process we didn't understand,' he added."

Last edited by toomanybooks; Sep 28, 2013 at 10:52 am
toomanybooks is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2013, 7:00 pm
  #174  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Evergreen Park, IL
Posts: 1,384
Originally Posted by weekilter
A Southwest flight from Phoenix to Sacramento was forced to make an emergency landing Friday when a hole opened in the roof. Aviation expert Clive Irving reports on why outsourcing may be a culprit.

Southwest Airlines grounded 81 of its oldest jets Saturday following an alarming emergency last night when the cabin of one of its Boeing 737s was ripped open at 36,000 feet.

The incident, aboard Southwest Airlines Flight 812 is strikingly similar to what happened to Southwest Airlines Flight 2294 in July 2009—only worse.

In both cases there was a sudden loss of cabin pressure as part of the fuselage structure failed. In both cases the pilots had to get the airplane on the ground as fast as possible, making diversions.

And in both cases the airplane involved was the Boeing 737—the only airplane Southwest flies, in a variety of models and ages.

Flight 2294 was en route from Nashville to Baltimore when passengers heard a loud pop and a hole the size of a football appeared in the roof. On Friday night, as Flight 812 was en route from Phoenix to Sacramento, there was a jarring blast and a hole opened up in the roof, far larger than a football.
[/url]
Both flights 812 & 2294 were mentioned in the program "Terror in the Skies" on the Smithsonian channel tonight.
OzzyOzzie is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.