FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Strip Seach Question (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/1226601-strip-seach-question.html)

exbayern Jun 17, 2011 4:44 am


Originally Posted by nco4242 (Post 16567135)
I recently flew to Mexico and on entering security at departure airport FAT was told my bags and clothes tested positive.

This would mean that if it were customs, it would be preclearance for Mexican customs at FAT, correct?

Boggie Dog Jun 17, 2011 5:02 am


Originally Posted by Bart (Post 16575142)
And this was TSA? Not Customs?

Considering what TSA has been done in Newark and Hawaii why would you be surprised?

TheGolfWidow Jun 17, 2011 5:14 am

Does customs generally get involved in resolving security alarms on outbound international flights?

flapping arms Jun 17, 2011 7:53 am


Originally Posted by Bungnoid (Post 16574385)
Whereas if they had left your clothes on but used their magic technology to look through your bra and panties to see what is underneath, that would have been perfectly within their rights and powers.

Could someone please explain this to me?:confused:

In my opinion, TSA is NOT within their rights to use a NoS, or any form of visual / imaging inspection underneath clothing. They assert they are within their powers to do both.


Originally Posted by nco4242 (Post 16574585)
Where were your belongings while this violation was going on? Did they bring them into the room with you or leave them outside? The handbag was handed off to another person and handed back to me as I left, I checked it when it was handed to me and every thing was in order. Well not quite the camera was on but that was it.

Underlining mine to indicate the question that nco4242 is replying to. There is the potential here that the screeners examined the photos in the camera, which is clearly outside their authority to screen only for W/E/I. :td:

PLEASE submit a complaint to DHS, TSA, your Senators and Representative, ACLU, EPIC, etc!

Caradoc Jun 17, 2011 8:08 am


Originally Posted by nco4242 (Post 16574585)
The handbag was handed off to another person and handed back to me as I left, I checked it when it was handed to me and every thing was in order. Well not quite the camera was on but that was it.

Why is the TSA snooping through passengers' cameras?

TheGolfWidow Jun 17, 2011 8:10 am


Originally Posted by Caradoc (Post 16577507)
Why is the TSA snooping through passengers' cameras?

If there was ever a YouTube moment-in-the-making, they were about to have one.

sweeper20 Jun 17, 2011 8:25 am


Originally Posted by Bart (Post 16576653)
Not trying to be defensive here, but I am really curious if this was a Customs inspection because our uniforms are too damn alike.

By the way, for those who don't know, I've always opposed the current TSA uniform. I do not like the LEO-like appearance. I am more for the khaki and pullover appearance because it is more practical, whether working checkpoint or checked baggage. I disagree with the whole notion that metal badges make us more professional, and, having carried a badge for over 20 years, I see a lot of potential problems that come with just having a badge.

At any rate, this would not be the first time that CBP was mistaken for TSA.

Good post - similar AUX and P/T police officers who wear a police uniform and possibly even drive a CVPI... with the only difference being AUX marked somewhere on the car and AUX appearing somewhere on a patch...when a member of the public sees the uniform and the car...and they need assistance, they don't distinguish, they just go to them for help. The problem is many AUX officers are not allowed to carry. I can see how that could happen between CBP and TSA. It is possible that there is confusion here.

Mabuk dan gila Jun 17, 2011 8:26 am


Originally Posted by Caradoc (Post 16577507)
Why is the TSA snooping through passengers' cameras?

If it powers up, it's a camera, not a bomb disguised to look like a camera. That would be the security premise for turning on a camera/laptop/other electronic device.

RichardKenner Jun 17, 2011 8:28 am


Originally Posted by Lara21 (Post 16575913)
What do you think she meant in her oral statement about TSA and strip searches?

Her oral statement sure didn't have a answer of no TSA would not do that to the passengers.

You misunderstand the nature of oral arguments in an appeals court. The questions are very often (as in this case) hypotheticals meant to explore the boundaries of what the advocate perceives to be the law. There's been no posted transcript of the hearing, but knowing the way these arguments work, I'm almost certain you are misinterpreting what was said.

The way I understand the exchange, the court was trying to address the issue of regulatory authority, whether TSA needs to have a formal regulatory process or can just make a change in checkpoint procedures without such a process. TSA was claiming the latter. To explore the boundaries of that, the court asked a question, specifying what everybody understood would be an unacceptable procedure. The TSA's answer was that was no matter what the procedure, they didn't need to go through a formal regulatory process. The discussion there was about the process of changing the procedure, not the acceptability of specific procedures, and indeed the US attorney said that such a procedure would have 4th Amendment issues.

Caradoc Jun 17, 2011 8:28 am


Originally Posted by Mabuk dan gila (Post 16577603)
If it powers up, it's a camera, not a bomb disguised to look like a camera. That would be the security premise for turning on a camera/laptop/other electronic device.

Or so they'd have us believe. Real security personnel make the person carrying it turn it on, not remove the device from the person and take it somewhere else to turn it on.

If they really thought it might be a bomb, why are they playing with it?

t325 Jun 17, 2011 8:40 am


Originally Posted by Bart (Post 16576388)
I'm still not convinced that this was a TSA search. There is nothing in the TSA SOP that requires officers to instruct or force passengers to remove blouses or otherwise strip down to the bra.

With the term "at security" applying loosely, I am curious if this was an inspection by customs. If so, I can't comment because I don't know their procedures.

If it was TSA (and that's a big IF), then I fully agree that the OP has a very legitimate complaint. But I have yet to be convinced that TSOs were involved.

The OP stated this was when being screened for departure at FAT. Since you don't clear customs when departing the US on an international flight, I think it's safe to say with 100% certainty that these actions were performed by TSA smurfs.

DeafBlonde Jun 17, 2011 9:06 am


Originally Posted by t325 (Post 16577668)
The OP stated this was when being screened for departure at FAT. Since you don't clear customs when departing the US on an international flight, I think it's safe to say with 100% certainty that these actions were performed by TSA smurfs.

Bolding mine: Naughty, you! Using the S-word! Mods swooping down on your post in 5....4....3....2... :rolleyes:

DeafBlonde Jun 17, 2011 9:08 am


Originally Posted by Caradoc (Post 16577619)
Or so they'd have us believe. Real security personnel make the person carrying it turn it on, not remove the device from the person and take it somewhere else to turn it on.

If they really thought it might be a bomb, why are they playing with it?

Excellent point! What if turning if turning it on resulted in a detonation...oh, never mind....wishful thinking again! </sarcasm>

Mabuk dan gila Jun 17, 2011 9:08 am


Originally Posted by Caradoc (Post 16577619)
Or so they'd have us believe. Real security personnel make the person carrying it turn it on, not remove the device from the person and take it somewhere else to turn it on.

If they really thought it might be a bomb, why are they playing with it?

Correct. Overseas I have been asked to power up devices by foreign security screeners on a number of occasions. In every case they asked me to power up my device, visually verified it powered up and then asked me to turn it off.

VelvetJones Jun 17, 2011 9:14 am


Originally Posted by Bart (Post 16576388)
I'm still not convinced that this was a TSA search. There is nothing in the TSA SOP that requires officers to instruct or force passengers to remove blouses or otherwise strip down to the bra.

With the term "at security" applying loosely, I am curious if this was an inspection by customs. If so, I can't comment because I don't know their procedures.

If it was TSA (and that's a big IF), then I fully agree that the OP has a very legitimate complaint. But I have yet to be convinced that TSOs were involved.

Nice change of terms Bart. At first you called the OP a liar and said they were never strip-searched, now you claimed they were never strip-searched "by the TSA". Way to go.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.