![]() |
Strip Seach Question
I recently flew to Mexico and on entering security at departure airport FAT was told my bags and clothes tested positive. I was asked to step aside and asked could they go through my handbag. I said yes and they pulled everything in the bag out, which contained only a wallet, Ipod, camera, pen, and car keys and said it all tested positive. I was then escorted into a room and had the strip search after which I was told to wait. I watched them and they ran some kind of rag over everything started up the camera and ran it over the lens, ditto the glass of the Ipod, pen etc. When I asked what it tested positive for I was told the next officer would talk to me. I got redressed, he came in asked where I was going and why, handed me back my bag and said everything was ok. I again asked what it tested positive for and he turned and walked out the door.
So what would make a handbag and clothes test positive? I am just on the sunny side of 70, not into drugs and have used this same small handbag for plane travel for years. |
Strip searched, as in they actually made you take your clothes off? ...? I didn't think even the TSA did that - sounds like grounds for a lawsuit.
|
Originally Posted by nco4242
(Post 16567135)
I recently flew to Mexico and on entering security at departure airport FAT was told my bags and clothes tested positive. I was asked to step aside and asked could they go through my handbag. I said yes and they pulled everything in the bag out, which contained only a wallet, Ipod, camera, pen, and car keys and said it all tested positive. I was then escorted into a room and had the strip search after which I was told to wait. I watched them and they ran some kind of rag over everything started up the camera and ran it over the lens, ditto the glass of the Ipod, pen etc. When I asked what it tested positive for I was told the next officer would talk to me. I got redressed, he came in asked where I was going and why, handed me back my bag and said everything was ok. I again asked what it tested positive for and he turned and walked out the door.
So what would make a handbag and clothes test positive? I am just on the sunny side of 70, not into drugs and have used this same small handbag for plane travel for years. Call a lawyer, contact ACLU and request tapes ASAP from the airport under FOIA. That is so not acceptable! |
Please follow as the thread moves to the Travel Safety and Security forum. Ocn Vw 1K, Moderator, TravelBuzz.
|
Originally Posted by nco4242
(Post 16567135)
I was then escorted into a room and had the strip search after which I was told to wait.
|
OP...I am sorry you had to go through this. It disturbs me deeply that you were coerced into removing your clothing...and clarification on that would be of interest to many here, as most of us would refuse to go into a private room with the TSA without a witness of our choosing.
It is also odd that you never got an explanation, or apparently, an apology for this treatment. (Making sure this thread stays on the first page a while longer, so maybe someone could answer your questions, or provide any further info on who to report this to, because it should be reported.) |
Had you taken/handled/packed any nitroglycerin for angina? That is one possibility. Glycerin lotions are another possibility.
I'm still trying to digest the part where you made to remove your clothing.... |
Fresno airport..
On American soil and they didn't tell you why, how and where? |
This is mind-bogglingly unusual for FAT where the TSOs are normally among the most friendly and laid back of any I have experienced. FAT is my home airport and I pass through many times per year.
I too would love to know what the false positive was for. |
Originally Posted by abmj-jr
(Post 16569654)
This is mind-bogglingly unusual for FAT where the smurfs are normally among the most friendly and laid back of any I have experienced. FAT is my home airport and I pass through many times per year.
I too would love to know what the false positive was for. and the secrecy is sometimes their policy in all fairness.. But OBL is dead now.. TSA could change the way they conduct security checks post terror era.. |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16569662)
and the secrecy is sometimes their policy in all fairness.. But OBL is dead now.. TSA could change the way they conduct security checks post terror era..
If you hold your breath waiting for the TSA to change for the better from within, you'll probably end up the same color as their uniforms. |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 16569669)
Secret rules and intrusive searches are not something any reasonable person should tolerate in a so-called free society.
If you hold your breath waiting for the TSA to change for the better from within, you'll probably end up the same color as their uniforms. The law isn't perfect.. so hopefully the Obama administration can affect some changes with TSA |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16569676)
The law isn't perfect.. so hopefully the Obama administration can affect some changes with TSA
The OP's post is prima facie evidence of this. |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 16569695)
The only acceptable change for the TSA is 100% de-funding. Disband it. It's a failed experiment, and has done nothing but waste time and money allowing untrained thugs to perform security theatre to show the sheeple how much their government "cares" about them.
The OP's post is prima facie evidence of this. A total invasion of privacy.. but our family wants to vacation in the US.. so yes.. 100% in agreement.. but don't see this happening anytime soon.. |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16569662)
Must have been enough of a reason for the TSA to proceed with due diligence..
and the secrecy is sometimes their policy in all fairness.. But OBL is dead now.. TSA could change the way they conduct security checks post terror era.. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:00 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.