Those of you who don't mind nude scans -- where DO you draw the line?
#181
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: FLL
Posts: 393
I don't think this is an argument about nudity. For some people it is and for those that think that those people are being prudish they feel that someones idea of modesty and the intrusion on that is a small price to pay for "saving lives".
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
#182
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
I don't think this is an argument about nudity. For some people it is and for those that think that those people are being prudish they feel that someones idea of modesty and the intrusion on that is a small price to pay for "saving lives".
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
Although it might be against TOS, I would urge the mods to post this in its own thread this 4th of July weekend.
#183
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
I don't think this is an argument about nudity. For some people it is and for those that think that those people are being prudish they feel that someones idea of modesty and the intrusion on that is a small price to pay for "saving lives".
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
This is what has begun to disgust me about humanity
We live as though our lives are the be all and end all. That life is more important than anything else in the world.
My problems with these scanners is the same problem I have with the Patroit act or with that measure that was/is trying to be pushed through congress that would make government backed spyware on every home computer being installed the law.
WHERE does one draw the line? What happened to living free? What happened to preserving one's principles and not just one's life?
Our forefathers (it's approaching July 4th, so lets think about this) were willing to and did sacrifice their lives so that we might live on principles and not in fear. And right now the hysterics of our government for years now have incited us to greater levels of fear where we are made to believe that by sacrificing our rights, liberties, etc will keep us safe... will keep us alive.
And the more we sacrifice little by little the more we will be willing to later and there will always be someone out there who will be willing to take advantage of that.
I know it sounds crazy conspiracy theorist, but the argument is viable and valid.
As far as the airport scanners go, I'm concerned about the radiation especially where there are some out there who say it can unzip... DNA or RNA... I think it was RNA that I read. Anyway, even if it was proven to be safe I would still have a problem with it. It goes way beyond the modesty issue, to me it's simply too much. The line has to be drawn somewhere otherwise we will give more and more until we have only our lives.
I would much rather live a life on principle than simply live to live. Of course, I might be weird.
Being half-Polish, I know that my family and other Polish families didn't hesitate to sacrifice 20% of their population rather than submit to the Nazis. When Americans are willing to lose 60 million of their population rather than endure the WBI, gate searches, secret warrants, "renditions," Guantanamo, the Patriot Act, the DHS, the TSA and all the rest of it, then Al-Qaeda will have lost the battle, and not before. Right now, they are pumping their fists in the air in victory with every bottle of water confiscated, and every dollar spent on the WBI.
#185
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Yes, well, as I've said here many times -- we need to decide if we want to be a society that is willing to sacrifice a few lives in order to preserve its freedoms, or one that is to willing to sacrifice its freedoms in order to save a few lives.
#186
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,050
#187
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
We are not freer than we have ever been. Our nation at its founding set out with principles that provided liberty for its citizens. Was the implementation perfect? Of course not. Institutions set up by men are always affected by the limitations and imperfections of the people involved. It was established to provide a framework for liberty that has at times been successful and at times have not.
We have abandoned and forfeited many of those liberties:
We have accepted restrictions on political speech before an election.
We allow the government to actively determine the limits of religious expression.
We have accepted restriction on self-defense in the name of safety.
We have accepted that government can take our property without compensation for safety.
We have accepted that our government can forcibly take our property for a non-public use.
We allow ourselves to not be secure in our persons, papers and effects without a warrant in the name of safety.
We can not grow food for our own consumption or the consumption of our livestock without government permission.
We can not drain or fill a pond fully contained on our own property without government permission.
We can not enter into a private business agreements or exchanges with others persons without government oversight and permission.
We can not choose to hire labor that is most profitable for our business at market rates.
We can not sell our labor to private employers without government control of wage and hours.
We can not choose to purchase individual policies of insurance for our property, life or health without government control.
The Declaration of Independence and its passing is celebrated tomorrow. It famously noted for the phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This goal was the hoped effect of implementation of the the Constitution of the United States. But the real reason for the Declaration was to throw off the bonds of tyrannical government. I suggest that a rereading is in order as many of the charges leveled against the king, have parallels today. If you are interested, it is here.
Last edited by InkUnderNails; Jul 3, 2010 at 7:52 am Reason: Why is it I can not proof read before hitting save?
#188
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 966
I didn't spend 6 years in the Navy, including multiple visits to the Persian Gulf on an aircraft carrier, so that DHS could install kiddie-porn generators in the airports. And you could wire the graves of the Founding Fathers and satisfy the power needs of the country, they're spinning so hard.
No, LAF - it's *NEVER* enough.
#189
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
I have thought about this long and hard. I have made a conscious decision that I will sacrifice my comfort, my time and my wealth and even put my life at risk to protect the liberties that others have sacrificed to preserve. I may never be asked to make that ultimate sacrifice, but I have prepared myself for the time if it should come. If others want to voluntarily join me, that is fine. I am not sacrificing others lives.
We are not freer than we have ever been. Our nation at its founding set out with principles that provided liberty for its citizens. Was the implementation perfect? Of course not. Institutions set up by men are always affected by the limitations and imperfections of the people involved. It was established to provide a framework for liberty that has at times been successful and at times have not.
We have abandoned and forfeited many of those liberties:
We have accepted restrictions on political speech before an election.
We allow the government to actively determine the limits of religious expression.
We have accepted restriction on self-defense in the name of safety.
We have accepted that government can take our property without compensation for safety.
We have accepted that our government can forcibly take our property for a non-public use.
We allow ourselves to not be secure in our persons, papers and effects without a warrant in the name of safety.
We can not grow food for our own consumption or the consumption of our livestock without government permission.
We can not drain or fill a pond fully contained on our own property without government permission.
We can not enter into a private business agreements or exchanges with others persons without government oversight and permission.
We can not choose to hire labor that is most profitable for our business at market rates.
We can not sell our labor to private employers without government control of wage and hours.
We can not choose to purchase individual policies of insurance for our property, life or health without government control.
The Declaration of Independence and its passing is celebrated tomorrow. It famously noted for the phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This goal was the hoped effect of implementation of the the Constitution of the United States. But the real reason for the Declaration was to throw off the bonds of tyrannical government. I suggest that a rereading is in order as many of the charges leveled against the king, have parallels today. If you are interested, it is here.
We are not freer than we have ever been. Our nation at its founding set out with principles that provided liberty for its citizens. Was the implementation perfect? Of course not. Institutions set up by men are always affected by the limitations and imperfections of the people involved. It was established to provide a framework for liberty that has at times been successful and at times have not.
We have abandoned and forfeited many of those liberties:
We have accepted restrictions on political speech before an election.
We allow the government to actively determine the limits of religious expression.
We have accepted restriction on self-defense in the name of safety.
We have accepted that government can take our property without compensation for safety.
We have accepted that our government can forcibly take our property for a non-public use.
We allow ourselves to not be secure in our persons, papers and effects without a warrant in the name of safety.
We can not grow food for our own consumption or the consumption of our livestock without government permission.
We can not drain or fill a pond fully contained on our own property without government permission.
We can not enter into a private business agreements or exchanges with others persons without government oversight and permission.
We can not choose to hire labor that is most profitable for our business at market rates.
We can not sell our labor to private employers without government control of wage and hours.
We can not choose to purchase individual policies of insurance for our property, life or health without government control.
The Declaration of Independence and its passing is celebrated tomorrow. It famously noted for the phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This goal was the hoped effect of implementation of the the Constitution of the United States. But the real reason for the Declaration was to throw off the bonds of tyrannical government. I suggest that a rereading is in order as many of the charges leveled against the king, have parallels today. If you are interested, it is here.
Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Jul 3, 2010 at 2:44 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
#190
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Oh, and I want my Jarts back, too.
Somewhere in that era the government decided it had to protect us from everything, even our own judgement. That mentality has led us to where we are today with airport security.
#191
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
BA, in FIRST, hands out lovely PJs to the passengers. As soon as possible after boarding, I disrobe, put on my supplied PJs, deploy the fully flat bed, and nosh all the way over the pond.
If -properly- run, the TSA should be providing the PJs, fully flat beds, champers and personal service that we, as citizens, deserve.
A properly deployed National Butler Service would discreetly pack away any offending items, then deliver them unharmed at the destination.
I fear that you will never in your life understand just how sad this post is.
Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Jul 3, 2010 at 9:12 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts