Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Malaysia Airlines | Enrich
Reload this Page >

MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Wikipost is Locked  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 3:08 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
PLEASE READ FIRST: WELCOME and MODERATOR NOTE

Welcome to the MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk!
Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel.

All travelers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.
We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, perhaps the most useful one is:

Respect our Diversity - link to this guideline

FlyerTalk members come from all walks of life and all parts of the world. We are as diverse in our makeup as we are alike in our passion for frequent flyer programs. Because we all bring a unique perspective to the forum, our collective experience is broadened, and we gain new insights.

Our diversity demands that we respect each other. Due to the inherent constraints of the Internet, humor, sarcasm, language and slang can be easily misinterpreted - especially when crossing cultural boundaries.

When posting a message, pay extra care to how it might be interpreted. And when you come across a post that offends you, read it with an eye toward giving the poster the benefit of the doubt.

If you have an issue with a post, please contact the member privately or contact a moderator (click on the button). Do not make a situation worse by publicly responding.
MORE about the MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

In order to a) keep the original thread focused on confirmed news and known facts, and b) allow folks a place to discuss their ideas about what might have happened, the MH370 moderators and Community Director have decided to open this thread.

Here are the expectations:

1. The normal FT TOS apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.

2. You are expected respect our diversity , and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.

3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions that could well be hurtful.

4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously, information that has been posted in the News thread wiki or FAQ, may be deleted.
E.g. the aircraft was vaporized.

In terms of housekeeping, posts may get moved from the "news" thread if and as needed, and posts that do not conform to these simple expectations, above, will be deleted.

Also note: this wiki is locked; changes can only be made by moderators.

Thank you.

Your MH370 Moderation Team
aBroadAbroad; cblaisd; JDiver; l'etoile; NewbieRunner; oliver2002; Prospero
and Community Director
SanDiego1K
Print Wikipost

MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2014, 1:09 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: iad/dca
Programs: UA Million Mile Gold, Club, AA, Delta, Marriott, Hertz G, A/Club
Posts: 1,106
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...y.html?hpid=z2 Conflict over search for missing Malaysia Airlines plane reflects regional tensions
iquitos is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 1:13 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 15
That Tomnod image above is located here:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/...!3m1!1s0x0:0x0

http://www.tomnod.com/nod/api/malays...014/map/637975


There is a trick for converting from a map number to latitude and longitude. In the link in your browser location bar, change the word 'challenge' to 'api', and hit enter. You'll get an error message from the tomnod site with the latitude and longitude of the image tile you were looking at.
boler is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 1:31 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Programs: UA 1K, AA Exec Plat, Marriott Plat, Hertz Pres
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
This Tomnod image is being bandied about on PPRuNe.

http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...014/map/637975
If the scale on tomnod is accurate, that aircraft is too small to be a 777, looks to be right around 40m in length... A320? 321? 737

Certainly interesting to see though
Tech1 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 1:49 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: BOS/MAN
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 168
Originally Posted by Tech1
If the scale on tomnod is accurate, that aircraft is too small to be a 777, looks to be right around 40m in length... A320? 321? 737

Certainly interesting to see though
Definitely not a 777, I'd put my money on a 737 judging by the shape.
ObscuredByClouds is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 2:04 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: iad/dca
Programs: UA Million Mile Gold, Club, AA, Delta, Marriott, Hertz G, A/Club
Posts: 1,106
Malaysians not cooperating with US on possible terrorist involvement. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/17/wo...e-help.html?hp
iquitos is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 2:13 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WSSS/RCTP
Programs: SQ KF, A3 Gold, CI Dynasty, UA MileagePlus, ANA AMC, HH Gold, M&C Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 317
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
This Tomnod image is being bandied about on PPRuNe.

http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...014/map/637975
It looks kinda stubby. Like an A300 or A310.
RCTP is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 2:33 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: DL SkyClub Lifer
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by alanstarr
It is impossible for the plane to fly without going through at least either one of Thai or Indo airspace.
There's a difference between "it didn't go through our airspace" and "we didn't see it go through our airspace." Unless you're pretty sure of the first, it's safer to say the second, even if it makes it sound like your radar operators are incompetent.

Originally Posted by alanstarr
If this went to the north, all the country's will hang their head in shame.
Well, given how many countries' radar or other sensors have either failed to see it, or seen it where it wasn't, it's already been an embarrassment to at least Malaysia, Vietnam and China - the more, the merrier!

Last edited by aBroadAbroad; Mar 17, 2014 at 9:39 am Reason: Edited quote for earlier redaction
DanTravels is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 4:21 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold, Marriott Rewards Platinum, HHonors Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 1,385
Originally Posted by Himeno
They also rejected media claims that the FBI wasn't being allowed in to assist with the investigation.
But these are not just "media claims." Rather allegations from Rep. Peter King, of the House Select Committee on Intelligence, and by the FBI itself.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...572_print.html
spainflyer is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 4:22 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 141
The thing no-one seems to have seriously considered (in public at least), is that if the 'plan' did work and the plane is sat on the ground somewhere, then the perpetrators are definitely watching all the conferences and following the developments as well!
GreatBritishBAECOff is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 4:27 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 15
Can't believe no one in the press conference asked about the 50 'blocked' seats and the details of the cargo manifest!
boler is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 4:31 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by boler
Can't believe no one in the press conference asked about the 50 'blocked' seats and the details of the cargo manifest!
Maybe the media can't think of questions like that. Find contact details for a media rep in KUL and 'suggest' the question to them?
Himeno is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 5:13 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: GLA
Posts: 1,214
Cargo apparently was 3-4 tons of mangosteens. Hard to see why they would block off 50 seats for that, surely the seats would be worth more?

http://news.malaysia.msn.com/malaysi...ys-airline-ceo
giblet is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 5:14 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 83
Can't speak for the credibility but check it out (picked up from IBT): Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 ‘Cyber Hijack’ Theory Emerges
Joe Schoomer is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 5:20 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Programs: Miles & More, Amex
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by giblet
Cargo apparently was 3-4 tons of mangosteens. Hard to see why they would block off 50 seats for that, surely the seats would be worth more?

http://news.malaysia.msn.com/malaysi...ys-airline-ceo
These 3-4 tons are not that heavy that it would explain the 50 blocked seats.
Scrooge McDuck is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 5:26 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 81
Personally, I feel the scariest thing would be if the pilot knew that SATCOM still communicates when ACARS is taken offline. This was a fact that I assume none of us here knew about, and neither did MAS seem aware of it. Tracking the SATCOM signal to locate the plane was also unorthodox thinking, not conventional thinking.

Imagine if Satcom was offline. We would NOT know the plane was still either flying or landed safely at 8.11am, AND we would not have known it's possible last point of flight.

Already, it seems like a monumental feat on the part of the pilot/perpetrator, but I shudder to think where we'd be headed if the SATCOM thing was known beforehand.
alanstarr is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.