RTQ Validator URL not working - anyone else able to use it?
#16




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Viajero
Until hauteboy's great tool is back online, if you are stuck with a flight you -know- exists, but the validator rejects it, here's a workaround.
Say you want to check a RTW that includes DFW-ANC. Now, because DFW-ANC is a seasonal flight, and the tool is currently "stuck" at a time of the year when that flight was not available, you too are stuck, until the tool is finally updated. You can substitute DFW-ANC with a dummy segment, but that is not very satisfactory.
So, here's what you do, with apologies to the software author for taking the liberty of semi-hacking his work:
0. Make a backup copy of flights.js
1. Open flights.js with a text editor (Notepad will do).
2. Find a really weird city pair, one you know you will never ever use.
3. *Carefully* replace the original city pair with the new city pair.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for each new flight you want to introduce.
Save the file and run the tool. Presto! you have now *created* new flights and can go on using the tool.
Say you want to check a RTW that includes DFW-ANC. Now, because DFW-ANC is a seasonal flight, and the tool is currently "stuck" at a time of the year when that flight was not available, you too are stuck, until the tool is finally updated. You can substitute DFW-ANC with a dummy segment, but that is not very satisfactory.
So, here's what you do, with apologies to the software author for taking the liberty of semi-hacking his work:
0. Make a backup copy of flights.js
1. Open flights.js with a text editor (Notepad will do).
2. Find a really weird city pair, one you know you will never ever use.
3. *Carefully* replace the original city pair with the new city pair.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for each new flight you want to introduce.
Save the file and run the tool. Presto! you have now *created* new flights and can go on using the tool.
Note that you don't actually need to overwrite an existing city pair, just create a new entry.
#17




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by hauteboy
Thanks for the hosting SLF! I still haven't had a chance to get this working again, and I will need a new host site (hopefully one that has a backup!)
No worries on modifying the flights.js; I autogenerated this from the PDF schedules and sometimes forget to put in some of the seasonal flights.
The javascript files are pretty easy to modify to add new rules/fares/etc.
No worries on modifying the flights.js; I autogenerated this from the PDF schedules and sometimes forget to put in some of the seasonal flights.
The javascript files are pretty easy to modify to add new rules/fares/etc.
If anyone knows of other things missing or wrong, please post them in this thread and I'll update the "0.95" version.
#18




Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: QF Gold, SQ, AA, HA
Posts: 126
Originally Posted by SLF
If anyone knows of other things missing or wrong, please post them in this thread and I'll update the "0.95" version.
Last edited by mrboh; Jul 17, 2006 at 11:45 am
#19
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by SLF
...Note that you don't actually need to overwrite an existing city pair, just create a new entry.
#20




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by mrboh
One sector which never actually made hauteboy's database was the seasonal SCL-USH and vv. flight on LAN, it only operates in the summer when Antarctic cruises are leaving from Ushuaia but I see no reason why it would not be valid for xONEx tickets. I have also flown SCL-LPB and vv. on LAN; the flight operates via ARI and IQQ (which are in the database) but the full sector does not appear to be included. Again, as far as I'm aware this is a valid xONEx flight.
#21
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 540
Lan Peru's GRU-LIM and vice versa flights i don't think have ever been loaded onto the system. Are definitely valid as i'm ticketed to fly them in the next few months.
Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.
Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.
Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?
Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.
Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.
Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?
Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
#22
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by sdorling
...Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
#23




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by sdorling
Lan Peru's GRU-LIM and vice versa flights i don't think have ever been loaded onto the system. Are definitely valid as i'm ticketed to fly them in the next few months.
Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.
Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.
Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?
Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.
Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.
Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?
Note that there is a flag field associated with each flights entry. It doesn't seem to be used, but I'm guessing it defines which airlines fly each route. So, I've been ignoring this field as I don't know whether it is important!
Originally Posted by sdorling
Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
#24




Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 7,019
LAX-GRU and vv is missing. Thanks.
Also, anyway to allow a transit through NA when going SA to Asia, SWP, or Europe after you have already left NA? For example, LAX-SCL-EZE-jfk-HKG. I think there is a similar rule for a transit through Asia as well.
Also, anyway to allow a transit through NA when going SA to Asia, SWP, or Europe after you have already left NA? For example, LAX-SCL-EZE-jfk-HKG. I think there is a similar rule for a transit through Asia as well.
Last edited by skunker; Jul 17, 2006 at 1:25 pm
#25




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by skunker
LAX-GRU and vv is missing. Thanks.
Originally Posted by skunker
Also, anyway to allow a transit through NA when going SA to Asia, SWP, or Europe after you have already left NA? For example, LAX-SCL-EZE-jfk-HKG. I think there is a similar rule for a transit through Asia as well.
#26
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MEL
Posts: 398
Sat-lax
Error!!! No oneworld service exists SAT-LAX
Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
#27
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Melbourne, FL
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 263
Thanks
Originally Posted by SLF
I've created a "0.95" version on the same website. Into this, I've added the aforementioned DFW-ANC (which is one of a few changes so far - see the tool). So the 0.95 version will now accept DFW-ANC (& back) as valid.
#28




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by under the clocks
Error!!! No oneworld service exists SAT-LAX
Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
#29
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Another flight missing: LAX <-> SJO [seasonal]
#30




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Viajero
Another flight missing: LAX <-> SJO [seasonal]

