Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

RTQ Validator URL not working - anyone else able to use it?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

RTQ Validator URL not working - anyone else able to use it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:11 am
  #16  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Viajero
Until hauteboy's great tool is back online, if you are stuck with a flight you -know- exists, but the validator rejects it, here's a workaround.

Say you want to check a RTW that includes DFW-ANC. Now, because DFW-ANC is a seasonal flight, and the tool is currently "stuck" at a time of the year when that flight was not available, you too are stuck, until the tool is finally updated. You can substitute DFW-ANC with a dummy segment, but that is not very satisfactory.

So, here's what you do, with apologies to the software author for taking the liberty of semi-hacking his work:

0. Make a backup copy of flights.js
1. Open flights.js with a text editor (Notepad will do).
2. Find a really weird city pair, one you know you will never ever use.
3. *Carefully* replace the original city pair with the new city pair.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for each new flight you want to introduce.

Save the file and run the tool. Presto! you have now *created* new flights and can go on using the tool.
Great Note that you don't actually need to overwrite an existing city pair, just create a new entry.
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:25 am
  #17  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by hauteboy
Thanks for the hosting SLF! I still haven't had a chance to get this working again, and I will need a new host site (hopefully one that has a backup!)

No worries on modifying the flights.js; I autogenerated this from the PDF schedules and sometimes forget to put in some of the seasonal flights.

The javascript files are pretty easy to modify to add new rules/fares/etc.
I've created a "0.95" version on the same website. Into this, I've added the aforementioned DFW-ANC (which is one of a few changes so far - see the tool). So the 0.95 version will now accept DFW-ANC (& back) as valid.

If anyone knows of other things missing or wrong, please post them in this thread and I'll update the "0.95" version.
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:38 am
  #18  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: QF Gold, SQ, AA, HA
Posts: 126
Originally Posted by SLF
If anyone knows of other things missing or wrong, please post them in this thread and I'll update the "0.95" version.
One sector which never actually made hauteboy's database was the seasonal SCL-USH and vv. flight on LAN, it only operates in the summer when Antarctic cruises are leaving from Ushuaia but I see no reason why it would not be valid for xONEx tickets. I have also flown SCL-LPB and vv. on LAN; the flight operates via ARI and IQQ (which are in the database) but the full sector does not appear to be included. Again, as far as I'm aware this is a valid xONEx flight.

Last edited by mrboh; Jul 17, 2006 at 11:45 am
mrboh is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:48 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by SLF
...Note that you don't actually need to overwrite an existing city pair, just create a new entry.
I know, but I thought the KISS approach would work better in this case, at least for people with 10 thumbs, like me.
Viajero is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:34 pm
  #20  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by mrboh
One sector which never actually made hauteboy's database was the seasonal SCL-USH and vv. flight on LAN, it only operates in the summer when Antarctic cruises are leaving from Ushuaia but I see no reason why it would not be valid for xONEx tickets. I have also flown SCL-LPB and vv. on LAN; the flight operates via ARI and IQQ (which are in the database) but the full sector does not appear to be included. Again, as far as I'm aware this is a valid xONEx flight.
Thanks - added (hopefully). Be sure to refresh the page; shift-refresh usually does the trick. You should see the new updates listed near the top of the page.
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:41 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 540
Lan Peru's GRU-LIM and vice versa flights i don't think have ever been loaded onto the system. Are definitely valid as i'm ticketed to fly them in the next few months.

Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.

Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.

Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?

Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
sdorling is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:59 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by sdorling
...Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
The problem with this, in my view, is one of onwership. Changing the data (flights, etc.) is one thing, but changing the logic of the code invades, IMO, an area that rightly belongs only to the author. I would therefore respectfully suggest the code is not changed, unless, of course, the author puts it into the public domain; then we are free to hack it to death.
Viajero is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 1:07 pm
  #23  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by sdorling
Lan Peru's GRU-LIM and vice versa flights i don't think have ever been loaded onto the system. Are definitely valid as i'm ticketed to fly them in the next few months.

Also QF's SFO-YVR segment of their SYD-SFO-YVR service, seasonal i know, but i guess it's still a valid flight nonetheless.

Oh and BA's LGW-KEF service is not there.

Would it be worth adding JNB-MRU given the segment is now in the timetables?
All added, thanks.

Note that there is a flag field associated with each flights entry. It doesn't seem to be used, but I'm guessing it defines which airlines fly each route. So, I've been ignoring this field as I don't know whether it is important!

Originally Posted by sdorling
Forgive me for what maybe an ignorant comment, but would it feasible to enable a 'seasonal' message next to flights when validating the routing?
Ahh. Now that's most definitely entering the realms of hauteboy territory. Sure, everything's feasible...
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 1:13 pm
  #24  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 7,017
LAX-GRU and vv is missing. Thanks.

Also, anyway to allow a transit through NA when going SA to Asia, SWP, or Europe after you have already left NA? For example, LAX-SCL-EZE-jfk-HKG. I think there is a similar rule for a transit through Asia as well.

Last edited by skunker; Jul 17, 2006 at 1:25 pm
skunker is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 1:38 pm
  #25  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by skunker
LAX-GRU and vv is missing. Thanks.
Added
Originally Posted by skunker
Also, anyway to allow a transit through NA when going SA to Asia, SWP, or Europe after you have already left NA? For example, LAX-SCL-EZE-jfk-HKG. I think there is a similar rule for a transit through Asia as well.
That's probably beyond what I'm prepared to/can easily do. If someone else figures it out and tells me what needs changing, that'll work for me.
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 4:34 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MEL
Posts: 398
Sat-lax

Error!!! No oneworld service exists SAT-LAX

Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
under the clocks is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 7:13 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Melbourne, FL
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 263
Thanks

Originally Posted by SLF
I've created a "0.95" version on the same website. Into this, I've added the aforementioned DFW-ANC (which is one of a few changes so far - see the tool). So the 0.95 version will now accept DFW-ANC (& back) as valid.
Thanks for your efforts.
rogodwin is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:54 pm
  #28  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by under the clocks
Error!!! No oneworld service exists SAT-LAX

Yes it does, and LAX-SAT exisits as well, both on AA. Another one to be updated.
Added, thanks.
SLF is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 5:03 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Another flight missing: LAX <-> SJO [seasonal]
Viajero is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 7:45 am
  #30  
SLF
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Viajero
Another flight missing: LAX <-> SJO [seasonal]
I'm not doubting you, but I don't see that in the OW timetable
SLF is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.