![]() |
Originally Posted by Gig103
(Post 31147038)
I'm sort of thinking about booking an RTW starting in south america (getting there on points). My first leg would be to the USA (home), then a few legs inside the USA before going to Europe, then HKG, then back to south america. The last leg is CX HKG-LAX-EZE.
Now to the question - I know on regular tickets folks sometimes 'miss the last leg' for hidden city pricing on regular tickets. Is it the same with the last leg of an RTW? Basically if I got off in LAX and took a non-oneworld ticket to my home would it be likely to run into problems for not completing an RTW itinerary? |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 31147224)
No, not likely (unless you did it frequently). But given that you have a year from first flight to last, another option would be to book it as an extended stop in LAX, with LAX-EZE many months out. Then you can use it the outbound of a different trip to EZE (or somewhere else), with miles or a cheap ticket back.
|
Originally Posted by Gig103
(Post 31147292)
Thanks. Unfortunately my first leg (beginning of 2020) is going to be EZE-USA, so I don't think I can book a second stopover in LAX at the end of 2020. The system on a dummy booking seemed to be okay with it as a connection city though.
There used to be additional restrictions on this, but not in the current version of the rules. There is a restriction for travel originating in the U.S., but that doesn't apply to your itinerary. |
Originally Posted by Gig103
(Post 31147038)
Basically if I got off in LAX and took a non-oneworld ticket to my home would it be likely to run into problems for not completing an RTW itinerary?
Remember, one of the things you can do is to schedule that last leg really far out into the future. Who knows, -- maybe you'll have occasion to use it at some point before the ticket expires. You'll be able to change the date, time, airline and flight number of that last leg without charge any time before you fly it (assuming, of course, that the inventory is available). I'm not doing that this time because no changes are permitted on my ticket. |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31147808)
It's extremely unlikely; and I've never heard of any airline doing this on a RTW ticket. I'd put the chances at less than one in a million. However, it will be extremely costly if they do. They have the legal right to recalculate your fare as the sum of the fares for one way flights for everything you flew.
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31147808)
Remember, one of the things you can do is to schedule that last leg really far out into the future.
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 31147874)
As I wrote, this is not likely. However, in the unlikely event an airline did go after someone for no-showing on the last leg, The appropriate penalty would be the no-show fee of $125. (Recalculating the fare as the sum of the fares for the flown segments is the process for a cancellation and refund of a partially flown itinerary.)
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31148102)
Maybe. If your ticket still ends in the continent of origin, you have satisfied the rules for eligibility for the fare, and there should be no penalty. However, if your last flight is intercontinental, it's possible that you did not fulfill the fare's requirements, and, based on what you actually flew, may have been ineligible for the fare to start with. In that case, it seems to me that since you're not eligible for the xONEx fare, what's the alternative?
VOLUNTARY REFUNDS (Resolution 737)Voluntary refunds will be computed as follows: [..] 3.1.2 if a portion of a ticket has been used, refund will be made in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the fare paid and the applicable fare for travel between the points for which the ticket has been used, less any applicable service charge and communication expenses. No suggestion that the passenger can somehow be liable to pay for not using a flight coupon, i.e., that an open flight coupon could have a negative monetary value. (It's also not clear to me that a sum of one way fares will always be a valid way of calculating a cost of an itinerary. Several carriers no longer allow their fares to be used end-on-end in an unrestricted way.) |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31154752)
... the difference, if any, between the fare paid and the applicable fare for travel between the points for which the ticket has been used
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31154752)
Several carriers no longer allow their fares to be used end-on-end in an unrestricted way.
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31155429)
But isn't that exactly what this says? Not that unused coupons have a negative flight value, but that you calculate what the fare would have been for the flight coupons used. Even looking at the cheapest possible fare, it's still going to be more than an xONEx fare.
I also think this discussion is a bit academic as the are no reports here on FT (or elsewhere AFAIK) of anyone ever been charged by an airline for an unused xONEx segment. I myself have dropped the last flight many times and never had any issue with it. |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31154752)
This is a refund after departure.
VOLUNTARY REFUNDS (Resolution 737)Voluntary refunds will be computed as follows: [..] 3.1.2 if a portion of a ticket has been used, refund will be made in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the fare paid and the applicable fare for travel between the points for which the ticket has been used, less any applicable service charge and communication expenses. No suggestion that the passenger can somehow be liable to pay for not using a flight coupon, i.e., that an open flight coupon could have a negative monetary value. (It's also not clear to me that a sum of one way fares will always be a valid way of calculating a cost of an itinerary. Several carriers no longer allow their fares to be used end-on-end in an unrestricted way.) 16(b).3 For partially used transportation the refund if any will be the difference between the fare paid and the fare for the transportation used less the fee specified in (1) above. Now, before anyone jumps down my throat about being overly legalistic, two points: 1. Yes, it's a legalistic argument. But when we get into Ts & Cs, we're talking legalities anyway, so we need to consider them. 2. To my knowledge, no airline has ever tried to make an additional collection on one of these tickets. If anyone has been in this situation where the fare used was less than the fare paid, I'd love to hear how it was handled. Was there a refund? Did you request it? Did you just no-show the remaining segments? Please let us know! |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31154752)
(It's also not clear to me that a sum of one way fares will always be a valid way of calculating a cost of an itinerary. Several carriers no longer allow their fares to be used end-on-end in an unrestricted way.)
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 31156334)
If the fare for the transportation used exceeds the fare paid, then there would (could?) be a negative refund, -- an additional collection.
There are the cases in the US of frequent hidden city ticketing abusers receiving invoices or suspension of their FF programme membership, and of BA sending debit memos to travel agents who have issued ex-EU tickets of which the last leg regularly gets thrown away, but I'm not aware of any such invoices/ADMs for partially used RTWs. Bear in mind that the RTW is valid for a year and has a nosho fee; the last coupon could hypothetically still be used up to max validity, so any audit would have to wait until after the ticket had expired. There are also many other ticket types that often have unused coupons left, and nothing happens with those. I'm sure if airlines saw systemic abuse of the fares then they'd act, like with the examples I gave. OtherwiseI think it just looks like common usage/abandonment. |
Just to confirm, the last leg has to be taken within 12 months of the date of departure from the origin, not from the date of ticketing, correct?
|
Originally Posted by andreiz
(Post 31205382)
Just to confirm, the last leg has to be taken within 12 months of the date of departure from the origin, not from the date of ticketing, correct?
|
Originally Posted by andreiz
(Post 31205382)
Just to confirm, the last leg has to be taken within 12 months of the date of departure from the origin, not from the date of ticketing, correct?
Originally Posted by R2
(Post 31205461)
Yes. This means it could be up to 24 months from the date of ticketing.
7. MAXIMUM STAY Return travel from the last stopover point must commence no later than 12 months after departure.
|
Should somebody update the wiki at the beginning of this thread? (I could help.) It lists airlines that don't exist anymore, doesn't list airlines that are now OW carriers, and contains a number of factual errors (i.e. it says if yours is a D ticket and there's no business class on a flight, you get downgraded to L, whereas in reality you get downgraded to B, which makes a difference). There are also a few obsolete links in the wiki.
|
Originally Posted by AlreadyThere
(Post 31232873)
Should somebody update the wiki at the beginning of this thread? (I could help.) It lists airlines that don't exist anymore, doesn't list airlines that are now OW carriers, and contains a number of factual errors (i.e. it says if yours is a D ticket and there's no business class on a flight, you get downgraded to L, whereas in reality you get downgraded to B, which makes a difference). There are also a few obsolete links in the wiki.
Anyone with 90 posts on FT can edit a wiki |
Hi everyone, I'm sure this is answered in other places but I couldn't find it. My last OWE RTW trip was 2006-7 and at the time there was a website/chart that showed how much an Economy OWE would cost in various currencies. For example, I live in the US but might fly to, say, Egypt to purchase and start my ticket if it was significantly less. Does anyone know if that data still exists? Many thanks!
|
Originally Posted by wsheldon
(Post 31313186)
Hi everyone, I'm sure this is answered in other places but I couldn't find it. My last OWE RTW trip was 2006-7 and at the time there was a website/chart that showed how much an Economy OWE would cost in various currencies. For example, I live in the US but might fly to, say, Egypt to purchase and start my ticket if it was significantly less. Does anyone know if that data still exists? Many thanks!
OR, a painful way is to plug in your itinerary on the "oneworld" web site, follow it all the way to pricing. As for the ex-CAI RTW, I am afraid that deal had gone long time ago. There had been several threads on that subject. When doing a search, I can find only this: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onew...ai-doh-qr.html |
Originally Posted by wsheldon
(Post 31313186)
Hi everyone, I'm sure this is answered in other places but I couldn't find it. My last OWE RTW trip was 2006-7 and at the time there was a website/chart that showed how much an Economy OWE would cost in various currencies. For example, I live in the US but might fly to, say, Egypt to purchase and start my ticket if it was significantly less. Does anyone know if that data still exists? Many thanks!
Think of where you want to go and then get the prices for those countries to shop prices. |
Is HND still the cheapest place to start a DONE itinerary?
|
Originally Posted by Wozza2404
(Post 31389945)
Is HND still the cheapest place to start a DONE itinerary?
|
Also Sri Lanka
|
Originally Posted by ajnaro
(Post 31390602)
Check out OSL or Pakistan
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 31392083)
Also Sri Lanka
|
when AT joins oneworld, do you think oneworld will file more OWE fare from african countries that are not currently served by oneworld?
|
Originally Posted by pbd456
(Post 31396254)
when AT joins oneworld, do you think oneworld will file more OWE fare from african countries that are not currently served by oneworld?
|
Originally Posted by R2
(Post 31396300)
Probably. I would expect them to be priced in USD where possible. I also don't think they will be particularly attractive. AFAIK there is limited competition on most international routes ex-Africa and oneworld must have learned their lesson from the numerous pricing 'events' in Africa in recent years.
|
Originally Posted by R2
(Post 31396300)
Probably. I would expect them to be priced in USD where possible. I also don't think they will be particularly attractive. AFAIK there is limited competition on most international routes ex-Africa and oneworld must have learned their lesson from the numerous pricing 'events' in Africa in recent years.
Agree that ex-Africa is unlikely to be filled with bargains. |
Originally Posted by Calchas
(Post 31397468)
Currency of air fares is set by IATA, not the filing airline—it takes a while (months at least) before the currency can be changed.
Agree that ex-Africa is unlikely to be filled with bargains. |
My proposed RTW is: NRT-LHR-PSA-LHR-MUC....INN-LHR-YVR-DFW-LIR-DFW-BWI-JFK-SFO-MEL-BNE-MEL-NRT is this lega as in 16 sectors l as I can’t now fly LHR-INN-LHR.....so has to be LHR-MUC and then "overland" to LHR via INN-LHR on a seperate ticket Thanks in advance |
Originally Posted by pbd456
(Post 31399950)
initially, maybe no bargain. but over time, opportunities will emerge which is how things have been playing out.
|
Originally Posted by pbd456
(Post 31399950)
initially, maybe no bargain. but over time, opportunities will emerge which is how things have been playing out.
|
Originally Posted by pyffii
(Post 31400153)
My proposed RTW is: NRT-LHR-PSA-LHR-MUC....INN-LHR-YVR-DFW-LIR-DFW-BWI-JFK-SFO-MEL-BNE-MEL-NRT |
Originally Posted by pyffii
(Post 31400153)
My proposed RTW is: NRT-LHR-PSA-LHR-MUC....INN-LHR-YVR-DFW-LIR-DFW-BWI-JFK-SFO-MEL-BNE-MEL-NRT is this lega as in 16 sectors l as I can’t now fly LHR-INN-LHR.....so has to be LHR-MUC and then "overland" to LHR via INN-LHR on a seperate ticket Thanks in advance If Yes, then your ticket is not valid, because it consists of 17 segments; the ticket has a limit of 16 segments. 4(h) A minimum of 3 and maximum of 16 segments, including surface segments between any 2 airports, are permitted for the entire journey. NRT-LHR-PSA-LHR-MUC....LHR-YVR-DFW-LIR-DFW-BWI-JFK-SFO-MEL-BNE-MEL-NRT |
INN-LHR would be a separately bought sector to keep the ticket within the 16 sector limit and taking the train back to Munich is not really an option as carrying checked bags and it’s a 4 hour train ride from Merano with changes so much easier and simpler to go to Innsbruck.....thanks all for your advice |
Originally Posted by pyffii
(Post 31402229)
INN-LHR would be a separately bought sector to keep the ticket within the 16 sector limit and taking the train back to Munich is not really an option as carrying checked bags and it’s a 4 hour train ride from Merano with changes so much easier and simpler to go to Innsbruck.....thanks all for your advice http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=NRT-LHR...SU=kts&RS=best Consider HND as well as NRT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haneda_Airport |
Has anyone had any success in booking a RTW or Circle Pacific with the first leg on Cathay? I've called twice now, and I've only received an e-mail back with a price on the RTW fare, but the e-mail made it seem that the Circle Pacific fare doesn't exist, which is clearly shown on Cathay's website. The last agent I spoke to said I would receive a call back, but these tickets may take 1 hr + to book and I'd prefer to do it at my convenience. Also, I'm looking to book 5 people and the flight I want is A5 currently, so I'm hoping to make a connection with the proper team soon.
|
If you are talking about booking a oneworld explorer ticket, have you tried to book thru the AA RTW desk? The fact the first segment is on another airline does not foreclose AA from issuing the ticket and the AA RTW desk is usually a joy to work with.
|
Originally Posted by lax.sea.jnu
(Post 31405748)
Has anyone had any success in booking a RTW or Circle Pacific with the first leg on Cathay? I've called twice now, and I've only received an e-mail back with a price on the RTW fare, but the e-mail made it seem that the Circle Pacific fare doesn't exist, which is clearly shown on Cathay's website. The last agent I spoke to said I would receive a call back, but these tickets may take 1 hr + to book and I'd prefer to do it at my convenience. Also, I'm looking to book 5 people and the flight I want is A5 currently, so I'm hoping to make a connection with the proper team soon.
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 31407360)
What fare basis and base fare did Cathay quote you? If your routing complies with Circle Pacific rules, then it should qualify as xCIRxx rather than xONEx or xGLOBxx. You might reply back by email to confirm that it is priced as desired (e.g., using DCIR22). You could also call AA, but they will likely want one or more over the water flights booked as AA codes, which you might or might not be happy about.
TRAVEL MUST ORIGINATE IN OR INCLUDE SOUTH AMERICA. TRAVEL MUST BE VIA THE NORTH/CENTRAL PACIFIC IN ONE DIRECTION AND VIA CHILE/ARGENTINA TO/FROM THE SOUTH WEST PACIFIC PACIFIC USING THE SERVICES OF QF/LA IN THE OTHER DIRECTION. |
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska
(Post 31405808)
If you are talking about booking a oneworld explorer ticket, have you tried to book thru the AA RTW desk? The fact the first segment is on another airline does not foreclose AA from issuing the ticket and the AA RTW desk is usually a joy to work with.
Originally Posted by anabolism
What fare basis and base fare did Cathay quote you? If your routing complies with Circle Pacific rules, then it should qualify as xCIRxx rather than xONEx or xGLOBxx. You might reply back by email to confirm that it is priced as desired (e.g., using DCIR22). You could also call AA, but they will likely want one or more over the water flights booked as AA codes, which you might or might not be happy about.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.