Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Malaysia Airlines is about to join the Oneworld Alliance

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Malaysia Airlines is about to join the Oneworld Alliance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 12:02 am
  #121  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
No.
It will be put on http://www.oneworld.com/news-information/oneworldnews/ when there is.
Himeno is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 2:22 am
  #122  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, M&M*G, HH Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,919
The fact that this thread had its 12th birthday during the week speaks volumes.
stifle is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 2:56 am
  #123  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 3,009
Rumour on AFF of November.
Unsure how credible but is just under 18mths from initial announcement.
moa999 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 6:00 am
  #124  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,336
If nothing else, late 2012 was always the time frame since last year's announcement:News - oneworld

Malaysia Airlines to join oneworld alliance 06 June 2011


Malaysia Airlines is to join oneworld[SUP][/SUP], adding one of aviation's most frequent award winners to the world's leading quality airline alliance.
Malaysia Airlines was unanimously elected a oneworld member designate by the Chief Executives of the alliance's member airlines, at a meeting on the sidelines of IATA's 2011 World Air Transport Summit, which opens in Singapore today.


A formal alliance membership agreement will be completed soon.


Malaysia Airlines is expected to start flying as part of oneworld late next year. ...



Last edited by serfty; Jul 22, 2012 at 7:13 pm
serfty is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 7:23 am
  #125  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: England
Programs: Executive Club Silver
Posts: 711
12 years is incredible, but what on earth took them so long to join?
PotNoodle is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 8:35 am
  #126  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by PotNoodle
12 years is incredible, but what on earth took them so long to join?
MH hasn't been in the process of joining oneworld for 12 years. This thread is 12 years old. There were a few posts in 2000, it was bumped for a few more posts of speculation 9 months later in 2001, and then nothing until mid 2011 when it was announced at the 2011 IATA AGM that MH would join oneworld.

MH has been in the process of joining the alliance for a little over 12 months, which is a normal amount of time for almost any airline to join any alliance.
Himeno is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 12:35 pm
  #127  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
Originally Posted by PotNoodle
12 years is incredible, but what on earth took them so long to join?
they were loooong time associated to KLM, hence "bound" to be induced in ST. Rumors had it that AF did not want them (for which reasons frankly don't know and would not comment on the singular pigheadedness to keep at bay a decent to good airline while at the same time inducing industry stalwarts such as GA, CI and MU), and they dragged their feet until QF came to the fore with an enticing offer on OWs behalf, that they accepted in virtually no time.
CXBA is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 3:03 pm
  #128  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: England
Programs: Executive Club Silver
Posts: 711
Originally Posted by Himeno
MH hasn't been in the process of joining oneworld for 12 years. This thread is 12 years old. There were a few posts in 2000, it was bumped for a few more posts of speculation 9 months later in 2001, and then nothing until mid 2011 when it was announced at the 2011 IATA AGM that MH would join oneworld.

MH has been in the process of joining the alliance for a little over 12 months, which is a normal amount of time for almost any airline to join any alliance.
Originally Posted by CXBA
they were loooong time associated to KLM, hence "bound" to be induced in ST. Rumors had it that AF did not want them (for which reasons frankly don't know and would not comment on the singular pigheadedness to keep at bay a decent to good airline while at the same time inducing industry stalwarts such as GA, CI and MU), and they dragged their feet until QF came to the fore with an enticing offer on OWs behalf, that they accepted in virtually no time.
Thanks lads for clarifying this.

MH is one of the last major airlines to join an alliance, they could have reaped alliance benefits over a decade ago.

I have heard the Air France thing by another person who said they wanted to continue Codesharing with Qantas rather than being obligated to codesharing with MH. I thought that person was crazy as AF could coeshare with who they please while still having a powerful new member like MH. After you have said the same thing it makes me baffled at Sky...

Do you reckon they chose small (many of whom are naff) airlines to join Sky as they will not take control and power away from AF-KLM and will be over-reliant on codesharing with the main members as they have small International networks?
PotNoodle is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 1:11 am
  #129  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by PotNoodle
Do you reckon they chose small (many of whom are naff) airlines to join Sky as they will not take control and power away from AF-KLM and will be over-reliant on codesharing with the main members as they have small International networks?
Likely. DL and AF/KL all but control Skyteam, just as UA, LH and SQ all but control Star.
The members of oneworld on the other hand, all seem to act like partners (even though some might not like others that much eg CX/QF).
Himeno is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 3:14 am
  #130  
Moderator, Finnair
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MMX (CPH)
Programs: EB Diamond, AY+ Gold, A3*G, Strawberry Lifetime Platinum, GHA Discovery Titanium, SJ Prio Black
Posts: 15,199
Originally Posted by Himeno
Likely. DL and AF/KL all but control Skyteam, just as UA, LH and SQ all but control Star.
The members of oneworld on the other hand, all seem to act like partners (even though some might not like others that much eg CX/QF).
Probably because OW is built on many "bilateral" agreements instead of centrally dictated co-operation. It has some drawbacks in consistency but the advantages mentioned above.
intuition is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 3:28 am
  #131  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 3,009
Date appears to have shifted into early 2013
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story...7&sec=business

Exact date targeted to be announced some time in September

Credit to YQY on AFF for the link
moa999 is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 4:33 am
  #132  
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TPE / HSZ
Programs: CX GO (=SPH), IHG Diamond Amb, Hertz 5*, Accor, Hilton, National
Posts: 7,226
Originally Posted by Himeno
Likely. DL and AF/KL all but control Skyteam, just as UA, LH and SQ all but control Star.
The members of oneworld on the other hand, all seem to act like partners (even though some might not like others that much eg CX/QF).
Would you not say that BA (or now IAG) sort of controls OW? Also, I don't think SQ has that much power in *A.
ernestnywang is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 5:48 am
  #133  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
Would you not say that BA (or now IAG) sort of controls OW? Also, I don't think SQ has that much power in *A.
I haven't seen anything out of BA, AA, QF, CX, LA or JL other then what bilaterals and antitrust immunity deals they have.
Himeno is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 11:10 am
  #134  
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TPE / HSZ
Programs: CX GO (=SPH), IHG Diamond Amb, Hertz 5*, Accor, Hilton, National
Posts: 7,226
Originally Posted by Himeno
I haven't seen anything out of BA, AA, QF, CX, LA or JL other then what bilaterals and antitrust immunity deals they have.
So what makes you differentiate BA's role in OW versus LH's in *A and AF's in ST? Remember BA was the main reason why OW lost LX.
ernestnywang is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012 | 1:47 pm
  #135  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Originally Posted by Himeno
Likely. DL and AF/KL all but control Skyteam, just as UA, LH and SQ all but control Star.
The members of oneworld on the other hand, all seem to act like partners (even though some might not like others that much eg CX/QF).
SQ control *A? Hardly! SQ plays in star out of convenience.
Traveloguy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.