![]() |
Just another question - am I right in understanding the 2entry/exit rule for NA would allow an itinerary like this:
---->GIG-xMIA-LIM-MIA----> |
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
(Post 37593279)
Keep in mind that what you find in "D" availability on publicly available tools is not necessarily the same as what is actually available for RTW tickets.
I find it to be more of an issue with "A" fares on first class RTWs. Not that I am planning on booking through the tool, rather trying to do as much leg work as possible before contacting a TA |
Originally Posted by paul4471
(Post 37594899)
Just another question - am I right in understanding the 2entry/exit rule for NA would allow an itinerary like this:
---->GIG-xMIA-LIM-MIA----> What you have is multiple entries/exit to South America (The entries/exits to North America are OK though) |
Hi all, I have booked my first DONE3 and very much looking forward to the experience. My route is as follows:
OSL-doh-hel-nrt-BLR-nrt-SIN-hnd-dfw-bos-lax-anc-DFW-sea-lax-doh-OSL (Apologies if I've got the presentation wrong; my stopovers are in BLR, SIN and DFW). Can anyone give me any guidance on the taxes I've paid - c.£1,500. Reading through this thread and the User Guide, have I incurred additional taxes from having a stopover in BLR? Almost all of the flights are codeshares on AY and JL (OSL-DOH and LAX-DOH on QR; ANC-DFW on QF). Any feedback gratefully received - would they be lower if I went ex-TYO? Thinking ahead to my next booking. Thank you! |
Originally Posted by TQ2
(Post 37595570)
Is this also the case with the Oneworld booking tool? It is showing bucket figures and I had thought if you could get through the point of reviewing flights it would have availability. Am I being overly optimistic?
Not that I am planning on booking through the tool, rather trying to do as much leg work as possible before contacting a TA |
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37597354)
Hi all, I have booked my first DONE3 and very much looking forward to the experience. My route is as follows:
OSL-doh-hel-nrt-BLR-nrt-SIN-hnd-dfw-bos-lax-anc-DFW-sea-lax-doh-OSL (Apologies if I've got the presentation wrong; my stopovers are in BLR, SIN and DFW). Can anyone give me any guidance on the taxes I've paid - c.£1,500. Reading through this thread and the User Guide, have I incurred additional taxes from having a stopover in BLR? Almost all of the flights are codeshares on AY and JL (OSL-DOH and LAX-DOH on QR; ANC-DFW on QF). Any feedback gratefully received - would they be lower if I went ex-TYO? Thinking ahead to my next booking. Thank you! Booked online or travel agent? Which airline issued the ticket? 001=AA, 081=QF Qantas, 157=QR Qatar, etc. ANC-DFW as Qantas QF codeshare a little unusable.Will be AS or AA operating airline. Did you ask for codeshares? It may because of D availability. |
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37597462)
Will be AS or AA operating airline.
|
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37597462)
Real govt taxes or carrier surcharges YQ YR? BA & QF are know for carrier surcharges, but not always on every flight.
Booked online or travel agent? Which airline issued the ticket? 001=AA, 081=QF Qantas, 157=QR Qatar, etc. ANC-DFW as Qantas QF codeshare a little unusable.Will be AS or AA operating airline. Did you ask for codeshares? It may because of D availability. My assumption is that the bulk of the charge is YQ / YR, but ultimately I'm curious to understand what would be determining factors for the entire amount. When I asked the TA (and it was to a certain extent moot because i was going to book the ticket anyway) I was told they couldn't know without some trial and error on different routes etc. I'm trying to find out more, so that when I book next time, I can go into the process with a more informed view as to what works and what doesn't. For example, I could just as easily do an ex-TYO DONE4 (which appears to have a good base ticket price, based on the latest table I've seen), and would do so if that made a material difference to the taxes and surcharges. There was a comment up thread about India introducing a premium for business class cabins, which was what prompted me to ask my original question - I presume that would not count as YQ / YR if I've paid it. If I asked the TA, should they be able to give me a line by line breakdown of the taxes? |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 37597585)
AS doesn't fly nonstop between ANC and DFW, it will be AA metal.
|
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37597922)
Thank you for the quick reply: booked via TA; ticketing airline is QR; I did ask for codeshares.
My assumption is that the bulk of the charge is YQ / YR, but ultimately I'm curious to understand what would be determining factors for the entire amount. When I asked the TA (and it was to a certain extent moot because i was going to book the ticket anyway) I was told they couldn't know without some trial and error on different routes etc. I'm trying to find out more, so that when I book next time, I can go into the process with a more informed view as to what works and what doesn't. For example, I could just as easily do an ex-TYO DONE4 (which appears to have a good base ticket price, based on the latest table I've seen), and would do so if that made a material difference to the taxes and surcharges. There was a comment up thread about India introducing a premium for business class cabins, which was what prompted me to ask my original question - I presume that would not count as YQ / YR if I've paid it. If I asked the TA, should they be able to give me a line by line breakdown of the taxes? Using the Amadeus PNR and your Surname, this will be possible if you can bring the booking up using Finnair manage booking. https://www.finnair.com/us-en/manage If the booking comes up, click "Passenger and Documents" on the left, then select "E-Ticket and document numbers" that appears. Choose "Send e-ticket receipt", select/enter your email address. In a few minutes you should receive an email, among the content of which is a full list of the Surcharge, Tax and Levy codes and the amount of each. |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37600549)
If you have at least one flight on Finnair, you may be able to get an email with a breakdown of the levies, surcharges and taxes that have been charged.
Using the Amadeus PNR and your Surname, this will be possible if you can bring the booking up using Finnair manage booking. https://www.finnair.com/us-en/manage If the booking comes up, click "Passenger and Documents" on the left, then select "E-Ticket and document numbers" that appears. Choose "Send e-ticket receipt", select/enter your email address. In a few minutes you should receive an email, among the content of which is a full list of the Surcharge, Tax and Levy codes and the amount of each. |
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37600588)
Thank you, this is super helpful. I've done so and the total taxes on that receipt is £651.99, o/w £268 is YQ/YR. Unfortunately it doesn't make up the full total though, but I'll do some more investigating, perhaps this only is the total for the AY codeshares.
Look for an XT entry. This is a general bucket identifier when amounts are combined in a tax/fee/charge box. |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37600644)
It may cap at 24 on the email itself - the .pdf attached can show at least 30 - other than it generally lists all such charges attached to a ticket.
Look for an XT entry. This is a general bucket identifier when amounts are combined in a tax/fee/charge box. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...526513e2de.png |
Hey wandering_fred - so interesting thing has happened. AA desk allowed me to book this. I was booking two itineraries both of which included this scenario. They then went different directions for later segments but the transit without stopover in MIA between GIG and BOG is on both.
Today I got notification that one had been priced ready for payment and the other has a routing issue and I need to call. When I called the agent said it was those sectors as you suggested but then I asked why the other booking was OK and she agreed that it was strange - I did say I expected it to be the case but then also stated that the rules allow a second intl/arrival in NA provided it is a transit without stopover and I also mentioned the fact there are no other internal flights within SA (save QR GIG-EZE) so almost pointless including SA in a DONEx in any case but at least this helps if allowed. The agent spoke to the rates desk and pointed out one had been rated and the rate desk said yep should be ok and they will rate mine as well and come back with pricing in an hour or so. Yet to be confirmed but if it comes through then I have a couple of questions for the learned: 1) I'm almost certain to need to make date changes to these bookings down the track - am I likely to hit potential grief with that even though AA has accepted it and ticketed it prob outside the rules? 2) Is the only point of having two NA arrivals/departures rule to add some minor flexibility to an XONEX say perhaps for itins originating in SA to allow a few more options/ways of getting out of or back into SA? And perhaps allowing a few additional cities in SA to be added to a routing that are accessible only through the US eg CLO/MDE etc? If they do start to interpret it that a re-entry to SA is ok in conjunction with a transit without stopover in NA is OK then it def improves the dire lack of OW options in that continent |
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37600686)
This is all I can see (from the PDF attachment; though it matches the email):
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...526513e2de.png |
Originally Posted by LilZeppelin
(Post 37593579)
One of my ex CAI rtws contained 17 segments if counting the unflown surface sector between origin and destination (within ME such as CAI AMM).
Not sure if that was overlooked because of numerous changes I had to do or if that is permitted by the rules.
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37593680)
16 segments(coupons) is a technical limit of e-tickets. Pre e-ticket with paper tickets/coupons it was 32
3015 rule 4 (c) Which is taken to mean open jaw origin to destination allowed.
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37594595)
My first xONEx was of 20 segments. That was the limit in 2005.
It was comprised of 5 x 4 voucher paper ticket booklets stapled together. |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37603839)
...
I thought 20 sectors was the limit of paper tickets (i. e., a book of tickets can contain at most 5 conjuncted tickets), hence the limit of xONEx back then. Did I remember wrong? Here is an early references on this forum to such of 26 segments. https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onew...-analysis.html |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37604121)
I believe the original xONEx fare rules did not have any specific limitation on the total number of segments.
Here is an early references on this forum to such of 26 segments. https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onew...-analysis.html |
Originally Posted by paul4471
(Post 37601519)
Hey wandering_fred - so interesting thing has happened. AA desk allowed me to book this. I was booking two itineraries both of which included this scenario. They then went different directions for later segments but the transit without stopover in MIA between GIG and BOG is on both.
Today I got notification that one had been priced ready for payment and the other has a routing issue and I need to call. When I called the agent said it was those sectors as you suggested but then I asked why the other booking was OK and she agreed that it was strange - I did say I expected it to be the case but then also stated that the rules allow a second intl/arrival in NA provided it is a transit without stopover and I also mentioned the fact there are no other internal flights within SA (save QR GIG-EZE) so almost pointless including SA in a DONEx in any case but at least this helps if allowed. The agent spoke to the rates desk and pointed out one had been rated and the rate desk said yep should be ok and they will rate mine as well and come back with pricing in an hour or so. Yet to be confirmed but if it comes through then I have a couple of questions for the learned: 1) I'm almost certain to need to make date changes to these bookings down the track - am I likely to hit potential grief with that even though AA has accepted it and ticketed it prob outside the rules? 2) Is the only point of having two NA arrivals/departures rule to add some minor flexibility to an XONEX say perhaps for itins originating in SA to allow a few more options/ways of getting out of or back into SA? And perhaps allowing a few additional cities in SA to be added to a routing that are accessible only through the US eg CLO/MDE etc? If they do start to interpret it that a re-entry to SA is ok in conjunction with a transit without stopover in NA is OK then it def improves the dire lack of OW options in that continent |
booking with RTW desk is a manual process... so there will be slight variations in practice due to mistakes... depending on how long your ticket goes out and the carriers you are flying (esp AA metal), the chances of a significant schedule change may force you to contact AA to reticket, prompting another review.
|
Need help with an itinerary
Hi experts... I am trying to make an itinerary work and somehow am getting a bit stuck.
Melbourne is home and places we are visiting.as a must are Europe in December 2026; South Africa in September 2027. We were thinking of getting 2 RTW tickets but if we can do it in one, we'll try. We are thinking: OSL to PER (via DOH or LHR for transit only) PER to MEL MEL to SYD Sydney to somewhere in Pacific return, probably Tonga Then to JNB via USA so something like OSL-LHR-PER-MEL-SYD-TBU-SYD-LAX-DFW-DOH-JNB-LHR-OSL the oneworld tool glitches because of the Euro stopovers but then says they can be under 24hrs. And the extra sectors would be used in either US or Asia if we tripped that by going to Aus first up. Any help welcomed!! |
Originally Posted by Cashew77
(Post 37610230)
Hi experts... I am trying to make an itinerary work and somehow am getting a bit stuck.
Melbourne is home and places we are visiting.as a must are Europe in December 2026; South Africa in September 2027. We were thinking of getting 2 RTW tickets but if we can do it in one, we'll try. We are thinking: OSL to PER (via DOH or LHR for transit only) PER to MEL MEL to SYD Sydney to somewhere in Pacific return, probably Tonga Then to JNB via USA so something like OSL-LHR-PER-MEL-SYD-TBU-SYD-LAX-DFW-DOH-JNB-LHR-OSL the oneworld tool glitches because of the Euro stopovers but then says they can be under 24hrs. And the extra sectors would be used in either US or Asia if we tripped that by going to Aus first up. Any help welcomed!! QF fly SYD-JNB. BA & QR fly from Capetown. A far better place than Jo'berg. (as a former Jo'berg resident) USA to Africa is difficult. No non stop flights. DOH is in EU-ME zone. TBU has QF (SYD) and FJ (NAN) flights. FJ fly to several USA destinations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fua%CA...tional_Airport To maximize ff earnings SYD-DFW-LAX-DOH may earn more than SYD-LAX-DFW-DOH. From AU many people start in Japan, with a separate flights AU to/from Japan. OW 3015 rule 4 (e) Only one intercontinental departure and one intercontinental arrival permitted in each continent except as follows: 1. Two permitted in North America. 2. Two permitted in Asia. 3. Two permitted in Europe/Middle East for travel to/from/via Africa. If travel is to/from Europe in both directions, itinerary may not include Mauritius/South Africa. A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...37cad08b05.jpg |
Thank you! So does this make this a valid itinerary or do I need to start over? Couldn't quite get my head around it. And how many continents am I looking at to make it work? Thanks so much for your help!
|
Originally Posted by Cashew77
(Post 37610394)
Thank you! So does this make this a valid itinerary or do I need to start over? Couldn't quite get my head around it. And how many continents am I looking at to make it work? Thanks so much for your help!
But I'm thinking you can maybe do better... I'm putting my ideas together and will post them shortly. What cabin class are you thinking of? (First, Business or Economy) |
I'm not sure if this is playing into trying to get the tool see a route as valid but it may help.
The tool seems to only consider an airport a transit if it is entered as a single line. E.g. OSL-LCA which comes up with route options via LHR is ok but entering OSL-LHR and a second line of LHR-LCA is always treated as a stopover even if you set the date to be the same for both |
Originally Posted by Cashew77
(Post 37610394)
Thank you! So does this make this a valid itinerary or do I need to start over? Couldn't quite get my head around it. And how many continents am I looking at to make it work? Thanks so much for your help!
And you are exploring whether a RTW will give you more/be better value for you. At this stage you are not looking to travel more widely - say in North America or Asia. But would be interested in South Pacific travel, while you are back in Australia. Have I got it right? To achieve what you want, you must start from somewhere in Tariff Conference 2 (TC2 - i.e. Europe/Middle East/Africa) (see Note 1 below for why starting elsewhere will not work for you. And by the way, if you are new to RTW planning I recommend you read the wiki in The Oneworld Explorer User Guide) With your proposed itinerary (mapped by Mwenenzi), you will use other means get yourself from MEL to OSL to start the RTW and then return from OSL to MEL at the end. This eastbound itinerary has 5 continents (by flying Europe/Middle East to South West Pacific you automatically include Asia). If instead you fly westbound you can avoid Asia, reducing the itinerary to 4 continents (a saving of ~NOK8000 in the business class base fare). Here's a very simple westbound itinerary OSL-LHR-LAX-SYD-JNB-LHR-OSL Another option is to start from elsewhere in TC2. How about South Africa? It is one of the lower cost starting countries too. A minimalist itinerary for this is JNB-LHR-SCL-SYD-JNB. By starting in Africa, there will be no restriction on stopovers in Europe/Middle East (it is no longer your continent of origin) If you start in Europe then you get to visit Europe twice. If you start in Africa then you get to visit Africa twice. Note 1 One of the Fare Rules states: 4(b) "Travel must be in a continuous forward direction between TC1 - TC2 - TC3..." So you start one TC, then visit the other two and end back in your starting TC. Therefore, if you want to visit a TC twice then it must be the starting TC. You are wanting to visit TC2 twice (Europe to start, and later South Africa). Therefore you must start somewhere in TC2. |
Thank you so much. Yes, we are heading to Europe in December and then South Africa the year after. Coming home to Australia in btw. Being based in Melbourne we would take advantage of the SWP extra sectors to go somewhere we havent been before (like Tonga). We have looked at return flights to each and seeing what is best value out there.
We are looking at Business Class and so DONE4 or DONE5. We've done a couple of these tickets starting in Sth Africa, or Tokyo on prior trips. The challenge with the Westbound trip is time. (Which in December is unfortunately in short demand ). Do you think we are best to start OSL-PER via DOH or via LHR (both transit only) based on first carrier and taxes? thanks again |
Originally Posted by Cashew77
(Post 37610902)
Thank you so much. Yes, we are heading to Europe in December and then South Africa the year after. Coming home to Australia in btw. Being based in Melbourne we would take advantage of the SWP extra sectors to go somewhere we haven't been before (like Tonga). We have looked at return flights to each and seeing what is best value out there.
We are looking at Business Class and so DONE4 or DONE5. We've done a couple of these tickets starting in Sth Africa, or Tokyo on prior trips. The challenge with the Westbound trip is time. (Which in December is unfortunately in short demand ). Do you think we are best to start OSL-PER via DOH or via LHR (both transit only) based on first carrier and taxes? thanks again On you previous *ONE* trips did you book on line or with a travel agent? Note real taxes and carrier surcharges YQ YR are not the same thing. Is a post by serfty on minimizing surcharges. With so many QF flights will have a lot of Qantas carrier surcharges. |
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37597922)
My assumption is that the bulk of the charge is YQ / YR, but ultimately I'm curious to understand what would be determining factors for the entire amount. When I asked the TA (and it was to a certain extent moot because i was going to book the ticket anyway) I was told they couldn't know without some trial and error on different routes etc. I'm trying to find out more, so that when I book next time, I can go into the process with a more informed view as to what works and what doesn't. For example, I could just as easily do an ex-TYO DONE4 (which appears to have a good base ticket price, based on the latest table I've seen), and would do so if that made a material difference to the taxes and surcharges.
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37597922)
There was a comment up thread about India introducing a premium for business class cabins, which was what prompted me to ask my original question - I presume that would not count as YQ / YR if I've paid it.
Originally Posted by Jun_Man
(Post 37597922)
If I asked the TA, should they be able to give me a line by line breakdown of the taxes?
|
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37611494)
So already have separate tickets to EU?
On you previous *ONE* trips did you book on line or with a travel agent? Note real taxes and carrier surcharges YQ YR are not the same thing. Is a post by serfty on minimizing surcharges. With so many QF flights will have a lot of Qantas carrier surcharges. thanks again for your help |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37610561)
First can I check that I'm understanding you properly. What you're wanting to do is:
And you are exploring whether a RTW will give you more/be better value for you. At this stage you are not looking to travel more widely - say in North America or Asia. But would be interested in South Pacific travel, while you are back in Australia. Have I got it right? To achieve what you want, you must start from somewhere in Tariff Conference 2 (TC2 - i.e. Europe/Middle East/Africa) (see Note 1 below for why starting elsewhere will not work for you. And by the way, if you are new to RTW planning I recommend you read the wiki in The Oneworld Explorer User Guide) With your proposed itinerary (mapped by Mwenenzi), you will use other means get yourself from MEL to OSL to start the RTW and then return from OSL to MEL at the end. This eastbound itinerary has 5 continents (by flying Europe/Middle East to South West Pacific you automatically include Asia). If instead you fly westbound you can avoid Asia, reducing the itinerary to 4 continents (a saving of ~NOK8000 in the business class base fare). Here's a very simple westbound itinerary OSL-LHR-LAX-SYD-JNB-LHR-OSL Another option is to start from elsewhere in TC2. How about South Africa? It is one of the lower cost starting countries too. A minimalist itinerary for this is JNB-LHR-SCL-SYD-JNB. By starting in Africa, there will be no restriction on stopovers in Europe/Middle East (it is no longer your continent of origin) If you start in Europe then you get to visit Europe twice. If you start in Africa then you get to visit Africa twice. Note 1 One of the Fare Rules states: 4(b) "Travel must be in a continuous forward direction between TC1 - TC2 - TC3..." So you start one TC, then visit the other two and end back in your starting TC. Therefore, if you want to visit a TC twice then it must be the starting TC. You are wanting to visit TC2 twice (Europe to start, and later South Africa). Therefore you must start somewhere in TC2. |
Originally Posted by Cashew77
(Post 37610230)
OSL to PER (via DOH or LHR for transit only)
|
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
(Post 37593279)
Keep in mind that what you find in "D" availability on publicly available tools is not necessarily the same as what is actually available for RTW tickets.
I find it to be more of an issue with "A" fares on first class RTWs.
Originally Posted by MoodLighting
(Post 37593557)
A well-informed BA agent said as much about a change I was trying to make. I thought the issue was purely about married segments, so was scratching my head when EF showed D2 on those flights. She said Point of Commencement is factored in too. Those combination of factors isn't available from any public sources, AFAIK, though ExpertFlyer are aware this is a weakness of its current service.
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 37612338)
There are several factors I'm aware of:
Your TA should be able to give you a breakdown of the taxes, fees, and surcharges, but the ease of obtaining this varies by airline/TA. For example, I recently purchased a BA-issued ticket, and asked BA agents for the info. They insist that it's impossible to know until after I fly, at which point I can use a form on BA's website that discloses all fees and taxes. BA's eticket receipt that is emailed upon purchase does show the base fare, actual taxes, and airline-imposed fees, but as a whole, not broken down by outbound versus inbound, much less segment by segment. When purchasing a ticket from AA, the emailed eticket confirmation lumps carrier overcharges in with taxes, but one can call AA and the agent can provide the total YQ/YR. I called JAL to get the breakdown for a recent DONE5 that I purchased from them, and to my surprise, the agent started rattling off each charge by its code and its segment number! For example, "Segment six, YQ $125." When calculating what AA earnings should be, knowing the specific segments is tremendously helpful. |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 37612367)
Just on this one small point, I recommend transiting DOH rather than LHR to get between Europe and Australia. QR operates their Qsuite-equipped 777 and A350 between DOH and Australia. QR's A380s do not have Qsuite. Qsuite is the nicest business class in oneworld. It's even nicer if you're flyig with someone because you can get an EF seat pair, which open into essentially your own two-person suite.
Having posted that, I'll happily fly either ... :cool: |
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37612426)
After my recent JAL DFW-HND in J on their A359-1000 I would say QR have serious competition. (I also flew QSuites DOH-JFK on the same DONE4.)
Having posted that, I'll happily fly either ... :cool: |
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 37612338)
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 37612378)
Indeed, type of fare limitation is frustrating. I've run into it before on an AONE5, and am now being forced into alternate flights while waiting for 'D' to become available on a JL flight for a DONE5 I've purchased. EF shows D8 but inside a DONEx it's D0.
|
Originally Posted by serfty
(Post 37612426)
After my recent JAL DFW-HND in J on their A359-1000 I would say QR have serious competition. (I also flew QSuites DOH-JFK on the same DONE4.)
Having posted that, I'll happily fly either ... :cool: |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 37613778)
Don't forget to try codeshares. UL has greatly limited availability in the D fare bucket, but I was able to get the flights I wanted from the AA RTW desk last night using one QF codeshare and one JL codeshare on flights operated by UL that had zero UL D availability. Got the codeshare info from EF.
I had an RTW booked via JL a few years ago where I used an SWU to upgrade an AA prime flight. When AA reissued it, they changed all codeshares to prime. Really pissed me off because it slashed the earnings. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.