![]() |
Originally Posted by rob_88
(Post 37516035)
I was trying to consolidate experiences of booking directly with airlines...
Do we know which airlines will ticket DONE/DGLOB fares without longer legs on their own metal or codes? Or, which airlines simply won't ticket these fares over the phone? While there's no clearly formal rule, it seems there are several experiences where, when calling airlines directly, agents refuse to price itineraries without a long TATL or TPAC sector on their own metal. I've been trying to find and consolidate experiences through this long long thread, what I can see so far is: AA - Often demand a TATL or TPAC sector on AA codes AY - Won't ticket anything BA - Often demand a TATL sector on BA codes IB - Won't ticket anything QR - Won't ticket anything QF - Seems to be very flexible, but agent experiences tend to be poor - also default for the OneWorld tool Does that list look right? Do we have any experiences of other carriers (JL, AS, EI [for DGLOB], FJ, or any of the African/Asian carriers?) |
Originally Posted by rob_88
(Post 37516035)
AA - Often demand a TATL or TPAC sector on AA codes
|
My last DONE3 was ticketed on UL stock by a TA in CMB.
Minor issues in getting code share flights. Not easy to change with changing fare class availability updates, Major issues with married segments on AA in the USA (My itinerary choices) Seemingly low added taxes. Payment cheaper by funds transfer as airline will not pick up CC charges. Anything to improve the wandering. Fred |
Originally Posted by rob_88
(Post 37516035)
I was trying to consolidate experiences of booking directly with airlines...
Do we know which airlines will ticket DONE/DGLOB fares without longer legs on their own metal or codes? Or, which airlines simply won't ticket these fares over the phone? While there's no clearly formal rule, it seems there are several experiences where, when calling airlines directly, agents refuse to price itineraries without a long TATL or TPAC sector on their own metal. I've been trying to find and consolidate experiences through this long long thread, what I can see so far is: AA - Often demand a TATL or TPAC sector on AA codes AY - Won't ticket anything BA - Often demand a TATL sector on BA codes IB - Won't ticket anything QR - Won't ticket anything QF - Seems to be very flexible, but agent experiences tend to be poor - also default for the OneWorld tool Does that list look right? Do we have any experiences of other carriers (JL, AS, EI [for DGLOB], FJ, or any of the African/Asian carriers?) |
Originally Posted by rob_88
(Post 37516035)
I was trying to consolidate experiences of booking directly with airlines...
Do we know which airlines will ticket DONE/DGLOB fares without longer legs on their own metal or codes? Or, which airlines simply won't ticket these fares over the phone? While there's no clearly formal rule, it seems there are several experiences where, when calling airlines directly, agents refuse to price itineraries without a long TATL or TPAC sector on their own metal. I've been trying to find and consolidate experiences through this long long thread, what I can see so far is: AA - Often demand a TATL or TPAC sector on AA codes AY - Won't ticket anything BA - Often demand a TATL sector on BA codes IB - Won't ticket anything QR - Won't ticket anything QF - Seems to be very flexible, but agent experiences tend to be poor - also default for the OneWorld tool Does that list look right? Do we have any experiences of other carriers (JL, AS, EI [for DGLOB], FJ, or any of the African/Asian carriers?) CX is fine in doing DONE from my experience, require minimum one sector on CX coded and operating flight but no restriction on sector length so could be anything within Asia or intercontinental one Only drawback to me, no exclusive line or access to the dedicated oneworld team so often take couple dates to in quoting or even simple flight change request though still work for me. |
Originally Posted by rob_88
(Post 37516035)
While there's no clearly formal rule, it seems there are several experiences where, when calling airlines directly, agents refuse to price itineraries without a long TATL or TPAC sector on their own metal.
I've been trying to find and consolidate experiences through this long long thread, what I can see so far is: AA - Often demand a TATL or TPAC sector on AA codes
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 37516301)
Always, not often. If they don't require an AA code on an over-water flight, it's because the agent made an error. It's one of AA's requirements.
|
Originally Posted by sydneyguy1234
(Post 37517800)
CX is fine in doing DONE from my experience, require minimum one sector on CX coded and operating flight but no restriction on sector length so could be anything within Asia or intercontinental one
Only drawback to me, no exclusive line or access to the dedicated oneworld team so often take couple dates to in quoting or even simple flight change request though still work for me. |
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
(Post 37517890)
IME it appears that the requirement from AA is for one intercontinental flight on their own metal, not necessarily TATL or TPAC. I recently had the AA RTW desk book OSL-DOH-SEZ-DOH-AKL-SYD-(AKL)-JFK-GRU-MIA-PHL-EYW-PHL-DFW-SFO-JFK-DOH-OSL. SYD-AKL-JFK is on QF, JFK-DOH is on QR, and JFK-GRU is on AA metal. I got zero pushback about needing a TATL or TPAC AA metal flight on this itinerary. The JFK-GRU segment appears to have satisfied AA's own metal requirements. And yes, I know that JFK-GRU does technically cross the Atlantic, just not in the sense that most people here usually consider when thinking about the RTW rules.
|
Slightly OT but happy 79th birthday to RTW tickets. Pan Am began selling the first commercial RTW tickets on this day in 1947.
|
Originally Posted by MoodLighting
(Post 37520483)
Slightly OT but happy 79th birthday to RTW tickets. Pan Am began selling the first commercial RTW tickets on this day in 1947.
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 37520595)
I never understood the business case for these. If the revenue that an airline receives for a flight on an xONEx is ((mileage for this flight) ÷ (total mileage for the ticket)) × (fare for the ticket), the airlines are often nearly giving these flights away. What's in it for them?
RTW/xONEx tickets target a different segment of travelers - people who spend more money than the avg customer, mainly business travelers. The majority of xONEx purchasers are not positioning to Norway or Japan to start their trip; they are purchasing from their home country. Even in economy, that will be thousands of dollars or Euros at a minimum. Second, the RTW product offers a unique solution to a unique problem .. for travelers who need to go from continent to continent (for example, a sales executive visiting their global customers), there is no convenient way to plan a solution in a seamless fashion. Point to point ticketing would be insane, multiple itineraries to track, and almost certainly across multiple alliances. Having a single, knowledgeable point of contact (eg, AA RTW desk) and a flexible fare product (xONEx) makes things much easier. Look at how easy it is to make changes or even refund -- that is on purpose, not because the airlines are nice. This fare product is not for the general public. There's no need to make the online tool any better.. who is going to invest the money? Also, this would do nothing for AA except drive ticketing away from them.. likewise for BA. Coincidentally, I'm sure many of these xONEx purchasers are based in US/UK/EU, not Japan or Sri Lanka. |
Originally Posted by izzik
(Post 37520865)
RTW/xONEx tickets target a different segment of travelers - people who spend more money than the avg customer, mainly business travelers.
The majority of xONEx purchasers are not positioning to Norway or Japan to start their trip; they are purchasing from their home country. Even in economy, that will be thousands of dollars or Euros at a minimum. I don't know if he's an outlier, but my hunch is that he's the rule rather than the exception. |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37515807)
Well that works perfectly, thank you. Now to work through some decent stop off points !
OSL/LHR/PER/MEL/SYD/TBU/SYD/SEL/HKG/DAD/NRT/DFW/DAB/CLT/MUC/MAD/OSL LHR would be under 24hrs so within the 2stopovers over 24hrs in continent of origin.... any and all expert tips appreciated!! TIA |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37522246)
I am trying to get this itinerary to work but having trouble getting the OW tool to see if possible....
OSL/LHR/PER/MEL/SYD/TBU/SYD/SEL/HKG/DAD/NRT/DFW/DAB/CLT/MUC/MAD/OSL LHR would be under 24hrs so within the 2stopovers over 24hrs in continent of origin.... any and all expert tips appreciated!! TIA A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper 16 Segments, 4 Continents Provided: there are valid flights between all your points Valid meaning direct flights marketed and operated by Oneworld airlines Is this true? - thinking particularly of SYD-TBU, SYD-SEL-HKG, in and out of DAB, CLT-MUC Because you are already using all 16 segments you have no wriggle room if there aren't direct flights. You can use FlightConnections: All flights worldwide on a map! to check. |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37522334)
Your itinerary appears valid
A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper 16 Segments, 4 Continents Provided: there are valid flights between all your points Valid meaning direct flights marketed and operated by Oneworld airlines Is this true? - thinking particularly of SYD-TBU, SYD-SEL-HKG, in and out of DAB, CLT-MUC Because you are already using all 16 segments you have no wriggle room if there aren't direct flights. You can use FlightConnections: All flights worldwide on a map! to check. Thanks for checking... let's see what the RTW desk comes up with... appreciate it!! |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37522334)
Your itinerary appears valid
A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper 16 Segments, 4 Continents Provided: there are valid flights between all your points Valid meaning direct flights marketed and operated by Oneworld airlines Is this true? - thinking particularly of SYD-TBU, SYD-SEL-HKG, in and out of DAB, CLT-MUC Because you are already using all 16 segments you have no wriggle room if there aren't direct flights. You can use FlightConnections: All flights worldwide on a map! to check. |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37522364)
SYD-ICN is probably the issue. QF suspended that route. There are SYD-TBU, ICN-HKG, and DAB-CLT-MUC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incheo...tional_Airport OW 3015 4. FLIGHT APPLICATION / ROUTINGS Fares only apply on any AA/AS/AT/AY/BA/CX/FJ/IB/JL/MH/NU/QF/QR/RJ/UL/WY flights. <snip> (j) Travel on any AA/AS/AT/AY/BA/CX/FJ/IB/JL/MH/NU/QF/QR/RJ/UL/WY codeshare service operated by AA/AS/AT/AY/BA/CX/FJ/IB/JL/MH/NU/QF/QR/RJ/UL/WY is permitted. Other codeshare services not permitted with the exception of QF Codeshare services operated by Jetstar (JQ) and QF services operated by Alliance Airlines (QQ) <snip> https://www.jetstar.com/au/en/flights/business-class |
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37522444)
JQ Jetstar fly BNE-ICN & SYD-ICN [JQ47 QF5507] from wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incheo...tional_Airport OW 3015 JQ business class on the B787 is more like PE. JQ47/QF5507 11:40 - 20:15, so a day flight. PE will be OK https://www.jetstar.com/au/en/flights/business-class |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37522522)
Righto... thanks for dbl checking.. will tweak the itinerary in that case!
I would fly as a day JQ PE flight. However as operator is not oneworld could only credit to QF ffp. |
Originally Posted by Unionruler
(Post 37518602)
Could I ask if the surcharges are noticeably more on CX plated than say AA or QR plated?
Difference between CX and OR plated ticket on my previous DONE4 is around EUR250 i am correct, on paper CX is bit more pricy but i did make multiple date/flight change along the way which CX don't change any handling fee as per the oneworld rule. In one case i even get EUR50 refund in tax/surcharge Finding a decent travel agent who knows and willing to book such type of ticket is kind of difficult and since I am based in Asia so work with CX don't have to worry about time zone or so. all in all, book with CX works fairly decent to me so might consider to book with them in coming year's if the travel agent not work out. |
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37522617)
Tweak to avoid a JQ B787 PE SYD-ICN flight?
I would fly as a day JQ PE flight. However as operator is not oneworld could only credit to QF ffp. |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37497930)
Agree that if the agent can see D availability within your PNR, POC is already taken into consideration. If the agent knows how to and is capable to do that, try to use the "long sell" command for waitlist (for Sabre, used by AA, that would be 0JL36D01FEBSINHNDLL2 for 2 seats on 01FEB) and see if the waitlist request then comes back as confirmed. If that still doesn't work though, c'est la vie. It happens occasionally, unfortunately. Obviously, this is assuming SIN and HND are both stopovers (>24 hours), or else Married Segment Control (MSC) might be the reason.
SIN is a ticketed stopover and HND is the final destination. Weirdly enough the flight is available when booked as part of HKG-xSIN-HND so this must be some kind of (un)married segment control? |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37497930)
0JL36D01FEBSINHNDLL2
|
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
(Post 37522444)
JQ Jetstar fly BNE-ICN & SYD-ICN [JQ47 QF5507] from wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incheo...tional_Airport OW 3015 JQ business class on the B787 is more like PE. JQ47/QF5507 11:40 - 20:15, so a day flight. PE will be OK https://www.jetstar.com/au/en/flights/business-class
Originally Posted by link2
(Post 37522743)
Just to give an update, unfortunately this didn't work. Each time the agents could see wide open D availability but the flight always comes back unconfirmed... and we're now within 30 days of departure. The agent I talked to yesterday tried to book it in I and J and as you'd expect J came back confirmed immediately so JL must be holding inventory back for some reason. She even tried calling JL and they've apparently refused to help.
SIN is a ticketed stopover and HND is the final destination. Weirdly enough the flight is available when booked as part of HKG-xSIN-HND so this must be some kind of (un)married segment control?
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 37522869)
Does changing LL to NN make any difference?
|
[QUOTE=Hennebou;36757225]Here you go, updated list including DONE, removing duplicates (only showing one airport by country -- all the airports within a country have the same base fare), and with improved formatting (showing ranking). Oslo wins for DONEx it seems.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...a88033afc1.png Is this still valid or have things shifted considerably since then? |
I am thinking that you priced the xONEx fares based on AA.
The prices listed in EF for QR are sometimes quite a bit less expensive. In particular, for India and South Africa. I know who I would be choosing if I were to consider more wandering Fred |
Has the collapse of the Iranian currency opened up any opportunities? QR does fly from IKA.
|
Originally Posted by steveholt
(Post 37526600)
Has the collapse of the Iranian currency opened up any opportunities? QR does fly from IKA.
Not to mention VWPs burn ESTA access https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...9e623ad21b.png https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...58f0466807.png |
Originally Posted by wandering_fred
(Post 37526505)
I am thinking that you priced the xONEx fares based on AA.
The prices listed in EF for QR are sometimes quite a bit less expensive. In particular, for India and South Africa. I know who I would be choosing if I were to consider more wandering Fred |
Originally Posted by steveholt
(Post 37526600)
Has the collapse of the Iranian currency opened up any opportunities? QR does fly from IKA.
So no opportunities to take advantage of the Iranian currency's collapse. (Unlike when the Egyptian Pound was severely devalued back in early 2024 (that led to a feeding-frenzy - which I was part of :D) |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37526674)
What are the experts' recommwndations for getting a DONE4 issued by QR? Is there a specialist desk for RTW for them... ?
|
Originally Posted by MoodLighting
(Post 37527003)
A TA can plate to QR. You can't book direct with QR though.
One included an upgrade from LONE5 to DONE5 after the third flight Ah times when I was wandering Fred |
Originally Posted by wandering_fred
(Post 37526505)
I am thinking that you priced the xONEx fares based on AA.
The prices listed in EF for QR are sometimes quite a bit less expensive. In particular, for India and South Africa... Fred Am I missing something? |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37526695)
According to ExpertFlyer, the underlying base fares for Oneworld Explorers are quoted in the GDS in USD
So no opportunities to take advantage of the Iranian currency's collapse. (Unlike when the Egyptian Pound was severely devalued back in early 2024 (that led to a feeding-frenzy - which I was part of :D) |
Quick check... these routes dont work for a DONE4 do they?
NRT-HEL-RVN-HEL-FRA-LHR-PER-MEL-SYD-TBU-SYD-LAX-DFW-NRT NRT-CDG-MAD-MUC-LHR-JNB-SYD-AKL-MEL-PPP-MEL-LAX-MIA-CUN-DFW-ICN-NRT |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37528471)
Quick check... these routes don't work for a DONE4 do they?
NRT-HEL-RVN-HEL-FRA-LHR-PER-MEL-SYD-TBU-SYD-LAX-DFW-NRT NRT-CDG-MAD-MUC-LHR-JNB-SYD-AKL-MEL-PPP-MEL-LAX-MIA-CUN-DFW-ICN-NRT All flights exist? PPP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitsunday_Coast_Airport MEL-PPP is flown by Jetstar JQ and not QF. So the JQ operated ~ QF codeshare exemption as post 3217 above needed. Route 1 A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper Route 2 A map from the Great Circle Mapper - Great Circle Mapper |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37528471)
Quick check... these routes dont work for a DONE4 do they?
NRT-HEL-RVN-HEL-FRA-LHR-PER-MEL-SYD-TBU-SYD-LAX-DFW-NRT NRT-CDG-MAD-MUC-LHR-JNB-SYD-AKL-MEL-PPP-MEL-LAX-MIA-CUN-DFW-ICN-NRT They violate these two rules: Rule 4 (a) Travel must be via the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and only one crossing of each ocean is permitted. (b) Travel must be in a continuous forward direction between TC1 - TC2 - TC3. Backtracking within a continent is permitted except as follows: |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37528650)
Neither itinerary is a valid RTW
They violate these two rules: really appreciate the help! |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 37528650)
Neither itinerary is a valid RTW
They violate these two rules: |
Originally Posted by Cashew1977
(Post 37528670)
thank you... thats helpful. Planning these is often half the fun!
Have you read the User Guide wiki? The Oneworld Explorer User Guide - FlyerTalk Forums |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:56 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.