Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[FARE GONE] J PEN-YVR $1758CDN o/w One World and friends. F option available.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Mar 6, 2016, 10:33 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: stephem
Fare Rules:
Fare basis code AA J PEN-YVR
Code:
FLIGHT APPLICATION	
BETWEEN CANADA AND AREA 3   
THE FARE COMPONENT MUST NOT BE ON ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AA FLIGHTS 5100 THROUGH 5249.
  AND
THE FARE COMPONENT MUST NOT BE ON ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AA FLIGHTS 6075 THROUGH 6124.
  AND
THE FARE COMPONENT MUST INCLUDE TRAVEL VIA EACH TRANSPACIFIC SECTOR BUT NOT ON ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AA FLIGHTS 7950 THROUGH 7969.

ADVANCE RES/TICKETING	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
  STANDBY NOT PERMITTED.
  OPEN RETURNS PERMITTED.
         NOTE -
          TEXT BELOW NOT VALIDATED FOR AUTOPRICING.
          RESERVATIONS BOOKED 3 DAYS OR LESS PRIOR TO
          DEPARTURE MUST BE TICKETED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
          RESERVATIONS BOOKED 24 HOURS OR LESS PRIOR TO
          DEPARTURE MUST BE TICKETED WITHIN 3 HOURS.

STOPOVERS 
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED   NOTE - GENERAL RULE DOES NOT APPLY UNLIMITED STOPOVERS PERMITTED ON THE PRICING UNIT.

TRANSFERS	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
  UNLIMITED TRANSFERS PERMITTED ON THE FARE COMPONENT
    FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS NOT PERMITTED AND EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE COMPONENT.

PERMITTED COMBINATIONS	FOR ONE WAY FARES
   ADD-ONS PERMITTED.
  END-ON-END
    END-ON-END COMBINATIONS PERMITTED. VALIDATE ADJACENT
    LINE OF FLIGHT FARE COMPONENTS ONLY. TRAVEL MUST BE VIA
    THE POINT OF COMBINATION.
     END-ON-END NOTE -
       ADD-ONS PERMITTED
  OPEN JAWS/ROUND TRIPS
    FARES MAY BE COMBINED ON A HALF ROUND TRIP BASIS
    -TO FORM SINGLE OR DOUBLE OPEN JAWS/ROUND TRIPS.
   PROVIDED -
     COMBINATIONS ARE WITH ANY FARE FOR ANY CARRIER IN ANY
      RULE IN TARIFF
      IPRP    - BETWEEN THE USA/CANADA-AREA 2/3 VIA PAC
      IPRPC   - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 2/3 VIA PAC
      IPRSAAS - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 3 VIA PAC
      IPRSAPN - AREA 1-SOUTH WEST PACIFIC VIA PAC AND N.
                AMERICA
      OR RULE 7100/8005 IN TARIFF
      PAMAAR  - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 3 VIA PAC.

  CIRCLE TRIPS
    FARES MAY BE COMBINED ON A HALF ROUND TRIP BASIS WITH
    ANY FARE FOR ANY CARRIER IN ANY RULE AND TARIFF
    -TO FORM CIRCLE TRIPS.
   PROVIDED -
     COMBINATIONS ARE WITH ANY FARE FOR ANY CARRIER IN RULE
      7100/8005 IN TARIFF
      ATMAAR  - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 2/3 VIA ATL
      OR ANY RULE IN TARIFF
      IPRA    - BETWEEN USA/CA-AREA 2/3 AND GUAM-AREA 2
      IPRAI   - BETWEEN THE USA/CANADA-AREA 2/3 VIA ATL
      IPRP    - BETWEEN THE USA/CANADA-AREA 2/3 VIA PAC
      IPRPC   - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 2/3 VIA PAC
      IPRSAAS - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 3 VIA PAC
      IPRSAA2 - BETWEEN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE-AREA 2 VIA
                ATL
      IPRSAA3 - BETWEEN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE-AREA 3 VIA
                ATL
      IPRSAPN - AREA 1-SOUTH WEST PACIFIC VIA PAC AND N.
                AMERICA
      OR RULE 7100/8005 IN TARIFF
      PAMAAR  - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 3 VIA PAC.

SURCHARGES	BETWEEN CANADA AND MALAYSIA
  IF INFANT UNDER 02 WITHOUT A SEAT.
  OR - CONTRACT BULK INFANT WITHOUT A SEAT UNDER 02.
  OR - MILITARY INFANT WITHOUT A SEAT UNDER 02.
  OR - INCLUSIVE TOUR INFANT WITHOUT A SEAT UNDER 02.
    A SECURITY SURCHARGE OF HKD 45 PER COUPON WILL BE ADDED
    TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR DEPARTURE FROM HKG AIRPORT.
         NOTE -
          THIS SECURITY SURCHARGE APPLIES TO -
            1/ INFANTS.
            2/ PASSENGERS TRANSFERRING/TRANSITING HONG KONG.
            3/ PASSENGERS TRAVELLING ON INDUSTRY/AGENCY
               DISCOUNT /ID/AD/ TICKETS.
            4/ PASSENGERS HOLDING DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS.
  THE PROVISIONS BELOW APPLY ONLY AS FOLLOWS -
  TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR US.
  OR - TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR AY.
  OR - TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR BA.
  OR - TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR IB.
  OR - TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR JL.
  OR - TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA OR QF.
    THERE IS NO CHARGE PER FARE COMPONENT FOR TRANSPACIFIC
    SECTORS.
         NOTE -
          YR FEE MAY APPLY
    AND - AN AIRPORT/TERMINAL SURCHARGE OF CAD 15.00 PER
          COUPON WILL BE ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR
          DEPARTURE FROM CANADA.
         NOTE -
          THIS NAVIGATION SURCHARGE APPLIES TO ADT/CNN
          AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DISCOUNT.
    AND - AN AIRPORT/TERMINAL SURCHARGE OF CAD 15.00 PER
          COUPON WILL BE ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR
          ARRIVAL IN CANADA.
         NOTE -
          THIS NAVIGATION SURCHARGE APPLIES TO ADT/CNN
          AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DISCOUNT.
    AND - A SECURITY SURCHARGE OF HKD 45 PER COUPON WILL BE
          ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR DEPARTURE FROM
          HKG AIRPORT.
         NOTE -
          THIS SECURITY SURCHARGE APPLIES TO -
            1/ PASSENGERS TRANSFERRING/TRANSITING HONG KONG.
            2/ PASSENGERS TRAVELLING ON INDUSTRY/AGENCY
               DISCOUNT /ID/AD/ TICKETS.
            3/ PASSENGERS HOLDING DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS.
    AND - ORIGINATING MALAYSIA -
      A SURCHARGE OF USD 134.00 PER FARE COMPONENT WILL BE
      ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR TRAVEL FOR
      TRANSPACIFIC SECTORS.
         NOTE -
          THIS SURCHARGE APPLIES IN ADDITION TO ALL OTHER
          CHARGES AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DISCOUNT.
          THIS SURCHARGE WILL NOT APPLY TO PASSENGERS
          TRAVELLING ON FREE TICKETS.
    AND - AN AIRPORT/TERMINAL SURCHARGE OF CAD 15.00 PER
          COUPON WILL BE ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR
          DEPARTURE FROM CANADA.
         NOTE -
          THIS NAVIGATION SURCHARGE APPLIES TO ADT/CNN
          AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DISCOUNT.
    AND - AN AIRPORT/TERMINAL SURCHARGE OF CAD 15.00 PER
          COUPON WILL BE ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR
          ARRIVAL IN CANADA.
         NOTE -
          THIS NAVIGATION SURCHARGE APPLIES TO ADT/CNN
          AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DISCOUNT.
    AND - A SECURITY SURCHARGE OF HKD 45 PER COUPON WILL BE
          ADDED TO THE APPLICABLE FARE FOR DEPARTURE FROM
          HKG AIRPORT.
         NOTE -
          THIS SECURITY SURCHARGE APPLIES TO -
            1/ PASSENGERS TRANSFERRING/TRANSITING HONG KONG.
            2/ PASSENGERS TRAVELLING ON INDUSTRY/AGENCY
               DISCOUNT /ID/AD/ TICKETS.
            3/ PASSENGERS HOLDING DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS.

SALES RESTRICTIONS	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
  TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED BY ELECTRONIC TICKETING.
  TICKETS MAY NOT BE SOLD IN VENEZUELA/ARGENTINA.
  TICKETS MAY ONLY BE SOLD IN AREA 1/AREA 2/AREA 3.

PENALTIES	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
         NOTE -
          FOR TRAVEL AGENCY BOOKINGS MADE IN MEXICO / THE
          CARIBBEAN / CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA - AA WILL
          ASSESS A USD 25.00 FEE ON ANY UNTICKETED
          RESERVATION NOT CANCELED BEFORE DEPARTURE.

CHILDREN DISCOUNTS	BETWEEN CANADA AND AREA 3
  ORIGINATING AREA 3 -
    ACCOMPANIED CHILD 2-11 - CHARGE 67 PERCENT OF THE FARE.
          TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS CH
    OR - INFANT UNDER 2 WITH A SEAT - CHARGE 67 PERCENT OF
           THE FARE.
               TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS CH
    OR - INFANT UNDER 2 WITHOUT A SEAT - CHARGE 10 PERCENT
           OF THE FARE.
               TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS IN
    OR - UNACCOMPANIED CHILD 5-14 - CHARGE 100 PERCENT OF
           THE FARE.
         NOTE -
          UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN 5 6 AND 7 YEARS OF AGE WILL
          ONLY BE TRANSPORTED OVER THE LINES OF AA NON-STOP
          OR THROUGH PLANE SERVICE.

FOR J- TYPE FARES
  ACCOMPANIED CHILD 2-11 - CHARGE 100 PERCENT OF THE FARE.
        TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS CH.
    MUST BE ACCOMPANIED IN SAME COMPARTMENT BY ADULT 16 OR
      OLDER
  OR - INFANT UNDER 2 WITH A SEAT - CHARGE 100 PERCENT OF
         THE FARE.
             TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS CH.
         MUST BE ACCOMPANIED ON ALL FLIGHTS IN SAME
           COMPARTMENT BY ADULT 16 OR OLDER
  OR - 1ST INFANT UNDER 2 WITHOUT A SEAT - CHARGE 10 PERCENT
         OF THE FARE.
             TICKETING CODE - BASE FARE CODE PLUS IN.
         MUST BE ACCOMPANIED ON ALL FLIGHTS IN SAME
           COMPARTMENT BY ADULT 16 OR OLDER.
         NOTE -
          WHEN TRAVEL INCLUDES BOTH DOMESTIC AND
          INTERNATIONAL SERVICE AND DIFFERENT
          INFANT FARES APPLY - THE FARE NEED NOT
          BE MORE THAN THE SUM OF THE APPLICABLE
          FARES FOR THE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL
          PORTIONS.
  OR - UNACCOMPANIED CHILD 5-14 - CHARGE 100 PERCENT OF THE
         FARE.
         NOTE -
          UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN 5 6 AND 7 YEARS OF AGE WILL
          ONLY BE TRANSPORTED OVER THE LINES OF AA NON-STOP
          OR THROUGH PLANE SERVICE.

TOUR CONDUCTOR DISCOUNTS	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
         NOTE -
          DISCOUNTS APPLY. INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE
          AT THIS TIME...CONTACT CARRIER FOR DETAILS.
          THIS RULE DOES NOT APPLY FOR TRAVEL ON OTHER
          AIRLINE OPERATED CODE SHARE FLIGHTS.

AGENT DISCOUNTS	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
         NOTE -
          DISCOUNTS APPLY. INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE
          AT THIS TIME. CONTACT CARRIER FOR DETAILS.
          THIS RULE DOES NOT APPLY FOR TRAVEL ON OTHER
          AIRLINE OPERATED CODE SHARE FLIGHTS.

ALL OTHER DISCOUNTS	UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
  THE PROVISIONS BELOW APPLY ONLY AS FOLLOWS -
  TICKETS MUST BE ISSUED ON AA. SALE IS RESTRICTED TO
  SPECIFIC AGENTS.
  FARES MAY ONLY BE SOLD BY AA AND MAY NOT BE SOLD BY TRAVEL
  AGENTS.
  PASSENGER OCCUPYING TWO SEATS. ID REQUIRED - CHARGE 100
    PERCENT OF THE FARE.
        TICKET DESIGNATOR - SEAT.
         NOTE -
          APPLICATION---
          FARES APPLY TO A PASSENGER PERMITTED THE
          EXCLUSIVE USE OF TWO ADJACENT SEATS.
  SENIOR CITIZEN 65 OR OLDER. ID REQUIRED - NO DISCOUNT.
         NOTE -
          RULE 1810 - SENIOR CITIZEN DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY
Print Wikipost

[FARE GONE] J PEN-YVR $1758CDN o/w One World and friends. F option available.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2016, 10:16 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, California
Programs: BMI Diamond Club Gold forever
Posts: 6,367
Originally Posted by Guava
AA does have a very antiquated and frustrating refund process. Be thankful they didn't ask you to write to their customer solutions for a refund. Unless absolutely necessary, I don't buy from aa.com
I'd never used AA.com before, so lesson learned. I usually use a TA but thought I got all the codes and flights I wanted, what was the downside.... now I know! Indeed these would have just been voided out by a TA since it was well under 24 hours. How silly that AA can't catch such tickets, but instead puts them through the same process as tickets that have long been issued.
stephem is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 10:23 pm
  #92  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, California
Programs: BMI Diamond Club Gold forever
Posts: 6,367
Originally Posted by Guava
What stephem was saying applies only when you are booking the ticket before the travel actually begins. After the first segment has been flown, it would no longer be possible to reprice the ticket if all you need is date/time change. The fare rules clearly state there is no restriction regarding stopover.
I've usually found that if the fare rules don't have a HIP exception for stopovers (and this one doesn't), then whether you try to add a stopover at initial ticketing or after you have flown a segment, you will get hit with the HIP fare, as long as the agent you are working with knows how to read fare rules. It doesn't matter that the stopover provision says the fare allows stopovers, that just means it can be done, but doesn't mean there will be no additional fare collection if you do add one (such as for HIP).

It sounds like Orbitz fails to catch this, and quite frankly I've found that the airlines themselves usually don't catch it when you call in unless there is something in the request that requires sending to the rate desk. So people will probably get stopovers, maybe not a sure thing though. The rules require a HIP calculation, so there is always the risk you will be required to pay the HIP differential for anything more than 24 hours. I say get it booked via O with a stopover and reduce the risk that you wont be able to get the stopover you want after flying the first segment without a large HIP differential being paid.

Edited to add: Most of these fares will have a statement either that there is a HIP exception for stopovers or that there isnt one. In the absence of an exception, I've always been told HIP applies by default. There is no HIP statement one way or the other in this fare, my guess is that some OTAs may have coded it incorrectly to allow stopovers without HIP calculation. Also, I put the complete fare rules in a wiki for the thread.

Last edited by stephem; Mar 6, 2016 at 10:36 pm
stephem is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 11:01 pm
  #93  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: YYC, SFO, OAK
Programs: AS MVP 75K, AA Platinum, IHG Platinum, Club Carlson Gold
Posts: 734
So if this fare has been around for ~10 years... why are we only finding it now? Does it come and go? Or has it been around continuously since then... and wouldn't tons of people be booking it?
AwardBee is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 11:05 pm
  #94  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
Does anyone see any problem booking the last segment with a long layover on a different alliance carrier through an OTA? I am not sure if I will take the last flight, skip it or try to change/push it forward.
nk15 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 11:15 pm
  #95  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 6,425
Originally Posted by AwardBee
So if this fare has been around for ~10 years... why are we only finding it now? Does it come and go? Or has it been around continuously since then... and wouldn't tons of people be booking it?
No, it doesn't come and go. It has been there the whole time. Just because you are hearing about it now doesn't mean others didn't know about it.
skunker is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 11:45 pm
  #96  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, California
Programs: BMI Diamond Club Gold forever
Posts: 6,367
My experience in the 2000s was that there were a number of these filed by AA with no expiration date. I've used many of them over the years, but the ones from major cities in SE Asia had all been "used up." My guess is that at some point someone at the airline realizes, oops. PEN, I was right near there living in Singapore for a few years and to be honest in all of my hunting and pecking it never occurred to me to try that. And my guess is that some people know of this fare and have been using it, just it didn't occur to most people to try that city pair. I generally hammered away on city pairs from CMB, KUL, SGN and DAC for my fun back then, but those are all long gone. Generally, I used a long list of west coast US, Canadian and LatAm cities. For some strange reason, the Canadian cities all died last, but often there were some hangers on in LatAm (SJD and GRU on a couple of fares). My uneducated guess is these more obscure north and south destinations were so infrequently used that they weren't really on the radar, and if the end date for the fare is infinity then these things will live on. BTW, if you hunt and peck a bit with PEN, I am sure there are some other interesting fares.

Originally Posted by AwardBee
So if this fare has been around for ~10 years... why are we only finding it now? Does it come and go? Or has it been around continuously since then... and wouldn't tons of people be booking it?

Last edited by stephem; Mar 6, 2016 at 11:53 pm
stephem is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 2:07 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
Originally Posted by Guava
It's a bad habit to book directly with airlines, people in this forum should learn to use airlines' website as a last resort, not the first thing they run to. You have far more protections if something goes wrong when booked via a TA than vs. booking with the airline directly.
This is terrible advice for many. Half of FT thinks you should only book with the airline and half thinks you should only book with an OTA/TA.

In my case I have great success booking directly with airlines and with one particular TA. OTAs are a complete pain most of the time, at least for me, if any changes need to be made.
whimike is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 8:15 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego
Programs: IHG Spire Amb, HH Diamond, DL Diamond and 1MM
Posts: 3,611
Originally Posted by nk15
Does anyone see any problem booking the last segment with a long layover on a different alliance carrier through an OTA? I am not sure if I will take the last flight, skip it or try to change/push it forward.
No problem with you plan either way. I'm in the camp at FT that believes in NOT using an OTA, unless you can't get the routing or price you want from booking directly with an airline. An OTA offers no "protection" and just adds another layer of complexity when things go wrong.
Bowgie is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 8:24 am
  #99  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
Originally Posted by Bowgie
No problem with you plan either way. I'm in the camp at FT that believes in NOT using an OTA, unless you can't get the routing or price you want from booking directly with an airline. An OTA offers no "protection" and just adds another layer of complexity when things go wrong.
Someone mentioned above that the ticket issuing airline takes over after you flew the first flight, is that true or do any subsequent changes (after you flew the first flight) have to go through the OTA?
nk15 is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 8:33 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ORD
Programs: BA, AA, SQ, UA, AC, WS, MR TIT
Posts: 8,659
I am trying a book a ticket using orbitz but I always get a message that the combo of F can't be be booked!!! Any idea why and what to do to solve this issue?
NA-Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 6:31 pm
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,093
Originally Posted by stephem
I've usually found that if the fare rules don't have a HIP exception for stopovers (and this one doesn't), then whether you try to add a stopover at initial ticketing or after you have flown a segment, you will get hit with the HIP fare, as long as the agent you are working with knows how to read fare rules. It doesn't matter that the stopover provision says the fare allows stopovers, that just means it can be done, but doesn't mean there will be no additional fare collection if you do add one (such as for HIP).
If you have booked your ticket via a travel agent, then when you call the airline after the travel has begun and the agent see your fare basis is full fare "J" or "F", they won't bother checking the fare rules. Airline agents typically stop reading after they see J or F. Case in point, the fare rule is unclear on cancellation policy so I called AA to reconfirm. The agent answered yes so fast I thought she was putting me on hold she wasn't, she answered yes the moment I finished my question. In some jurisdictions, the reading of a contract (aka. fare rules) is required to be read in favor of the consumer if it's ambiguous, FYI.

Originally Posted by stephem
It sounds like Orbitz fails to catch this, and quite frankly I've found that the airlines themselves usually don't catch it when you call in unless there is something in the request that requires sending to the rate desk. So people will probably get stopovers, maybe not a sure thing though. The rules require a HIP calculation, so there is always the risk you will be required to pay the HIP differential for anything more than 24 hours. I say get it booked via O with a stopover and reduce the risk that you wont be able to get the stopover you want after flying the first segment without a large HIP differential being paid.
That's typically the case. Airlines are usually very liberal when it comes to time change on full fare tickets, especially when such ticket involves multiple carriers. I have in the past called airline A to change one segment, which put its flight out of sync with the rest then assured airline A I will call airline B to move the next flight and I did.

Originally Posted by AwardBee
So if this fare has been around for ~10 years... why are we only finding it now? Does it come and go? Or has it been around continuously since then... and wouldn't tons of people be booking it?
There used to be a lot more fares like this, not limited to just AA, when originating from various Asian cities. Most of them have since disappeared. PEN is a very unusual departure city, a place most people wouldn't think of. The fact it is located relatively far away from North Asian cities contribute to its survival until now. This ex-PEN F fare in AA is comparable to some F fares from the bygone era of 2000s until early 2010s. I think the fact it is kind of out of the way make it a little less attractive. Similar fares that used to be very attractive were far more convenient for people departing from HKG, China, Taiwan, Korea and Japan. I will also say that most of us have also learned to be discreet when it comes to fares like this. Had we been blogging about amazing fares ex-Asia in the mid 2000s, chances are they would have survived for weeks instead of years. I have told Gary Leff many things in private and I made him swore secrecy.

Originally Posted by nk15
Does anyone see any problem booking the last segment with a long layover on a different alliance carrier through an OTA? I am not sure if I will take the last flight, skip it or try to change/push it forward.
If your last segment is not on AA, I see little problem with it. More reasons why you should book through a TA as opposed to the airline directly but apparently some people think saving at least 5% off the entire value of the fare purchased is apparently a very poor advice. In the past, when the premium fare was with *A, I had booked return trip where the last segment on the outbound is on AA so that AA can ticket the whole thing (to kill the *A fuel surcharges). I skipped that segment but when check-in with AA to commence the return trip, AA remarked to me that there was a skipped segment on the outbound but they chose to do nothing about it.

Originally Posted by stephem
My experience in the 2000s was that there were a number of these filed by AA with no expiration date. I've used many of them over the years, but the ones from major cities in SE Asia had all been "used up." My guess is that at some point someone at the airline realizes, oops. PEN, I was right near there living in Singapore for a few years and to be honest in all of my hunting and pecking it never occurred to me to try that.
That's very similar to my experience as well. And many those fares were *A, not just AA and Oneworld.

Originally Posted by Bowgie
An OTA offers no "protection" and just adds another layer of complexity when things go wrong.
If one just blindly choose whatever OTA/TA come to mind, sure. Not all airlines are born equal, neither are TA, whether online or otherwise.
Guava is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 8:34 pm
  #102  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
Originally Posted by stephem
My experience in the 2000s was that there were a number of these filed by AA with no expiration date. I've used many of them over the years, but the ones from major cities in SE Asia had all been "used up." My guess is that at some point someone at the airline realizes, oops. PEN, I was right near there living in Singapore for a few years and to be honest in all of my hunting and pecking it never occurred to me to try that. And my guess is that some people know of this fare and have been using it, just it didn't occur to most people to try that city pair. I generally hammered away on city pairs from CMB, KUL, SGN and DAC for my fun back then, but those are all long gone. Generally, I used a long list of west coast US, Canadian and LatAm cities. For some strange reason, the Canadian cities all died last, but often there were some hangers on in LatAm (SJD and GRU on a couple of fares). My uneducated guess is these more obscure north and south destinations were so infrequently used that they weren't really on the radar, and if the end date for the fare is infinity then these things will live on. BTW, if you hunt and peck a bit with PEN, I am sure there are some other interesting fares.
What other interesting fares?
nk15 is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 9:14 pm
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
Thanks for everyone's input. The more I think about this the more I think we should perhaps be booking several of these. For the next few months each of these one ways can bring in 50k RDMs (for an EXP choosing the right flights), 30kEQMs, and 1 SWU, while for next year they are worth 15k rdms (for an EXP), 30k eqms, and 1 SWU. Yet, if you want to maximize these you should be booking them as roundtrips, to minimize positioning costs. So this is getting complex.

Are you guys booking these as roundtrips or one ways mostly?

Based on my quite conservative math (for EXPs), 50k rdms and 1 SWU are worth $500+$500= $1,000, so for every $1650 or $1300 spent, we get at least $1,000 worth of product back.

Last edited by nk15; Mar 7, 2016 at 9:46 pm
nk15 is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 9:53 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: YYC, SFO, OAK
Programs: AS MVP 75K, AA Platinum, IHG Platinum, Club Carlson Gold
Posts: 734
Originally Posted by nk15
Based on my quite conservative math (for EXPs), 50k rdms and 1 SWU are worth $500+$500= $1,000, so for every $1650 or $1300 spent, we get at least $1,000 worth of product back.
I'd buy several round trips if I could... my problem is having a lot of RDMs in the bank to spend this year, and all my vacation time is already accounted for by the award trips I have booked. It's either burn RDMs pre-devaluation or do these cheap-ish revenue fares.

Doing them purely as mileage runs... as you've calculated, the value of product I'd get back isn't worth the money invested (you value SWUs more/RDMs less than I do, but it all washes out), although I do just love flying for the sake of flying. It's tempting.
AwardBee is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 10:13 pm
  #105  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
Originally Posted by AwardBee
I'd buy several round trips if I could... my problem is having a lot of RDMs in the bank to spend this year, and all my vacation time is already accounted for by the award trips I have booked. It's either burn RDMs pre-devaluation or do these cheap-ish revenue fares.

Doing them purely as mileage runs... as you've calculated, the value of product I'd get back isn't worth the money invested (you value SWUs more/RDMs less than I do, but it all washes out), although I do just love flying for the sake of flying. It's tempting.
I know, a lot of hard decisions. I think the strategy should be keep earning strongly at least until June 30, potentially a bit longer if new rdm scheme is delayed, and burn from July/August til December, booked on pre devaluation rates. Then from January start earning again for new year, accepting the new hard reality of reduced RDMs, and rationing remaining award bookings into the future.

I think the strategy for the PEN fare could be to also explore the region using it as a basis for repeat trips (SIN, BKK, HAN, etc), and not only as an MR and just flying for the sake of it.
nk15 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.