Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 11, 2015, 11:49 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: drewguy
If you've never gone through this process read this before posting!
Note: Please consider that with high probability, United is monitoring this thread, so please pay attention on what you post!

DOT Investigation UpdatesNews Media Updates:

-------

According to USA Today, Ben Mutzabaugh:
United is voiding the bookings of several thousand individuals who were attempting to take advantage of an error a third-party software provider made when it applied an incorrect currency exchange rate, despite United having properly filed its fares. Most of these bookings were for travel originating in the United Kingdom, and the level of bookings made with Danish Kroner as the local currency was significantly higher than normal during the limited period that customers made these bookings.
Note that United has also accidentally cancelled "legitimate" tickets paid for in USD, purchased in USD from LHR... Please check your other tickets if purchased today to ensure they were not unilaterally cancelled.

However, there is no chance at all that you can have your tickets re-instated if you complain to DOT on the basis of DOT rule § 399.88:
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.
Form for filing DOT complaint. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.

Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.


Tips for DOT Complaint:
  • File on DOT for every ticket number affected.
  • If you have one reservation with four people traveling (four tickets) file 4 DOT complaints, one per ticket.
  • If you have separate reservations, file a DOT complaint for each.
  • The DOT complaint website may take several minutes to load, depending on demand.
  • When you go to upload a file, be careful as it will reset all your radio buttons. So, if you want a copy of the complaint, make sure you double check that "Yes" is still selected before submitting, especially if you upload a file.

Template For Complaint:
United has unilaterally cancelled my ticket without my consent.

Facts:
1. The ticket was ticketed (had a ticket number).
2. I received a confirmation number, ticket number, and emails stating both
3. The ticket was paid for and my credit card charged.

United must reinstate the ticket within its original cabin. This trip is for travel TO the United States.

At no time during the booking process was any other fare than the Danish Krone equivalent displayed. As a reasonable, prudent consumer, I believed I was paying the price displayed to me on the website. United never sent or displayed the equivalent fare in any other currency.

Trip Details
Ticket #: 016XXXXXXXXXX
PNR: XXXXXX
Routing: LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL

Attachments: Attached is a document showing the ticket, routing, and providing proof that the reservation was ticketed.

Filename: Cancelled - UA Reservation - LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL - XXXXXX - 016XXXXXXXXXX.pdf

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant Law |
| http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/399.88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant FAQ |
| http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/rules/EAPP_2_FAQ.pdf |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Does the prohibition on post-purchase price increases in section 399.88(a) apply in the situation where a carrier mistakenly offers an airfare due to a computer problem or human error and a consumer purchases the ticket at that fare before the carrier is able to fix the mistake?

Section 399.88(a) states that it is an unfair and deceptive practice for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, or of a tour or tour component that includes scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation to a consumer after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of a government-imposed tax or fee and only if the passenger is advised of a possible increase before purchasing a ticket. A purchase occurs when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer. Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a “mistake.”
-----
Tips for retrieving your ticket number:
  1. paste(right click copy link location first) following link into your web browser
  2. change XXXXXX next to COPNR= for your reservation number and LASTNAME next to LN= for you SURNAME
  3. go to the webpage address you have just created

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...NRCD=2/11/2015


Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX View Post
R E L A X

Breathe deep.

Congrats on all who got in.

Now comes the fun part.

1. Discovery - mistake fare is posted on FT. Novices frantically checks how much vacation time they have and if the dates of availability mesh with their schedules. Experienced FTers just book it and worry about contacting spouses or their boss later. Word spreads like wildfire.

2. Excitement - Tickets purchased, confirmation emails received and dates of travel shared with other FTers. Discussions of what to see and do and where to stay crop up in other threads. Novices contact source to change seats or inquire about upgrades, Seasoned FTers sit back and enjoy reading the discussion threads.

3. Stress Stage 1 - Concern over paper ticket delivery - Novices Frantically check otheFedEx website every few hours, constant monitoring of driveway for FedEx truck. Seasoned FT veterans sit back and relax.

4. Glee and happiness - Paper tickets in hand, vacation request submitted, spouses finally informed, hotel reservations made and bragging to friends and co-workers begins. Both novices and experts get very excited.

5. Stress Stage 2 - Rumors of fare not being honored, discussion threads about the airline and ticketing agency ensue. Rumors crop up like crabgrass at this stage. Many FTers begin to worry excessively about whether or not the trip will happen. Novices make non-refundable and financial committments to their trip. Seasoned FTers make mixed drinks (and maybe a sandwich) and is patient.

6. Reality Check - Accurate information is obtained - usually takes place a week to 10 days after mistake fare is published. Confirmed information from the source as to whether or not tickets will be honored.

7a. Pure Joy (Icelandair style- Fare is Honored) - Lots of happy people, FT threads on shared information regarding hotels, restaurants, tours, etc. Jealousy from others sets in. First "FT guinea pigs" embark, post confirmation threads that all is ok.


7b Hostile Feelings (Copa Airlines Style - fare is not honored) - Many angry and disappointed FTers. Refunds are issued. Novices have multiple discussion threads of lawsuits and hostile correspondence, FT pros mutter "c'est la vie" and look for the next fare mistake.

8a Success (Honored) - Trip Report thread becomes very active


Freedom of Information Act Request
File #2015-147, Office of the Secretary of Transportation - Receipt acknowledged 3/13/15

http://www.dot.gov/individuals/foia/office-secretary-foia-information

Relevant excerpt from my request on 2/24/15. There no need for multiple requests for the same thing, though feel free to request more or different information obviously. I'll post any updates as I get them.

"Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S. C. subsection 552, I am requesting access to any and all records of correspondence, including electronic, between anyone working for, or on the behalf of, United Airlines and its subsidiaries, and with anyone working for, or on the behalf of, the Department of Transportation; specifically this would include only the date range beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015.

In addition, I am requesting access to any and all internal records and correspondence in relation to coming to the decision made on February 23rd, 2015 regarding the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings Determination Regarding United Airlines Mistaken Fare, with the exception of any of the consumer submitted complaints via phone, email, website, or letter. Specifically, this would be any records beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015."
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:21 pm
  #2056  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Programs: QFF, Krisflyer, US Air DM, VelocityRewards, Hertz Gold, Hilton Gold, Accor Plat
Posts: 446
Originally Posted by iahphx
Have any airlines actually been fined yet for not honoring mistake fares? The idea of fines here seems absurd. I guess the DOT could make UA honor the fare, but I think that's a longshot.
No DOT cant make UA honor the fares but they can tell them that if they don't they would be fined. My guess the reason no airline hasn't been fined is that they realize honoring is the cheaper option and shouldn't be taken as a sign DOT wouldn't fine.
burmans is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:21 pm
  #2057  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: IAD,MOW
Programs: PMUA
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by tboons
many bought more than 1... if everyone buy 2 on average, just 8k people... and some may alert their friends, so we may be only look at about 8000 buyers for that 17-20k tickets.

several blogs also highlighted this deal
We can't get a prove until DOT posts it, but I don't believe in such high numbers. UAL announced that they are voiding 3 hours ago, and 8k posted it. I think there are 3k complains. At 6am US time not many people are buying tickets or checking flyertalk. and if it was people from Europe, they were sleeping 3 hours ago
Karlson is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:22 pm
  #2058  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,265
Originally Posted by Parachute07
So as a US citizen filing a complaint because US cancelled by LH flight, I have no recourse here, right? Or give it a whirl?
You actually do in the perspective of European pax rights

and applies if you are:

departing from any airport situated in the EU, or
arriving in the EU with an EU carrier or one from Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.
.

Only for the consumer rights (and complaining at EU consumer rights center) there should be a EU-citizen link.
Epicura is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:22 pm
  #2059  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: DL DM, UA 1K, AA EXP, US G, SPG P, HH D, MR G, NEXUS/GE, DL AMEX Reserve
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by Tummy
I know one person who bought 16. Most of them were ticketed before getting shut down.
One of my friends purchased 52 round trips, one per a week for the next year...
mbwmbw is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:23 pm
  #2060  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,425
Originally Posted by dera
I'm guessing some will, but not in the cabin they booked.
That would be the most cost-effective damage reduction strategy:

First cancel everything - lose more than half of passengers.
Then downgrade them to Economy - lose even more.

The rest who want to fly, let them. They'll prob buy enough booze on board to pay for the minimal losses. That way you keep your face because you did "honor" the fare, and avoid a possibility of losing the DOT argument which can be very costly.
I'm sorry, but this won't be happening. UA will not be honoring the tickets in any capacity whatsoever. Unless the gov't makes them. And I think that's quite improbable.

Originally Posted by Epicura
If a shop happens to advertise a certain product for 1$ instead of 10$ , they could be enforced to sell it at 1$, related to consumers rights. IMHO this is not much different than the issue in this case...
No, that's not how consumer protection law works. The shop isn't required to sell that product for $1. That's why the DOT rules are dumb and, probably, illegal. And why they themselves are shying away from them. Read the Gary Leff blog links and you will understand the situation.
iahphx is online now  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:24 pm
  #2061  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Programs: Flying Blue Gold, Air Berlin Gold, Etihad Silver (bad move)
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by iahphx

But those aren't the facts here. EVERYBODY knows it was a mistake. We all know how it happened. It wasn't really UA's fault. While I'd like a nearly-free European biz class trip for my family as much as the next guy, I can sufficiently detach myself from the emotions to know that's not what the law should require. It's wrong. Nobody else in the world in any industry is held to the standard required by the DOT.
Stockholm, sorry, Copenhagen syndrome?!
Irelandflyer is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:25 pm
  #2062  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by Ender4576
My first itinerary was scheduled for Feb 16, well within the 14 day window. I have a positioning flight on hold for Saturday, but am scared to take that flight and then be stuck in LHR without a valid ticket.
This. Ditto, but my positioning flight is the 13th.
burgetka is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:25 pm
  #2063  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA / San Francisco, CA
Programs: BA Gold, TK Elite Plus
Posts: 1,150
What is the email to United's reservations for complaints?
dera is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:26 pm
  #2064  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: DL DM, UA 1K, AA EXP, US G, SPG P, HH D, MR G, NEXUS/GE, DL AMEX Reserve
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by iahphx
I'm sorry, but this won't be happening. UA will not be honoring the tickets in any capacity whatsoever. Unless the gov't makes them. And I think that's quite improbable.



No, that's not how consumer protection law works. The shop isn't required to sell that product for $1. That's why the DOT rules are dumb and, probably, illegal. And why they themselves are shying away from them. Read the Gary Leff blog links and you will understand the situation.
Here's the difference. The airline not only advertised, but sold, and then provided a receipt for the service. United takes advantage of technology to perform their ticketing. It is their responsibility to do that. If a soda machine started dispensing sodas or bose headphones at a fraction of the cost, and the transaction already OCCURRED, then the company couldn't force the consumer to return the soda/headphones/whatever.

Food for thought.
mbwmbw is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:26 pm
  #2065  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Here Today Gone Tomorrow
Programs: NW Silver, CO Silver,SPG Gold, USMint Presidential, Chase/BA 100k, Airtran Wendy's cups
Posts: 815
Glad I missed this one. I was 30 min late to the game. When I saw this blow up to 50 pages in a mater on minutes I had a fell UAL wouldn't honor it. It just had too much attention.
nwa330 is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:28 pm
  #2066  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA / San Francisco, CA
Programs: BA Gold, TK Elite Plus
Posts: 1,150
Originally Posted by iahphx
I'm sorry, but this won't be happening. UA will not be honoring the tickets in any capacity whatsoever. Unless the gov't makes them. And I think that's quite improbable.



No, that's not how consumer protection law works. The shop isn't required to sell that product for $1. That's why the DOT rules are dumb and, probably, illegal. And why they themselves are shying away from them. Read the Gary Leff blog links and you will understand the situation.
We'll see how they play this. Handing out maybe 1000 free TATL economy seats is pretty much free for them, and would be a good PR move. Playing by the book is a bad business strategy in this situation, even though it is possible (but not certain) that is would be legal.

And this $1 product, they would not be required to sell it, but they are responsible for damages and costs the customer had because they offered it with an erroneous pricetag.
dera is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:29 pm
  #2067  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 945
Originally Posted by mbwmbw
One of my friends purchased 52 round trips, one per a week for the next year...
i had to comment on this... talk about a "glutton"
divjan is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:31 pm
  #2068  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,432
Originally Posted by burgetka
This. Ditto, but my positioning flight is the 13th.
Mine too.
cruisr is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:31 pm
  #2069  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA / San Francisco, CA
Programs: BA Gold, TK Elite Plus
Posts: 1,150
BTW: For anyone understanding how payment processing and currency conversions work, I'm pretty sure there's an available job starting tomorrow for you
dera is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 7:31 pm
  #2070  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: BTS
Posts: 611
Originally Posted by divjan
i had to comment on this... talk about a "glutton"
Yeah, it would serve him right if everyone else's tickets are honored (but not his) -- wishful thinking
scibuff is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.