Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 19, 2013, 9:45 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: fti
People, please edit/use the wiki so same questions are not always asked.

The current CTA decision on the Yangon deal is only for tickets canceled by SWISS Airlines for the seven merged complaints/companions and tickets canceled by Jet Airways for one complainant and companions
- It's not about other carriers because each carrier submits different tariffs.
- If you are not one of the complainants or their companions above who were mentioned in the respective cases, you need to submit a case yourself for hearing.
- There's currently one person who is on Iberia for CTA decision, one can either wait for results or submit a complaint to CTA.

Result of the current case for LX in brief is:
- CTA found 5(F) in the tariff used to be unclear for canceling tickets on erroneously quoted fares.
- 5(F) is unjust and unreasonable and must be revised or taken down by July 9, 2013 (or SWISS can appeal by then)
- SWISS did not use its tariff correctly to cancel the tickets.
- SWISS must compensate one complainant's First Class ticket and any related expenses by July 18, 2013 provided with evidence.
- SWISS must transport other complainants (and their companions) in the original price charged with same booking class and routing by June 18, 2014.

Result of the current case for 9W in brief is:
- Tariff on file had no clauses for "erroneous fares" and was updated subsequently, which means it is not relevant to this event
- Therefore, 9W is to reinstate the tickets with a 1-year validity for transport between the same points and the same booking class.


CTA official news can be read here for general overview of the case.

Actual CTA case review can be found here for reference should you wish to file a complaint.

If you have a similar case that's with SWISS, you need to file with CTA to get a result through informal process first before it gets to formal process. The entire procedure can take up to 3 months for each and the result may not be same cause it's case-by-base and the reviewer of the case can be different.

To file an informal complaint with CTA, see here. Click through all of the pages to get to the online form for the informal complaint. Or click here.

To file a formal complaint after informal complaint has been closed, see here. Continue on to the next page to see the address or email address for the formal complaint.

The July 17th and 18th responses from LX can be found here:
Other Letters:


Feel free to add dates, flights, etc., in order to plan DOs, etc.

Aug 4: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 5: ICN-SFO (UA892)
Jason8612

Aug 7: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 11: ICN-NRT-ORD (UA78, UA882)
Jason8612

Aug 14: BOS-IAD-NRT-ICN (UA285, UA803, UA79)
Deltspygt

Aug 19: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA352)
Deltspygt

Oct 1: UA433-UA893
JeredF +1

Oct 8: UA892-UA242
JeredF +1

Oct 9: BOS-SFO-ICN (UA433, UA893)
BigJC

Oct 13: ICN-NRT-ORD-BOS (UA78, UA882, UA744)
BigJC

Oct 21: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
Sterndogg +1
flyerdude88 (SFO - ICN portion only)

Oct 23: ICN - SFO UA 892
flyerdude88

Oct 27: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-BOS UA286
Sterndogg +1

Nov 05: BOS-ORD UA521, ORD-NRT UA881
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 11: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-IAD UA727
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 26: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-NRT UA837, NRT-ICN UA79
thepla

Nov 27: BOS-ORD-NRT-ICN (UA501, UA881, UA196)
BigJC+1

Nov 29: Planning 2 days in TPE, been to ICN
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-ORD UA698, ORD-BOS UA961
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA822)
BigJC+1

Dec 15: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
songzm

Dec 25: BOS-IAD UA285, IAD-NRT UA803, NRT-ICN UA79
Dinoscool3 +2

Dec 30: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA444
songzm

Dec 31: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA770
Dinoscool3 +2

Jan 11: BOS-SFO UA1523, Jan 12: SFO-ICN UA893
margarita girl

Jan 12: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
Zebranz

14 Jan: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
ORDOGG

19 Jan: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-ORD UA698 to ORD-BOS UA961
ORDOGG

Jan 22: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA500
margarita girl

Feb 5: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA242
Zebranz



CMB-DFW EY F

FARE IS GONE

FARE RULES (thanks to SQ421)
FRTLK Fare Rules (RT)
FOWLK Fare Rules (OW)

WHEN ARE YOU FLYING?
Feel free to add any additional cities you're leaving from!
Please slot yourselves in!!!

ex-CMB
Feb

Mar
8 - Darmajaya
12 - Thaidai
22 - Deadinabsentia

Apr
21 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
26 - tahsir21

May
28 - Upperdeck744
29 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

Jun
12 - lelee

Jul
7 - HansGolden +6
8 - arcticbull + 1
11 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: SIN-CMB, DFW-MCI)
25 - Tycosiao
30 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: MCI-DFW, CMB-SIN)

Aug
17 - DC777Fan
26 - Yi Yang
31 - dcas

Sep

Oct

Nov
8 - harryhv
29 - stephem+4

Dec
6 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. roastpuff , JFKEZE (UL Code-share)
7 - DWFI
10 - jlisi984 + dad (CMB-AUH-DFW)
21 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

ex-AUH
Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr
27 - RICHKLHS

May


Jun
29 - yerffej201

Jul
9 - HansGolden +6
27 - Tycosiao

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov
30 - stephem+4 (to JFK)

Dec
7 - JFKEZE, DWFI [EY161 nonstop]
9 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. Roastpuff

ex-DFW
Jan

Feb

Mar
14 - Thaidai
15 - zainman +1

Apr
25 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir

May

Jun

Jul

Aug
22 - arcticbull + 1

Sep
22 - bonsaisai (positioning flights ORD-DFW, CMB-SIN)


Oct

Nov
19 - harryhv->Paris

Dec
19 - Yi Yang, jona970318
24 - DWFI (EY160 nonstop)
26 - HansGolden +6 (CDG), LwoodY2K (AUH)
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2014, 12:43 am
  #10021  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UAE
Programs: SPG Gold, Marriott Silver, Continental OnePass, BA Executive Club, Tesco ;)
Posts: 490
Originally Posted by stargold
3 posts up. You'll find the exact reference right there if you read it.
Ah yes, sorry - missed that.

Glad they've put something in writing.
Vitriol01 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 2:36 am
  #10022  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Originally Posted by bangkokiscool
The oral hearing is requested as an opportunity to "present and test the evidence"

Thanks - so that bit of speculation gets blown out of the water

LX isn't interested in clearing up the expectations of CTA, it's interested in cross examining and intimidating the complainants.

so you think the airline is aiming for a face to face, across the table, eyeball to eyeball confrontation with the individuals who brought the complaints ???

IAN-UK is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 3:36 pm
  #10023  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TLV
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by Deltahater
Can anybody post the text of the lastest email please?
You can see it here: http://goo.gl/TFa9Rg

I couldn't plug it into the wiki due to having fewer than 90 posts.

Last edited by Maayan; Mar 19, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Maayan is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 3:54 pm
  #10024  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York Metropolitan Area 45 km from JFK
Programs: UA,AA,AS,BA
Posts: 4,607
Irony

SWISS International Airlines Company slogan is:

'Unser Zeichen ist ein Versprechen' 'Our sign is a promise' (English).

I guess they should add: 'Unless We decide otherwise'.
WingedWorldExplorer is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 4:32 pm
  #10025  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Aeroplan, BMI, Hyatt, SPG, PC
Posts: 606
Originally Posted by Deltahater
In order for that to happen, the complainants (us) would have to be there right?

So, either we show up voluntarily, which would be the dumbest thing we could do, or CTA would have to issue international subpeonas. I doubt that a regulatory body could issue those. Here in Texas, courts can only issue a subpeona for up to 150 miles (I believe).

Can anybody post the text of the lastest email please?

Cheers
There is no subpoena rights. There is no cross examination. However, if you provide an affidavit you could be cross examined on this. The sole reason for the oral hearing request is to dissuade complainants from coming from all over the world.
erasmus99 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 5:20 pm
  #10026  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle WA USA
Programs: AS MVP Gold, Hilton Diamond, Starbucks/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Hyatt Explorist, and some others
Posts: 251
Originally Posted by WingedWorldExplorer
SWISS International Airlines Company slogan is:

'Unser Zeichen ist ein Versprechen' 'Our sign is a promise' (English).

I guess they should add: 'Unless We decide otherwise'.
The dimensions aren't perfect but if you use your imagination when picturing the large Swiss + (Plus) sign...

- The top vertical line could represent a middle finger.
- The wide horizontal section could represent the hand, thumb, and 3 of the fingers
- The bottom vertical line could represent the forearm/wrist

Given that imagery, I would say that they are living up to their slogan in terms of this fare. (And not to get off topic but the condition of their JFK lounge facilities made me feel like they were giving me the finger as well).
RustingInSeattle is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 5:45 pm
  #10027  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, California
Programs: BMI Diamond Club Gold forever
Posts: 6,367
Thanks janetdoe, will be useful when I get to this stage.
stephem is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 6:32 pm
  #10028  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,898
Originally Posted by Maayan
You can see it here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Z...it?usp=sharing

I couldn't plug it into the wiki due to having fewer than 90 posts.

Thank you very much.

This is indeed an interesting letter. Since LX has lost every single argument so far, they are now trying to muddy the waters by making this an industry issue vs an LX issue.

The fact that they have spent a multiple of what it would have cost to transport us on legal fees so far and then have the gall to argue "economic consequences" is just mind boggling. What parallel universe LX and Heather Tracey live in is fascinating.

If SWISS had spent half their effort on PREVENTING mistake or special fares vs fighting all of us here, LX would have an industry leading, 100% fool proof fare publishing system, but that does not seem to be in their interest. Why fix the issue, right??

But, it does look like LX wants a hearing with us there. Obviously, more than 50% of us won't be able to attend, even if LX were to provide transportation. So that is one simple way of reducing the number of complainants.
And then Tracey and her team are much more skilled and experienced than 99% of us to argue in front of a court/regulartory body. And we are unrepresented by counsel. It is the perfect set-up for her. It is clearly a set-up. I trust the CTA sees that too and denies the motion swiftly
Deltahater is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 6:33 pm
  #10029  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,898
[QUOTE=erasmus99;22525692 The sole reason for the oral hearing request is to dissuade complainants from coming from all over the world.[/QUOTE]

Could you elaborate on this part a bit more please?
Deltahater is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 8:08 pm
  #10030  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ZRH, CGN
Programs: AA Gold, *G
Posts: 257
Originally Posted by WingedWorldExplorer
SWISS International Airlines Company slogan is:

'Unser Zeichen ist ein Versprechen' 'Our sign is a promise' (English).

I guess they should add: 'Unless We decide otherwise'.
I think they've gotten in trouble with that in the past because people were interpreting it as pro-Christianity.
gnof is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2014, 2:42 am
  #10031  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: AA EXP LT GLD 1MM, BA GLD, NH/UA*G, Hyatt Dia, Marr Tit LT PLT, IHG Spire,HH Dia, MGM NOIR,Hertz PC
Posts: 10,571
Originally Posted by FlytheTail
I read "all of the parties" to include the complainants (but correct me if my legalese interpretation is not correct). The request is simply absurd and Davis LLP is "grasping at straws".
Agreed. They are trying to drag this to the most absurd levels imaginable.

I am still convinced this matter would have best been solved in letting the people fly, probably have a 40-50% no show/cancellation rate and transport the rest.
skywalkerLAX is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2014, 7:05 am
  #10032  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 10^7 mm from Ȱ
Programs: Hyatt D/HHonors D/ SPG P/ Marriott P/ IHG P/ UA 1K/ AA EXP/ DL D
Posts: 1,976
Originally Posted by skywalkerLAX
Agreed. They are trying to drag this to the most absurd levels imaginable.

I am still convinced this matter would have best been solved in letting the people fly, probably have a 40-50% no show/cancellation rate and transport the rest.
Agree. If no changes are allowed after honoring the fare, half of the bookings may be cancelled voluntarily.

P.S. but right now there are only 80+ complainants against LX, of which about 200+ tickets in aggregate. Should LX be ordered to reinstate all these tickets, it is still in a much better shape than honoring the whole fare (1000+ tickets alleged by LX) and wait for half of them to be cancelled, if disregarding the hefty bills from Davis.

Last edited by lewende; Mar 18, 2014 at 7:12 am Reason: Add comments
lewende is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2014, 9:03 am
  #10033  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,432
CTA denies LX request for oral Hearings

Just got the email from Cathy Murphy. Why on earth is LX listening to their lawyers, More money down the drain for them. They are running out of ideas and time,
cruisr is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2014, 9:05 am
  #10034  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Multiple locations
Programs: AAdvantage ExPlat LT Gold, BA Silver, Aegean Star Gold
Posts: 5,038
Originally Posted by cruisr
Just got the email from Cathy Murphy. Why on earth is LX listening to their lawyers, More money down the drain for them. They are running out of ideas and time,
same email, last line is the best...

Conclusion
The Agency denies Swiss’s motion that the hearing of Case No. 13-06641 proceed by way of oral hearing.
jfkeze is online now  
Old Mar 18, 2014, 9:10 am
  #10035  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: YVR
Programs: AE, MP, DL, AA, Accor Platinum (But aren't we all?)
Posts: 268
With the day just getting going in Canada I have to imagine someone at Davis LLP is having a bad day today now that the CTA has denied another one of SWISS' frivolous motions. SWISS ahould just let the complainants fly already...
SOLTATIO is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.