US Bank adverse action
#16
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 164
I had my USBank account for 14 years until they shut me down in April. I was depositing around 5-10K in cash/mo per month from their buxxx cards. Then in February, a buddy gave me cash to deposit, I wrote a big check, and sold my condo. Just too much happening at one time. They called me to ask me how much I expect to deposit every month. Then a couple of weeks later, I got the same letter. They closed my personal and biz checking account. I thought my cc was safe until a month later, they decided to close my cash+ and Carlson card too. Expect those to be shut down next. Now I don't deposit anything that comes close to MS into my Chase account.
#17
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 322
I had my USBank account for 14 years until they shut me down in April. I was depositing around 5-10K in cash/mo per month from their buxxx cards. Then in February, a buddy gave me cash to deposit, I wrote a big check, and sold my condo. Just too much happening at one time. They called me to ask me how much I expect to deposit every month. Then a couple of weeks later, I got the same letter. They closed my personal and biz checking account. I thought my cc was safe until a month later, they decided to close my cash+ and Carlson card too. Expect those to be shut down next. Now I don't deposit anything that comes close to MS into my Chase account.
#18
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 164
No they didn't. When I received the cc closure letter, it said the cc's were closed immediately. No future date. I logged onto my account, took out all my cash+ points. Then I called to cancel both cards (I wanted it to be reported to agencies that I closed instead of them closing). I had just paid the annual fee on the Carlson card too; I was outside of the AF refund window. The girl said I could probably call back and get it refunded if they closed my account, but I wasn't going to let them ding my credit for $75. Chalk it up to cost of doing business. I had just made a b1g1 redemption at the Martinique in NYC; I don't think they can pry that rsvp or promo back.
#19
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere above the Mason-Dixon
Programs: DL Ham Samich
Posts: 1,661
Oh goodness... My guess is 12-15 years old-ish. It's been my main checking account for as long as I can remember. And I cycle HEAVY volume through them. I'm talking lots of money orders and regular AP and Paypal deposits. I even earn a bit of interest on it
#20
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Down South, The Desert
Programs: Marriot Rewards, Southwest Rapid rewards, Emerald Club, Avis Preferred
Posts: 1,871
I have US Bank, and have only done the occassional MO through there. I just opened an account at a local bank to prepare for any heavy volume I might do.
I thought it was already a rule of thumb for folks to spread these deposits around a bunch of banks. I guess not.
#21
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chyona
Programs: Anywhere I can ski...
Posts: 401
Your signature is awesome.
I have US Bank, and have only done the occassional MO through there. I just opened an account at a local bank to prepare for any heavy volume I might do.
I thought it was already a rule of thumb for folks to spread these deposits around a bunch of banks. I guess not.
I have US Bank, and have only done the occassional MO through there. I just opened an account at a local bank to prepare for any heavy volume I might do.
I thought it was already a rule of thumb for folks to spread these deposits around a bunch of banks. I guess not.
P.S. sorry for the shutdown op, especially with that tenure you have with them.
#23
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 1,139
Most banks do not deny a walk-in customer an account based on a bad Chex history. They might place a longer hold time on the availability of deposits and deny overdraft courtesy.
The problems with opening new accounts should be confined to online banks that do not actually see the customer.
#24
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 122
For what it's worth, according to Wells Fargo what counts as "abuse" is closing the account and refusing to pay the cascading overdraft charges they added after the fact.
#25
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LAX
Posts: 546
I got a letter from US Bank telling me that my checking and savings account will be closed in 10 days, although there was no mention of closure of my credit card accounts. I've done a few thousand MO/cash deposits every month plus a few thousand more from AP. Has anyone had a similar experience? Does that usually mean that my CC accounts will be closed as well?
I actually just had this happen. They did not close my credit line, but it does not work for ordering AGC. See the post here. I went ahead and closed my account voluntarily so as to avoid it being terminated on CHEX.
BTW, I am interested how soon will shutdown my Charter One account now that they acquired them.
#26
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: WAS
Programs: SPG Plat. Marriott Plat. Hilton Diamond. Hyatt Diamond. IHG Plat.
Posts: 2,580
I think that is a little over the top.
Most banks do not deny a walk-in customer an account based on a bad Chex history. They might place a longer hold time on the availability of deposits and deny overdraft courtesy.
The problems with opening new accounts should be confined to online banks that do not actually see the customer.
Most banks do not deny a walk-in customer an account based on a bad Chex history. They might place a longer hold time on the availability of deposits and deny overdraft courtesy.
The problems with opening new accounts should be confined to online banks that do not actually see the customer.
They'll talk about how they're not able to get accounts etc because of what's on them. Negative closures etc.
I was on Chex for 7 years. I beg to differ. When your Chex says "Closed due to abuse", you have a hard life for a while, trust me.
For what it's worth, according to Wells Fargo what counts as "abuse" is closing the account and refusing to pay the cascading overdraft charges they added after the fact.
For what it's worth, according to Wells Fargo what counts as "abuse" is closing the account and refusing to pay the cascading overdraft charges they added after the fact.
#27
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chyona
Programs: Anywhere I can ski...
Posts: 401
#28
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 175
No they didn't. When I received the cc closure letter, it said the cc's were closed immediately. No future date. I logged onto my account, took out all my cash+ points. Then I called to cancel both cards (I wanted it to be reported to agencies that I closed instead of them closing). I had just paid the annual fee on the Carlson card too; I was outside of the AF refund window. The girl said I could probably call back and get it refunded if they closed my account, but I wasn't going to let them ding my credit for $75. Chalk it up to cost of doing business. I had just made a b1g1 redemption at the Martinique in NYC; I don't think they can pry that rsvp or promo back.
#29
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 1,139
There have been a lot of bank account closures as a result of dollar coin deposits and money order deposits. I have a feeling a great number of those people have successfully opened new bank accounts at other institutions. I have read the Google search accounts of people with bad Chex reports having difficulties opening new accounts, but those generally involved customers who were accused of owing money to the bank that closed the account.
#30
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: All of them!
Posts: 322
The big banks tend to be pretty risk-averse when it comes to deposit accounts and don't really care if they have to fire a bunch of innocent customers along the way. It's like a rental car company choosing not to rent to someone under 25 even if they have a good driving record. Someone running large amounts of money through their account, especially relative to their average balance, is a much greater risk to the bank than the average person who gets their paycheck direct deposited and pays bills, plain and simple.
I'd try a small community bank or credit union, be frank with them about your plans for the account, and take your business somewhere else if they don't like it. Every financial institution is different, but you should be able to find one that is willing to work with you. Smaller financial institutions tend to know their customers a lot better, so they have more ability to take a closer look instead of just shooting first and asking questions later. I don't know why anyone uses the big banks for deposit accounts honestly. Both the deals available and the customer service seem to be much worse than at the average small community bank or CU. And they often/usually rebate other banks' ATM fees, so you actually have easier access to cash.
As far as I know banks generally don't report to Chex unless you owe them money. If they just didn't want to do business with you anymore, the form letters they send to tell you the account is being closed will warn that you may be reported to Chex/EWS, but everyone I have talked to who had a checking account closed for MS-type activities who then checked their Chex report (free once a year) saw nothing reported there. They can't report you to Chex for depositing too many MO, or withdrawing it too rapidly after they make it available, and something like suspected fraud would be way over the top without any evidence to support it. The worst consequence would be if any ACH payments or checks bounced and caused adverse action from other banks. Luckily when a payment is returned there is a code that gives the payee the reason, so they will know it wasn't because of NSF but because the bank froze your account, so a phone call to explain followed by prompt payment from another account is likely to clear things up if you are an otherwise good customer.
If anyone has a counterexample of someone who was actually reported to Chex for MO deposits without owing the bank money, I'd be very interested to hear about it. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd think that reporting to Chex in this situation would cause the bank all kinds of legal issues. If they report something false to Chex, refuse to correct it if the customer disputes it under FCRA, and as a result the customer can't open a checking account, it seems like the customer would have a good libel case. Seems like it's in the banks' interest to only report solid facts to Chex and not mere suspicion based on a customer's pattern of transactions looking similar to customers who caused the bank problems in the past. If they are not sure if you are a risk or not, and they don't really need your deposits, it might be a wise business decision to axe you, but that same risk aversion would discourage risking lawsuits and regulatory complaints. What if they thought there was a 10% chance you were engaged in some kind of fraud that could cause them a big loss? It might be an easy decision to close that account if they aren't making much money on checking accounts anyway, but I can't see how they could go around reporting people their risk model said had a 10% chance of defrauding the bank to Chex.
I'd try a small community bank or credit union, be frank with them about your plans for the account, and take your business somewhere else if they don't like it. Every financial institution is different, but you should be able to find one that is willing to work with you. Smaller financial institutions tend to know their customers a lot better, so they have more ability to take a closer look instead of just shooting first and asking questions later. I don't know why anyone uses the big banks for deposit accounts honestly. Both the deals available and the customer service seem to be much worse than at the average small community bank or CU. And they often/usually rebate other banks' ATM fees, so you actually have easier access to cash.
If anyone has a counterexample of someone who was actually reported to Chex for MO deposits without owing the bank money, I'd be very interested to hear about it. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd think that reporting to Chex in this situation would cause the bank all kinds of legal issues. If they report something false to Chex, refuse to correct it if the customer disputes it under FCRA, and as a result the customer can't open a checking account, it seems like the customer would have a good libel case. Seems like it's in the banks' interest to only report solid facts to Chex and not mere suspicion based on a customer's pattern of transactions looking similar to customers who caused the bank problems in the past. If they are not sure if you are a risk or not, and they don't really need your deposits, it might be a wise business decision to axe you, but that same risk aversion would discourage risking lawsuits and regulatory complaints. What if they thought there was a 10% chance you were engaged in some kind of fraud that could cause them a big loss? It might be an easy decision to close that account if they aren't making much money on checking accounts anyway, but I can't see how they could go around reporting people their risk model said had a 10% chance of defrauding the bank to Chex.