Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flyertalk/Vielfliegertreff and Lufthansa Dialog 2013 event

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2013, 4:19 pm
  #271  
IMH
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Berlin
Programs: BA Gold; Accor Plat; IHG Diamond-Amb; Meliá & HH & Marriott Gold
Posts: 5,450
Originally Posted by gojko88
I find the admitted shift to a transactional model absolutely horrendous and wouldn't be surprised if it causes LH serious damage in the long run.
I think it's bound to. Despite numerous missteps in recent years LH still has a generally positive image in Germany and in most of the other markets it serves. Stereotypical as it may sound, it's still true to say that people associate LH with reliability, safety, quality and -- for F and the FCT/FCLs -- understated luxury. As long as your customer sees you that way you don't need to be the cheapest -- a point well understood by many of the most successful German companies.

At the moment most people still see Lufthansa the same way they see BASF, Bayer, Bosch, Siemens and the quality German car manufacturers. LH can count themselves lucky that that's still the case. It's an incredible advantage, as there's still a large (if declining) number of people who base buying decisions on perceived quality. A few more stupid moves on LH's part, though, and they'll be just another airline -- as exchangeable as they seem to believe their customers are. It's all rather sad.
IMH is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2013, 2:00 am
  #272  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Originally Posted by seat 1a
Yes , a really skilled and visionary leadership .
Then good luck with that !
sw1x is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2013, 2:05 am
  #273  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by seat 1a
Yes , a really skilled and visionary leadership .
Realistically- the management I have met from Lufthansa over the past 10 years all seem very competent- the one complaint I have is that it is a very insular company- it would not hurt to bring in more outsiders and particularly from other industries.

In general the airline industry tends to look inwards for a variety of reasons. Looking out and branching into new ways of thinking would not hurt the business at all.

Dialog such as this with customers while hardly ground breaking or revolutionary is indeed a post first step.

Now hire someone who hates NEK and we are on to a good start. Also a re-segmentation of customers would not hurt at all. The customer of 10 years ago is not the customer of tomorrow.
TRAVELSIG is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2013, 2:32 am
  #274  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Originally Posted by TRAVELSIG
Realistically- the management I have met from Lufthansa over the past 10 years all seem very competent- the one complaint I have is that it is a very insular company- it would not hurt to bring in more outsiders and particularly from other industries.

[...]
I agree as far as Management until a few years ago is concerned. I met with several of their Management Board members and their team and always found Lufthansa one of the best managed airlines in the industry.
Especially while Mayrhuber may have had his faults, I think he at least developed an ambitious vision and strategy for the airline - which unfortunately was almost dropped completely post his departure as CEO and under Franz' regime where focus and bias were shifted totally towards cost reduction while from my point of view neglecting the entrepreneurial approach to continuously growing the business profitably.

I - as others here - find it hard to envision how Lufthansa wants to compete with LCC's considering their inherent structure and thus cost base. While it may have been necessary to cut some cost to free up cash for much needed investments into the fleet and improving profitability, I find the sale of an airline such as BMI cost cutting measures in loyalty shemes short sighted and lacking in entrepreneurial vision. The losses of BMI were hardly god given while BMI and its LHR slots could have been of highly strategic value to Lufthansa's TATL Business, e.g. for a strategic tie-up with Virgin Atlantic now that US Airways is bound to leave Star Alliance. It were bold approaches like the purchase of other carriers that set former Lufthansa Management apart from their peers, while Franz' defensive cost cutting measures hardly demonstrates a strategic vision for growth. And retreating from markets and accepting a shrinking business in favour of increased (short-term) profitability in an overall growing industry seems dangerously short-sighted and highly risky for the company's long-term future as a relevant European carrier.
sw1x is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2013, 2:52 am
  #275  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,069
Originally Posted by sw1x

I - as others here - find it hard to envision how Lufthansa wants to compete with LCC's considering their inherent structure and thus cost base. While it may have been necessary to cut some cost to free up cash for much needed investments into the fleet and improving profitability, I find the sale of an airline such as BMI cost cutting measures in loyalty shemes short sighted and lacking in entrepreneurial vision. The losses of BMI were hardly god given while BMI and its LHR slots could have been of highly strategic value to Lufthansa's TATL Business, e.g. for a strategic tie-up with Virgin Atlantic now that US Airways is bound to leave Star Alliance. It were bold approaches like the purchase of other carriers that set former Lufthansa Management apart from their peers, while Franz' defensive cost cutting measures hardly demonstrates a strategic vision for growth. And retreating from markets and accepting a shrinking business in favour of increased (short-term) profitability in an overall growing industry seems dangerously short-sighted and highly risky for the company's long-term future as a relevant European carrier.
Well said .

Cost cutting is a dangerous downward spiral , unless you have a very clear vision of what's the next step .
I am sure that the cost cutting and revamping is necessary , and this might be current managements strength , but if there is not someone hovering above this with a clear path forward once this is accomplished , LH owners are in for a tuff time .
seat 1a is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2013, 7:42 am
  #276  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by IMH
I..people associate LH with reliability, safety, quality and -- for F and the FCT/FCLs -- understated luxury..
To be fair, the safety part is indeed real. They are no QF in that aspect but if you add food poisoning and being slain by a boozed passenger as flight risk, then traveling on QF is likely riskier than LH or BA for that matter.

I feel a lot less safe on SQ, UA, or LX for that matter. And on LX you can at least aim for the infallible A340.
A few more stupid moves on LH's part, though, and they'll be just another airline -- as exchangeable as they seem to believe their customers are. It's all rather sad.
Yes, I feel like that too. The last 10 years, LH gpt a lot uglier. And you cannot built on captive markets for the eternity.
weero is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2013, 9:22 pm
  #277  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Programs: Hyatt Lifetime Globalist, SQ PPS Solitaire
Posts: 3,600
Originally Posted by weero
To be fair, the safety part is indeed real.
What part is real here?

Lufthansa is flying the same aircrafts as every competitor. It can't be new aircrafts that give the aura of safety as LH doesn't fly the youngest fleet. And it can't be German engineering as Lufti sends their aircrafts (at least the 747) to China for maintenance as competition does.

The real part could be the staff training for both cabin and cockpit. I think there Lufthansa still holds an advantage over others.
SMK77 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2013, 11:07 pm
  #278  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ORD
Programs: BA, AA, SQ, UA, AC, WS, MR TIT
Posts: 8,659
Originally Posted by weero
To be fair, the safety part is indeed real.

I feel a lot less safe on SQ, UA, or LX for that matter. And on LX you can at least aim for the infallible A340.
Not when I am flying on the LH almost 30 years old aging 737 fleet
NA-Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2013, 2:02 am
  #279  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by SMK77
And it can't be German engineering as Lufti sends their aircrafts (at least the 747) to China for maintenance as competition does.
Actually a number of competitors including the GCC in some cases uses the Lufthansa maintenance centers around the world including Hamburg and they have long-term maintenance contracts with Lufthansa.
TRAVELSIG is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2013, 2:31 am
  #280  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: homeless 2.0
Programs: A3 Gold, LH FTL
Posts: 1,065
Originally Posted by TRAVELSIG
Actually a number of competitors including the GCC in some cases uses the Lufthansa maintenance centers around the world including Hamburg and they have long-term maintenance contracts with Lufthansa.
Its quite impressive to see a low flying EK A380 over the Hamburg port , would recommend it to everyone!
kanor is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2013, 11:11 am
  #281  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by SMK77
What part is real here?

Lufthansa is flying the same aircrafts as every competitor. It can't be new aircrafts that give the aura of safety as LH doesn't fly the youngest fleet.
So? Airframe failure is at the root of a negligible percentage of all fatal accidents. And age matters nowhere near as much as the press loves to claim.

So you are right on all accounts, I just don't share the conclusion.
The real part could be the staff training for both cabin and cockpit. I think there Lufthansa still holds an advantage over others.
Very much so. Not this blind flying into any weather as practiced by say SQ.
Originally Posted by NA-Flyer
Not when I am flying on the LH almost 30 years old aging 737 fleet
Something that flies for 30 years counts as safe in my book.
weero is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2013, 11:26 pm
  #282  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by kanor
Its quite impressive to see a low flying EK A380 over the Hamburg port , would recommend it to everyone!
I can imagine. Only beaten by EK's super low flying A340 in MEL ...
weero is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2013, 2:57 pm
  #283  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Hi Members,

One question after reaching 1 month anniversary since the famous LH dialogue event: Will we still see the transcript, as originally planned?
As I remember the FT/ VT Team were awaiting the LH notes, however this is some 3 weeks ago now.

Even if LH bureaucracy could be imagined complicated at least, Christmas is approaching and some may not find the notes anymore after new year.

Should FT/ VT consider a participants notes only transcript?

Hungry for an update

Best regards
Flyglobal
flyglobal is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2013, 5:32 am
  #284  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,187
Just a quick update: we did receive a short version of the notes LH took at the event. rcs85551 is currently trying to find time to consolidate everything and will post it here. I'm unsticking the thread primarily to reduce the number of stickies in this forum.

Regards Oliver
oliver2002 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.