SkyPriority companions not allowed in AMS priority security
#62
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 9,125
What do you mean by "assigned to priority lanes"? Any boarding pass will work at any scanner as far as I know. I wonder if a non-same-day boarding pass would still work?
#64
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 8,089
It used to be like that but I believe it isn't any more. In any case there is a document a bit upstream that describes how to encode priority access on a BP. At that point all Schiphol has to do is keep archive of BPs scanned, which they probably have to do anyway, and run data analysis on it.
#65
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
It's possible they also enabled the check to see if the passenger is actually a premium passenger in the gates but I doubt this as this would make the manual check unnecessary.
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,750
And remember that half of KLM's customers are transferring, but your calculations above appear to assume they all originate at AMS and must pass through security there.
#67
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,750
#68
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: VLC
Programs: FB Plat (Y3), All Accor Gold (Y2)
Posts: 644
If anyone who has Privium and willing to fly FR (or just buys the cheapest ticket they sell from AMS without intention to fly them..) could just try to scan their RYR boarding pass.... That way any manual check would allow you to pass, and in case the BP scanner says "no", it's not that awkward as you can go through the Privium gate instead.
#69
Join Date: Jun 2015
Programs: Delta GM; FB Plat; HHonors Diamond; Hertz PC; National EE
Posts: 190
So yes, my opinion is that Schiphol should focus on getting those security lines moving, instead of putting extra staff on all kinds of new useless checkpoints.
#70
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
I disagree because here's what would happen if they didn't stop companions (without status of course) from using the priority lines: someone would figure out that you can simply buy a KL flex ticket for a little extra € which lets you and everyone with you use the priority line which is *much* shorter than the regular line. Groups and families that would otherwise not have access travelling together would have one person buy their ticket on a separate PNR (something real people don't care about) with flex, the rest would get light fares, and once at the airport they'd all come through the SP check-in, the one with SP goes "they're with me" and they all walk up the stairs to clog the priority security line. This information would quickly get out because people can't help themselves and would post their amazing travel life hack on twitter, instagram and facebook, and before you know it most of the passengers at the airport are using this scheme and tadaa we're all stuck in a giant line behind people who have no business being there and, not being frequent travellers, are inexperienced and holding up the line even more.
Oh, and this of course is all in addition to people like the ones I kicked out of the SP check-in line yesterday who thought that they might be skypriority even though they weren't in a premium cabin and fly once a year, and there were multiple such groups.
Oh, and this of course is all in addition to people like the ones I kicked out of the SP check-in line yesterday who thought that they might be skypriority even though they weren't in a premium cabin and fly once a year, and there were multiple such groups.
Last edited by CyBeR; Jul 10, 2022 at 8:17 am
#71
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GOT
Programs: KL Plat
Posts: 484
I disagree because here's what would happen if they didn't stop companions (without status of course) from using the priority lines: someone would figure out that you can simply buy a KL flex ticket for a little extra € which lets you and everyone with you use the priority line which is *much* shorter than the regular line. Groups and families that would otherwise not have access travelling together would have one person buy their ticket on a separate PNR (something real people don't care about) with flex, the rest would get light fares, and once at the airport they'd all come through the SP check-in, the one with SP goes "they're with me" and they all walk up the stairs to clog the priority security line. This information would quickly get out because people can't help themselves and would post their amazing travel life hack on twitter, instagram and facebook, and before you know it most of the passengers at the airport are using this scheme and before you know it we're all stuck in a giant line behind people who have no business being there and, not being frequent travellers, are inexperienced and holding up the line even more.
Oh, and this of course is all in addition to people like the ones I kicked out of the SP check-in line yesterday who thought that they might be skypriority even though they weren't in a premium cabin and fly once a year, and there were multiple such groups.
Oh, and this of course is all in addition to people like the ones I kicked out of the SP check-in line yesterday who thought that they might be skypriority even though they weren't in a premium cabin and fly once a year, and there were multiple such groups.
#72
Moderator: Aegean Miles+Bonus
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: AMS / ATH
Programs: AFKL Plat, A3 Gold
Posts: 7,342
Interesting details, thanks.
The Schiphol page explains that these percentages are per airline. However how do you define 'an airline'? If KLM would include Transavia flights (Which, from what I understand, is basically a sub-brand of KLM)... then the average percentages would change quite dramatically as HV has zero premium passengers.
One thing I don't understand though, is that some airlines are actually not offering priority - even for their Elites or Business pax. If this service does not require a surcharge compared to regular non-prio pax, then why would any airline exclude themselves? I remember a few years ago when the priority security entrance was still manned, that they had a laminated page with logo's of Airlines and FFP's for the employee to be able to recognise which premium pax would be allowed, and which ones would not.
One thing I don't understand though, is that some airlines are actually not offering priority - even for their Elites or Business pax. If this service does not require a surcharge compared to regular non-prio pax, then why would any airline exclude themselves? I remember a few years ago when the priority security entrance was still manned, that they had a laminated page with logo's of Airlines and FFP's for the employee to be able to recognise which premium pax would be allowed, and which ones would not.
#73
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: VLC
Programs: FB Plat (Y3), All Accor Gold (Y2)
Posts: 644
One thing I don't understand though, is that some airlines are actually not offering priority - even for their Elites or Business pax. If this service does not require a surcharge compared to regular non-prio pax, then why would any airline exclude themselves? I remember a few years ago when the priority security entrance was still manned, that they had a laminated page with logo's of Airlines and FFP's for the employee to be able to recognise which premium pax would be allowed, and which ones would not.
#74
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AMS
Posts: 2,064
Interesting details, thanks.
The Schiphol page explains that these percentages are per airline. However how do you define 'an airline'? If KLM would include Transavia flights (Which, from what I understand, is basically a sub-brand of KLM)... then the average percentages would change quite dramatically as HV has zero premium passengers.
The Schiphol page explains that these percentages are per airline. However how do you define 'an airline'? If KLM would include Transavia flights (Which, from what I understand, is basically a sub-brand of KLM)... then the average percentages would change quite dramatically as HV has zero premium passengers.
One thing I don't understand though, is that some airlines are actually not offering priority - even for their Elites or Business pax. If this service does not require a surcharge compared to regular non-prio pax, then why would any airline exclude themselves? I remember a few years ago when the priority security entrance was still manned, that they had a laminated page with logo's of Airlines and FFP's for the employee to be able to recognise which premium pax would be allowed, and which ones would not.
I guess it's also possible that outside of the documents airlines made specific agreements to not use priority lanes to reduce their fees (which I'm sure EasyJet and Ryanair would be the primary suspects for having done such a thing.)