Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

DL and AA No More Interline Agreement; Then Interline Agreement Returns January 2018

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

DL and AA No More Interline Agreement; Then Interline Agreement Returns January 2018

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2015, 8:08 am
  #106  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM+(segs)/MM, UA Ag, Hilton DM, Marriott Ti (life Pt), TSA Opt-out Platinum
Posts: 3,227
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
In my experience as a reservations agent I can say the following about off-lining in general and specifically AA

2) I would long-sell in the AA flight and get the space back confirmed. I would issue the ticket and then 20 minutes later the space would be cxld an unconfirmed. This happened at least 50% of the time when I tried to offline with AA. It got so bad I would tell people if they wanted AA to ask at the airport.

3) Airlines can pull OAL space right from their reservations system. So AA didn't always ask DL if there was space available. If there was Y1 they would grab it and reissue the ticket. As we all know if the flight is showing Y1 it's probably actually oversold by 3-10. That would lead DL to have to pay VDB/IDB to protect an AA passenger. DL was probably willing to pay VDB if they could get $1300 for a full Y purchase but not the amount AA was paying DL.
As a former ticket/gate agent (not for AA or DL), I completely agree with this. I will say, I think DL did a really good job of controlling their inventory during OA IROPS (must be some algorithm that kicks in). It wasn't unusual to pull up a DL flight and see Y7, then go to book it and it fails, then pull up the same flight again and it's Y0. AA on the other hand played a lot of games. Even though they showed Y7, we'd call them and get permission (which was the mutually agreed upon method at our station) before we booked it, often they'd later cancel the res and send the pax back to us which is a disservice for everyone.
HDQDD is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 12:15 pm
  #107  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by Starblazer
No. The only time we can turn away an INVOL was if they were overselling us. Other than that, if there was an actual seat, it was up for grabs by anyone.
That's what I thought I had heard somewhere: In IROPs, other airlines cannot oversell DL inventory. This means that the arguments comparing VDB compensation to what the other airline pays to DL are irrelevant, although of course DL could then decide to oversell the flight itself for a high fare and plan on VDBing someone at a profit.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 2:51 pm
  #108  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
In my experience as a reservations agent I can say the following about off-lining in general and specifically AA

3) Airlines can pull OAL space right from their reservations system. So AA didn't always ask DL if there was space available. If there was Y1 they would grab it and reissue the ticket. As we all know if the flight is showing Y1 it's probably actually oversold by 3-10. That would lead DL to have to pay VDB/IDB to protect an AA passenger. DL was probably willing to pay VDB if they could get $1300 for a full Y purchase but not the amount AA was paying DL.
So Delta was unable to protect against that, as I thought. That makes interlining much less profitable for DL.

Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
That's what I thought I had heard somewhere: In IROPs, other airlines cannot oversell DL inventory. This means that the arguments comparing VDB compensation to what the other airline pays to DL are irrelevant, although of course DL could then decide to oversell the flight itself for a high fare and plan on VDBing someone at a profit.
That's the way it's supposed to work, but apparently doesn't. (Given that it would be handled by DL IT, are you surprised?)
sethb is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 3:12 pm
  #109  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MSP
Posts: 164
In a broad sense yes DL is able to protect the space by pulling Y availabliy from AA/UA et al

But that usually only happens with major events that are going to affect everyone. A one off mechanical just happened OAL can get several seats before DL could pull the inventory.

But I regularly see flights that show Y seats for sale but the flight is actually oversold.

DL tends to honor the space even if it means VDB. AA in my experience will UC the space even if I took the time to long sell as a request. That tells AA I would like a Y seat and let's their RM software decide if they want to give it to me. It can come back UC for unconfirmed or KK for confirm and I can change it to HK.

I would get a KK change to HK and reissue only for AA to UC at the gate. A huge disservice and passengers think I did something wrong or lied to them
DLMiddleSeats is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 4:09 pm
  #110  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Brace yourselves. Enhancements usually come in multiples...
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 7:44 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,989
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
In a broad sense yes DL is able to protect the space by pulling Y availabliy from AA/UA et al

But that usually only happens with major events that are going to affect everyone. A one off mechanical just happened OAL can get several seats before DL could pull the inventory.

But I regularly see flights that show Y seats for sale but the flight is actually oversold.

DL tends to honor the space even if it means VDB. AA in my experience will UC the space even if I took the time to long sell as a request. That tells AA I would like a Y seat and let's their RM software decide if they want to give it to me. It can come back UC for unconfirmed or KK for confirm and I can change it to HK.

I would get a KK change to HK and reissue only for AA to UC at the gate. A huge disservice and passengers think I did something wrong or lied to them
Are there audit logs that one can point to and are there industrial practices where AA can be held accountable to?
PayItForward is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 9:31 pm
  #112  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MSP
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by PayItForward
Are there audit logs that one can point to and are there industrial practices where AA can be held accountable to?
I have no idea if logs exist. But I was able to see in the history that the space was HK and even had a record locator from AA, but then UC. But I couldn't force AA to take the passenger.

And by the time I would have been able to prove anything, A: they still not might care (not saying I would blame the person, someone from a competitor calls telling them to do something doesn't usually go well) B: the flight would be gone.

That's why I usually told people who wanted to be off lined to AA to ask at the airport where Sam from DL could actually ask Terry from AA if there was space available. Yes it is not convinent for passenger but way less inconvenient than finding out your space cxld
DLMiddleSeats is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 9:41 pm
  #113  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,989
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
I have no idea if logs exist. But I was able to see in the history that the space was HK and even had a record locator from AA, but then UC. But I couldn't force AA to take the passenger.

And by the time I would have been able to prove anything, A: they still not might care (not saying I would blame the person, someone from a competitor calls telling them to do something doesn't usually go well) B: the flight would be gone.

That's why I usually told people who wanted to be off lined to AA to ask at the airport where Sam from DL could actually ask Terry from AA if there was space available. Yes it is not convinent for passenger but way less inconvenient than finding out your space cxld
Totally agree. To be sent to a gate only to be told that there is no seat would make a horrible situation worse. And these real experiences and challenges from the ground is demonstrating why the agreement should be dropped when the benefits are kind of one-sided (AA). At least not in its current form.
PayItForward is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 9:56 pm
  #114  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,806
I agree with DL on this. They're not making money flying AA pax.

Years ago at NW, we had a problem with Sun Country. Both companies flew the same planes. Sun Country was always hitting NW up for spare parts. Arlines do these sorts of deals. It costs money to keep spare parts sitting on shelves. We had the parts. It's the cost of doing business. Sun Country wasn't keeping stock. They were using NW for parts and Sun Country didn't have the overhead costs.

NW cut Sun Country loose and stopped supplying them with parts. If NW asked for a part, more times than not, Sun Country couldn't help NW out. The benefits weren't reciprocal.

Fly Safe,
NWA FA
NWAFA is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 10:00 pm
  #115  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
I have no idea if logs exist. But I was able to see in the history that the space was HK and even had a record locator from AA, but then UC. But I couldn't force AA to take the passenger.

And by the time I would have been able to prove anything, A: they still not might care (not saying I would blame the person, someone from a competitor calls telling them to do something doesn't usually go well) B: the flight would be gone.

That's why I usually told people who wanted to be off lined to AA to ask at the airport where Sam from DL could actually ask Terry from AA if there was space available. Yes it is not convinent for passenger but way less inconvenient than finding out your space cxld
This sounds to me like AA, or at least many AA agents even if it's not AA policy, haven't been playing fair here.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 10:39 pm
  #116  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by NWAFA
I agree with DL on this. They're not making money flying AA pax.

Years ago at NW, we had a problem with Sun Country. Both companies flew the same planes. Sun Country was always hitting NW up for spare parts. Arlines do these sorts of deals. It costs money to keep spare parts sitting on shelves. We had the parts. It's the cost of doing business. Sun Country wasn't keeping stock. They were using NW for parts and Sun Country didn't have the overhead costs.

NW cut Sun Country loose and stopped supplying them with parts. If NW asked for a part, more times than not, Sun Country couldn't help NW out. The benefits weren't reciprocal.

Fly Safe,
NWA FA

Apples and oranges. DL and AA are both network carriers, and are closer in terms of ideology than NW and SY.

Besides, the industry is cyclical. DL is at the top of their game right now. Recall that 10 years ago, DL was filing for bankruptcy, DL customers were drinking first class beverages out of plastic cups, and were flying 1,500-mile segments with no meal service in F. DL was not #1 on time, I think it was CO back then, then UA a few years later.

Yes, DL is not using this arrangement much now. But there is going to be a time when DL is going to need AA's help. Burning down the house so they can't use them is not in their best long-term interest.
channa is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2015, 11:07 pm
  #117  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by DLMiddleSeats
DL tends to honor the space even if it means VDB. AA in my experience will UC the space even if I took the time to long sell as a request. That tells AA I would like a Y seat and let's their RM software decide if they want to give it to me. It can come back UC for unconfirmed or KK for confirm and I can change it to HK.

I would get a KK change to HK and reissue only for AA to UC at the gate. A huge disservice and passengers think I did something wrong or lied to them
And that's a big part of the problem.

Though if the passenger has a confirmed seat, why isn't unconfirming it IDB? I'd certainly consider it that.
sethb is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2015, 9:36 am
  #118  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West of CLE
Programs: Delta DM/3 MM; Hertz PC; National EE; Amtrak GR; Bonvoy Silver; Via Rail Préférence
Posts: 5,384
Does this have a collateral impact on DL's bad romance with Alaska Airlines?
ND76 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2015, 9:48 am
  #119  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,394
Originally Posted by ND76
Does this have a collateral impact on DL's bad romance with Alaska Airlines?
Doubtful.

AS/AA may cozy up a little more with off line protection but there isn't enough overlap in their networks for AS to pick up all the passengers that were going to DL.

Both DL and AA are going to have to try and get closer with UA for offline protection. But that comes with it's own host of problems!
kop84 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2015, 9:54 am
  #120  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
It's interesting that if you read the thread on this topic in the AA forum, AA flyers are blaming DL for not honoring interline reservations during IROPs. They're generally saying that DL hasn't been following the rules.
MSPeconomist is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.