Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

First Bag Fees & 2009 OnePass Program Changes

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

First Bag Fees & 2009 OnePass Program Changes

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 8:52 pm
  #286  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CLE
Programs: CO Gold - 1MM, IC Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,644
Originally Posted by OPFlyer
For those of us that mostly travel intra-Texas, how are we going earn base miles to use? It isn't just the EQMs but the base miles as well. I don't think I can survive constant 143 mile postings on my flights to AUS, especially when I was mostly booking Y fares.
I must be stupid here or extremely tired (both are possible... ) but I am still lost...the way I see it you were getting 500 EQMs for the 500 miles flight intra-Texasa before today (and 1 EQP) so you have to fly 50 Intra Texas Flights to qualify for Silver from EQMs....But the requirement is only 30 EQP's for Silver Status so you made it much earlier than with EQMs.

Unless, of course you are overly concerned with acquiring miles versus the Status levels then what is the problem.

I guess I must be stupid on this, I just don't get the complaints.
CLEHillbilly is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:05 pm
  #287  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 401
The chopping of the mileage bonuses is yet another step in turning frequent flyer programs upside down and into one of the great marketing scams ever.
As we all know, these started as customer loyalty programs. We still get all those emailed offers for bonus miles on rental cars, hotels, flowers, etc. We all see the commercials to sign up for credit cards so you are quickly on your way to "free travel," or have the sign-up forms handed out on the concourses. Yet actually getting in a seat and flying is the one area where bonuses are cut. Just what exactly are we supposed to be loyal to?
At the same time, of course, CO and the others keep spewing miles while they are cutting flights and pushing load factors close to 90. They keep pushing redemption alternatives, but I don't want overpriced magazine subscriptions. I think I'm like most everyone else in that I want seats, but they are heading to extinction.
gogreyhound is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:11 pm
  #288  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PHL
Posts: 3,113
Originally Posted by belynch
CO - why not charge these fees to folks buying only the lowest fares? It's insulting to pay $700 to fly between EWR and DCA and then have to pay $15 to check my bag.

Then people would, maybe, purchase higher fares instead of always choosing the lowest fare. @:-)

Same with mileage bonuses and minimums. CO does this to an extent to drive bookings directly through CO - why not take it a slight step further?

Or, offer a JK like model. I know they're not a great example when it comes to a profitable airline, but they're onto something.
This is what is maddening to me. I have no objection to "unbundling" or fees for deep-discount flights. But why go after everybody, even those on higher fares? Why can Air Canada do this but none of the US airlines can?
Phudnik is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:12 pm
  #289  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,437
Originally Posted by CLEHillbilly
I must be stupid here or extremely tired (both are possible... ) but I am still lost...the way I see it you were getting 500 EQMs for the 500 miles flight intra-Texasa before today (and 1 EQP) so you have to fly 50 Intra Texas Flights to qualify for Silver from EQMs....But the requirement is only 30 EQP's for Silver Status so you made it much earlier than with EQMs.

Unless, of course you are overly concerned with acquiring miles versus the Status levels then what is the problem.

I guess I must be stupid on this, I just don't get the complaints.


I believe you may be missing some math:

Ex. pre CO BS changes (ie today)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment EWR-YYY. I net 2500 EQM's out of it!

After the CO BS changes (ie when i never get back on a CO bird)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment IAH-YYY. I net 2070 EQM's out of it!

So...what took 10 segments (20 or LESS EQPs), now will take 13 segments. For the casual business traveler flying once a month, he will now NOT make SILVER!!!
PhillyPhlyer40 is online now  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:16 pm
  #290  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,437
Thumbs down What a bunch of BULL

Ok, so as a CO PLAT *, I am through. I fly a LOT of short flights in the northeast, and pay a BOAT LOAD of money for them. For what...a FEW HUNDRED MILES????

I have already switched to UA due to the ability to:
1-GET AN UPGRADE!

2-GET AN F SEAT INTERNATIONALLY

3-AVOID EWR

4-Honestly...Ive been well taken care of during IROPS at UA

5-BOARD WITHOUT 3/4 OF THE CITY OF NEWARK BOARDING WITH ME! (1K gets to board before silver!!)


So..for northeast corridor travel, I will go to AMTRAK. Cheaper, better service, nice meals, NO EWR ATC HOLDS!!!!

Hopefully LARRY LEAVES along with GLENN!

Last edited by PhillyPhlyer40; Sep 5, 2008 at 9:30 pm
PhillyPhlyer40 is online now  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:20 pm
  #291  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ/NYC
Programs: AA EXP/LT Plat, SPG Plat/LT Plat, HHonors Gold, Hyatt Plat, IHG Plat, MR Silver
Posts: 2,789
Originally Posted by Bookexp
One more benefit for Platinum is international lounge access. This is a big benefit for international travelers, especially if you travel on partner airlines.
Agreed, however it is a benefit available at much lower mileage thresholds on other airlines - typically 50,000 elite miles per year, but as low as 35-38,000 on some international airlines.
troyb is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:28 pm
  #292  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,437
Originally Posted by rankourabu
I understand that some folks', especially road warriors, flying patterns will be imapcted by this, but cmon, honestly guys, weren't we all just a bit naive to think that things can continue as they were.


And now I think CO will be naive...VERY NAIVE to think that this Plat* will spend $750+ FULL Y fares EWR-BOS. Here comes amtrak!!! WOOOWOOOO!

And to think....I would only need to fly 625 roundtrips, spending $468,750 to get a free sleezyass roundtrip to europe...unless I got one of the 3 seats available for the entire month at the 100K level!!!!!



WAY TO ALIENATE YOUR 'MOST FREQUENT' CUSTOMERS!
PhillyPhlyer40 is online now  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:32 pm
  #293  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IAH
Programs: La Ministreuse de Surréalisme, CO Plat, MR Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 11,358
I was pretty saddened to read the email when I received it today. I didn't think they would go there. Scott, sorry you had to give us the bad news because I am sure that is the last thing you wanted to do. I was shocked to read my plat bonus went from 125% to 100%. Between MR BL and I we will lose approx. 75K miles by my calculations per year (I've had three drinks so that is not especially good calculations at this point, but close enough). BL JR is gold and as that is not changing, I guess she is to be punny, golden. We make only about 4-6 flights to DFW a year; so not a big deal to us on the 500 miles but still, a big . I'm unhappy about the $15 1st bag charge even again, it really doesn't affect us (dad, I'll make sure you're on Mom's PNR). I love CO; but am very, very disappointed by these changes.
baglady is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:47 pm
  #294  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CLE
Programs: CO Gold - 1MM, IC Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,644
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
I believe you may be missing some math:

Ex. pre CO BS changes (ie today)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment EWR-YYY. I net 2500 EQM's out of it!

After the CO BS changes (ie when i never get back on a CO bird)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment IAH-YYY. I net 2070 EQM's out of it!

So...what took 10 segments (20 or LESS EQPs), now will take 13 segments. For the casual business traveler flying once a month, he will now NOT make SILVER!!!
You mention EQM throughout your posting but then jump to speaking about EQPs. no matter how you cut it (1 mile or 40000) each segment will still get you an EQP...what am I missing?


If I fly CLE-EWR-CDG-IST (like I am to doing on Saturday), then I still get 3 EQP's towards elite re-qualification , today, tomorrow, or even next year....yes I lost out on the CLE-EWR 500 miles but once again the question remains if your interested only in miles then yes I agree that this change hurts, but many have complained about status lose on this thread, that is unchanged from yesterday to today and onto next year. At least that is my opinion. Earn the EQPs and forget the 500 mile clusters.

From what I see everyone is stuck on the EQM changes, but they are not considering that EQPs DID NOT CHANGE which still get you elite status, if that is what you want.
CLEHillbilly is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 9:57 pm
  #295  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Plat, 1 MM; SPG LT Plat (RIP); Marriott LT Titanium; Fairmont Plat (RIP), DL Kryptonium Medallion
Posts: 1,859
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
I believe you may be missing some math:

Ex. pre CO BS changes (ie today)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment EWR-YYY. I net 2500 EQM's out of it!

After the CO BS changes (ie when i never get back on a CO bird)
I fly a 70 mile segment from XXX-EWR connecting to a 2000 mile segment IAH-YYY. I net 2070 EQM's out of it!

So...what took 10 segments (20 or LESS EQPs), now will take 13 segments. For the casual business traveler flying once a month, he will now NOT make SILVER!!!
The other poster and you are, I think in different situations.

People who only fly long flights who qualified, did so on miles and will continue to do so.
People who only fly short flights who qualified, did so on segments and will continue to do so.

People who qualified, on miles, using a mix of short and long flights might lose out.
Spent_All_My_Miles is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 10:00 pm
  #296  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 66
Just raise the airfare instead of adding baggage fees

Ugh !! Baggage fees will definitely increase the processing time at the airport security lines and increase boarding time as more folks try to take carryon luggage. It's bad enough at EWR.
phyllisnnj is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 10:47 pm
  #297  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Programs: UA Gold MM; AA Gold MM; WN A-List; IHG Diamond Ambassador; Marriott Gold; Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 24,564
I guess CO doesn't give a crap about it's intraTexas frequent flyers anymore. The elimination of the 500-mile minimum is just pathetic. With the round-trip SAT-IAH Y fare that I have often purchased creeping up to just under $400 and 25% lopped off the Platinum elite bonus, I think I made a mistake in choosing sides with the Houston-based carrier in the impending NW-CO divorce.

Certainly there is not much point in gunning for Platinum anymore, especially when it will take substantially more flying for the short-hopper. Gold status will only be nominally inferior to Platinum status, and really only in the complimentary upgrade department, which is hit and miss already, and can generally be remedied by buying a Y fare at the outset and Y-upping even as a Silver if the near guarantee of a first class seat is essential. And, for short hops as between San Antonio and Houston, I might as well take WN, typically more convenient Hobby Airport, and no change fees.

No 500-mile minimums, a 25% bonus mile hit, and no free standby? Any reason I shouldn't say, "No, thanks"?

Last edited by SAT Lawyer; Sep 5, 2008 at 10:54 pm
SAT Lawyer is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 11:23 pm
  #298  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,830
Hi there CO Insider,

I am surprised that it took so long to introduce the first checked bag fee. Good for Continental.

I have always wondered why CO had that 500 mile minimum. It's good to see it gone.

Why are Platinum and Gold Elites at the same bonus level? I don't get the sense of that one.

Thanks for the update.
ContinentalFan is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 11:24 pm
  #299  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,830
Originally Posted by MBM3
So can someone let me know why I should bother trying to reach Platinum? The bag fee doesn't bother me, but why are they reducing benefits for Plats?

I can't figure that one either. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Maybe someone from USAirways got a job at CO!
ContinentalFan is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2008 | 11:29 pm
  #300  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,830
Originally Posted by ctownflyer
So who's ready to pay for booze in PC's?
If it would reduce the numbers, I'd vote for it!
ContinentalFan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.