First Bag Fees & 2009 OnePass Program Changes
#136
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south FL
Posts: 226
Did I miss this announcement somewhere? Mr. rsnash is almost to Plat based on EQPs and we very rarely book on CO.com because he has to book his business travel with his company's in-house travel agency. But he still gets his 1 pt per segment or 2 pts per if H. Is this about to change too?
#137
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
wow.....this sucks.
So 2nd bag fee that I am exempt from...I am guessing it goes paid now too?
So 2nd bag fee that I am exempt from...I am guessing it goes paid now too?
#138
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south FL
Posts: 226
2nd bag is $25, unless you are Elite and then fee is waived. I think when I next fly w/DH, he will be checking in both bags, since I have no status.
#139
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,150
Hell no and Hell no 
The increase in TLV rewards affects me, obviously. I'd actually perhaps be OK with it, if they allowed routing via europe, but as it is, if you want C to TLV via europe (which is the way CO wants you to go since they can't afford for you to fly EWr-TLV), its 180k! a rip off! If they allowed EU routing on 120k business to TLV (besides KL only metal), it might be a decent trade-off. But its not.
UA to TLV is 80/115/140 and your options are:
1xAC, 1xUS(next year), 2xLH, 2xOS, 2xLX, ?xTK, may be forgetting something.
that's >4x the # of flights CO has available at reasonable levels.

The increase in TLV rewards affects me, obviously. I'd actually perhaps be OK with it, if they allowed routing via europe, but as it is, if you want C to TLV via europe (which is the way CO wants you to go since they can't afford for you to fly EWr-TLV), its 180k! a rip off! If they allowed EU routing on 120k business to TLV (besides KL only metal), it might be a decent trade-off. But its not.
UA to TLV is 80/115/140 and your options are:
1xAC, 1xUS(next year), 2xLH, 2xOS, 2xLX, ?xTK, may be forgetting something.
that's >4x the # of flights CO has available at reasonable levels.
What I loved is that TK although they use a 737 or A320 between IST & TLV the flight is like just over an hour so its doable. Unlike OS or most European carriers that will have you on a narrow-body for some 4-5 hrs and if you think CO is bad youve seen nothing yet.
But with LH and LX and AC using wide-bodys Only into TLV having to fly CO or LY is diminished. For a time it was only TW or LY out of the States and BA out of Europe that used wide-bodys . Then LH did followed by LX recently. Also with LY and AA tied up and not as when it was with DL on a very limited basis, that also now adds as an alternative.
FWIW TK on 10/12 out of JFK and back on 10/23 was a month or so ago <$1400 its now <$1500 while CO was always over $2000. So for me at least I guess I will be flying via Europe and doing a layover in the Hub city in either direction for a couple of days. I needed to get in early so I paid the EasyPass for the 84 in and got lucky that there was a Standard BF for the way back.
#140
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Michigan's West Coast and wherever my clients need me
Programs: Delta Diamond (2+M MQMs), Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 615
#141
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
I must disagree esp with one statement in the previous post - once these changes are implemented, they will remain in place and NEVER be "liberalized." It just doesn't happen in the airline industry. Once something is taken away, any airline just hopes you forget you ever had it to begin with - the sad truth of it all.
#142
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,892
I ended up having to buy certs in order to fly up front.
#143
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Currently in Bloomington, IN, but Normally NYC, CDG, and even POZ or wherever FT takes me.
Programs: Northwest Airlines. MTA pay-per-ride Metrocard; zero-balance Oyster card.
Posts: 14,082
Changing redemption levels within the UA/LH alliance might be tough. (At least I'm hoping
)
#144
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Southwest is looking good, 20 miles further to an airport they serve but larger room in coach, more times per day they fly(esp with CO Florida scaling back).....
#145
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Michigan's West Coast and wherever my clients need me
Programs: Delta Diamond (2+M MQMs), Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 615
#146




Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 44
While CO does still provide some perks, as a lowly Silver (of 8 yrs - all earned by tush in seat, sometimes nearing Gold), this will be my final year as a CO elite.
I have only flown on CO once this year. As I fly out of BWI, I have access to Southwest and have been able to make all my other trips on them...all nonstops including such places as SAT, PHX and MSY. Boarding on SWA is dependent on getting your pass printed early, not on status. Frankly, often on CO flights there are so many elites pre-boarding it almost makes it worthless. Upgrades on CO for Silver are a joke, so I am usually in steerage anyway. The seats on SWA have a 1-2" (32-33") advantage on seat pitch over CO (31") on most planes. SWA isn't charging for bags (not that it isn't likely in the future). So why should I make the effort to keep my business on CO?
It will be no big loss for CO to lose my business in the great scheme of things...I understand that. Also know many CO Elites will be happy to see the ranks dwindle...more room for them. But you do have to wonder how many other folks will take business elsewhere (as many have already stated on this forum) when there really isn't that much reason to work at earning elite status.
Never thought I would find SWA a better deal than CO, but all my recent travels on them have been very pleasant. I am sad to leave CO - have enjoyed my status over the years but can no longer see the benefits to maintaining it.
I have only flown on CO once this year. As I fly out of BWI, I have access to Southwest and have been able to make all my other trips on them...all nonstops including such places as SAT, PHX and MSY. Boarding on SWA is dependent on getting your pass printed early, not on status. Frankly, often on CO flights there are so many elites pre-boarding it almost makes it worthless. Upgrades on CO for Silver are a joke, so I am usually in steerage anyway. The seats on SWA have a 1-2" (32-33") advantage on seat pitch over CO (31") on most planes. SWA isn't charging for bags (not that it isn't likely in the future). So why should I make the effort to keep my business on CO?
It will be no big loss for CO to lose my business in the great scheme of things...I understand that. Also know many CO Elites will be happy to see the ranks dwindle...more room for them. But you do have to wonder how many other folks will take business elsewhere (as many have already stated on this forum) when there really isn't that much reason to work at earning elite status.
Never thought I would find SWA a better deal than CO, but all my recent travels on them have been very pleasant. I am sad to leave CO - have enjoyed my status over the years but can no longer see the benefits to maintaining it.
#147
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Is CO trying to stem the tide of tranafers from other airlines becuase they don't have the capacity to handle?
Last edited by Steph3n; Sep 5, 2008 at 11:35 am
#148
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,859
how many other folks will take business elsewhere (as many have already stated on this forum) when there really isn't that much reason to work at earning elite status
#149
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: EWR and SAN
Programs: PWP Direktor of Homeland, CO Plat* 1MM,UA 1K,BD Gold,DL Gold,SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 7,551
In the end, it's changes like these that make me reconsider having a 100% travel job. The problem is that these changes directly impact the traveler, in this case the frequent travelers. Pissing off the actual travelers, the ones that are putting money in your pocket, not a good idea. Post 9/11 when traffic slumped, it was due to companies cutting costs, but a person who still wanted to travel found a way (i know i did -- many times). So the determined traveler still traveled and gave the airlines business. Now, you're pissing off the actual traveler so they are much more inclined to a) find an alternate way to get to their destination or b) just reduce travel and find alternatives such as video conferencing and such.
In the end, biting the hand that feeds you is dangerous. When UA did this change, i moved all my SAN-SFO flights to VX. Now, in the northeast I'll take Amtrak... In the end, one way or another, while cutting this "cost" CO is also going to cut revenue through this change.
So, who's going to start up saveonepass.com?
#150
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,150
Not true in regards to EWR!
Theres LGA and JFK and PHL. As I posted many a time Im a 15 min drive from EWR and if Im flying within the US most likely I drove to 1 of those alternatives for my trip rather then be subjected to CO and its high fares out of EWR. For my Intl CO has pretty much been the same as anyone else fare wise out of any airport so I flew with them. PHl is very limited in Intl flights even I think BA or AF is 1 flight a day. So theres JFK where BA is what 7 flights and AF I think 5 and hardly a 757 to be found
NY today is what SF was till say a few months ago, where you had SFO,OAK and SJC or what LA remains with the likes of LAX,SNA,BUR,LGB,ONT
thats why till now I paid a couple of $$ more at times to fly CO due to its product and the benefits received.They have now been reduced that it doesnt pay to stick with CO any longer and pay more for the samething basically a flight between 2 cities


