FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Citi | ThankYou Rewards (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/citi-thankyou-rewards-739/)
-   -   Citi AA Platinum, Gold and Business cards. (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/citi-thankyou-rewards/1632562-citi-aa-platinum-gold-business-cards.html)

AugustWest Aug 2, 2016 7:31 pm

As I said, the question is really for folks with experience with the mailers. That does not sound like you. The mailers have some language about the offer not being eligible for current accounts. It is unclear to me whether that means I must close the card first. I has assumed it did, but others may have a different experience. I appreciate your advice, but you are answering questions I did not ask--I am well aware of the management of credit lines.


Originally Posted by sdsearch (Post 27006292)
Well, then you should have explained all that. The general rule at Citi has always been apply before cancelling, including for other reasons, like the fact that if necessary to approve a new card, they can pull credit limit from an existing card but they can't pull credit limit from a just-cancelled card (and credit limit from cancelled cards can take months before it's available to new cards).

So from a credit limit perspective (which is very independent of whether it's a mailer or not), you want to either reduce credit limit on previous cards at least a month or so earlier if possible, or cancel them many months earlier, or don't cancel until approved (so that credit limit can be moved from the yet-uncancelled card to the new card).

So what you haven't explained is why you assumed you need to cancel before applying, since most people with Citi experience would I think assume exactly the opposite is at the very least possible and may even be better.


flyer4512 Aug 2, 2016 7:55 pm


Originally Posted by sdsearch (Post 27005584)
I don't know why your one experience seems to be counter to everyone else's experience. Perhaps you were denied the bonus for a different reason, like the system thought you had applied in a way that didn't include a bonus? (Citi has been making online signup offers lately that include no signup bonus at all, for cards that have other online signup offers with signup bonuses.)

This was about 13 months ago and I used the the ( new at the time) 70 or 75K link ( I think it was 75K/$2k but I don''t have my spreadsheet so I'm not 100% sure) from the Wiki as the old churnable 50K link had just died.

The CSR told me that I already had the card ( Hilton) and that I would not be getting the bonus, since I had about a dozen HH cards open at that time I doubt he felt the need to explain any 18 month rule to me.

As far as my last DP there is absolutely no reason why this new bonus won't post as forget the 24 months, I don't even have a record of him having the Platinum AA MC before and thus no need to wait for a letter, the clock on the Citi page, etc.

One of the reasons I made my original post was to let people know that link actually brings to to a 40K/$1000 app as the wording on the landing page says 40,000 miles but it also has a banner saying 50,000 reasons to get away ( same banner as the 50K app) so some may be wondering what the actual bonus is.

flyer4512 Aug 2, 2016 8:01 pm


Originally Posted by AugustWest (Post 27005790)
Well, I guess you are trying to help, but what you write is manifestly untrue. I have done 6 straight cards off the mailers, closing each one prior to the next application. Each approved, and each netting me 50 or 60K. The mailers have no 24 month language.

My question, for those with experience with the mailers, is whether I actually need to be canceling the card prior to the next application.

How are you getting all these targeted offers for a card you already have ?

I had a bunch of Hilton cards open and I used to get offers in the mail but it was one or maybe 2 per year.

freeflyin Aug 3, 2016 12:58 am


Originally Posted by AugustWest (Post 27004393)
Looking for clarification:
With mailer offers it is NOT necessary to cancel an existing card prior to a new application, correct?
Thanks

We have been using mailers regularly and have never cancelled before applying for the next one. As soon as the card arrives, we lower the limit. Soon after,the oldest one is closed.

freeflyin Aug 3, 2016 1:01 am


Originally Posted by flyer4512 (Post 27006563)
How are you getting all these targeted offers for a card you already have ?.

In our case,the mailers are sent to a family member with an AA account but no AA credit card.

AugustWest Aug 3, 2016 7:51 am


Originally Posted by freeflyin (Post 27007325)
We have been using mailers regularly and have never cancelled before applying for the next one. As soon as the card arrives, we lower the limit. Soon after,the oldest one is closed.

Thank you. Just what I was looking for. And to be double sure--you say "we", but the cards (new and old) are in the same person's name.

bobert24 Aug 3, 2016 8:40 am


Originally Posted by sdsearch (Post 27006327)
I think you're confused. The business card didn't have 18-month language for a long time after the personal cards already had it. The business card was the last to get that language.

So I don't think there were people who were able to churn the business card "despite" the 18-month language. Rather, there were people who were able to churn the business card at the time that the personal card had 18-month language but the business card didn't yet.

I thus never assumed that anyone would able to churn the business card now any faster than 24 months, and thus was surprised to see that you were surprised that the 24 month language is indeed enforced.

The only loophole for the 18-month language that I am aware of was the World -> World Elite loophole, which AFAIK only applied to the personal card, not the business card.

Also, people's ability vs inability to churn the business card (before the relatively recent 18/24-month wording) had nothing to do with timing. Some people were able not able to churn it no matter how many years they waited, while other people were able to churn in less than a year IIRC.

This is all correct. The business card churning could technically be done in as little as ~95 days. We had 7 of them in our household, but we generally tried to space them out by about 6 months or so. At one point I did get 3 within 365 days.

freeflyin Aug 3, 2016 9:36 am


Originally Posted by AugustWest (Post 27008577)
Thank you. Just what I was looking for. And to be double sure--you say "we", but the cards (new and old) are in the same person's name.

Correct

miadukes Aug 3, 2016 10:29 am

Is the 30k bonus points the best offer the have had for AA business card? Also, does this report to personal credit reports?

lkat Aug 3, 2016 11:59 am


Originally Posted by bobert24 (Post 27008822)
This is all correct. The business card churning could technically be done in as little as ~95 days. We had 7 of them in our household, but we generally tried to space them out by about 6 months or so. At one point I did get 3 within 365 days.

You were able to churn them 95 days/6mths with the 18month language? But not with the new 24 month language? Or you did this before any 18 month language was on the business version?

beltway Aug 3, 2016 3:08 pm


Originally Posted by miadukes (Post 27009403)
Is the 30k bonus points the best offer the have had for AA business card?

Other than the 50K offer in the wiki?

sdsearch Aug 3, 2016 5:47 pm


Originally Posted by AugustWest (Post 27006415)
As I said, the question is really for folks with experience with the mailers. That does not sound like you. The mailers have some language about the offer not being eligible for current accounts. It is unclear to me whether that means I must close the card first. I has assumed it did, but others may have a different experience. I appreciate your advice, but you are answering questions I did not ask--I am well aware of the management of credit lines.

That exact same wording is in online offers, and has been discussed often. It simply means that you cannot get the bonus miles with a card you have, you have to apply for a new card to get it. That's all that it means.

If it's been established that that's all that language means in every other circumstance, why would you assume it means something different in mailers? :confused:

That's why I don't understand why think is a mailers-specific question. The language that Citi uses means the same thing wherever Citi uses it.

sdsearch Aug 3, 2016 5:51 pm


Originally Posted by miadukes (Post 27009403)
Is the 30k bonus points the best offer the have had for AA business card?

Of course not.

The wikipost for this thread has links for 50k bonus points offers for the AA business card as well as for the personal Platinum card.

Are you viewing FlyerTalk on a mobile device, using the mobile site? If so, come back on a computer. (The wikipost is not visible on the mobile site.)

To see the wikipost on a computer, scroll to to top of this page and look for "Wikipost". If its collapsed, click on the "+" at the far right to expand it. It it's only showing a few lines, click "show more".

mia Aug 3, 2016 6:44 pm

Moderator explanantion
 
miadukes' post was moved into this thread from a recently revived older thread which I have now closed.

thisguyoverhere Aug 3, 2016 8:46 pm


Originally Posted by freeflyin (Post 27007325)
We have been using mailers regularly and have never cancelled before applying for the next one. As soon as the card arrives, we lower the limit. Soon after,the oldest one is closed.

How are you lowering the limit? I'm confused by what I've read online if that requires a hard pull. It shouldn't, imo, but each bank has different rules.

I suppose by doing it within 30 days of application that you may be avoiding that HP anyway, but do you have any knowledge on this? Has a CSR ever mentioned pulling credit for a decrease?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:54 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.