Trump administration bans China passenger planes effective June 16
#106
Ambassador: China
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
#107
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
I also pointed out somewhere that USA and other foreign carriers will mostly want flights to PVG since the divert for testing and possible quarantine exercise if one is trying to fly into Beijing would be a big mess for carriers that don't operate domestic flights within mainland China.
#108
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,680
Of course I'm just trying to have some fun with this, but with a wet lease arrangement some of the big birds that are currently parked by DL and UA could be used. For example, DL has some excess 777s at the moment and they've flown to China in the past. Wet leases would be faster than creating subsidiaries United One, United Two, etc. and getting approval for them to fly.
#109
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,154
#110
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,154
I also pointed out somewhere that USA and other foreign carriers will mostly want flights to PVG since the divert for testing and possible quarantine exercise if one is trying to fly into Beijing would be a big mess for carriers that don't operate domestic flights within mainland China.
#111
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,417
It doesn't really matter--flights from areas with less cases to areas with more cases are basically irrelevant in terms of risk. There should be no restrictions on passengers from China.
#112
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,317
#113
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
I think B6/WN 737 can do it.
#114
Ambassador: China
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
What's behind the resumption of China-U.S. passenger flights?
Last edited by anacapamalibu; Jun 8, 2020 at 6:16 am
#115
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,680
Best they could hope for is a 2nd freedom route, because I don't think the Japanese are going to allow a bunch of potentially COVID-19 infected Americans to roam around the airport.
#117
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,233
The speculation about AS and B6 flying to China is fun and all but it’s not gonna happen. Does anyone know if the 1 flight a week have been approved by the Chinese yet for DL and UA and what 4 routes will be flown by the combination of Chinese and USA carriers? Or is this still in diplomatic limbo?
#118
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
The speculation about AS and B6 flying to China is fun and all but it’s not gonna happen. Does anyone know if the 1 flight a week have been approved by the Chinese yet for DL and UA and what 4 routes will be flown by the combination of Chinese and USA carriers? Or is this still in diplomatic limbo?
China is in a tough spot. If they agree 2 weekly flights, then they must cut two flights and people who bought tickets will be mad.
If they agree 4, then UA/DL will operate 2 each. This crushes 5-1 policy and they lose face in public.
China only has itself to blame. Whoever designed idiotic 5-1 policy clearly has no idea about international air rights. The whole thing makes China look bad among international community.
#119
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,911
It wasn't the 5 ones exactly; it's the March 12 baseline that was the problem. If they heeded the USDOT warning, the US might have been satisfied with 4 vs. 2.
#120
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 812
Not yet. DOT order gives CAAC until June 16 to decide.
China is in a tough spot. If they agree 2 weekly flights, then they must cut two flights and people who bought tickets will be mad.
If they agree 4, then UA/DL will operate 2 each. This crushes 5-1 policy and they lose face in public.
China only has itself to blame. Whoever designed idiotic 5-1 policy clearly has no idea about international air rights. The whole thing makes China look bad among international community.
China is in a tough spot. If they agree 2 weekly flights, then they must cut two flights and people who bought tickets will be mad.
If they agree 4, then UA/DL will operate 2 each. This crushes 5-1 policy and they lose face in public.
China only has itself to blame. Whoever designed idiotic 5-1 policy clearly has no idea about international air rights. The whole thing makes China look bad among international community.
The PRC wants to minimize the risk of returnees spreading the virus, so China would love to stop all inbound flights from countries where COVID is still uncontrolled. But cutting off travel completely makes China look hypocritical (since China criticized other countries for cutting flights back in January) and also pisses off citizens who are stuck outside the country. The 5-1 policy was meant to open the door just enough so overseas student, etc. won't be too pissed off, but still substantially limit risk.
However, if it's the US government that's limiting flights, China can just shrug its shoulders and say "hey that's the best we can do, it's out of our control," and only having 4 weekly flights keeps the number of returnees and the risk of re-seeding COVID to a minimum until a vaccine is found.
1 of the 2 weekly flights will be given to CA. The other weekly frequency may rotate between MU and CZ.
Alternatively, with CX possibly getting bought out by CA, maybe CZ can finally join OneWorld and get AA to restart a China flight, so there'll be 3 weekly flights on each side.