Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > China
Reload this Page >

Current China Entry policy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Current China Entry policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2022, 8:16 pm
  #1276  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,315
Originally Posted by moondog
2. They should eliminate the direct flight rule, possibly with some exceptions (e.g. Canada, Germany, France, Japan, Korea should be okay, but it's cool if they prohibit some transit points)
You can obtain a green code if you stay in Korea for 30 days or longer before flying to China. This is explicitly stated on the Seoul Embassy website.

These transit bans are enforced by each individual embassy so there is no blanket rule.
tauphi is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2022, 9:25 pm
  #1277  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by tauphi
You can obtain a green code if you stay in Korea for 30 days or longer before flying to China. This is explicitly stated on the Seoul Embassy website.

These transit bans are enforced by each individual embassy so there is no blanket rule.
At least Thailand works as well in this regard (no 30-day rule there), and I assume many other countries.

The ban is intended to prevent people from flying via Canada, Europe, or Japan/Korea, using simple same/next day connections. These flights are often cheap and should be allowed, assuming China actually wants tourists and students to visit again.
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2022, 10:03 pm
  #1278  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,226
Originally Posted by moondog
At least Thailand works as well in this regard (no 30-day rule there), and I assume many other countries.

The ban is intended to prevent people from flying via Canada, Europe, or Japan/Korea, using simple same/next day connections. These flights are often cheap and should be allowed, assuming China actually wants tourists and students to visit again.
What would possibly make you think China wants tourists and students to visit?
tauphi, gudugan and boat stuck like this.
travelinmanS is online now  
Old Jan 28, 2022, 11:00 pm
  #1279  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
What would possibly make you think China wants tourists and students to visit?
I suppose the hospitality industry doesn't really need foreign visitors in order to thrive, in part due to the fact that Chinese people who would normally go to places like Paris or New York now have to settle with domestic destinations, and have boatloads of coin to spend.

However, the same can't be said about students. Foreign students provide the exact same benefit to Chinese universities as Chinese students do to schools like UCR and Northeastern (cash cows). I also believe foreign students provide intangible value to their Chinese classmates, most of whom want to improve their English and enjoy healthy discourse about world affairs, but I realize Beijing might not be especially swayed by this line of thinking.
joesk likes this.
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2022, 1:29 am
  #1280  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
Originally Posted by moondog
I suppose the hospitality industry doesn't really need foreign visitors in order to thrive, in part due to the fact that Chinese people who would normally go to places like Paris or New York now have to settle with domestic destinations, and have boatloads of coin to spend.

However, the same can't be said about students. Foreign students provide the exact same benefit to Chinese universities as Chinese students do to schools like UCR and Northeastern (cash cows). I also believe foreign students provide intangible value to their Chinese classmates, most of whom want to improve their English and enjoy healthy discourse about world affairs, but I realize Beijing might not be especially swayed by this line of thinking.
Agree with you about the benefit of having international students. And more than agree that this benefit will be sacrificed at the drop of a hat if it conflicts with any other "national interests" goal.

Good to see you back!
uanj is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2022, 7:51 pm
  #1281  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,315
Originally Posted by moondog
I suppose the hospitality industry doesn't really need foreign visitors in order to thrive, in part due to the fact that Chinese people who would normally go to places like Paris or New York now have to settle with domestic destinations, and have boatloads of coin to spend.

However, the same can't be said about students. Foreign students provide the exact same benefit to Chinese universities as Chinese students do to schools like UCR and Northeastern (cash cows). I also believe foreign students provide intangible value to their Chinese classmates, most of whom want to improve their English and enjoy healthy discourse about world affairs, but I realize Beijing might not be especially swayed by this line of thinking.
The amount of tuition fees China earns from overseas students is vastly dwarfed by the amount of fees Chinese students spend overseas.

Besides they don't even care about the outbound tuition fees, it's just loose change in the grand scheme of things.
tauphi is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 1:49 am
  #1282  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by tauphi
The amount of tuition fees China earns from overseas students is vastly dwarfed by the amount of fees Chinese students spend overseas.

Besides they don't even care about the outbound tuition fees, it's just loose change in the grand scheme of things.
I suppose you're right. I know a lot of Chinese universities are able to soak foreign students for 2-3x as much money as locals, but there's no way they could bridge the gap between local tuition and ~$45k (typical US figure) and still attract students.

Are you moved by the diversity argument? IMO, it's one of the main areas in which universities outside of China are way ahead, and I'm pretty sure this is common knowledge within the upper ranks of the Party. How do you think they feel when their own children demand to go to school abroad because they think it is better?
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 5:15 am
  #1283  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,226
Originally Posted by moondog
I suppose you're right. I know a lot of Chinese universities are able to soak foreign students for 2-3x as much money as locals, but there's no way they could bridge the gap between local tuition and ~$45k (typical US figure) and still attract students.

Are you moved by the diversity argument? IMO, it's one of the main areas in which universities outside of China are way ahead, and I'm pretty sure this is common knowledge within the upper ranks of the Party. How do you think they feel when their own children demand to go to school abroad because they think it is better?
Are you saying you think Xi Jinping is hoping for more foreigners at Chinese universities so that they can mingle and share ideas with the local Chinese students?
tauphi likes this.
travelinmanS is online now  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 5:58 am
  #1284  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
Are you saying you think Xi Jinping is hoping for more foreigners at Chinese universities so that they can mingle and share ideas with the local Chinese students?
I know he's not interested in the mingling part, but I'm sure he would prefer it if the best students stayed in China. For some reason, Japan and Korea don't have this brain drain problem to nearly the same extent, in spite of the fact that their universities are also homogenous.
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 9:31 am
  #1285  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Programs: Marriott Titanium (Lifetime Gold), Caesars Diamond
Posts: 1,402
Chinese universities still can't issue student visas for international students two years later. Medical students who are enrolled at Chinese universities, for example, were kicked out in March 2020 and are still forced to learn online at 2am in their home country.

Those students would definitely go through the PU letter, quarantine rigmarole if they could. But they can't. It's clear that businesspeople are prioritized more highly, and international students are just as useless as tourists.
gudugan is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 11:29 am
  #1286  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
Are you saying you think Xi Jinping is hoping for more foreigners at Chinese universities so that they can mingle and share ideas with the local Chinese students?
Absolutely NOT.

The Emperor wants foreigners OUT.

He feels safer that way.
gudugan likes this.
kb1992 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 12:48 pm
  #1287  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,911
Originally Posted by kb1992
Absolutely NOT.

The Emperor wants foreigners OUT.

He feels safer that way.
And he wants to minimize friendship and of course relationships with foreigners from here on. Likely medal winners excepted.

(Tutoring for profit is banned. English learning materials are off the shelves. Very soon rarely anybody can pass TOEFL and IE!TS anyway.)
HkCaGu is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 5:14 pm
  #1288  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by HkCaGu
And he wants to minimize friendship and of course relationships with foreigners from here on. Likely medal winners excepted.

(Tutoring for profit is banned. English learning materials are off the shelves. Very soon rarely anybody can pass TOEFL and IE!TS anyway.)
The (primary) stated rationale behind these policies is to reduce the opportunity gap. This sort of makes sense to me; children from poorer families/villages are at a competitive disadvantage as long as wealthy parents are able to devote bottomless resources to their own offspring. I would think test prep is somewhat shielded because there are many good online options, some of which are free or close to free.

However, I have a hard time believing that X and company are truly in favor of isolation. All of those guys have seen past examples, including their own, of this, and it never produces favorable results. I will stop here because I don't want this thread to get moved to the dark side, especially since it's pretty much our only active thread in this subforum.
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 8:44 pm
  #1289  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by moondog
The (primary) stated rationale behind these policies is to reduce the opportunity gap. This sort of makes sense to me; children from poorer families/villages are at a competitive disadvantage as long as wealthy parents are able to devote bottomless resources to their own offspring. I would think test prep is somewhat shielded because there are many good online options, some of which are free or close to free.
It's not just a matter of resources, but the competition isn't a good thing for the students. (It isn't here, either.)

However, I have a hard time believing that X and company are truly in favor of isolation. All of those guys have seen past examples, including their own, of this, and it never produces favorable results. I will stop here because I don't want this thread to get moved to the dark side, especially since it's pretty much our only active thread in this subforum.
I think it's more a matter of physical isolation, not economic isolation.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2022, 11:11 pm
  #1290  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,315
The only isolation is the banning of foreign nationals entering China. There is very little effort in enforcing a ban on outbound travel by Chinese nationals. Students are still lining up in droves at the Shanghai US Consulate.
Even Taiwan citizens can travel freely in and out of China, of course if they are doing so between China and Taiwan then that means 35 days of quarantine.
tauphi is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.