FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   China (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/china-613/)
-   -   Current China Entry policy (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/china/2016837-current-china-entry-policy.html)

moondog Apr 9, 2021 9:04 pm


Originally Posted by chichow (Post 33166235)
Given the showcase importance of the Olympics, does FT believe that China will open up before Feb 2020?

Typo?

GloballyServiced Apr 9, 2021 9:22 pm


Originally Posted by sincx (Post 33165175)
The new variants are terrifying. I don't blame countries that have this under control from tightening rules further. Canada was doing fine until suddenly they weren't.

Oh please, there nothing terrifying about any of it at this point.


Originally Posted by yoyo (Post 33165064)
True. NZ is even banning citizens from returning (after 17 positives out of 23 came from India) from India which is a step further than China Entry policy. Not the direction I am happy to see countries going.

That’s disappointing but not surprising. World leaders are doing their best to keep the shenanigans rolling.


Originally Posted by STS-134 (Post 33165908)
US and all other countries should simply reciprocate: no entry by Chinese citizens who don't have a visa issued after March 28, 2020. Only Chinese citizens with lawful permanent resident status OR a visa issued after March 28, 2020 allowed to enter the other country at all. If applying for a new visa, Chinese citizens required to be vaccinated with a US (or whatever relevant country we're talking about) approved vaccine before applying for new visa, etc.

This sounds like the type of battle that everyone loses.

tauphi Apr 10, 2021 4:54 am


Originally Posted by yoyo (Post 33165064)
True. NZ is even banning citizens from returning (after 17 positives out of 23 came from India) from India which is a step further than China Entry policy. Not the direction I am happy to see countries going.

China may not have gone as far as blocking a whole country but it does have a similar policy in place, the so-called circuit-breaker on flights with excessive positive cases which has recently been applied to the China Eastern route of JFK/PVG.

STS-134 Apr 10, 2021 9:45 am


Originally Posted by GloballyServiced (Post 33166374)
This sounds like the type of battle that everyone loses.

Only thing you can really do is make sure that you're not the one who threw the first grenade.

yoyo Apr 10, 2021 12:47 pm


Originally Posted by STS-134 (Post 33167212)
Only thing you can really do is make sure that you're not the one who threw the first grenade.

define "grenade" first :p

YVR Cockroach Apr 10, 2021 3:08 pm


Originally Posted by tauphi (Post 33152260)
The Chinese tourism sector was massively tilted towards the outbound side so if anything closing the borders is giving a major economic boost to China as far as tourism is concerned. Of course the same is not true for Australia or NZ and their tourism sectors are struggling for survival.

Indeed. Chinese tourists are a valued source of demand and major revenue stream for external tourist-dependent economies. If it tourism demand (and spending) is kept within domestic borders the tourist-dependent economies (such as the 5 Eyes alliance) will be screaming that China is being protectionist.

moondog Apr 10, 2021 5:47 pm

I've been researching flights from Shanghai to the US for May and June. The prices are no longer insane, but the routings are (e.g. PVG-ICN-SEA-BOS...41 hours total). PVG-CDG-BOS is actually the best I've found...I will try to book this one way with DL miles, and hope that US-China flights are back on the schedule when I come back.

ETA: For those of you without China IDs, now is a good time to invest in residence permits. Just pay an agent around $600 (many can hook up with a "job"), jump through the hoops, and ask a friend to allow you to use his/her residence for documentation purposes. You still might be required to stay in a (very cheap) designated hotel during your quarantine, but maybe not for 14 days. Apart from RPs being awesome, I know a number of people on M visas who have been booted recently; those cameras are everywhere.

STS-134 Apr 10, 2021 7:01 pm


Originally Posted by yoyo (Post 33167552)
define "grenade" first :p

Border policies that have nothing to do with science and data, like accepting Chinese vaccines (Sinovac/Sinopharm) but not Pfizer/Moderna/J&J. A lot of the data I've seen says that the Sinovac one may be the worst of the above.


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 33168112)
Apart from RPs being awesome, I know a number of people on M visas who have been booted recently; those cameras are everywhere.

Huh? What do you mean by "booted"? Did they violate quarantine?

moondog Apr 10, 2021 7:27 pm


Originally Posted by STS-134 (Post 33168257)
Border policies that have nothing to do with science and data, like accepting Chinese vaccines (Sinovac/Sinopharm) but not Pfizer/Moderna/J&J. A lot of the data I've seen says that the Sinovac one may be the worst of the above.


Huh? What do you mean by "booted"? Did they violate quarantine?

No. They are actually working here on L or M visas. This is no longer allowed, though M is better than L (i.e. buys you around 3 months).

travelinmanS Apr 10, 2021 11:40 pm


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 33168290)
No. They are actually working here on L or M visas. This is no longer allowed, though M is better than L (i.e. buys you around 3 months).

Working on tourist or business visas was never allowed. In the past this was loosely enforced, now they kick people out who do it. Fair enough IMHO.

moondog Apr 11, 2021 12:07 am


Originally Posted by travelinmanS (Post 33168620)
Working on tourist or business visas was never allowed. In the past this was loosely enforced, now they kick people out who do it. Fair enough IMHO.

If you worked for McKinsey in SF and had a project in BJ, business visas were definitely allowed 10 years ago, and might still be now. The current crackdown I've witnessed focuses on domestic helpers from SE Asia. Basically, they spend a week in "detention" and then get booted. To me, this is shameful because all of their bosses are MDs at F500 companies, and could actually hire them legally if they put up $600. Instead, they tell them to lay low.

chichow Apr 11, 2021 1:50 am


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 33166350)
Typo?

yeah meant

given Beijing Winter Olympics are scheduled for Feb 2022, does FT believe that China will open up borders prior to Feb 2022

yoyo Apr 11, 2021 7:27 am


Originally Posted by chichow (Post 33168728)
yeah meant

given Beijing Winter Olympics are scheduled for Feb 2022, does FT believe that China will open up borders prior to Feb 2022

which is more important, Olympics or Stability? Unless context tracking can be done efficiently for 1.4 billion people or China can import enough vaccine (SinoVac only has effacacy of 50%) I would say very unlikely

yoyo Apr 11, 2021 7:31 am


Originally Posted by STS-134 (Post 33168257)
Border policies that have nothing to do with science and data, like accepting Chinese vaccines (Sinovac/Sinopharm) but not Pfizer/Moderna/J&J. A lot of the data I've seen says that the Sinovac one may be the worst of the above.

Do you categorize Trump's ban on Chinese traveler into U.S. directly from China last March as based on scientific data or not then?

travelinmanS Apr 11, 2021 9:11 am


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 33168651)
If you worked for McKinsey in SF and had a project in BJ, business visas were definitely allowed 10 years ago, and might still be now. The current crackdown I've witnessed focuses on domestic helpers from SE Asia. Basically, they spend a week in "detention" and then get booted. To me, this is shameful because all of their bosses are MDs at F500 companies, and could actually hire them legally if they put up $600. Instead, they tell them to lay low.

The consultant is traveling in and out and is not working full time in China, it’s a short term assignment. A business visa is appropriate for that type of work. If they got transferred to the Beijing office of McK then they’d need a work permit and residence permit. The domestic helpers are obviously working full time in China and domiciled here. According to the rules they need a WP and RP as well. I agree that it’s a shame they are cracking down but it’s technically illegal to work full time in China on anything other than a work permit backed RP.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:33 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.