![]() |
Current China Entry policy
We have a ton of large orders going on with our factories in Shenzhen, and I'm trying to be on the ground over there.
I currently have a 10 year entry visa with a US passport. Can anyone advise if their allowing US citizens in? (i'm perfectly healthy) Side note would be if there are any one world carriers still flying there? (Im based in NYC) |
At present, you would need to convince a Chinese embassy or consulate to issue you a new visa. With a new visa, you can enter China. You'd have to ask what sort of documents you'd have to produce to support your visa application.
Even if you can enter China, there's still the quarantine to consider. |
Originally Posted by DuncanCrowdSync
(Post 32338490)
We have a ton of large orders going on with our factories in Shenzhen, and I'm trying to be on the ground over there.
I currently have a 10 year entry visa with a US passport. Can anyone advise if their allowing US citizens in? (i'm perfectly healthy) Side note would be if there are any one world carriers still flying there? (Im based in NYC) |
You’re not getting into China until they lift the foreigner ban. My friends and I think that’ll happen sometime early next year.
|
It is not an absolute ban on foreigners entering China: the official announcement makes clear that foreigners may be granted visas to enter China in certain cases:
"Foreign nationals coming to China for necessary economic, trade, scientific or technological activities or out of emergency humanitarian needs may apply for visas at Chinese embassies or consulates. Entry by foreign nationals with visas issued after this announcement will not be affected." How the OP would demonstrate that necessary trade activities require his travel to China, I do not know. But the door is there. He'll have to knock to see how widely it will open. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjbxw/t1761867.shtml |
Originally Posted by 889
(Post 32339466)
It is not an absolute ban on foreigners entering China: the official announcement makes clear that foreigners may be granted visas to enter China in certain cases:
"Foreign nationals coming to China for necessary economic, trade, scientific or technological activities or out of emergency humanitarian needs may apply for visas at Chinese embassies or consulates. Entry by foreign nationals with visas issued after this announcement will not be affected." How the OP would demonstrate that necessary trade activities require his travel to China, I do not know. But the door is there. He'll have to knock to see how widely it will open. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjbxw/t1761867.shtml |
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 32339445)
You’re not getting into China until they lift the foreigner ban. My friends and I think that’ll happen sometime early next year.
|
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 32339549)
China says these things so they can say it isn’t a complete ban. I’d be curious to see how many visas they have issued since the announcement. Probably under 100 worldwide. If the OP is a Nobel prize winning infectious disease specialist or a billionaire investor employing hundreds of thousands of Chinese then maybe they have a shot. Otherwise, nope.
What possible pressing reason for business would require a personal visit to china now? Its locked down..they have no reason to risk infected foreigners coming in. |
You're making some broad statements there based on what you and "your friends" think.
Anything first-hand -- yes, first hand not rumour -- to back up any of your assertions? Anything at all? Otherwise, you're just guessing. (No, in terms of daily life, China for the most part is not "locked down.") |
If you have urgent business situation that requires a company representative/employee to physically go to china hire a chinese national.
In this emergency the country is in lockdown and restricting entry, in most cases, to only chinese nationals. I can refer charter flights on a gulfstream its 50k usd per person each way. |
Have you any contact whatever with people in China? If you did, you wouldn't make that sort of statement. Daily life is not "in lockdown" these days.
What's the point of spreading that kind of false information here? |
Originally Posted by 889
(Post 32339607)
Have you any contact whatever with people in China? If you did, you wouldn't make that sort of statement. Daily life is not "in lockdown" these days.
What's the point of spreading that kind of false information here? |
"Lockdown" in this crisis has a pretty specific meaning. There are sporadic lockdowns of various degrees still hitting hotspots that sometimes popup, like Suifenhe, but taken as a whole, China is heading back to normal with surprising speed.
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32339618)
I am guessing that, instead of lockdown, he meant to say unwelcoming to arrivals from other countries. This affects me because if I were to leave now, I wouldn't be allowed to return, but I'm fine with the current policies to the extent that they protect us from further outbreaks.
|
Originally Posted by DuncanCrowdSync
(Post 32338490)
I currently have a 10 year entry visa with a US passport. Can anyone advise if their allowing US citizens in? (i'm perfectly healthy)
Originally Posted by DuncanCrowdSync
(Post 32338490)
Side note would be if there are any one world carriers still flying there? (Im based in NYC)
But you are banned in Hong Kong. |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32340029)
No. China does not have any OW carrier. The closest one is CX, i.e. to Hong Kong.
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32339550)
They are still processing renewals in Shanghai, and presumably other places, so I think you'll be fine yourself.
|
Originally Posted by tauphi
(Post 32342780)
So if you renew your RP after 28 March, can you then leave and come back? Anyone tried it?
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32339618)
I am guessing that, instead of lockdown, he meant to say unwelcoming to arrivals from other countries. This affects me because if I were to leave now, I wouldn't be allowed to return, but I'm fine with the current policies to the extent that they protect us from further outbreaks.
|
China is to ease its domestic coronavirus travel restrictions by issuing national standards for a Covid-19 health QR code, national authorities announced on Friday.
Eligible citizens who were previously subject to tough quarantine and travel restrictions will be allowed to travel around the country. SCMP article yesterday https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...36cedfccae.jpg |
Delete
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32342112)
The OP asked about OW carriers flying to the Mainland, not within it. KA and JL are the only two that come to my mind at present, but there might be some other options between China and Europe (i.e. I haven't checked).
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32339618)
I am guessing that, instead of lockdown, he meant to say unwelcoming to arrivals from other countries. This affects me because if I were to leave now, I wouldn't be allowed to return, but I'm fine with the current policies to the extent that they protect us from further outbreaks.
|
Originally Posted by STS-134
(Post 32344426)
Well, the current policy is kind of stupid. Mandatory quarantines for all arrivals at your own expense (if a non citizen) makes more sense. Just that policy alone would cut down on all but the most essential trips. Hawaii arrivals fell from around 30k-35k per day to below 200 with their mandatory 14 day quarantines on arrival, but there's no stupid restriction like you have to be a Hawaii resident to go to Hawaii. Regardless of whether you are a resident or visitor, if you go, you serve your quarantine (and if a visitor, you pay for the hotel and food for 14 days).
|
Originally Posted by STS-134
(Post 32344426)
Well, the current policy is kind of stupid..
US-bound shipments from China plunged 25.2 per cent in the first quarter compared to the year-earlier period, including a 20.8 per cent fall in March. |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32344443)
I don't think it's stupid to limit the number of arrivals towards the end of keeping the numbers manageable
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32344443)
I don't think it's stupid to limit the number of arrivals towards the end of keeping the numbers manageable (i.e. not flood the quarantine hotels with more people than they can safely handle). Selfishly, it would be nice if (pre-March 28) RPs were included in the admissible class, but the blanket ban is a lot simpler to understand and implement.
|
Originally Posted by STS-134
(Post 32344497)
What do you think a mandatory 14 day quarantine does? It dramatically limits the number of arrivals, as the example of Hawaii shows (daily arrivals down something like 99.5-99.7%).
|
To be willing to undergo a strict 14-day quarantine at one's own expense in a Chinese hotel, one would have to have an awfully awfully strong commitment and motivation to be travelling to China. I certainly don't buy the "Why they'll be flooding in!" argument. Besides, the limited number of flights imposes a limit on the number entering each day.
|
Originally Posted by 889
(Post 32345023)
To be willing to undergo a strict 14-day quarantine at one's own expense in a Chinese hotel, one would have to have an awfully awfully strong commitment and motivation to be travelling to China. I certainly don't buy the "Why they'll be flooding in!" argument.
|
Where did I suggest the hotels themselves would be a problem? Imprisonment is imprisonment, even if in a gilded cage.
There are presumably reasons behind continuation of the foreigner blockade. But "limited quarantine hotels" is a smokescreen for whatever are those real reasons. (Skepticism is a useful approach in China.) |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 32345030)
They're presumably comfortable in their ability to accommodate the current inbound traffic. It's their call as to when and how much to further open the spigot. Not all of the quarantine hotels suck FYI.
|
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
(Post 32345096)
Depending on one's narrative of the origination failure to implement a nationwide border quarantine would be going down a slippery slope. Obviously the US fell off a cliff.
|
"Obviously the US fell off a cliff."
Let us not forget -- ever -- how China attacked the U.S. when it blocked entry from China in late January, attacking America at the very time China itself had blockaded travel from Hubei. "True feeling shines through in hardship . . . Many countries have shown their support and help for China’s fight against the epidemic. By contrast, the United States’ words and deeds are not in keeping with the facts and less are they in keeping with friendship.” So said a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman. How on earth was blocking arrivals from China in late January "not in keeping with the facts"? |
As I recall, the US initially did not block arrivals from China, it blocked Chinese citizens. I read that 450,000 people traveled between the two countries after the "blockade".
On a somewhat related subject, anybody who can read the Chinese press (and social media- the new propaganda tool) will notice that in recent weeks the language changed and sounds like what you could read during the cultural revolution. It certainly has my Chinese friends over 50 years old somewhat worried as this language is all too familiar and brings back very bad memories. Foreigners and foreign countries are referred to as the enemy, foreigners in China are spies and Chinese who moved abroad are traitors, especially if they change passport. The expression traitor is used a lot these days and rather loosely. |
[MENTION=638610]JPDM[/MENTION] Since we aren't allowed to discuss politics in this sub forum (a policy I fully support BTW), I simply want to state that your observations are consistent with my own, but I'm not especially worried about long term implications.
|
"As I recall, the US initially did not block arrivals from China, it blocked Chinese citizens."
You know with Google, it's so easy to check and post the truth. Why spread false information like that? Here's the actual language of the Presidential proclamation: "The entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the People’s Republic of China, excluding the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States is hereby suspended and limited subject to section 2 of this proclamation." Section 2 then lays out certain exceptions for close relatives of Americans, Green Card holders, etc. http://www.whitehouse.gov/presidenti...l-coronavirus/ |
A primary objective of Intelligence & Analysis is determining the credibility of
a source. "Ministerial words" rank below "I saw it written on a bathroom wall". |
Can we please stick with known facts, guys? In the instant case, we are waiting on the OP (or anyone else) to provide data based on actual experiences. Attempting to read Zhongnanhai's mind is an exercise in futility, but if any of you feel compelled to brainstorm, head over to bad OMNI.
|
Originally Posted by JPDM
(Post 32345251)
As I recall, the US initially did not block arrivals from China, it blocked Chinese citizens. I read that 450,000 people traveled between the two countries after the "blockade".
SARS-CoV-2 is a virus. It does not care where you're flying from or what citizenship you hold. It will infect anyone (actually, I should say anything, since cats and dogs and other animals can apparently get it too) with ACE-2 receptors. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:44 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.