Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > China
Reload this Page >

Current China Entry policy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Current China Entry policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2022, 11:48 am
  #1831  
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Programs: UA 1MM
Posts: 348
Originally Posted by kb1992
Actually someone reported that 1K on Q fare and a Platinum on a U fare got kicked out of UA 857.

My friend bought $6,600 ticket and was safe. He has no status.

I think UA values a non-status pax bought $6,600 B fare higher than an 1K on $3,000 Q fare.....
Interesting if UA is sorting solely by fare class!

I wonder if J and PY are going out full then with all their booked passengers, and regular economy is the only cabin whose reservations are getting cancelled.
joesk likes this.
boat stuck is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2022, 12:01 pm
  #1832  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by boat stuck
Interesting if UA is sorting solely by fare class!

I wonder if J and PY are going out full then with all their booked passengers, and regular economy is the only cabin whose reservations are getting cancelled.
I observed few 857 flights in April.

J and PY were never full. Usually only 1/2 or 2/3 full at take-off.

Someone also reported that J pax got ticket canceled.
kb1992 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2022, 2:13 pm
  #1833  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,679
Originally Posted by kb1992
I observed few 857 flights in April.

J and PY were never full. Usually only 1/2 or 2/3 full at take-off.

Someone also reported that J pax got ticket canceled.
Maybe they're sorting by booking fare class?
STS-134 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2022, 4:06 pm
  #1834  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by STS-134
Maybe they're sorting by booking fare class?
On most days in April when 40% capacity cap stands, I looked at seat map after 857 took off.

Typically 30/60 J seats, 10/24 PY seats and 100/266 Y seats were occupied.

Total: 140/350=40%. Often the load was even slight less than that.
joesk likes this.
kb1992 is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 11:07 am
  #1835  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Posts: 9,455
Why don't you move your nonsense trolling where it belongs, to OMNI PR?

If you're not interested in a serious discussion, this isn't the place for you.

Now let's pick up where #1834 left us with.

I've also heard it's close to impossible of finding space on a flight FROM China now, since plenty of flights simply gets cancelled.

This is getting worse.. the 2 years where 0-covid worked clearly made the Chinese leadership believing their strategy will be always better, without actually able to react to the changed reality of Omicron.
YuropFlyer is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 12:30 pm
  #1836  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,679
Originally Posted by YuropFlyer
I've also heard it's close to impossible of finding space on a flight FROM China now, since plenty of flights simply gets cancelled.
One of my Chinese friends just got out. Went from PEK-HKG-SFO yesterday and arrived last night. Says he'll probably be in the US for "at least 2 months". Not sure how long his US visa is good for, or exactly what he's planning to do here, and I'll probably find out some time this week when I meet him. I strongly suspect being tired of the 0 COVID crap over there though has something to do with it.
STS-134 is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 1:09 pm
  #1837  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,532
My mom has made it out of China on CA 987 PEK-LAX, which appears to be Sunday only flight; I saw that CA 609 also operated today.
angetenar is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 2:46 pm
  #1838  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
I think UA 858 PVG-SFO is fairly wide open next several months to EOS.
kb1992 is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 7:50 pm
  #1839  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,532
Is transit through PVG allowed?
angetenar is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 8:30 pm
  #1840  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,227
I got out on UA 858 yesterday. It was not full by any means but more crowded than the last two times I took it during the pandemic. It’s gonna be really hard to get back as I can’t find anything under $8k for July. Insane, almost as insane as continuing zero Covid like they seem set on doing. Here are some pics of my escape…you’ll see just how vibrant Shanghai has become.



Getting ready to get on the expressway to Pudong from Huangpu

Crossing the Lupu bridge into Pudong. Surprisingly light traffic 😂

Same traffic situation as my taxi approaches PVG

Wonder if I’ll be able to snag a trolly for my luggage with all the people fighting for them!

Vibrant Pudong Airport

Domestic travel is really booming in China these days.

Gonna be a long wait at immigration!

Most of the Chinese planes there had these engine warmers on, must be to get through the cold Shanghai night.
YariGuy, joesk, tauphi and 6 others like this.
travelinmanS is online now  
Old May 1, 2022, 8:50 pm
  #1841  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PVG
Programs: MU Platinum, HH Diamond
Posts: 827
Good for you.

How did you get to PVG? Car service? How much did they charge?

And did you have to get permission from the neighborhood committee?

We want to go back in July too -- Shanghai American School starts in early August -- but I don't think it's realistic at this point. It seems more and more likely that we'll be spending the next schoolyear here in California.
YariGuy is offline  
Old May 1, 2022, 11:03 pm
  #1842  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
I got out on UA 858 yesterday. It was not full by any means but more crowded than the last two times I took it during the pandemic. It’s gonna be really hard to get back as I can’t find anything under $8k for July. Insane, almost as insane as continuing zero Covid like they seem set on doing. Here are some pics of my escape…you’ll see just how vibrant Shanghai has become.
Did you get upgraded?

858 fares are fairly cheap. Even J fare is only $5,000 these days. Upgrade is easy too.

But 857 is ridiculously expensive.
kb1992 is offline  
Old May 2, 2022, 10:18 pm
  #1843  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Update on my flight UA 857 on May 8.

Per suggestion from another GS, I called GS desk this morning and asked not to cancel my reservation. I explained the situation of 40% capacity of UA 857 mandated by the Chinese government. I told the agent that I planned this trip 6 months ago and I have already arrived in SFO to comply with requirements by PRC Consulate in SF about 7 day self isolation and 3 COVID tests. I told the agent that UA will soon, maybe today, cancel a lot of peoples tickets booked on the 5/8 flight to PVG. I asked the agent to talk to the China desk or send a message to protect me. The agent put me on hold, talked to her supervisor and told me that I am on the flight. She said that my ticket won't be canceled unless China throws another hardball at United which is out of United's hands.

Few hours later, about 100 people received notifications from United that their reservations on 5/8 UA 857 are canceled.

I would be shocked if they cancel my ticket, but I wasn't going to take any chances.

About 20 J seats are open, and only 6 people are on upgrade list. Everyone should eventually clear!

IF, IF they get the blue code from the PRC Consulate in SFO.... That is not a given.
joesk and MSPeconomist like this.
kb1992 is offline  
Old May 2, 2022, 10:26 pm
  #1844  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Programs: Marriott Titanium (Lifetime Gold), Caesars Diamond
Posts: 1,402
lol you actually want to take UA 857 in a week? I thought this was a holiday?!
gudugan is offline  
Old May 2, 2022, 11:27 pm
  #1845  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,227
Originally Posted by kb1992
Update on my flight UA 857 on May 8.

Per suggestion from another GS, I called GS desk this morning and asked not to cancel my reservation. I explained the situation of 40% capacity of UA 857 mandated by the Chinese government. I told the agent that I planned this trip 6 months ago and I have already arrived in SFO to comply with requirements by PRC Consulate in SF about 7 day self isolation and 3 COVID tests. I told the agent that UA will soon, maybe today, cancel a lot of peoples tickets booked on the 5/8 flight to PVG. I asked the agent to talk to the China desk or send a message to protect me. The agent put me on hold, talked to her supervisor and told me that I am on the flight. She said that my ticket won't be canceled unless China throws another hardball at United which is out of United's hands.

Few hours later, about 100 people received notifications from United that their reservations on 5/8 UA 857 are canceled.

I would be shocked if they cancel my ticket, but I wasn't going to take any chances.

About 20 J seats are open, and only 6 people are on upgrade list. Everyone should eventually clear!

IF, IF they get the blue code from the PRC Consulate in SFO.... That is not a given.
Why would you go to China now? I just escaped Shanghai and can't fathom a reason to go there outside of a parent/close relative being extremely sick there.
Loren Pechtel likes this.
travelinmanS is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.