![]() |
Originally Posted by dd992emo
(Post 8433578)
Excellent use of generalization and stereotyping! ^
|
Originally Posted by JNS2001
(Post 8431746)
How ridiculous is to thrown someone out of the plane because one is not wearing socks??
;) |
Originally Posted by iluv2fly
(Post 8432705)
Absolutely unbelievable!!!
You handled it better than I probably would have. But I understand the need to comply in order to get to your destination when you needed to. I probably would have done the exact same thing, but after the aircraft was in the air, I probably would have then taken off my socks. Wonder what they would have done? Have the police meet the aircraft at the gate for a passenger failing to comply with a crewmember's instruction to put on socks? :confused: :rolleyes: :eek: My response to those who complain: Stop staring at the bare feet if you find them disturbing. |
Originally Posted by NorcrossFlyer
(Post 8421343)
The FA wasn't scared nor were her feelings hurt. She was just having a bad day while also having quasi-police powers. Bad combination.
Neither voilated laws, both could have handled it better. Unfortuneately global warming and recent flooding in parts of the US seems to have washed away the Moral High Ground, which has for ages been occupied by the Sensible people. Jokes aside, as I posted quite early in this thread, and which seems to be especially wide spread in the US: for more and more people it seems totally unpossible to grasp the difference of "I have the right to do X" and "It seems sensible to avoid X, even if I was within my right to do X". All in all, the word "concequence" seems to go the way of the word "freedom", and it seems to become more and more opaque as time goes by. -A |
Originally Posted by ph-ndr
(Post 8435379)
Much in the same vein that the OP had a what seemed to be a bad day and blurted out what he did.
Neither voilated laws, both could have handled it better. Unfortuneately global warming and recent flooding in parts of the US seems to have washed away the Moral High Ground, which has for ages been occupied by the Sensible people. Jokes aside, as I posted quite early in this thread, and which seems to be especially wide spread in the US: for more and more people it seems totally unpossible to grasp the difference of "I have the right to do X" and "It seems sensible to avoid X, even if I was within my right to do X". All in all, the word "concequence" seems to go the way of the word "freedom", and it seems to become more and more opaque as time goes by. -A Sure, the FA was "within the right" to have the cops called. But was it sensible? I don't think so. |
Originally Posted by Superguy
(Post 8435432)
No one's saying that there aren't consequences for one's action. What some are saying is that the consequences as meted out by the FA were way out of line.
Sure, the FA was "within the right" to have the cops called. But was it sensible? I don't think so. Then I attached a small rant describing my general view of how it works these days over there. ;) So no, we don't disagree on anything here. :p -A |
Originally Posted by ph-ndr
(Post 8435379)
for more and more people it seems totally unpossible to grasp the difference of "I have the right to do X" and "It seems sensible to avoid X, even if I was within my right to do X".
|
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 8434696)
Not ridiculous at all, and certainly not ****ing ridiculous. Nobody wants to look at your ****ing feet for 6 hours. It's an airplane, not the ****ing beach.
;) |
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 8434696)
Not ridiculous at all, and certainly not ****ing ridiculous. Nobody wants to look at your ****ing feet for 6 hours. It's an airplane, not the ****ing beach.
;) |
Originally Posted by oneant
(Post 8433936)
Ever lived in the South? That stereotype wasn't created out of thin air.
FWIW, I grew up in the South, and I am not particularly offended by your original comment, oneant. I was, in fact, one of those Southerners who once went to live for a time in New York and who was originally amazed by the lack of good manners (until I became a convert to the culture.) So, as I say, I am not personally offended by cultural stereotyping such as yours, having no doubt contributed to it in my time. ;) I am bothered by overly facile posting, however, when a simple check. . . . :) |
Originally Posted by oneant
(Post 8435849)
Why not just put the Taliban in control. Feet!? Dear God, what's next? Ankles? Wrists? The nudity just keeps flowing! :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by JNS2001
(Post 8437245)
I heard that Burkas will be the way to go on AA moving forward...LOL:D
It's just that it's deemed funny to have a poke at what is not common, so you guys disarm this with referencing burkahs, and when they point out ridiculous stuff over there the reference is usually the other way, hinting at the lack of properness and state of undress at women. Now, bringing up the habit that two guys that are good friends usually hold hands in many places when walknig around town, lets see that happen in a few choice places in the US. -A |
Originally Posted by ph-ndr
(Post 8437276)
Well, this is actually not all that funny. If you substitute the muslim reference of burkah with more christian right wing ideas of whats proper and to be brought morals and advice onto, I'd say from my travels in the middle east and africa that you have at least as much tendcy to do moral policing in the US as most places I've been.
It's just that it's deemed funny to have a poke at what is not common, so you guys disarm this with referencing burkahs, and when they point out ridiculous stuff over there the reference is usually the other way, hinting at the lack of properness and state of undress at women. Now, bringing up the habit that two guys that are good friends usually hold hands in many places when walknig around town, lets see that happen in a few choice places in the US. -A |
Originally Posted by SkeptiCallie
(Post 8437012)
Had you thought about taking a look at that poster's profile? Dd992emo indicates Gulf Shores, AL. @:-)
FWIW, I grew up in the South, and I am not particularly offended by your original comment, oneant. I was, in fact, one of those Southerners who once went to live for a time in New York and who was originally amazed by the lack of good manners (until I became a convert to the culture.) So, as I say, I am not personally offended by cultural stereotyping such as yours, having no doubt contributed to it in my time. ;) I am bothered by overly facile posting, however, when a simple check. . . . :) |
Originally Posted by ph-ndr
(Post 8437276)
Well, this is actually not all that funny. If you substitute the muslim reference of burkah with more christian right wing ideas of whats proper and to be brought morals and advice onto, I'd say from my travels in the middle east and africa that you have at least as much tendcy to do moral policing in the US as most places I've been.
It's just that it's deemed funny to have a poke at what is not common, so you guys disarm this with referencing burkahs, and when they point out ridiculous stuff over there the reference is usually the other way, hinting at the lack of properness and state of undress at women. Now, bringing up the habit that two guys that are good friends usually hold hands in many places when walknig around town, lets see that happen in a few choice places in the US. -A I saw JNS2001's comment as relatively harmless. It's unfortunate that you did not find it funny. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:05 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.