Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA slowdown / sickout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 7:37 am
  #241  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Except it wouldn't be 75k workers, it would more along the lines of 30k, maybe 40k if they really amp up the organization. The government would have the option to fire every single one of them, as long as they could prove the individual was participating as part of an organized walk out/slow down/stoppage. There are many people that would ignore such pleas/organization - much more than I think the people calling for a "strike/work stoppage" realize. There is ample precedent for the firing of those individuals that take part, and I do not get the sense that the sitting administration is in any mood to tolerate such an event very well. There are temporary options available to the Executive branch, and I am not so certain that a strike will bode well for the Union in a legal sense (if they are a part of the organizing and or striking).
I'm not sure anyone here is calling for a work stoppage other than saying they could understand the reasoning for such action. I've tried seeing myself in the shoes of the impacted government employees and fully understand the difficulties many are facing.

If 30,000 TSA screeners walked off the job security screenings around the country would be severely impacted and I'm guessing more workers would follow. There is no way that this many employees could be replaced in a manner fast enough to not have a long lasting impact on commercial passenger aviation so I'm not sure any serious punitive action would be taken. But guessing what could happen and taking that step are two different things.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 7:42 am
  #242  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Except it wouldn't be 75k workers, it would more along the lines of 30k, maybe 40k if they really amp up the organization. The government would have the option to fire every single one of them, as long as they could prove the individual was participating as part of an organized walk out/slow down/stoppage. There are many people that would ignore such pleas/organization - much more than I think the people calling for a "strike/work stoppage" realize. There is ample precedent for the firing of those individuals that take part, and I do not get the sense that the sitting administration is in any mood to tolerate such an event very well. There are temporary options available to the Executive branch, and I am not so certain that a strike will bode well for the Union in a legal sense (if they are a part of the organizing and or striking).
The 75,000 number includes not only TSA but IRS, federal prison employees, anyone who is being forced to work without pay, which some sources are saying is as high as 400,000+.

Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I'm not sure anyone here is calling for a work stoppage other than saying they could understand the reasoning for such action. I've tried seeing myself in the shoes of the impacted government employees and fully understand the difficulties many are facing.

If 30,000 TSA screeners walked off the job security screenings around the country would be severely impacted and I'm guessing more workers would follow. There is no way that this many employees could be replaced in a manner fast enough to not have a long lasting impact on commercial passenger aviation so I'm not sure any serious punitive action would be taken. But guessing what could happen and taking that step are two different things.
I've been advocating a work stoppage for quite some time.

Last edited by TWA884; Jan 24, 2019 at 8:06 am Reason: Merge consecutive posts by the same member; Please use the multi-quote function. Thank you.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 7:46 am
  #243  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
Originally Posted by petaluma1
The 75,000 number includes not only TSA but IRS, federal prison employees, anyone who is being forced to work without pay, which some sources are saying is as high as 400,000+.
I've seen numbers as high as 800,000.

Everything you need to know about the government shutdown

How many federal employees have been affected?

Of the about 800,000 employees in the nine Cabinet departments and various smaller agencies whose funding has lapsed, about 380,000 initially were furloughed without pay with the rest still working without pay.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 7:57 am
  #244  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
The difference in the numbers is between those at an affected agency who are "essential" and are thus being required to work without pay and those not deemed "essential" who are not working and, of course, not being paid either.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 8:02 am
  #245  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I've seen numbers as high as 800,000.

Everything you need to know about the government shutdown[h3]
I believe the 800,000 number is the total number of workers affected, both those forced to work and those furloughed. Of course, the number of people impacted is far, far higher.

Last edited by petaluma1; Jan 24, 2019 at 8:07 am
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 8:38 am
  #246  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,677
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I'm not sure anyone here is calling for a work stoppage other than saying they could understand the reasoning for such action. I've tried seeing myself in the shoes of the impacted government employees and fully understand the difficulties many are facing.

If 30,000 TSA screeners walked off the job security screenings around the country would be severely impacted and I'm guessing more workers would follow. There is no way that this many employees could be replaced in a manner fast enough to not have a long lasting impact on commercial passenger aviation so I'm not sure any serious punitive action would be taken. But guessing what could happen and taking that step are two different things.
I've read a couple of articles - wish I had saved the links - about what would ultimately happen if a strike or stoppage occurred in connection with this shutdown. While the law that precludes strikes doesn't offer any exceptions, a couple of legal commentators thought that the courts could see this situation as justifiable and perhaps find the law overly broad particularly when the Court of Federal Claims already found the government violated the Fair Labor Standards Act in the 2013 shutdown (with regard to covered employees forced to work without pay). But the only way to know for certain would be for a group to do it, and then have the case wind its way through the courts - not an easy thing to do, nor quick.

A joint statement was issued yesterday by the unions for ATC, pilots, and FAs. It touches on more than just the TSA absences, as it takes a more systemic view (which is what we need to be doing IMHO), but thought I'd post it here for starters.

https://www.afacwa.org/air_traffic_c...ue_to_shutdown

Due to the shutdown, air traffic controllers, transportation security officers, safety inspectors, air marshals, federal law enforcement officers, FBI agents, and many other critical workers have been working without pay for over a month. Staffing in our air traffic control facilities is already at a 30-year low and controllers are only able to maintain the systems efficiency and capacity by working overtime, including 10-hour days and 6-day workweeks at many of our nations busiest facilities. Due to the shutdown, the FAA has frozen hiring and shuttered its training academy, so there is no plan in effect to fill the FAAs critical staffing need. Even if the FAA were hiring, it takes two to four years to become fully facility certified and achieve Certified Professional Controller (CPC) status. Almost 20% of CPCs are eligible to retire today.
Safety inspectors and federal cyber security staff are not back on the job at pre-shutdown levels, and those not on furlough are working without pay. Last Saturday, TSA management announced that a growing number of officers cannot come to work due to the financial toll of the shutdown. In addition, we are not confident that system-wide analyses of safety reporting data, which is used to identify and implement corrective actions in order to reduce risks and prevent accidents is 100 percent operational due to reduced FAA resources.
petaluma1 likes this.
84fiero is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 8:56 am
  #247  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 702
Unless the shutdown ends in the next 4 hours, the earliest a paycheck could arrive would be Monday

I would expect the 10% callout rate we saw last Sunday to be topped this weekend.
jamesinclair is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 9:56 am
  #248  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I'm not sure anyone here is calling for a work stoppage other than saying they could understand the reasoning for such action. I've tried seeing myself in the shoes of the impacted government employees and fully understand the difficulties many are facing.

If 30,000 TSA screeners walked off the job security screenings around the country would be severely impacted and I'm guessing more workers would follow. There is no way that this many employees could be replaced in a manner fast enough to not have a long lasting impact on commercial passenger aviation so I'm not sure any serious punitive action would be taken. But guessing what could happen and taking that step are two different things.
Understood, my intent was not directed at most of the folks here, but more towards agency employees and the Union members that are pushing those employees to take a drastic action like a work stoppage.

Short term solutions are available, and would be able to be implemented probably within 5 days, but the impact would be felt. Most likely it would be damaging to efficiency instead of completely shutting down operations.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 10:07 am
  #249  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
Originally Posted by jamesinclair
Unless the shutdown ends in the next 4 hours, the earliest a paycheck could arrive would be Monday

I would expect the 10% callout rate we saw last Sunday to be topped this weekend.
I've been advised that if T&A wasn't keyed last night at the field locations that the only option would be for just base pay to be issued by NFC but even then the deadline for that is quickly approaching. I'm fairly sure that the upcoming payday will go unfunded.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 10:50 am
  #250  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
It doesn't matter if strikes are illegal. Someone has to sue and I'm not sure there is any will by any government agency to sue to require its people to work without pay. Same thing for down the road. The people who called in sick and were not will not be disciplined and everyone will get paid. None of this has to do with what happens over the next few days other than the end of a shutdown.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 11:23 am
  #251  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
Originally Posted by Often1
It doesn't matter if strikes are illegal. Someone has to sue and I'm not sure there is any will by any government agency to sue to require its people to work without pay. Same thing for down the road. The people who called in sick and were not will not be disciplined and everyone will get paid. None of this has to do with what happens over the next few days other than the end of a shutdown.
Do you not believe that a major interruption to air travel wouldn't help end this situation. This may be one of those times where TSA screeners hold a pretty big stick.

We are in a severe flu season!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 11:40 am
  #252  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: Aeroplan AA
Posts: 251
CNN now reporting that TSA sceeners in Hawaii are starting to resign. Didn’t give any sense of the extent, though.
J. Leslie is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 11:43 am
  #253  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Do you not believe that a major interruption to air travel wouldn't help end this situation. This may be one of those times where TSA screeners hold a pretty big stick.

We are in a severe flu season!
Of course I do. I said this the first day it was reported that Officers were calling in sick.

The entire purpose of a strike, whether it is a formal strike, a sickout, or whatever is to bring pressure for a change. Shutting down the commercial aviation system will bring unbearable pressure relatively immediately.
petaluma1 likes this.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 12:11 pm
  #254  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Ex Platinum & 1MM, DL PLT, Marriott LFT PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,542
Originally Posted by J. Leslie
CNN now reporting that TSA sceeners in Hawaii are starting to resign. Didnt give any sense of the extent, though.
MSNBC just now reporting one screener, 16 years on the job, is claiming he 'can't in good conscience...go to work...screen the bags and pax knowing that I might be sending them to their death'.

Good grief.
txrus is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2019 | 12:20 pm
  #255  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
Originally Posted by Often1
Of course I do. I said this the first day it was reported that Officers were calling in sick.

The entire purpose of a strike, whether it is a formal strike, a sickout, or whatever is to bring pressure for a change. Shutting down the commercial aviation system will bring unbearable pressure relatively immediately.

I fully agree about the pressure on the system. There have been reports of elevated absenteeism for the last couple of weeks. While the cause could be attributed to seasonal illnesses like the flu it could be other things also. I doubt we'll ever know for sure. I can understand an increasing number of people calling out.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.