Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]
#646
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
The problem they really need to fix is that of airline, airport and security workers having unsecured access to baggage. The same person who steals that camera could presumably also put something nefarious in its place. And they wouldn't even have to be on the plane when the bomb goes off.
The real reason planes aren't being blown out of the sky right and left is the same reason huge numbers of people aren't being deliberately run over by passenger vehicles or gunned down and/or blown to pieces in shopping centers: there just aren't all that many people out there who are both willing and able to do those things. Even in countries where ISIS and Al Shabab have a real presence, most people simply aren't murderers.
(Does that mean we need no security at all? No, of course not. But we need to keep the security screening proportionate to the actual level of threat, and we need to realize and accept that a risk-free free society is a contradiction in terms.)
Last edited by artemis; May 15, 2017 at 12:31 pm
#647
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,746
More than once I have heard people refer to Africa as a country.
This makes most people reacting to the news believe that this issue (and so many others) are far less complex than they actually are. Add that to people believing that the US is the center of the world, and....
#648
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
#649
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,956
That's very different: differentiated by clear signs, still involves getting ID checked, etc. Nothing like some apparently-random people on the same airplane being allowed to have a laptop while most aren't.
#650
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA ExPlat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,967
Maybe the airlines should be required to segregate us trusted travelers in the pointy end of the plane (free of charge), with non-transparent curtain separating us from the scary masses in the back.
#651
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,510
Sadly, I wouldn't be surprised if half (literally 50%) of the US population isn't aware that not all countries in Europe are part of the EU, or that the Schengen zone is yet another different grouping of states.
More than once I have heard people refer to Africa as a country.
This makes most people reacting to the news believe that this issue (and so many others) are far less complex than they actually are. Add that to people believing that the US is the center of the world, and....
More than once I have heard people refer to Africa as a country.
This makes most people reacting to the news believe that this issue (and so many others) are far less complex than they actually are. Add that to people believing that the US is the center of the world, and....
#652
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
True, but it still represents a problem. Barriers that make it more difficult for people without nefarious intentions to enter and visit the US reduce the US's global competitiveness. No matter how much many of my countrymen like to think the US is the center of the world, it's simply not true.
#653
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,078
That's the difficulty of trying to have a unified policy. There are some countries that are EU and Schengen (France, Germany, etc.), some countries are EU but non-Schengen (UK, Ireland, Cyprus, Croatia, Bulgaria, and Romania), and you have non-EU but Schengen countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland). Then there are non-EU, non-Schengen countries with nonstop flights to the US (Russia and Ukraine).
#654
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The Onion beat you to that joke by 15 years.
#655
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
Seriously, although allowing folks with Global Entry to carry otherwise-banned electronics onto the plane probably makes sense purely from a security point of view, it will never go over. It smacks too much of elitism (most people know only that you pay to get Global Entry; they don't know that anyone can apply for it, and they don't understand that there's more than just paying a fee involved in getting it, and that a background check and personal interview are required as well.) What might make more sense from a public-relations perspective would be to allow any person to pay a fee to carry on electronics other than a cellphone, with the electronics subject to a rigorous inspection (paid for by the fee). That would feel more democratic to most people than Global Entry holders getting special privileges does.
#656
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,510
Or maybe the scary masses should also go in the cargo hold, along with their PEDs? The airlines could call it "Steerage Economy" and promote its virtues ("You are never separated from ANY of your luggage! No seats at all means you'll never be squished by a fat person or have your knees crushed by the person in front of you reclining!" Climbing on the checked bags will give your kids an outlet for their youthful energy!")
Seriously, although allowing folks with Global Entry to carry otherwise-banned electronics onto the plane probably makes sense purely from a security point of view, it will never go over. It smacks too much of elitism (most people know only that you pay to get Global Entry; they don't know that anyone can apply for it, and they don't understand that there's more than just paying a fee involved in getting it, and that a background check and personal interview are required as well.) What might make more sense from89th a public-relations perspective would be to allow any person to pay a fee to carry on electronics other than a cellphone, with the electronics subject to a rigorous inspection (paid for by the fee). That would feel more democratic to most people than Global Entry holders getting special privileges does.
Seriously, although allowing folks with Global Entry to carry otherwise-banned electronics onto the plane probably makes sense purely from a security point of view, it will never go over. It smacks too much of elitism (most people know only that you pay to get Global Entry; they don't know that anyone can apply for it, and they don't understand that there's more than just paying a fee involved in getting it, and that a background check and personal interview are required as well.) What might make more sense from89th a public-relations perspective would be to allow any person to pay a fee to carry on electronics other than a cellphone, with the electronics subject to a rigorous inspection (paid for by the fee). That would feel more democratic to most people than Global Entry holders getting special privileges does.
The pay-for-more-fun ethos of air travel in a monopolistic system already has begun to reap the whirlwind in fuselages nationwide.
But...here's a sarcastic solution.
If GE's are afforded extra benefits, issue a snazzy kind of uniform to go with the status. One thing clear in modern America is that questioning anyone wearing a uniform no matter what they are doing is verboten and lawfully subject to the harshest reprisal.
#657
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,375
#658
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: VPS
Programs: IHG Diamond, Delta PM, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 7,288
Seriously, although allowing folks with Global Entry to carry otherwise-banned electronics onto the plane probably makes sense purely from a security point of view, it will never go over. It smacks too much of elitism (most people know only that you pay to get Global Entry; they don't know that anyone can apply for it, and they don't understand that there's more than just paying a fee involved in getting it, and that a background check and personal interview are required as well.) What might make more sense from a public-relations perspective would be to allow any person to pay a fee to carry on electronics other than a cellphone, with the electronics subject to a rigorous inspection (paid for by the fee). That would feel more democratic to most people than Global Entry holders getting special privileges does.
So easy to have to spend a couple hundred dollars beyond the cost of application to get GE if you don't live vaguely near a GE interview site and can't combine your interview with another trip.
#659
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Some EU citizens can, but most can't. But don't worry -- GE members won't be waived from the hits of this ban. And so all equal animals will be treated poorly as US DHS likes it in this regard.
#660
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA ExPlat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,967