Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA going to stop allowing NOS opt-out?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:00 pm
  #181  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Programs: AA Plat, CX Silver
Posts: 2,361
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:

a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA

b) the manufacturer didn't screw up

Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
txflyer77 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:05 pm
  #182  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by txflyer77
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:

a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA

b) the manufacturer didn't screw up

Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
It's more fundamental for me: Why would anyone voluntarily submit themselves to being irradiated by an industrial x-ray? Why would a government willingly do this to its people? Poetic justice -- the real losers are the TSA clerks who operated these Cancer Boxes 8-9 hours per day while standing right next to it. Depending upon other health risks of the individual clerks, some of them could be dropping like flies in the next few years.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:10 pm
  #183  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Programs: AA Plat, CX Silver
Posts: 2,361
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
It's more fundamental for me: Why would anyone voluntarily submit themselves to being irradiated by an industrial x-ray? Why would a government willingly do this to its people? Poetic justice -- the real losers are the TSA clerks who operated these Cancer Boxes 8-9 hours per day while standing right next to it. Depending upon other health risks of the individual clerks, some of them could be dropping like flies in the next few years.
I agree completely—my argument was meant to put forward an objection on practical rather than philosophical grounds.

That said, before they were removed I never once submitted to the BKSX. If they come back and opt-out is refused I'm not entirely sure what will happen.
txflyer77 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:26 pm
  #184  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,137
Originally Posted by txflyer77
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:

a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA

b) the manufacturer didn't screw up

Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.

https://www.nirs.org/radiation/radte...dose072005.pdf

US RADIATION PANEL RECOGNIZES NO SAFE RADIATION DOSE
There is no acceptable safe dose of radiation!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:29 pm
  #185  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
They should get rid of the scanners and bring back something that is actually effective at doing what TSA is meant to be doing - ETP "puffer" machines.
Himeno is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 12:38 pm
  #186  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,137
Originally Posted by Himeno
They should get rid of the scanners and bring back something that is actually effective at doing what TSA is meant to be doing - ETP "puffer" machines.

They would need to hire people who can actually follow instructions and operate advanced equipment to do so.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 5:43 pm
  #187  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
They would need to hire people who can actually follow instructions and operate advanced equipment to do so.
They can get the staff at CN Tower to train them.
Himeno is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2015, 9:37 pm
  #188  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by Himeno
They can get the staff at CN Tower to train them.
Well, to be fair, they could get the CN staff to TRY top train them. I doubt they'll have much success.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2016, 5:59 am
  #189  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,620
Originally Posted by cottonmather0
That actually seems really high to me.

I am constantly amazed at the number people who just meekly line up to go through the perp box like cattle to slaughter as if there is nothing disturbing or degrading about it. If more people would opt-out and overwhem the system, the system would change, but the sad truth is that many don't care and don't want to rock the boat. They'd rather get yelled at by WalMart dropouts and presumed to be criminals than stand up for their rights and their dignity.
I line up less due to PreCheck, but I tend to look at things like this, I do not like the idea of a Body Scanner because I am not a criminal, have done nothing, have NO intention of doing anything wrong, but what am I to do?

I could complain to my Senators and Congressperson (or more accurately his/her staffers) but that would not alter the situation in the slightest.

I could choose not to fly, but that would limit my abilities to travel outside a reasonable area to drive and I enjoy vacationing too much for that.

I can Opt-Out but that is going to make my life materially annoying (if not harder) and while it maybe the right thing to do from a civics perspective, I just do not have the patients nor interest in being a better citizen.

So if I am directed to use the Body Scanner, I do, not because I like too or because I think it is safe, but because it is the path of the least resistance, probably all the wrong reasons to do so, but that is my thinking.

Why do other people, you would have to ask them, but I would wager that most do not put any sort of thought into it, it is just follow along. Some may feel good about doing so (I cannot speak to that) but that majority just do it because they are told to do so.
kmersh is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2016, 6:07 am
  #190  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
In principle, I agree with this. My fear is they may try to re-introduce their backscatter machines (they owned a lot of them at one point!) and not allow opt-outs on those, despite them being almost certain to cause cancer.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 3:58 am
  #191  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,069
Originally Posted by AllieKat
In principle, I agree with this. My fear is they may try to re-introduce their backscatter machines (they owned a lot of them at one point!) and not allow opt-outs on those, despite them being almost certain to cause cancer.
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
Majuki is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 5:00 am
  #192  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Majuki
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
TSA will bring back backscatter as soon as it can be made to work with AIT as they claim backscatter is better technology than MMW.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 6:47 am
  #193  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by Majuki
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
If those who fear the return of BSX are right, TSA can easily con Congress into increasing their budget a few tens of millions and buying all new BSX machines.

The idea of the cancer boxes coming back is truly frightening, especially when combined with the new no opt out policy, but I'll wait for a while before I get into a panic over it. TSA is heavily invested in the MMW units, so there's a good chance that they'll continue buying the same units when the current ones need replacing.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 6:54 am
  #194  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by Majuki
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
The TSA sent the Cancer Boxes into the government surplus system run by GSA. An agency has to go through a process similar to how NFL teams put a player on waivers. Another federal agency could have claimed the Cancer Boxes "on waivers" from the TSA during a short period of time. If they weren't claimed, they would go to a GSA warehouse to be either sold for scrap or sold to someone outside the federal government for a fixed price or at an auction. In order for the TSA to bring back the old Cancer Boxes, they would have to buy them back from the GSA. I think most of us agree that the TSA is that stupid and that Congress would let them get away with it.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2016, 7:11 am
  #195  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
I think most of us agree that the TSA is that stupid and that Congress would let them get away with it.
Actually, I think TSA is even muchly more stupiderest than that - they would insist on buying all-new cancer boxes. And they'd have at least one legitimate card to play; the whole (official) reason they were scrapped was because they couldn't be made to work with ATR. If they're re-adopted, it will only be after ATR is made to work on them - but there is no guarantee that the older models could be retrofitted with ATR. It might only work on brand-new models.
WillCAD is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.