TSA going to stop allowing NOS opt-out?
#181
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Programs: AA Plat, CX Silver
Posts: 2,361
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
#182
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
#183
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Programs: AA Plat, CX Silver
Posts: 2,361
It's more fundamental for me: Why would anyone voluntarily submit themselves to being irradiated by an industrial x-ray? Why would a government willingly do this to its people? Poetic justice -- the real losers are the TSA clerks who operated these Cancer Boxes 8-9 hours per day while standing right next to it. Depending upon other health risks of the individual clerks, some of them could be dropping like flies in the next few years.
That said, before they were removed I never once submitted to the BKSX. If they come back and opt-out is refused I'm not entirely sure what will happen.
#184
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,137
Even if the BKSX machines are designed to emit some tiny fraction of an acceptable dose, we'd still have to trust that:
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
a) the machines are configured and maintained properly by the TSA
b) the manufacturer didn't screw up
Seems like a situation ripe for a repeat of Therac-25.
https://www.nirs.org/radiation/radte...dose072005.pdf
US RADIATION PANEL RECOGNIZES NO SAFE RADIATION DOSE
#186
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,137
#188
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
#189
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,620
That actually seems really high to me.
I am constantly amazed at the number people who just meekly line up to go through the perp box like cattle to slaughter as if there is nothing disturbing or degrading about it. If more people would opt-out and overwhem the system, the system would change, but the sad truth is that many don't care and don't want to rock the boat. They'd rather get yelled at by WalMart dropouts and presumed to be criminals than stand up for their rights and their dignity.
I am constantly amazed at the number people who just meekly line up to go through the perp box like cattle to slaughter as if there is nothing disturbing or degrading about it. If more people would opt-out and overwhem the system, the system would change, but the sad truth is that many don't care and don't want to rock the boat. They'd rather get yelled at by WalMart dropouts and presumed to be criminals than stand up for their rights and their dignity.
I could complain to my Senators and Congressperson (or more accurately his/her staffers) but that would not alter the situation in the slightest.
I could choose not to fly, but that would limit my abilities to travel outside a reasonable area to drive and I enjoy vacationing too much for that.
I can Opt-Out but that is going to make my life materially annoying (if not harder) and while it maybe the right thing to do from a civics perspective, I just do not have the patients nor interest in being a better citizen.
So if I am directed to use the Body Scanner, I do, not because I like too or because I think it is safe, but because it is the path of the least resistance, probably all the wrong reasons to do so, but that is my thinking.
Why do other people, you would have to ask them, but I would wager that most do not put any sort of thought into it, it is just follow along. Some may feel good about doing so (I cannot speak to that) but that majority just do it because they are told to do so.
#191
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,069
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
#192
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
#193
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
The idea of the cancer boxes coming back is truly frightening, especially when combined with the new no opt out policy, but I'll wait for a while before I get into a panic over it. TSA is heavily invested in the MMW units, so there's a good chance that they'll continue buying the same units when the current ones need replacing.
#194
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Perhaps I could be remembering incorrectly, but I thought that the TSA auctioned/sold off the backscatter machines (or gave them away to other agencies)? Also, what would be the point of bringing back the backscatter machines? All airports that had them have since swapped out for MMW.
#195
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Actually, I think TSA is even muchly more stupiderest than that - they would insist on buying all-new cancer boxes. And they'd have at least one legitimate card to play; the whole (official) reason they were scrapped was because they couldn't be made to work with ATR. If they're re-adopted, it will only be after ATR is made to work on them - but there is no guarantee that the older models could be retrofitted with ATR. It might only work on brand-new models.