![]() |
That’s great news. The camera is now light years ahead of the old one.
The IFE controls look similar to the ones on 350s. what is the “seat” icon for? |
Do I spot a new amenity kit design as well?
|
Originally Posted by VE105
(Post 36600844)
From social media photos Aria's footwell space is significantly smaller than that of present J seats :(
I think CX is killing one of the most-loved feature and its biggest advantage (on hardware) over its competitors in exchange for a larger TV screen. but I guess the footspace would be known when they test it. i saw most of the features retained from the a350. |
Originally Posted by nomadabroad
(Post 36601017)
Do I spot a new amenity kit design as well?
|
Originally Posted by cxwaterboy
(Post 36601025)
That's interesting. How did you spot it?
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...27861f1b7.jpeg Structurally the seat looks very identical to Collins aerospace Elements (Starlux + Etihad’s newer 789s)? If so that tray table mechanism tends to vibrate/wobble alot in flight unless they’ve refined it since then. |
Originally Posted by cxwaterboy
(Post 36600977)
what is the “seat” icon for?
|
Originally Posted by nomadabroad
(Post 36601017)
Do I spot a new amenity kit design as well?
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...1c7f615d5d.jpg |
Originally Posted by nomadabroad
(Post 36601028)
Sam Chui’s photo on FB:
Hopefully the new amenity bag will retain its size. The current ones are handy to store travel items. |
|
Originally Posted by nomadabroad
(Post 36601053)
Found a clear pic re the footwell situation..
|
At risk of violating forum rules (please figure out and ‘explore’ yourself ;) ) I had the chance to see the Aria Suite and new PEY / Y products today - finishes are stunning although I definitely agree that things are more ‘evolutionary than revolutionary’.
I did not find the Aria Suite to be particularly cramped / tight- the much feared ‘losing headroom for legs’ issue turned out to be an over-worry - or at least that’s my initial thoughts upon the initial 10-20 minutes or so that I had sitting in the seats. |
Originally Posted by FlyEurope
(Post 36601075)
Unfortunately, the footwell situation looks much worse than on FB2. The positioning of the monitor limits the foot space in a similar way to BA's new J. The only thing that looks better than BA J is the space on the side. It's not really understandable why they would create a new J that has so much less foot space.
|
Originally Posted by nomadabroad
(Post 36601053)
Found a clear pic re the footwell situation..
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...27970c7f8.jpeg |
Originally Posted by majorpuppy
(Post 36601018)
I think they could have made the large tv screen retractable
but I guess the footspace would be known when they test it. i saw most of the features retained from the a350. |
Originally Posted by djsflynn
(Post 36600973)
Very cool - IFE shows which toilets are available.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...0dbe9ecc0.jpeg |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:54 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.