Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cathay First is overrated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2015 | 7:26 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 3,373
As far as catering YVR-JFK is concerned, it bears mentioning that YVR originating pax will likely have eaten and want nothing more than to sleep as much as possible. Those who originated in HKG may well be more alert during the flight, but are still on a 5 hour overnight leg that arrives at 7 am local.

The thing that is really missing from this service is breakfast. Boarding in YVR I don't want dinner, or supper. I want four hours kip followed by a decent breakfast.
AC*SE is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2015 | 7:42 pm
  #17  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Originally Posted by AC*SE
The thing that is really missing from this service is breakfast. Boarding in YVR I don't want dinner, or supper. I want four hours kip followed by a decent breakfast.
Ha, yea just shows they can't plese everyone. I booked the flight so I could head straight to a breakfast meeting in NY. I wanted to sleep until the absolute last possible moment allowable before landing. Similar to what I do ex-DXB. I guess provided they kept the lights off I wouldn't have an issue, although inevitably the clanging of plates is a possible way to get woken up.


...but yea, thinking on it I don't really want supper either. I just want to sleep the whole damn time. Breakfast makes more sense for the ex-YVR crowd than dinner.
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2015 | 7:50 pm
  #18  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: exUA1K, UA MM, lifetime UA1P, AA MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,806
Kat007: Please fly your preferred carrier next time so that we can enjoy CX F peacefully next time.
roberto99 is offline  
Old Nov 29, 2015 | 9:25 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1A
Programs: Elite Diamond Purple Gold Silver Titanium for life
Posts: 1,882
Originally Posted by moondog
+2. It was upon reading that part that I had to conclude the OP was having a bad day.
+1

IMO you can't give real feedback on a flight until you've done 10x on the same sector/cabin within 12 months. Everyone has their off day - even passengers.
d00t is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 1:09 am
  #20  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by Paulakers2010
3. I really cannot remember when there was service to help with carry-on. In 4/5-star hotels, yes, but in First class lounges? I know JAL, CX, BA, SQ, TK, LX, KL, AF. I don't think it's fair for you to even expect help with luggage.
.
I get help with carry-on almost all the time-personnel asks for assistance, or just grab it - especially if they see I have a few items. The Pier has a very thick carpet, and it is extremely hard to drag something over it, but a girl I asked about foot massage (they were booked for the next five hours, so I didn`t get it either-and so no cabanas at The Wings-they said no chance) just took off, and I followed her with my few carry ons. This is NOT acceptable for First Class service no matter if you personally ever received such help.
Kat007 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 1:14 am
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,018
[QUOTE=Paulakers2010;25787286]
3. How exactly the food was bad in HKG-YVR? What food was bad? Perhaps the food was not to your liking?

Maybe those who never had good HK (or Western) food find that good, but I lived in HK and Europe for some time, so no, I don`t like awful food, which was on the first leg HKG-YVR.
Kat007 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 1:21 am
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by Guy Betsy
Sounds like the OP had a bad day to begin with, and was grumpy so everything that didn't right to him/her, just escalated into a bad experience. If things are not right , then make it right by being intereactive... smile, say thank you.. instead of sitting there thinking that you're the king / queen of the world. A simple gesture goes long way.
I wish that was the case here, but I guess you judge for yourself and present such behavior yourself.

I had a great day, but CX surely spoiled it for me.

P.S. Your comment about "king sitting there" is just too silly. I fly in F very frequent, so that newbie attitude you describe is opposite from my behavior.
Kat007 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 3:16 am
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: AA & SPG Plat
Posts: 387
Originally Posted by Kat007
The lounges (I visited The Wing and The Pier) had non-existent service (girls stood in bunch of 4-5 minding their own business-no welcome, no help with carry-on, never asked me if I needed anything,
Sounds like what you need, is a nanny instead.

Originally Posted by Kat007
Flight experience was bad on HKG-YVR leg - the worst service (unfriendly flight attendant - stiff and not welcoming despite she was from Canada with Shanghai-born mother,
What does this have to do with anything??

Other little things such as no toothbrush or other products in the bathrooms is so out of date-nowadays it is not acceptable for F and other Asian airlines have those items even for J.
Out of date??? What were you expecting? A Japanese electronic toilet?

One PJ per person on two leg flight? Too cheap. Asking didn`t yield another one...
You can't be serious right? Did you s* in your pants throughout the 12 hour flight, that you needed a second pair??
Daffie is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 3:22 am
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: AA & SPG Plat
Posts: 387
Originally Posted by Kat007
P.S. Your comment about "king sitting there" is just too silly. I fly in F very frequent, so that newbie attitude you describe is opposite from my behavior.
Yeah, seems like you do fly in F quite regularly.

Perhaps you should continue churning all those credit cards of yours and try United First next?
Daffie is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 3:57 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Asia Pac
Programs: AA UA DL AS CXDM JL NH Hilton Hyatt Marriott SPG IHG
Posts: 545
On several TPAC F flights on CX, I asked for more than one PJ, and has never been denied. Guess smiles and "thank you" do get a long way!

I am a captive of CX IFE, JL is no comparison at all!!
APeverell is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 4:04 am
  #26  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Originally Posted by AmexCent
On several TPAC F flights on CX, I asked for more than one PJ, and has never been denied.
Ditto. I don't often ask for extra pairs, but when I do I have never been denied. On an F flight JFK-HKG last month, I had a FA aggressively trying to give me another. She was quite aggressive in trying to ensure I got a second...I mentioned my significant other, which is what spurred her trying to give me another to take home. My significant other has plenty anyway, and I declined. But she returned to my seat 2-3x including right before landing making sure I didn't want another pair.

The amenity kits seem to be much tighter inventory. On return flights I frequently ask to swap mine for a female version, which I gift to family members (I am a male)...because I can just reuse the amenity kits from the outbound sector I got a few days before. Often, the FAs mistakenly think I'm asking for a second amenity kit. I've been "denied" multiple amenity kits on many occasions.

Last edited by QRC3288; Nov 30, 2015 at 4:10 am
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 4:15 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SZX/HKG/BWI
Programs: UA 1K 1.1MM, CX Diam 1.0MM, Bonvoy LT Titanium, Hertz PC, MGM Pearl
Posts: 2,637
I have had 15+ sectors on CX F this year. In my opinion, the soft product is at times uneven but I don't really think there is any product in the air now that can match the hard product.
There's always going to be cutbacks, and CX is no different. For now though, their alternatives still outpace the competition, imo.

I prefer The Pier, as it is a much quieter lounge but everytime I've been through The Pier or The Wing, I find very little to complain about. Usually, the only complaint I do find is that the waitstaff is not topping off my champagne as much as I would like

Originally Posted by brunos

The funny part of the post is the request for 2 PJs on a one-stop flight.
I chuckled but also
mjcewl1284 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 4:45 am
  #28  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NYC
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 247
With in excess of forty long haul F sectors under my belt so far this year (and twenty odd of them on CX) I can happily say that IMHO it is the best F product in the sky all things considered. The bed is divine, the food generally excellent and the staff are remarkably attuned to pax needs. Yes occasionally something goes wrong but then nobody and no one is perfect!
sebastiansw3 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 4:48 am
  #29  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Originally Posted by sebastiansw3
With in excess of forty long haul F sectors under my belt so far this year (and twenty odd of them on CX)
Wow...
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 5:03 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: YYZ-HKT-CWL
Programs: aeroplan E .HH.
Posts: 994
Just off Our 3 rd F trip with CX still one of the better F experiences. (TK,TG,LX,LH,BA,JAL,OZ) enjoyed 'the Wing' Use of cabana, In flight services +dinning only 'Huge negative 'was the boarding at gate4 no escort no FirstClass line ! Writing to Cathay with Review
thaidai is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.