Cathay to EWR?
#16


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Take the train for most people at east coast huh... you're not from USA are you?
#17
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Trenton, NJ (PHL, EWR)
Programs: A3 Gold, BA Bronze
Posts: 1,633
As a Jersey guy who stumbled on this thread (and is on CX JFK-HKG in Nov) I can tell you getting the train to JFK, for me, is a real pain. This means New Jersey Transit from Trenton to New York Penn Station, which is 90 min. Then the AirTrain which takes forever from there to JFK. Then you have to get there 2ish hours early.
40 minute train to EWR. Done.
40 minute train to EWR. Done.
#18




Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: UA 1K (2MM), HH Gold, Marriott Gold Elite
Posts: 1,479
As a Jersey guy who stumbled on this thread (and is on CX JFK-HKG in Nov) I can tell you getting the train to JFK, for me, is a real pain. This means New Jersey Transit from Trenton to New York Penn Station, which is 90 min. Then the AirTrain which takes forever from there to JFK. Then you have to get there 2ish hours early.
40 minute train to EWR. Done.
40 minute train to EWR. Done.
#19



Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TPE / HSZ
Programs: CX GO (=SPH), IHG Diamond Amb, Hertz 5*, Accor, Hilton, National
Posts: 7,240
#21


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
So let's see, you need to be at JFK at least 2 hours early, one hour AirTrain from Penn Station to JFK, and another good 3-4 hours from WAS area to NYC. So to board a flight, people in WAS need to budget 7 hours before actual departure time.
Not good...
#23


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
I don't want to judge people on this forum, but it is kind of funny to hear them make comments about Greater New York area and how "easy" it is to get to JFK, when people like us living in this area for decades know full well what a horrific experience it can be, especially if you are traveling with more than one luggage.
#24


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Yep, I've come to realized EWR will be a dream but no reality. CX are more interested in other ports like DFW, or adding capacity at JFK. EWR is too big an unnecessary risk when things are so good at JFK.
#25
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EWR TPE PVG
Programs: BR GOLD UA GOLD CX SILVER
Posts: 33
It take 2 more hours to JFK as NJ resident (compare to EWR)
Well, you can take the "A" Train to JFK, although that would be a bigger mess (tried that once, took a good 1.5 hours when you factor in the wait time, horrific.)
I don't want to judge people on this forum, but it is kind of funny to hear them make comments about Greater New York area and how "easy" it is to get to JFK, when people like us living in this area for decades know full well what a horrific experience it can be, especially if you are traveling with more than one luggage.
I don't want to judge people on this forum, but it is kind of funny to hear them make comments about Greater New York area and how "easy" it is to get to JFK, when people like us living in this area for decades know full well what a horrific experience it can be, especially if you are traveling with more than one luggage.
I am one of my 10+ friends (live in NJ)that will choose CX if they enter EWR even I need to have HK connection to TPE . EWR departure means a lot for NJ residents. If CX can not do it, most of us will choose CO which provide various daily flights to Asia. The major reason is EWR departure.
#26


Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX MarcoPolo (SL), BA Executive Club (GO)
Posts: 1,875
The problem is that an EWR flight would be just for local residents. I don't know what demand is like, but could that support a daily flight to HKG when there are 4 daily flights next door?
It would be great if CX could do EWR, perhaps even convert CX888/CX889 to HKG-YVR-EWR-YVR-HKG.... and add a direct flight to replace that at JFK. But perhaps that would be too much capacity to HKG?
CX can only get Oneworld connection of usefulness from EWR to: DFW (Its better to fly via LAX) and MIA. Thats why they currently fly to JFK for all the AA connections.
It would be great if CX could do EWR, perhaps even convert CX888/CX889 to HKG-YVR-EWR-YVR-HKG.... and add a direct flight to replace that at JFK. But perhaps that would be too much capacity to HKG?
CX can only get Oneworld connection of usefulness from EWR to: DFW (Its better to fly via LAX) and MIA. Thats why they currently fly to JFK for all the AA connections.
#27
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
it doesnt matter since CX codeshares with AF/KLM/LH for people to catch the respective CX flights to HKG!
I think the only time i went to LGW by car was because it was the only flight that wouldnt break my bank going to PSA and i was getting off at LHR (and got to my friend's place to drop off sth).
it felt like i've gone through 5 of brixtons and clapham before reaching the A3...
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QRPC PLT/OW EMD; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 14,587
#29
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
it would make sense to have at least one flight to LGW and tap the substantial network of second tier/leisure cities BA has there. Anything that may avoid passing through the congested and dysfunctional euro hubs is welcome to me.
#30




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New York
Programs: AAdvantage, BA Executive Club, CX MPC, Marriot Rewards, Priority Club
Posts: 152
Whenever I travel light, I try to take public transportation to JFK and it is very easy & convenient for me (better & much cheaper than driving or taking a taxi). Getting caught in traffic on the way to any of the area airports is no joke.
It usually takes me about 1 hours via public transportation to get to JFK, sometimes less & sometimes more - that is coming from the upper Bronx (2 trains & Air train/bus).

