Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Canada
Reload this Page >

Canada Will Require Negative COVID-19 Test 72 Hours Before Arrival

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Canada Will Require Negative COVID-19 Test 72 Hours Before Arrival

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:01 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 366
I don't understand the government's decision making process here... During the same press conference, Public Safety Minister also announced that they are discussing a testing pilot program at YYZ. I imagine this is something similar to what is taking place at YYC (the ability to quarantine for only 48 hours).

But during the same press conference, they brag about how Canada has some of the strongest border measures in the world and renewed their call for Canadians to not travel abroad for non-discretionary reasons.

Why impose more conditions on people eligible to come to Canada when at the same time you are exploring options to reduce quarantine time?

FYI, the pilot program was discussed during the last minute of this YouTube video:
LETTERBOY likes this.
On Time Reports is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:12 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,602
Originally Posted by On Time Reports
I don't understand the government's decision making process...
Good one.
JNelson113 and LETTERBOY like this.
SFO777 is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:12 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Quebec and Ontario, Canada
Programs: AC*E50, SPG/Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,917
Interesting... they are talking about a PCR test. So no rapid antigen testing before boarding possible, like for other destinations...
That would really makes things more complicated for some...
Yul_voyager is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:14 pm
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
Seems this decision is based on optics rather than reason as Ottawa has itself admitted the very low number of positive cases imported from abroad:

The federal government has advised against non-essential travel outside Canada since the start of the pandemic, though officials noted Wednesday that about two per cent of COVID-19 cases have been brought into the country from overseas.
JNelson113 and D582 like this.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:32 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SE, FOTSG Platinum
Posts: 5,728
Originally Posted by YZF_Elite
Which it seems is the point according to what was said at the news conference. They don't want people traveling and they want to add another layer of hurt for those who do travel for discretionary reasons and an added layer of detection for those who do need to.
Blair's statement this morning was pretty clear on this - essentially "we can't make it illegal to travel, and begging you not to travel hasn't worked, so now we're going to start using whatever other tools are available to us."
YOWgary is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 1:34 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,185
Originally Posted by kevflyer
Why can't they turn you around? They do that all the time with people denied entry into Canada.
Canadians are not allowed to enter USA by land only by air.
LETTERBOY likes this.
sydneyracquelle is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 2:11 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: YVR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by sydneyracquelle
Canadians are not allowed to enter USA by land only by air.
Fair enough so if they present themselves at the land border they'd be stuck as they can't go back, so Canada has to let them in.
LETTERBOY likes this.
kevflyer is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 2:14 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
A few more details released by the Minister in an interview on CBC a few minutes ago:

- rules will be in place 'within about a week'
- airlines will be required to administer it to confirm who has a test
- if people arrive without a test they will need to go into a government approved center until they can be tested, details being worked out
- no details about how the government approved centers cost will be dealt with, details being worked out
- no plans for this to replace quarantine, though they are talking about other programs like the AB one
- further details will be released tomorrow

Reporter didn't ask about if there will be any exceptions or how essential workers will be handled.
YZF_Elite is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 2:18 pm
  #24  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: YVR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by YZF_Elite
A few more details released by the Minister in an interview on CBC a few minutes ago:

- rules will be in place 'within about a week'
- airlines will be required to administer it to confirm who has a test
- if people arrive without a test they will need to go into a government approved center until they can be tested, details being worked out
- no details about how the government approved centers cost will be dealt with, details being worked out
- no plans for this to replace quarantine, though they are talking about other programs like the AB one
- further details will be released tomorrow

Reporter didn't ask about if there will be any exceptions or how essential workers will be handled.
So what's the point of setting up government approved center to test people arriving without a test if they are also going to require pax to have a negative test before they can board (that's my take since they're working with airlines on this)?

Or... if they're simply letting people fly even without a negative test and just transport them to a center, get tested, before they clear immigration? If that's the case, we need to know how much that test will cost, and if anyone will even bother going to get tested before flying.
kevflyer is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 2:29 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,307
Originally Posted by YZF_Elite
- if people arrive without a test they will need to go into a government approved center until they can be tested, details being worked out
So acknowledging that legally, they cant prevent you from coming home - but they can make it difficult for you once you get here in the name of "health" I can see how the optics of this will look good to the sheeple judging by the comments like "about time!" on various forums. In reality 80% will probably continue to be exempt, and nothing has been done to actually address this (non) issue.

How about we tighten the rules about what is considered essential instead?
jackmaninov likes this.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 3:03 pm
  #26  
m.y
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by kevflyer
So what's the point of setting up government approved center to test people arriving without a test if they are also going to require pax to have a negative test before they can board (that's my take since they're working with airlines on this)?

Or... if they're simply letting people fly even without a negative test and just transport them to a center, get tested, before they clear immigration? If that's the case, we need to know how much that test will cost, and if anyone will even bother going to get tested before flying.
It serves as a back stop just in case if someone were to slip through the pre-departure screen, not designed as the default case.
m.y is online now  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 3:10 pm
  #27  
m.y
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by rankourabu
So acknowledging that legally, they cant prevent you from coming home - but they can make it difficult for you once you get here in the name of "health" I can see how the optics of this will look good to the sheeple judging by the comments like "about time!" on various forums. In reality 80% will probably continue to be exempt, and nothing has been done to actually address this (non) issue.

How about we tighten the rules about what is considered essential instead?
Sure, it's not perfect, but it's an important step to reduce the importation of cases from leisure travelers. Most of the essential workers exempt are truck drivers, delivering goods. The goal of this is really to discourage Canadians from taking leisure trips to Florida and other warm places.

Yes, travel only accounts for small percentage of spread today, but any kind of domestic lockdown measures would not yield any results if new cases keep trickle in from abroad.
m.y is online now  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 3:12 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,185
I still don’t know what happens on my frequent business day trips YYZ>LGA>YYZ. No time in NYC to run around for a test so I guess I just do one in YYZ before I leave?
sydneyracquelle is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 3:22 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,307
Originally Posted by m.y
Sure, it's not perfect, but it's an important step to reduce the importation of cases from leisure travelers. Most of the essential workers exempt are truck drivers, delivering goods. The goal of this is really to discourage Canadians from taking leisure trips to Florida and other warm places.

Yes, travel only accounts for small percentage of spread today, but any kind of domestic lockdown measures would not yield any results if new cases keep trickle in from abroad.
There were 7 million people who entered Canada since the pandemic started according to the CBC. 2.5 million were truckers, people I have no problem with exemptiong.
There were a further 3+ million exempt for various reasons - this is where the rules need to change.

This is done so that the government can look good - there is no practical point to putting this requirement in - it doesnt prevent anything when we still exempt hundreds of thousands of non-essential people from any rules
rankourabu is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 3:23 pm
  #30  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
Originally Posted by YZF_Elite
A few more details released by the Minister in an interview on CBC a few minutes ago:

- rules will be in place 'within about a week'
- airlines will be required to administer it to confirm who has a test
- if people arrive without a test they will need to go into a government approved center until they can be tested, details being worked out
- no details about how the government approved centers cost will be dealt with, details being worked out
- no plans for this to replace quarantine, though they are talking about other programs like the AB one
- further details will be released tomorrow

Reporter didn't ask about if there will be any exceptions or how essential workers will be handled.
And presumably no plans for how long this requirement will be in place. Indefinitely? Until case counts start to drop permanently in Summer when enough Canadians are vaccinated and the advisory against non-essential travel possibly rescinded? Too many unanswered questions.
tcook052 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.