Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is Cruz Gone? [Rumour]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:39 pm
  #16  
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
Originally Posted by ajeleonard
Willie Walsh should be the one who goes. He set the culture and laid the seeds for the current problems.
Do we have to pick only one?
Dover2Golf and SkyTeem like this.
EuropeanPete is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:42 pm
  #17  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Apart from Flyertalkers who exactly decides whether he goes or not?
HIDDY is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:43 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK - Hampshire & London
Programs: Mucci de Guardian des Celliers des Grands Crus 1e Classé, plus BAEC.
Posts: 2,737
Originally Posted by skipness1E
Yet the man who hired him, remains? WW remains the puppet master.
Think WW will be around for a while if he keeps delivering the financials.
krispy84 is online now  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:45 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,399
Originally Posted by krispy84


Think WW will be around for a while if he keeps delivering the financials.
Think you’re right. Would need the Board to remove him, and that seems unlikely.

OP can be assured of a place in the FT annals if he is shown to have called this right on Cruz. But OTOH ......
nancypants and DelTroon like this.
subject2load is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:49 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,293
Has @corporate-wage-slave been approached to take over yet?
alex67500 is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 4:55 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by alex67500
Has @corporate-wage-slave been approached to take over yet?
i don’t think they can afford him
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 5:13 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK - Hampshire & London
Programs: Mucci de Guardian des Celliers des Grands Crus 1e Classé, plus BAEC.
Posts: 2,737
Originally Posted by alex67500
Has @corporate-wage-slave been approached to take over yet?
They’ve been after him for years. All those OPUPs to F happen for a reason 😁
krispy84 is online now  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 5:14 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Gateshead
Programs: BA Gold, ELAL Top Platinum
Posts: 851
The have left the best birthday present till last...
tedcruz is online now  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 5:15 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
Originally Posted by skipness1E
Yet the man who hired him, remains? WW remains the puppet master.
Agreed, seems odd that AC would go while WW remains. Unless AC is being made a convenient scapegoat.
orbitmic and nancypants like this.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 5:23 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Buckinghamshire
Programs: BAEC Gold Guest List, Hilton Honours Diamond, Accor Gold
Posts: 2,303
In the middle of an industrial relations dispute it would seem odd to me that the CEO resigns unless there’s a boardroom power struggle and he’s forced out. As has been mentioned previously, this would be strange, unless there are factors we don’t know about. The only other circumstances I could see him quitting would be if he simply had had enough: for personal reasons.

His departure would plunge BA into choppy and uncertain waters at a time when it requires clear leadership. Maybe he’s not the person to lead the airline into the next decade. I think many on this site would agree with that.
nancypants and dibbs98 like this.
Dicksbits is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 7:04 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlottesville, Va. USA
Posts: 1,752
Wish full thinking. YMMV
jmj9905 is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 10:44 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LHR/SEA/YVR
Programs: BAEC G/*O E
Posts: 921
That would be a huge surprise. CEO is there to make shareholders happy, not the company's customers (sadly). Fire him for delivering great results and containing the costs? For losing a bit of money because of the "greedy employees"? Looking at Alex's track record from the shareholders' perspective, he is doing just fine. I could be somewhat biased though as I believe WW is one of the best (if not the best) airline leader. Oh, well, guess I shall get my coat now.
nancypants likes this.
luitje is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 10:53 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
Originally Posted by luitje
That would be a huge surprise. CEO is there to make shareholders happy, not the company's customers (sadly). Fire him for delivering great results and containing the costs?
Although things have not gone perfectly on AC's watch. The data breach fine and IT meltdown costs and now a strike are all profit off the bottom line that didn't need to have occurred. Add in the 261 compensation they paid during the IT troubles plus the fine and that could be reaching a 1/4 billion pounds in unnecessary cost.
samfrost93 likes this.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 11:39 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 109
Is this the source? ��





Although this is one is also funny.


xnetco is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2019, 11:49 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,238
Originally Posted by highexpectations
Looks like maybe Klaus Goersch too apparently.
Klaus has been an empty suit for a while, at least ever since Rags Pattar (Willie's man) has been made director of LHR and WW airports. If Rags was to be made CEO... Even more mala tempora currunt.
13901 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.