Strike ballot called: here we go [General discussion of BA industrial relations]
#196
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,024
My Mrs is longhall LHR. She is on the newer contract.
Never has she earnt more than £22,500 in a year. This is made up of base pay and allowences. From this she has to buy her food when she is away. In Nigeria where you are taken from the aiport to the hotel under police escort a burger in the hotel costs £20.00. Obv not safe to leave the hotel!!
Anyone can see how this £22,500 is alot lower when you take into account. Even spending £25.00 for food on each trip soon add's up. Many places you can not take food into the country.
BA is run on a seniority system where the old skl get paid the most and they choose where to work on the plane i.e the newest person gets what is left!!
From my understanding not to many of the old 60k CSD people are left.
I think what get's most crew is that the people who are making these cuts have never actually done the job as cabin crew. People who have put the new service together when a crew member is cut are people who sit in waterworld but have never been crew. Therefore how can they do the job. Remember when chocolates were cut in 1st?? Crew said keep them but Waterworld said cut them. So when u got the chocolate backs Waterworld went with a brand with the chocolate diagram on the bottom of the box!!!
With the changes not once has ww or the head of cabin crew said we will work a few services to see how it is. I reckon crew would have a better liking for them if they did.
BA Senior Management are making cost saving so they can collect huge payouts and then they will leave.
Never has she earnt more than £22,500 in a year. This is made up of base pay and allowences. From this she has to buy her food when she is away. In Nigeria where you are taken from the aiport to the hotel under police escort a burger in the hotel costs £20.00. Obv not safe to leave the hotel!!
Anyone can see how this £22,500 is alot lower when you take into account. Even spending £25.00 for food on each trip soon add's up. Many places you can not take food into the country.
BA is run on a seniority system where the old skl get paid the most and they choose where to work on the plane i.e the newest person gets what is left!!
From my understanding not to many of the old 60k CSD people are left.
I think what get's most crew is that the people who are making these cuts have never actually done the job as cabin crew. People who have put the new service together when a crew member is cut are people who sit in waterworld but have never been crew. Therefore how can they do the job. Remember when chocolates were cut in 1st?? Crew said keep them but Waterworld said cut them. So when u got the chocolate backs Waterworld went with a brand with the chocolate diagram on the bottom of the box!!!
With the changes not once has ww or the head of cabin crew said we will work a few services to see how it is. I reckon crew would have a better liking for them if they did.
BA Senior Management are making cost saving so they can collect huge payouts and then they will leave.
#197
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: BAEC (Gold)
Posts: 700
Yes, but the principal changes (removing a purser, making the CSD a service role) are surely more likely to hit the 'better paid' than those on lower salaries, at least on average. In practice, what difference do the changes make to you and your 'direct' colleagues?
Presumably the risks of New Fleet taking the best routes, expanding to destroy 'Old Fleet' in practice, etc. are the only major concern to you personally?
Presumably the risks of New Fleet taking the best routes, expanding to destroy 'Old Fleet' in practice, etc. are the only major concern to you personally?
#199
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,922
Yes, but the principal changes (removing a purser, making the CSD a service role) are surely more likely to hit the 'better paid' than those on lower salaries, at least on average. In practice, what difference do the changes make to you and your 'direct' colleagues?
Presumably the risks of New Fleet taking the best routes, expanding to destroy 'Old Fleet' in practice, etc. are the only major concern to you personally?
Presumably the risks of New Fleet taking the best routes, expanding to destroy 'Old Fleet' in practice, etc. are the only major concern to you personally?
I'd imagine they will have been far better informed of the changes than you and I and then vote accordingly.
#200
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: BAEC (Gold)
Posts: 700
Jimcbob , if it's as simple as your post ,you've absolutely nothing to worry about. The cabin crew will have a secret democratic vote and vote no to industrial action.
I'd imagine they will have been far better informed of the changes than you and I and then vote accordingly.
I'd imagine they will have been far better informed of the changes than you and I and then vote accordingly.
I really don't get some of the issues. Yes, some crew numbers will be reduced on aircraft, but this is being balanced by the voluntary redundancies so it won't mean job cuts. The CSD is becoming a part service role, but surely that's obvious business sense and couldn't possibly justify a strike. The crew are being offered no pay cut, rather than the 2.5% odd cut they offered.
So what is the problem? So far as I can see, it is the future threat of New Fleet - i.e. that they will get all the most popular and best 'paid' (i.e. with allowances) routes; they will grow as 'old fleet' dies out; and people wanting promotion / transfer will be forced to accept New Fleet terms. So, New Fleet is a present threat of worse terms being imposed by the backdoor.
That is the thrust of the 'fact' sheet: http://uniteba.com/ESW/Files/AMICUS_...et-Oct2009.pdf
Am I missing something?
#201
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 498
We all no BA is in trouble but when times are good they can cope with paying there crew what they currently get and lets face it for the average crew thats not great - the average crew member can barely earn the high £20k's if they bust a gut - but then again there are those old CSD'd that get £40k just for turning up and then allowances on top of that - it thats the same in any company when you've been there 20+ years they were earning small amounts when they first started to
#202
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
I'd be straight onto CS demanding 4,000,000 miles in compo!
You'd hope that the above to issues would be a rarity that would have very little impact on service levels.
#203
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 125
#204
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New York
Programs: BA, LH, VS, Hyatt, SPG
Posts: 3,813
This is the problem though BingBongBoy, isn't it? That there are a small minority of crew who are raking it in for sitting in an office putting video cassettes into players, refusing to help out with the service, treating the passengers with contempt and spending their entire time shuttling to NRT thanks to 'a friend in scheduling.'
Meanwhile hard-working SH crew on recent contracts, and your colleagues at LGW, are expendable in order to keep this community feather-bedded.
Is it true that the head of BASSA is a part time CSD who commutes from LAX? Figures.
Meanwhile hard-working SH crew on recent contracts, and your colleagues at LGW, are expendable in order to keep this community feather-bedded.
Is it true that the head of BASSA is a part time CSD who commutes from LAX? Figures.
The stereotype of the old contract CSD on 60k a year may not be accurate, but the current system of basic pay and variable allowances is geared massively towards a small minority of crew, and if BASSA really had the interests of all crew in mind, it would agree to replacing this with hourly rates. This would benefit the majority of crew by giving them much greater consistency in monthly earnings.
PS. A scheduling manager was recently sacked by BA for unauthorised adjustments to rosters to help out certain crew members. He now works for Unite. Just like the two BA groundstaff who were sacked after the GG walkout....
#205
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home: East Mids UK - Work (Base): Accra, Ghana.
Programs: BAEC: Silver - Marriott: Titanium
Posts: 12,086
On Short Haul, they want to reduce our days off from 9 (Feb) and 10 for the rest of the year per month, to 8 (Feb) and 9 per month. That to me is a pay cut. The actual figure of my salary may not change, but being asked to work an extra 12 days a year for the same money is a pay cut in my books.
#206
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 59K
Posts: 2,301
On Short Haul, they want to reduce our days off from 9 (Feb) and 10 for the rest of the year per month, to 8 (Feb) and 9 per month.
What are we not doing, after listening to your feedback
This simplified approach, including a separate new fleet, means I will not be introducing any of the following changes previously proposed for current crew. There will be:
* no reduced nights downroute at worldwide destinations,
* no change to days off at base for Eurofleet,
* no transferral of the B767 fleet to Eurofleet,
* no change to early day report for worldwide
* no change to the finishing times for Eurofleet
* no company changes to your variable pay and allowances
* no pay cut
* no increment freeze
This simplified approach, including a separate new fleet, means I will not be introducing any of the following changes previously proposed for current crew. There will be:
* no reduced nights downroute at worldwide destinations,
* no change to days off at base for Eurofleet,
* no transferral of the B767 fleet to Eurofleet,
* no change to early day report for worldwide
* no change to the finishing times for Eurofleet
* no company changes to your variable pay and allowances
* no pay cut
* no increment freeze
#207
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver (Oneworld Sapphire), VS Silver, Skywards Blue, UA General, Qantas Bronze.
Posts: 1,077
On Short Haul, they want to reduce our days off from 9 (Feb) and 10 for the rest of the year per month, to 8 (Feb) and 9 per month. That to me is a pay cut. The actual figure of my salary may not change, but being asked to work an extra 12 days a year for the same money is a pay cut in my books.
#208
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver (Oneworld Sapphire), VS Silver, Skywards Blue, UA General, Qantas Bronze.
Posts: 1,077
On Short Haul, they want to reduce our days off from 9 (Feb) and 10 for the rest of the year per month, to 8 (Feb) and 9 per month. That to me is a pay cut. The actual figure of my salary may not change, but being asked to work an extra 12 days a year for the same money is a pay cut in my books.
#209
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cambs
Programs: Mucci, BAEC Silver, Scandic 3rd Floor, PC Pleb, FB Off White, Tufty Club
Posts: 2,836
I dunno. I've seen a CSD seemingly spend half a flight on AVOD issues. Having said that, when it's working perfectly, about the only time you see them on TATL flights is to dish out the I94W forms and landing cards. Oh yeah, and the all-important customer survey forms. Ooh, the excitement - I got one last time!
#210
Join Date: Nov 2007
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 178
Yes, and it explains that Pilots earn in excess of £100k... we were, and still are, discussing Cabin Crew, to whom the article credits an average of £29,000. Of which around half the crew employed by BA, on new, post 1997 contracts do NOT earn.
If I were more brazen, I would post my take home salary for the last few months, and you could see a real salary for a full time short haul crew member.
If I were more brazen, I would post my take home salary for the last few months, and you could see a real salary for a full time short haul crew member.
If you think that the average figure is too high then, based on what has been stated about new contracts, the problem is the distribution of pay between the lucky few and the majority.
Surely then the unions should be advising its members to support a reduction in salary of the minority in order to reduce the overall cost and ensuring BA CC remain at least on par with competitors.