Clawbacks of 2019 reimbursements for REFUNDED airline "fees".
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,478
I have $600 in credits and they were all on UA last year. If there's a clawback, there's nothing else to apply them to.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta Metro
Programs: DL , AC, BA, Hhonors Diamond, IH Platinum, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,360
Myself, I wouldn't consider this a "clawback." Since these are refunded charges that you should not have received a credit for, it's just cleaning up the accounting.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
Last edited by hotturnip; Feb 26, 2020 at 7:21 pm Reason: spelling and punctuation
#18
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 194
#19
Join Date: Nov 2019
Programs: DL Plat, Amex Plat
Posts: 10
Myself, I wouldn't consider this a "clawback." Since these are refunded charged that you should not have received a credit for, its just cleaning up the accounting.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
Seems quite tacky for Amex to make a big deal about this. It was in fact their system that dropped the ball. Seems easy from a programming end to tie a credit to a particular charge. If the change gets refunded, credit disappears.
Amex, spend the money on building a better system.
#20
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,958
#21
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca., USA
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat; Bonvoy Titanium Lifetime Elite;Hyatt Globalist; HHonors Diamond; United Silver
Posts: 8,318
I just got a double credit from Southwest and Amex on my platinum card.
I only fly Southwest in very rare situations. Seems to me that I should consider a second (non-reimbursed) Southwest charge in case the first one is clawed back if it isn't rectified by year end.
I only fly Southwest in very rare situations. Seems to me that I should consider a second (non-reimbursed) Southwest charge in case the first one is clawed back if it isn't rectified by year end.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,185
Myself, I wouldn't consider this a "clawback." Since these are refunded charged that you should not have received a credit for, its just cleaning up the accounting.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
I consider a "clawback" when they change their mind about loopholes like the "additional charge" with DL and try to apply it retroactively.
#23
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,084
I agree that clawback is the appropriate term. Amex issues the statement credit, and then due to a later refund (or an earlier one the systems didn't notice when issuing the credit), Amex claws it back. FWIW, I think this sort of clawback is completely fair on Amex's part. The underlying charge is reversed, and thus so should be the statement credit.
The safer approach is to actually use the charge you make. For example, make Southwest charges that earn the credit, and if you cancel the cheap flights you book, keep the travel funds for later use -- don't request a refund.
The safer approach is to actually use the charge you make. For example, make Southwest charges that earn the credit, and if you cancel the cheap flights you book, keep the travel funds for later use -- don't request a refund.
#24
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
I have a DP here for you to judge
I have two E+ purchase using Amex with each more than $100 and I put it on the Gold
the first one was cancelled and refunded because the Air travel ban
I got clawback, and I feel Amex should credit me the second purchase
I have two E+ purchase using Amex with each more than $100 and I put it on the Gold
the first one was cancelled and refunded because the Air travel ban
I got clawback, and I feel Amex should credit me the second purchase
#25
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 251
If both purchases were on the Gold in the same year, then they absolutely should.
#27
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Programs: Amex Membership Rewards, Chase Ultimate Rewards
Posts: 191
The funny thing the first time I received the credit and also a refund afterwards I called Amex to let me know and they told me "once you received the credit, you stay with the credit". LOL
#28
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHX
Programs: AS MVP, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,259
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,239
You made $600 in charges on UA last year, and received $600 in credits (presumably across multiple cards).
If any of those charges were refunded, then I would expect Amex to reverse the credit, so to basically charge your card, therefore offsetting the refund you previously received.
The issue is that if I made $600 in charges on UA and only had one Platinum card, and got $200 reimbursed, but then $50 was refunded at some point, if Amex wants to claw back $50 of credit (i.e., charge me $50), the should also retroactively apply the "remaining" $50 credit to one of the other un-reimbursed charges on UA last year.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Programs: Amex Membership Rewards, Chase Ultimate Rewards
Posts: 191
I actually would like to see DPs on this clawback. As far as I can tell, the few people who have actually reported getting clawed back had to do with E+ reimbursements.