FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   American Airlines | AAdvantage (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage-733/)
-   -   Business Extra ("ExtrAA") Program (master thread) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/american-airlines-aadvantage/898180-business-extra-extraa-program-master-thread.html)

platbrownguy May 22, 2017 8:31 pm


Originally Posted by 869 (Post 28346120)
Agent mentioned that BXP1's (the instrument I was discussing) will soon be electronic.

Interesting. I wonder if the rate at which paper BXP1s are not collected by airport agents has anything to do with it. Presumably making them electronic will reduce the rate of duplicate redemption to zero. And presumably it's hard to police it now (at least in cases where they don't ask you for the serial number, which they didn't ask me last month) because the certs are commonly transferred.

Making them electronic probably has a countervailing effect of decreasing expiration/spoilage significantly, but maybe still better for AA in the end.

snorkmaster May 24, 2017 11:18 pm

I've used the BXP1 certificates several times before, but don't have the answer to the following question:

Does a through flight count as one segment? For example, AA 1704 from SFO to BDL has a stop in CLT.

platbrownguy May 25, 2017 1:10 am


Originally Posted by snorkmaster (Post 28356627)
I've used the BXP1 certificates several times before, but don't have the answer to the following question:

Does a through flight count as one segment? For example, AA 1704 from SFO to BDL has a stop in CLT.

My strong hunch says yes; and, if so, that would be perhaps the first good reason to book a through flight (assuming you had confirmable C space).

snorkmaster May 25, 2017 1:34 am

Thanks. Miraculous to see something like SFO-BDL pop up in C in this day and age with AA.

If it's still sticking around when Meeting Services opens, I'll give them another call and try. The first agent yesterday didn't seem to get my request.


Originally Posted by platbrownguy (Post 28356841)
My strong hunch says yes; and, if so, that would be perhaps the first good reason to book a through flight (assuming you had confirmable C space).


869 May 25, 2017 8:48 am


Originally Posted by 869 (Post 28346120)
Agent mentioned that BXP1's (the instrument I was discussing) will soon be electronic.


Originally Posted by platbrownguy (Post 28347066)
Interesting. I wonder if the rate at which paper BXP1s are not collected by airport agents has anything to do with it. Presumably making them electronic will reduce the rate of duplicate redemption to zero. And presumably it's hard to police it now (at least in cases where they don't ask you for the serial number, which they didn't ask me last month) because the certs are commonly transferred.

Agent indicated that was the cause for the serial # request and the pending change to electronic form.

Was told yesterday that this implementation should be completed by year-end.

fastflyer May 25, 2017 9:47 am


Originally Posted by snorkmaster (Post 28356627)
I've used the BXP1 certificates several times before, but don't have the answer to the following question:

Does a through flight count as one segment? For example, AA 1704 from SFO to BDL has a stop in CLT.

Yes it does -- one of the few positive things about direct flights (through flights with a stop). I have used a single BXP1 on one of these through flights PBI-CLT-MCI.

C must be available on the whole flight, and I believe you need to be assigned to the same seat on both segments to process the upgrade, so it will usually be the bulkhead. After you clear into C, you can move to different seats by asking the agent to break the PNR.

Ross0 May 25, 2017 11:46 am

I've had to recently give serial numbers, but I'm not sure how it is policed. I've several times applied BXP1 certificates and then changed plans and didn't need the certs, so I presume those serial numbers are still good. Of course, 50% of the time the TA doesn't even know to collect a paper certificate...

869 May 25, 2017 12:20 pm


Originally Posted by Ross0 (Post 28358845)
I've had to recently give serial numbers, but I'm not sure how it is policed. I've several times applied BXP1 certificates and then changed plans and didn't need the certs, so I presume those serial numbers are still good. Of course, 50% of the time the TA doesn't even know to collect a paper certificate...

I asked agent the other day if I had to have the serial #'s because I was waiting for additional certs when C inventory opened. He said no & he could confirm upgrades without it so there is a way.

It may just be a policy that is in place to dissuade folks from using again since many agents aren't taking them. IMO, using a bxp1 more than once is theft.

platbrownguy May 25, 2017 1:56 pm

nvm misread

joepercussion1 May 31, 2017 9:44 pm

I thought points are supposed to post on the 20th of each month. Has anyone else not seen points post for this month yet?

platbrownguy May 31, 2017 10:48 pm


Originally Posted by joepercussion1 (Post 28386200)
I thought points are supposed to post on the 20th of each month. Has anyone else not seen points post for this month yet?

Mine posted on May 12, I requested missing flights on May 16, and those posted May 18.

AAExecPlatFlier Jun 1, 2017 3:48 am

Spoke to BE today and they claim u can't go on the PALL with a BE upgrade. They say many agents don't know this rule but the rule is u can't use a BPX at the airport. She said they expect to automate things sometime this year and that this would likely change.

Aymmv.


Originally Posted by FleyeSkyHigh (Post 28207955)
That's a great question. I know that IF the upgrade space (C inventory) is available the itinerary has to be ticketed PRIOR to the BXP1 upgrade being applied (even though applying a BXP1 upgrade does NOT result in a re-issue). I have had some meeting services agents mistakenly apply the BXP1 upgrade to a reservation that is on hold and by doing so it will prevent the reservation from ticketing all together (and the systems will refuse payment via website or live rep). I was unaware that meeting services would waitlist a reservation that is on hold (prior to ticketing) but good to know if that is the actual process.

Therefore, based on the extrapolating the above, I highly doubt that a waitlisted BXP1 upgrade will clear prior to ticketing and if it does it might require removing the upgrade (and losing the C inventory altogether or to another waitlisted pax) just to get the ticket to issue after payment. I would highly recommend that anyone that waitlists a BizExtra upgrade prior to ticketing verifies it’s still waitlisted after ticketing (my guess based on what I know about the systems it is should stick however but who knows for sure).

One other piece of advice: When you find an available BizExtra upgrade but have not ticketed the itinerary I recommend you put it on hold and then call meeting services. They have access not only to the front end systems that reservations reps use but also to the back-end systems so that can perform the two step process of forcing an immediate ticket issuance followed by application of the BizExtra upgrade. If you ticket the itinerary via website or reservations (even EP desk) then mtg svcs has to wait for it to queue for ticketing which can take hours and then you have to wait and risk the upgrade inventory going away not to mention waste the time to call back in after the ticket is issued.

Here is my experience over recent months with C (domestic) inventory opening up close to departure time (rated most frequently/likely to least frequently/likely):
T-25ish hours
T-5ish hours
T-100ish hours

The release of C (domestic) is based on route, historical, demand, overall premium load (and to a lesser extent economy load/anomalies) and certainly aircraft type. For example I never see C open up on a 2+ hour flight serviced by an A319 if less than 3 premium seats are for sale. On the other hand a on a B757 or B763 I occasionally see C open most likely at T-25 if it is not a trans-con.

In the event C doesn’t open up and you are waitlisted you should automatically be put on the airport waitlist (PALL) according to status but above all sticker/500 miles upgrades but below all eVIP/SWU upgrades. In addition, it should be noted that prior to the airport waitlist, normally revenue management is supposed to open up C space (to satisfy eVIPs, BizExtra Upgrades and Mileage upgrades) prior to opening up the other types of inventory that satisfy complimentary EP sticker/500 miles upgrades .

There are some weird processes now with regards to CK and Airpass members that violate a lot of what I have mentioned above but they are mostly manual processes and if you are not a member of either program they don’t really affect you.


MGW2000 Jun 1, 2017 4:48 am

I was automatically put on the PALL list at check-in on both JFK-CDG and CDG-JFK this past weekend with a BXP3. Of course, neither cleared...

Ross0 Jun 2, 2017 4:35 pm

I have a few BXP1 certs that expire at the end of this month. Does anyone have recent experiences returning these awards? If so, care to share what happened with your points? The points I would've used to issue these certs likely would have expired last year.

Thanks!

dll Jun 2, 2017 4:57 pm


Originally Posted by Ross0 (Post 28395038)
I have a few BXP1 certs that expire at the end of this month. Does anyone have recent experiences returning these awards? If so, care to share what happened with your points? The points I would've used to issue these certs likely would have expired last year.

Thanks!

I had a similar situation - I had requested a BXP1 upgrade on a roundtrip and both legs cleared. Unfortunately, at check-in for both flights they pulled one of my systemwides instead. That was OK by me (it was LAX-JFK-LAX). But my certs were due to expire. I emailed them and they asked me to return them, and reissued me new ones that expire end of this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:38 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.