AA Increasing Carry On Bag Enforcement, Audits (Oct 2019)
#271
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,755
I'm still waiting for the opportunity to have them check my newspaper or magazine.
#272
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,600
Originally Posted by rdrnnr
I won't even mention the cost of my flights, in cash plus J-to-F upgrade instruments, but this really seemed like nit-picking in extreme, to me.
#273
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,248
This is key. There is no penalty, so even if your bag is disallowed, you'll be forced to check it and be in the same situation you would have been if you had checked it originally. Maybe a $25 gate check fee for all bags rejected after trying the sizer would discourage this behavior.
Also, BNA - zero sizer use. Witnessed nothing grossly egregious on my flight, but as usual, 90+% of the bags were out of compliance with the sizer.
#274
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,248
So yes, we can bang the drum of a rule is a rule is a rule, but AA cant even enforce wild deviants, so pounding the rule fist rings hollow.
#275
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,228
I flew LAX - PHL on Friday (AA1799, the A330 service) and there were multiple announcements about enforcement, that irrespective of class of service or status your bags would be checked if they didn't fit in the sizer etc. I actually went to an adjacent gate and checked both my bag and my fiancée's bag in the sizer to make sure they both fitted with no issues. We boarded as Group 2 but for all pre-boarders, CK and Group 1 there was no actual enforcement whatsoever. Based on what we saw others bringing on I'd say that there was little if any enforcement for other groups based on both size, number of bags and lack of grumbling / complaints from anyone else.
Excellent flight too - great set of FAs who were motivated and professional.
Excellent flight too - great set of FAs who were motivated and professional.
#276
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AA LT Gold
Posts: 3,646
I haven't heard of a situation in which the GA or 3rd party was on a "power trip" for 1/4 inch while allowing the guy with the guitar, garment bag and backpack to get on.
You are comparing enforcement on different flights, that is inconsistent, yes.
And the rules are the rules. Not because on that flight 3 days ago they allowed the guy with the guitar (and also my non-compliant Rimowa) means that on today's flight they are going to allow any of us with the excessive carry on (guitar guy and myself).
BTW, I was at the Rimowa store recently and NONE of their bags comply with 22X14x9. They fail on width (> 14")
#277
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 11,248
If on a certain flight they do enforce the carry-on policy, then that guy with five bags will be forced to check. The guy with the non-compliant Rimowa (by 0.0003 inches if you wish) will also be forced to check.
I haven't heard of a situation in which the GA or 3rd party was on a "power trip" for 1/4 inch while allowing the guy with the guitar, garment bag and backpack to get on.
You are comparing enforcement on different flights, that is inconsistent, yes.
And the rules are the rules. Not because on that flight 3 days ago they allowed the guy with the guitar (and also my non-compliant Rimowa) means that on today's flight they are going to allow any of us with the excessive carry on (guitar guy and myself).
BTW, I was at the Rimowa store recently and NONE of their bags comply with 22X14x9. They fail on width (> 14")
I haven't heard of a situation in which the GA or 3rd party was on a "power trip" for 1/4 inch while allowing the guy with the guitar, garment bag and backpack to get on.
You are comparing enforcement on different flights, that is inconsistent, yes.
And the rules are the rules. Not because on that flight 3 days ago they allowed the guy with the guitar (and also my non-compliant Rimowa) means that on today's flight they are going to allow any of us with the excessive carry on (guitar guy and myself).
BTW, I was at the Rimowa store recently and NONE of their bags comply with 22X14x9. They fail on width (> 14")
I had to sizer my backpack on one flight (it was my only piece) and the lady boarding after me waltzed on with 3 bags.
#278
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The FT AA forum, until it no longer wants me.
Programs: CK or bust
Posts: 1,913
That's making a lot of assumptions. I can cite a few cases personally on a single flight where either the GA is intermittent on checking, one one GA checks and the other doesn't.
I had to sizer my backpack on one flight (it was my only piece) and the lady boarding after me waltzed on with 3 bags.
I had to sizer my backpack on one flight (it was my only piece) and the lady boarding after me waltzed on with 3 bags.
They must have been light as had they been heavy, she might have shuffled or perhaps even stumbled. Maybe the GA thought that Antarius was a celebrity with just the one backpack with the handler following behind, shleping the other baggage.
#279
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Aspen, CO
Posts: 792
Weird - there's a sizer placed at SFO prior to entering security and at every gate - but no enforcement whatsoever.
CLT and MIA had sizers at every gate, as well, and it looked like the GA's were looking for larger bags, but did not have any issues getting through when boarding Group 1.
AA has done a great job of setting up for carry-on audits, but it seems like staff are not interested in enforcing it (at least for the first few boarding groups.)
CLT and MIA had sizers at every gate, as well, and it looked like the GA's were looking for larger bags, but did not have any issues getting through when boarding Group 1.
AA has done a great job of setting up for carry-on audits, but it seems like staff are not interested in enforcing it (at least for the first few boarding groups.)
#280
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 92
Yesterday on mid-morning DFW to MCO flight, very cheerful gate agent made announcement on reminder of number of carry ons and that it applied no matter when you board or your status. I saw the new sizer just by the door but did not see them have anyone try their bag in it (I boarded group 3).
#282
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
All while DL@LGA (which has more DL flights than DL has at JFK) and UA@LGA are less likely to hassle most of these very same kind of customers with the very same kind of baggage.
#283
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Programs: AA, CX, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 1,484
To be fair there is a survivorship biases on my post as I don't know what's happening after I boarded. My luggage is not strictly compliant but was not selected as there are obvious other outliners there.
#285
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: WAS/NYC/LON
Programs: AA EXP, HH DIA, Hyatt DIA
Posts: 286
Started enforcing this at LGA recently (AA employee standing in front of the TSA lines). Had to go get a supervisor to let me through, which was an annoyance to say the least. (Had a garment bag + roller board, flying in F so was hanging the bag anyways)