Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA sets new policy limits on onboard waiting during delays

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2007, 9:19 am
  #106  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Originally Posted by hillrider
there will be another instance like AUS, and you could be the one subject to it.
You heard it here first. More passengers trapped and abused by an airline -- http://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/02/15...ded/index.html
hillrider is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 11:12 am
  #107  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OKC/DFW
Programs: AA EXP/2 MM
Posts: 9,999
Originally Posted by hillrider
More passengers trapped and abused by an airline -- [/url]
Un-flippin-believable!
oklAAhoma is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 11:36 am
  #108  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
While this is beyond inexcusable, particularly after the brew ha ha of the AA incidents, at least B6 management got in front of this immediately and offered an apology (as well they damn should), a full refund and a free round trip ticket. Unfortunately for those paxs B6 has no way of awarding a club membership, a free ticket in F, or a round trip ticket to a destination that typically would cost hundreds of dollars as B6 flies to very close international destinations. But AA could have and should have offered more than its paltry $500 voucher (and only after it became a news story).
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 11:45 am
  #109  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LI, NY
Programs: AA PLT, AAdv since Day One
Posts: 2,682
There were, count 'em, ten (10) planes that were subject to these delays. Some idiot in B6 ops made the decision, and probably more than once, to send these planes out from the gates in the first place. This wasn't just a plane enroute that got nailed by bad weather at their destination and had to divert.

Keep your money and your vouchers, B6. Tell me you fired the bone head who made this decision. That would be management getting in front of this situation and apologizing.
inlanikai is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 11:53 am
  #110  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas, TX, AA 3MM EXP, WN
Posts: 1,808
And how pissed would you be if you tried to use your AA voucher and they asked for your credit card for the phone reservation fee since you can't use the voucher online
MrMan is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 2:32 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 20
Angry AA 937 Jan 29 MIA to SJO Mechanical Delay Compensation

Our family of four (including a diabetic and a four year old)boarded AA 783 in MCO for the connection to SJO via MIA with a scheduled layover of 1 hr 10 minutes. We breakfasted at our hotel at 6:30AM so that we could check in 2 hours before the MCO flight. AA has this "policy" of no food if the flight is less than three hours. AA 937 scheduled duration was 2 hr 50 min. After boarding us late in MIA, we were held on the tarmac for more than two hours due to a mechanical delay while the aircraft brakes were repaired. The check in to clearing customs interval ended up being nearly 11 hours. 7:30AM EST to 5PM CST. No compensation nor amenities were offered and the agent on board Raoul rudely advised that I write to customer service. When we arrived in Costa Rica we had missed our local airline connection and thus lost a nonrefundable OW fare of $320.00 = (4 x $80). The delay resulted in another family member (who had travelled on CO) waiting three hours in SJO. We had to hire a car for $200.00 to get the five of us to our destination. Bottom line is besides being out $520.00, what recourse do I have with AA?

Last edited by JBerger; Feb 16, 2007 at 8:13 am
JBerger is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2007, 3:36 pm
  #112  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville
Programs: DL DM 3 MM AA PLAT HH Lifetime Diamond Marriott Plat AMB lifetime titanium Hertz PC
Posts: 6,187
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
While this is beyond inexcusable, particularly after the brew ha ha of the AA incidents, at least B6 management got in front of this immediately and offered an apology (as well they damn should), a full refund and a free round trip ticket. Unfortunately for those paxs B6 has no way of awarding a club membership, a free ticket in F, or a round trip ticket to a destination that typically would cost hundreds of dollars as B6 flies to very close international destinations. But AA could have and should have offered more than its paltry $500 voucher (and only after it became a news story).
I agree at least B6 admits they have problem. AA did everything way after the fact and then seemd like they were forced too.
troyintn is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 12:19 am
  #113  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Proof that airlines can't be trusted

American Airlines Promised to the Flying Public after Dec. 29th strandings of 121 planes, we have "revised our policy to ensure passengers do not remain on aircraft more than 4 hours on the ground." They then claim this new policy "is a rule that may never be used again" because measures were in place to prevent them after Dec. 29th. Now they claim this 4 hour rule was only an "Internal Operational Guideline", not a pledge, or agreement or commitment to the flying public.
The latest incident? "Virginia, 74 a recovering Pancreatic Cancer victim with 1/2 of her intestines removed 6 years ago, and her 80 year old husband, a diabetic, were stranded for 8+ hours on the Midland Tarmac when diverted there by American Airlines without potable water, adequate food or the ability to deplane. At 6 hours of stranding they brought out stairs, and told the passengers they would be able to get off and walk around. Armed Air Marshalls said no. One woman ran for the terminal in an effort to get a candy bar from a vending machine and was escorted by the armed Air Marshalls back to the plane. There was a revolt of sorts on board."

Source: Coalition for an Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights, http://flyersrights.com/
hillrider is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 7:24 am
  #114  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BWI
Programs: AA PLT and that's that!
Posts: 8,349
Originally Posted by hillrider
The latest incident? "Virginia, 74 a recovering Pancreatic Cancer victim with 1/2 of her intestines removed 6 years ago, and her 80 year old husband, a diabetic, were stranded for 8+ hours on the Midland Tarmac when diverted there by American Airlines without potable water, adequate food or the ability to deplane. At 6 hours of stranding they brought out stairs, and told the passengers they would be able to get off and walk around. Armed Air Marshalls said no. One woman ran for the terminal in an effort to get a candy bar from a vending machine and was escorted by the armed Air Marshalls back to the plane. There was a revolt of sorts on board."
Where is the link to this story?
tazi is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 8:03 am
  #115  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: CO Gold, UA Premier Exec
Posts: 1,539
Originally Posted by hillrider
The latest incident? "Virginia, 74 a recovering Pancreatic Cancer victim with 1/2 of her intestines removed 6 years ago, and her 80 year old husband, a diabetic, were stranded for 8+ hours on the Midland Tarmac when diverted there by American Airlines without potable water, adequate food or the ability to deplane. At 6 hours of stranding they brought out stairs, and told the passengers they would be able to get off and walk around. Armed Air Marshalls said no. One woman ran for the terminal in an effort to get a candy bar from a vending machine and was escorted by the armed Air Marshalls back to the plane. There was a revolt of sorts on board."

Source: Coalition for an Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights, http://flyersrights.com/
Since when do Air Marshalls have any say in a situation like this? Thats not in their job descripition and blowing their cover (to normal everyday passengers not all the FT'ers who claim to always know when one is on board) for a weather delay/diversion is a serious issue.

Last edited by AEpilot76; May 2, 2007 at 9:11 am
AEpilot76 is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 9:04 am
  #116  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA GLD (1MM), DL GLD, Marriott Plat, RCL D+, X Elite
Posts: 3,229
While I am sympathetic to the plight of anyone stuck on an airplane for 8 hours; random postings on a blog, including my own, should not always be accepted as gospel fact suitable for Congressional testimony or Biblical inscription without some kind of check and balance to verify the validity of what is being said.

Having some experience in a past life dealing with the Federal Air Marshal Service on a regular and routine basis, I am not convinced that the story about the woman running for the snack machine only to be escorted back by armed federal law enforcement officers is 100 percent accurate.
MJonTravel is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 9:32 am
  #117  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Originally Posted by flyastrojets
without some kind of check and balance to verify the validity of what is being said.
Given the preponderance of evidence of the callousness of airlines in inhumanly treating Americans, I am always puzzled by the reactions here...a forum of mostly passengers. Maybe there are more airline employees lurking that we think!

Her name is Virginia, She is 74. She was on Flight #556. They touched down at 2:48 p.m. and left at 11:30 p.m. They landed in DFW between 12 and 12:30 a.m. I have spoken to 7 different passengers on that flight as well as a Salvation Army representative who took multiple names. Everyone tells the same story. By the way, some of the passengers were American Airlines employees who have also verified the story. Now, let me make clear the Pilot told the passengers there were no steps for 6 hours, they then saw another jet get steps and revolted saying how come they get steps. Then they brought steps over at the pilots request. Then the 2 Air Marshal's went, according to passenger accounts, and stood at the bottom of the steps and refused to let anyone off. Somehow one woman, very determined to have a candy bar from a vending machine, made a run for the terminal and got one. They retrieved her and escorted her back to the plane.

Does that satisfy you?

Believe me, we are checking out our facts multiple times and the national media are all over this right now working on some stories with Virginia and others.

Kate Hanni
Real Estate Broker
(XXX)XXX-XXXX cellular
Spokesperson and Founder
Coalition for an Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights
http://strandedpassengers.blogspot.com/
Air Marshalls may not like having uncontrolled people running around the tarmac - that is definitely a security breach.
hillrider is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 9:34 am
  #118  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,176
I agree with the passenger bill of rights, I just think the current version of it is lame and needs to be expanded to inclue, the FAA, TSA and Airport operators.

I also have some questions .

1 .
Compensate “bumped” passengers or passengers delayed due to flight cancellations or postponements of over 12 hours by refund of 150% of ticket price.
Do they mean involuntary denied boaridng ? Fair enough on that one, but I know many disagree with me on that. I made a post once that airlines should stop overselling, but some posters on here disagreed as it would put up ticket prices. This of course will do the same.

2.
Publish and update monthly on the company’s public web site a list of chronically delayed flights, meaning those flight delayed thirty minutes or more, at least forty percent of the time, during a single month.
Agree with that too, as long as it lists the specific reason, such as FAA imposed ground stops, weather, mechanicals.

For delays or cancellations due to FAA ground stops or atc flow restrictions are the FAA going to compensate passengers or the airline ?

3.
Provide for the essential needs of passengers during air- or ground-based delays of longer than 3 hours, including food, water, sanitary facilities, and access to medical attention.
Will the airport operators also be required to provide terminal facilities to stranded passengers, such as ensuring that restaurants are obliged to stay open late to provide food ? They should also be required to provide more alternatives for passengers who are stranded with young families. For passengers stranded overnight the airports should provide better sleeping facilities .

4.
Make lowest fare information, schedules and itineraries, cancellation policies and frequent flyer program requirements available in an easily accessed location and updated in real-time.
Such as on a web site maybe ?

5.
Ensure that baggage is handled without delay or injury; if baggage is lost or misplaced, the airline shall notify customer of baggage status within 12 hours and provide compensation equal to current market value of baggage and its contents.
We have , daily, bags that are late arriving to our bagroom because the TSA either misdirected them, or placed them on the wrong belt , or just forgot to send them to us. If this happens where is the provision for the TSA to reimburse you the "compensation equal to current market value " or the airline ?

6.
Establish procedures for returning passengers to terminal gate when delays occur so that no plane sits on the tarmac for longer than three hours without connecting to a gate
A very good idea. The FAA and the airport operator should also impose limits on the number of planes that should be on the ground at any one time . If the airport has 20 gates, then only 20 aircraft can be on the ground at that airport, the airlines will never be able to use the "not enough gates" excuse again. Of course they would have to make allowances for aircraft that have declared an emergency of some kind.

Airport operators dont let planes land for free, they collect a hefy fee for each aircraft . Perhaps the airport operator at AUS could use the money generated by landing fees from diverted aircraft to build 2 new gates that are kept just for diversions. Landing fees are based on the weight of the aircraft , AUS and other airport operators in that area actually made a handsome profit that day.



Ok, some of the above is over the top, but the fact is that the FAA and Airport Operators play a huge role in airline operations and passenger comfort. The FAA , bless their hearts, are so concerned about congestion that when AA and UA gave up 5% of the slots at ORD to help reduce the pressure on the system, the FAA then started allocating those slots to other carriers such as jetBlue.

While airport operators pay a lot of lip service to passengers, it is all about revenue to them. They very rarely have to deal with passengers. They run the airports, and take large fees to allow us to use their airports. As far as they are concerned their obligation ends there. They could quite easily put conditions for OSO situation in to leases to food vendors etc.

Again, I agree with a passenger bill of rights, but it needs to be expanded to cover the entire industry , and not just the airlines.
jrhone is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 9:41 am
  #119  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: CO Gold, UA Premier Exec
Posts: 1,539
Originally Posted by hillrider
Air Marshalls may not like having uncontrolled people running around the tarmac - that is definitely a security breach.
Thats not their jurisdiction, a person needing food or the bathroom is not life threatening nor is it a threat to the passengers on the aircraft.

Air Marshalls are also subject to captains authority while on board that aircraft
AEpilot76 is offline  
Old May 2, 2007, 9:43 am
  #120  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Originally Posted by AEpilot76
Air Marshalls are also subject to captains authority while on board that aircraft
Are you hypothesizing that the captain (i.e. AA) told the Air Marshalls to grab the passenger starved by AA?
hillrider is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.