Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Does Alaska suck now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2018, 6:53 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Programs: Delta Gold, Alaska Gold 75K, LATAM Black
Posts: 3,393
Originally Posted by keitherson


Because the real business world does not operate by power users and hobbyists maximizing mileage redemptions for First Class flights on 5-star carriers through obscure award charts and maximizing routing and stopovers.

Look through Alaska's own data and you'll see the majority of redemptions are for AS on their own metal.

By this metric, not bloggers and Flyertalk hobbyists salivating over CPM and suites, they are failing as award space on their own metal is becoming tighter and Alaska continues to offer no long-haul international service and are losing partners left and right.
I completely agree ^

I will be earning 75K status again this year, with a much different (and significantly worse) landscape than just a few years ago, sad really. I now wonder if it’s worth becoming 75k again this year or not.
Mauibaby2008 is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2018, 6:59 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Does Alaska suck now? When put in perspective between them and the top 3, no, they don’t suck. Have they changed? Yes. But still better than AA/UA/DL.
Seat 2A, NoLaGent and HatAndJacket like this.
Baze is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2018, 9:57 pm
  #48  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,320
Originally Posted by Baze
no, they don’t suck.
+1.
dayone is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2018, 11:07 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: South Florida
Programs: DL GM, SPG GOLD, UA DIRT, AA PLAT, US (RIP), Hilton HHonors
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by vji
Sure, AS still provides incredible value, the changes are still more generous than what other airlines have, etc. but the writing looks like it's on the wall - we're in for a bumpy ride.
I think you’ve already hit it as to why the do not suck now... they did used to be amazing and now they’re kind of like “meh” but what really sucks is that they’re still better than the other options out there...
HatAndJacket is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2018, 5:07 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: AS, QF, SK
Posts: 127
Originally Posted by ou81two
There's a study that came out on the topic. Every time I search for a Qantas business reservation the only thing I can find is a mixed fare with AS business from SEA to LAX and then coach to Australia. I've been asking them to fix this for a good 4 years now.

Their web team says that this can't be done. They could filter is on the front end, but they're too stupid to do that. You might have found a Qantas reward fare, but they're not easily found and AA has more options.
The problem with redeeming on QF (and this is something I know a little about, as I have lifetime status with QF so obviously I make that trip with some cadence) is their (AS) partner redemption windows are shorter than the competition. I can only book out AS rewards for QF F 330 days out. I can do the same 365 days out via any other QF partner. So by the time you've got a window to book QF F....all the partner redemption seats have been sold. It just never works, and I will never - not once ever - fly in coach to SYD, even on an airline I love as much as QF.

We're in this weird boat where we're sitting on a crap-tonne of AS miles and really don't know how we're going to begin to spend them. AS is down to something like 17 partners (they had over 30 a few years ago, I think), and with the AF/KL partnership ending, no viable way into Europe anymore (because I'm not going to fly garbage like Condor or pay BA's extortion petrol surcharge). QF is out for reasons just stated. CX is a tough redemption. EK's award chart got shot to hell. KE and JL might be fair game, but they don't go to our favourite places.

It's really amazing to look at just how far and how fast the programme has fallen. DL really boxed AS into a corner when they became enemies and DL went after not only AS, but its family, too.
Quintious is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2018, 6:14 pm
  #51  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Rapid Rewards, AAdvantage, SkyMiles
Posts: 2,931
AS needs to start being competitive on the East Coast if they want to survive as a brand/company beyond 2025.
am1108 likes this.
DCP2016 is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2018, 6:19 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,397
It's good to hear from the FlyerTalk Executive Vice Presidents of Airline Network Development™. Keep it coming.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2018, 6:41 pm
  #53  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,320
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
It's good to hear from the FlyerTalk Executive Vice Presidents of Airline Network Development™. Keep it coming.
They are also responsible for Alliance Partnerships, Loyalty Programs and Yield Management .
eponymous_coward likes this.
dayone is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2018, 11:25 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: AS, QF, SK
Posts: 127
Originally Posted by DCP2016
AS needs to start being competitive on the East Coast if they want to survive as a brand/company beyond 2025.
They'll survive just fine, but they'll never be more than a regional player. Their entire consumer base basically revolves around 4 cities on the same stretch of I-5. It's an airline I desperately WANT to support, but they go out of their way to make it infeasible.
Quintious is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 12:37 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,036
Originally Posted by Quintious
They'll survive just fine, but they'll never be more than a regional player. Their entire consumer base basically revolves around 4 cities on the same stretch of I-5.
I agree entirely. Just like this airline will never be relevant to most people outside of Juneau and Anchora... oh, wait.

Also, that's the first time I've heard 1142 miles of freeway referred to as "the same stretch." I get your point, but you are being very dramatic.
jinglish is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 8:15 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Between SFO and STS
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold, United Serf, Delta Gold
Posts: 731
Originally Posted by Quintious
They'll survive just fine, but they'll never be more than a regional player. Their entire consumer base basically revolves around 4 cities on the same stretch of I-5. It's an airline I desperately WANT to support, but they go out of their way to make it infeasible.
By that metric, B6 is doomed: they predominantly serve the same stretch of I-95 save for the outstation at LGB that’s maxed out for growth. The AS station outside the highway corridor (ANC) seems to just keep growing...




DrAlex is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 8:22 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by Quintious
They'll survive just fine, but they'll never be more than a regional player. Their entire consumer base basically revolves around 4 cities on the same stretch of I-5. It's an airline I desperately WANT to support, but they go out of their way to make it infeasible.
As long as most of the west coast continues to be an engine of economic growth and development, it seems like a pretty good strategy to be a regional player.
channa and pbelmore like this.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 8:34 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA ExecPlat; AF Gold; UA GS; Hyatt L. Globalist; Marriott Plat; Hilton Diamond; National EE
Posts: 6,167
The increase in F legroom and the roll out of Premium Class have made AS better. The improved catering also cannot be overlooked, though I wish there were more Crater Lake vodkas.
Buster CT1K is offline  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 9:20 am
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,654
Originally Posted by fly18725
As long as most of the west coast continues to be an engine of economic growth and development, it seems like a pretty good strategy to be a regional player.
California alone is now the 5th largest economy in the world. (Of course, this is subject to fluctuation because of relative currency values.) Add WA, OR, AK and HI, and you are probably still at 5th, but still ... this is not an insignificant market all by itself.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Jun 15, 2018, 9:48 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by Quintious
They'll survive just fine, but they'll never be more than a regional player. Their entire consumer base basically revolves around 4 cities on the same stretch of I-5. It's an airline I desperately WANT to support, but they go out of their way to make it infeasible.
I feel like people using this "regional" label is very misleading especially when you're talking about the United States. The BIG3 are the largest airlines IN THE WORLD, i don't think people appreciate how large these airlines operations are. Southwest is up there when you consider passengers carried. Give Alaska some time, there will be growing pains and mistakes. You wouldn't complain about BA not having a hub in Russia (apples to oranges i know) but logistics of operating an airline throughout the US arent as easy as just starting a hub on the east coast. Businesses that don't grow, die, business 101
gobeavs8 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.