Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Planned Diversions From SFO to OAK/SJC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2018, 1:30 pm
  #196  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by fly18725
In the absence of data on how frequently this happens at Alaska, why it is a mismanagement of resources and how it is not an issue for other airlines I think we can dismiss this post as an isolated complaint.
And without working for the airline, we won't be able to get that data. So you have a foolproof retort to any complaint since we can't get hold of bulletproof insider data.
channa is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 1:38 pm
  #197  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SJC / DPS
Programs: AS G75K, UA Silver
Posts: 1,757
Originally Posted by fly18725
Ultimately, this has NOTHING to do with diversions. It seems like a small group of posters are looking for any possible excuse to trash Alaska.
I don't think that's true at all. It has everything to do with SFO, and more specifically the diversions and operational issues that occur, unique to AS, at this particular airport. While separate from the SFO diversion issue, failing to adequately remove RON planes from gates is an issue I've only experienced with AS at SFO with a sample size of hundreds.

Pointing out AS's specific failings is hardly trashing the airline; I've seen numerous constructive suggestions on how AS could mitigate a large number of these failures by increases in notifications, IT infrastructure, or simply staffing. As it stands, the operational issues that exist at SFO are indeed unique to AS.
channa likes this.
pushmyredbutton is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 7:26 pm
  #198  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by pushmyredbutton
I don't think that's true at all. It has everything to do with SFO, and more specifically the diversions and operational issues that occur, unique to AS, at this particular airport. While separate from the SFO diversion issue, failing to adequately remove RON planes from gates is an issue I've only experienced with AS at SFO with a sample size of hundreds.

Pointing out AS's specific failings is hardly trashing the airline; I've seen numerous constructive suggestions on how AS could mitigate a large number of these failures by increases in notifications, IT infrastructure, or simply staffing. As it stands, the operational issues that exist at SFO are indeed unique to AS.
I’m confused. I said occasional issues with getting RONs on and off batters has nothing to do with diversions, THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD. You disagreed, but in the next sentence admitted they’re separate issues?

In general, this discussion is getting absurd with posters claiming Alaska is unique in having delays and diversions in one of the most congested and delay prone airports in the country. Could Alaska do better? Absolutely, particularly with how it communicates.

It is hard to take constant complaints from the same 4-5 posters seriously, particularly when a handful drowned the United forum with the same type of complaints for years post merger. I understand that airline mergers are tough, particularly when you’ve made an emotional connection with the aquiree. The road will be rocky at time for everyone, but at the end of the day it is a company made up of thousands of fallible people. Mistakes will happen and decisions will be made that you don’t like. At that point, you have a choice: be miserable or move on.

I’m making my choice and diverting my attention from this thread.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 7:54 pm
  #199  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by fly18725
I’m making my choice and diverting my attention from this thread.
Good bye. It will be hard to carry on without your participation, but there's enough of us here that fly the airline (do you?) to hopefully keep the thread alive.
tom911 is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 9:04 pm
  #200  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by tom911
Good bye. It will be hard to carry on without your participation, but there's enough of us here that fly the airline (do you?) to hopefully keep the thread alive.
Yes, I do.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 9:38 pm
  #201  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP , Delta Gold Medallion, "Credit Card" status for various hotels
Posts: 672
It’s one thing when AS diverted planes away from SFO while being a PNW focused airline. It’s another after absorbing VX and its SFO hub. This is something AS needs to address if it wants to stay relevant in SFO. Just my opinion as a SEA based flier.
steve64, channa and pbelmore like this.
Bretmd is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2018, 9:46 pm
  #202  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by fly18725
It is hard to take constant complaints from the same 4-5 posters seriously, particularly when a handful drowned the United forum with the same type of complaints for years post merger.
I never recall UA having a diversion tendency at a hub airport.

The only parallel I see between the AS/VX and UA/CO merger is the sense of arrogance by the dominant airline misunderstanding the new customer base. Though in AS's case, it's a lot more muted than CO's.

You seem to have a low tolerance for complaints about an airline, even if the issue is causing frustration and problems for its customers. I recognize that AS has a very strong following. But that's not the case here in the Bay Area. They don't get the same benefit of the doubt that they do in the PNW.
channa is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 7:23 am
  #203  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Give me a break. Stop whining about all of this. If you do not like flying Alaska because it does not meet your needs, then fly someone else. To say this never happens to any other airline at SFO is patently false and is a ridiculous statement. Get real. You can whine and complain, I just hope you are not next to me on the next flight. It gets old.

Originally Posted by sfozrhfco
This thread is about SFO/The Bay Area. This does not happen to all airlines at SFO--only AS. How does being backed up at ORD/DFW have any relevance to the fact that AS leaves an aircraft RON at a gate at SFO that needed to be towed to be remote parked? It is great to be a fan boy/girl for an airline but citing completely irrelevant airports and saying if you don't like it fly somebody else is not a great attitude for anybody wanting a business to succeed. As has been noted several times, people have actually gone out of their way to fly AS and AS is making it very difficult to choose them a 2nd time. This thread is to make others aware of what is happening and perhaps make AS management wake up to the fact that SFO is no longer just a destination airport for people travelling from PDX/SEA so it is time to come up with a plan to operate their new hub efficiently.
WebTraveler is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 8:20 am
  #204  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by WebTraveler
Give me a break. Stop whining about all of this. If you do not like flying Alaska because it does not meet your needs, then fly someone else. To say this never happens to any other airline at SFO is patently false and is a ridiculous statement. Get real. You can whine and complain, I just hope you are not next to me on the next flight. It gets old.
The only one who seems to be whining is you, but I'm not here to attack or berate other posters, so I simply ask that you offer up some data.

If you claim that planned diversions to OAK/SJC either to/from SFO are practiced by other airlines, please show us. I've been flying to/from this station for over 40 years and have never witnessed it on any other carrier, but I would love to be proven wrong.

And if you claim this only applies to the previous posters RON comments, then I'll just suggest you stop whining and that everyone should stay on topic, which I'm pretty sure is planned diversions, right?

Last edited by NoLaGent; Jun 7, 2018 at 8:29 am Reason: Remaining on topic.
NoLaGent is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 8:35 am
  #205  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by WebTraveler
To say this never happens to any other airline at SFO is patently false and is a ridiculous statement.
This is 100% unique to AS.

Others may have an occasional unplanned diversion, but planning a diversion and operating from a different airport is unique to AS.
channa is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 9:26 am
  #206  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,646
today's twitter fun, sounds like this guy had a connection in SFO and ended up diverted to SJC, causing him to misconnect. wonder if the diversion decision was made in the air or again not well communicated prior to departure from his origin in SLC.

PV_Premier is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 9:35 am
  #207  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Originally Posted by PV_Premier
today's twitter fun, sounds like this guy had a connection in SFO and ended up diverted to SJC, causing him to misconnect. wonder if the diversion decision was made in the air or again not well communicated prior to departure from his origin in SLC.

https://twitter.com/Dukemoose2/statu...30228118360064
Seems like an every day thing now, with very normal June weather.

(And to state the obvious, if AS took a 2 hour delay on this flight he would very likely have missed his connection as well. Don't plan a connection involving OO/QX at SFO, just like you shouldn't plan an express connection on UA at SFO if you can't miss your connection.)
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 9:50 am
  #208  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by channa
This is 100% unique to AS.

Others may have an occasional unplanned diversion, but planning a diversion and operating from a different airport is unique to AS.
Yes, and others may have a rolling delay and eventual cancellation, but never a planned diversion.

I'd bet that UA, as a percentage of passengers, has more misconnects and people just abandoning their trips because of IRROPS than any other airline at SFO. Of course, I base this statement using the same orifice full of gas that many other posts in this thread emanate.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 9:50 am
  #209  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
Seems like an every day thing now, with very normal June weather.

(And to state the obvious, if AS took a 2 hour delay on this flight he would very likely have missed his connection as well. Don't plan a connection involving OO/QX at SFO, just like you shouldn't plan an express connection on UA at SFO if you can't miss your connection.)
Except there's only low clouds (which are already clearing) and the average delay is 1 hour. This is nothing for SFO and UA's operations are not even experiencing those delays.

Just another data point that this is specifically an AS issue here.

https://www.flightview.com/airport/S..._Francisco-CA/

(You can filter those results by carrier if you're interested in confirming my point about UA today.)
NoLaGent is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2018, 10:00 am
  #210  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
Yes, and others may have a rolling delay and eventual cancellation, but never a planned diversion.
SFO ATC seldom rolls. They have a reasonably good idea of the weather, issue a wheels up, and you go with it. This is not some unpredictable thunderstorm where they don't know what it's doing to do or how long it's going to take. As someone who has been using the airport for 20 years, it's reasonably well orchestrated. Dumping someone into a non-hub with fewer connection options doesn't help them. Neither does adding over an hour of travel time (bag reclaim, figure out the bus, then an hour up to SFO if there's little/no traffic).

Looks like they diverted this SLC-SFO flight 2 days in a row to SJC now. And the weather is decent today...just some normal June stuff:

Due to WEATHER / LOW CEILINGS, departure traffic destined to San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA (SFO) is currently experiencing delays averaging 1 hour and 1 minute.

It's going to take them more than 1 hour and 1 minute to get their bags, figure out where the bus is, get everyone on, get to SFO, reclear security and get ready for the connection. The drive time alone is about an hour right now.
tusphotog likes this.
channa is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.