Planned Diversions From SFO to OAK/SJC
#196
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
And without working for the airline, we won't be able to get that data. So you have a foolproof retort to any complaint since we can't get hold of bulletproof insider data.
#197
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SJC / DPS
Programs: AS G75K, UA Silver
Posts: 1,757
Pointing out AS's specific failings is hardly trashing the airline; I've seen numerous constructive suggestions on how AS could mitigate a large number of these failures by increases in notifications, IT infrastructure, or simply staffing. As it stands, the operational issues that exist at SFO are indeed unique to AS.
#198
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
I don't think that's true at all. It has everything to do with SFO, and more specifically the diversions and operational issues that occur, unique to AS, at this particular airport. While separate from the SFO diversion issue, failing to adequately remove RON planes from gates is an issue I've only experienced with AS at SFO with a sample size of hundreds.
Pointing out AS's specific failings is hardly trashing the airline; I've seen numerous constructive suggestions on how AS could mitigate a large number of these failures by increases in notifications, IT infrastructure, or simply staffing. As it stands, the operational issues that exist at SFO are indeed unique to AS.
Pointing out AS's specific failings is hardly trashing the airline; I've seen numerous constructive suggestions on how AS could mitigate a large number of these failures by increases in notifications, IT infrastructure, or simply staffing. As it stands, the operational issues that exist at SFO are indeed unique to AS.
In general, this discussion is getting absurd with posters claiming Alaska is unique in having delays and diversions in one of the most congested and delay prone airports in the country. Could Alaska do better? Absolutely, particularly with how it communicates.
It is hard to take constant complaints from the same 4-5 posters seriously, particularly when a handful drowned the United forum with the same type of complaints for years post merger. I understand that airline mergers are tough, particularly when you’ve made an emotional connection with the aquiree. The road will be rocky at time for everyone, but at the end of the day it is a company made up of thousands of fallible people. Mistakes will happen and decisions will be made that you don’t like. At that point, you have a choice: be miserable or move on.
I’m making my choice and diverting my attention from this thread.
#199
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
#201
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP , Delta Gold Medallion, "Credit Card" status for various hotels
Posts: 672
It’s one thing when AS diverted planes away from SFO while being a PNW focused airline. It’s another after absorbing VX and its SFO hub. This is something AS needs to address if it wants to stay relevant in SFO. Just my opinion as a SEA based flier.
#202
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
The only parallel I see between the AS/VX and UA/CO merger is the sense of arrogance by the dominant airline misunderstanding the new customer base. Though in AS's case, it's a lot more muted than CO's.
You seem to have a low tolerance for complaints about an airline, even if the issue is causing frustration and problems for its customers. I recognize that AS has a very strong following. But that's not the case here in the Bay Area. They don't get the same benefit of the doubt that they do in the PNW.
#203
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: Hilton Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold
Posts: 2,363
Give me a break. Stop whining about all of this. If you do not like flying Alaska because it does not meet your needs, then fly someone else. To say this never happens to any other airline at SFO is patently false and is a ridiculous statement. Get real. You can whine and complain, I just hope you are not next to me on the next flight. It gets old.
This thread is about SFO/The Bay Area. This does not happen to all airlines at SFO--only AS. How does being backed up at ORD/DFW have any relevance to the fact that AS leaves an aircraft RON at a gate at SFO that needed to be towed to be remote parked? It is great to be a fan boy/girl for an airline but citing completely irrelevant airports and saying if you don't like it fly somebody else is not a great attitude for anybody wanting a business to succeed. As has been noted several times, people have actually gone out of their way to fly AS and AS is making it very difficult to choose them a 2nd time. This thread is to make others aware of what is happening and perhaps make AS management wake up to the fact that SFO is no longer just a destination airport for people travelling from PDX/SEA so it is time to come up with a plan to operate their new hub efficiently.
#204
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Give me a break. Stop whining about all of this. If you do not like flying Alaska because it does not meet your needs, then fly someone else. To say this never happens to any other airline at SFO is patently false and is a ridiculous statement. Get real. You can whine and complain, I just hope you are not next to me on the next flight. It gets old.
If you claim that planned diversions to OAK/SJC either to/from SFO are practiced by other airlines, please show us. I've been flying to/from this station for over 40 years and have never witnessed it on any other carrier, but I would love to be proven wrong.
And if you claim this only applies to the previous posters RON comments, then I'll just suggest you stop whining and that everyone should stay on topic, which I'm pretty sure is planned diversions, right?
Last edited by NoLaGent; Jun 7, 2018 at 8:29 am Reason: Remaining on topic.
#205
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
#206
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Calif./Eastern Ida.
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 20,646
today's twitter fun, sounds like this guy had a connection in SFO and ended up diverted to SJC, causing him to misconnect. wonder if the diversion decision was made in the air or again not well communicated prior to departure from his origin in SLC.
#207
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
today's twitter fun, sounds like this guy had a connection in SFO and ended up diverted to SJC, causing him to misconnect. wonder if the diversion decision was made in the air or again not well communicated prior to departure from his origin in SLC.
https://twitter.com/Dukemoose2/statu...30228118360064
https://twitter.com/Dukemoose2/statu...30228118360064
(And to state the obvious, if AS took a 2 hour delay on this flight he would very likely have missed his connection as well. Don't plan a connection involving OO/QX at SFO, just like you shouldn't plan an express connection on UA at SFO if you can't miss your connection.)
#208
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,644
I'd bet that UA, as a percentage of passengers, has more misconnects and people just abandoning their trips because of IRROPS than any other airline at SFO. Of course, I base this statement using the same orifice full of gas that many other posts in this thread emanate.
#209
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Seems like an every day thing now, with very normal June weather.
(And to state the obvious, if AS took a 2 hour delay on this flight he would very likely have missed his connection as well. Don't plan a connection involving OO/QX at SFO, just like you shouldn't plan an express connection on UA at SFO if you can't miss your connection.)
(And to state the obvious, if AS took a 2 hour delay on this flight he would very likely have missed his connection as well. Don't plan a connection involving OO/QX at SFO, just like you shouldn't plan an express connection on UA at SFO if you can't miss your connection.)
Just another data point that this is specifically an AS issue here.
https://www.flightview.com/airport/S..._Francisco-CA/
(You can filter those results by carrier if you're interested in confirming my point about UA today.)
#210
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Looks like they diverted this SLC-SFO flight 2 days in a row to SJC now. And the weather is decent today...just some normal June stuff:
Due to WEATHER / LOW CEILINGS, departure traffic destined to San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA (SFO) is currently experiencing delays averaging 1 hour and 1 minute.
It's going to take them more than 1 hour and 1 minute to get their bags, figure out where the bus is, get everyone on, get to SFO, reclear security and get ready for the connection. The drive time alone is about an hour right now.